CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01020331TAMEUpdated Nov 25, 2009

Memantine Therapy in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Memantine in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, sponsored by Phoenix Neurological Associates, LTD. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-11-25.

Sponsored by Phoenix Neurological Associates, LTD · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Tau, a protein in the cerebrospinal fluid CSF is believed to be elevated in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. The investigators believe that Tau is truly a marker of increased neuronal death from any disease process. It is been shown that Memantine can inhibit and reverse the abnormal hyperphosphorylation of Tau and therefore the investigators are looking at the efficacy of Memantine at 10 mg twice a day (BID) to see if disease progression correlates with possible changes in Tau in ALS patients based on ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS) scores.

Read the detailed description

We have been very interested in the role of developing a more active anti-excitotoxic cocktail for patients with ALS. As part of this interest we have been investigating potential markers for disease progression. One of our candidate markers has been the presence of elevated levels of TAU in the CSF of patients with ALS. While the presence of Tau was originally described as being used for adjunctive diagnostic testing in patients with Alzheimer's disease it has become clear that many neurodegenerative diseases possess elevated levels of Tau in the CSF. Therefore Tau is truly a marker of increased neuronal death from any disease process.

While levels of Tau have not been studied in depth in ALS, there was one report in 2003 which showed that 70% of ALS patients have elevated levels of Tau in their CSF (Sussmuth et al). We have also collected a series of 24 patients with clinically definite ALS and found that 22 of them had elevated levels of Tau at the time of diagnosis.

We have been intrigued by the findings that Memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, can inhibit and reverse the abnormal hyperphosphorylation of Tau which leads to sequestration of the normal Tau microtubules as well as microtubule associated protein 1 (MAP-1) and MAP-2. Further, Memantine has been shown to block the disassembly of microtubules which follows the hyperphosphorylation if Tau (Li et al., 2004).

We have submitted for presentation to the International Motor Neuron Disease meeting in 2005 the data on two anecdotal cases of patients with ALS. These two patients were diagnosed with ALS on clinical and electrophysiological data and they were found to have elevated levels of Tau in their CSF at the time of diagnosis. Both patients were treated with Riluzole, as standard therapy, and with Memantine 10 mg BID for 6 months. After 6 months their disease course was clearly very slow. A repeat analysis of their CSF showed that levels of Tau had returned to normal.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Keywords

  • ALS
03

In context

Motor Neuron Disease

717 studies on the registry are indexed under Motor Neuron Disease; 137 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 35 across 461 interventional studies indexed under Motor Neuron Disease.

Browse Motor Neuron Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Phoenix Neurological Associates, LTD is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18-85
  2. Male or Female
  3. Clinically definite ALS by El Escorial criteria
  4. Elevated levels of Tau in CSF

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with FVC below 1.5 L or who require respiratory assistance
  2. History of liver disease
  3. Severe renal failure
  4. History of intolerance to Riluzole or Memantine
  5. Any other co morbid condition which would make completion of trial unlikely
  6. If female, pregnant or breast-feeding; or, if of childbearing age, an unwillingness to use birth control.
  7. Taking any trial medications. Non-trial medications are not cause for exclusion.
  8. Unwillingness to provide consent
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ACTIVE

    Drug: Memantine

Interventions

  • DrugMemantine
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Standardized assessment of ALS disease progression through the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS) and compare the levels of Tau at baseline, 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in muscle strength as measured by quantitative dynamometry (baseline vs 18 months)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Phoenix Neurological Associates, LTD
    Phoenix, Arizona 85018, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 25, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01020331
Lead sponsor
Phoenix Neurological Associates, LTD
Collaborators
Forest Laboratories
First posted
Nov 25, 2009
Start date
Jun 2005
Primary completion
Jul 2009
Completion
Oct 2009
Last update
Nov 25, 2009

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion