CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT01013714PREVENT VTUpdated Jan 19, 2024

Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation for Prevention of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias

A Phase 3 interventional study of Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation (CSD) and Routine Care in Sudden Cardiac Death, Ventricular Tachycardia and Ventricular Fibrillation, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Recruiting at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-19.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2024, 2 years 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2021; still recruiting 5 years 2 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to examine the effect of cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) surgery on life threatening abnormal heart rhythms called ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation that can lead to sudden cardiac death. Subjects will be asked to participate in this research study if they have recurrent ventricular tachycardia (at least one ICD shock for ventricular tachycardia) and have undergone at least one catheter ablation procedure or have ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation that is not ablatable. The goal of this study is to determine whether cardiac sympathetic denervation can prevent these abnormal heart rhythms from occurring and therefore, prevent, ICD shocks which are not only painful, but have been shown to reduce quality of life and/or lead to depression, particularly in the period immediately after the shock.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine if bilateral cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) in addition to routine care is more effective than routine care for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) who continue to have episodes of VT despite drug therapy and when appropriate, at least one catheter ablation procedure.

The CSD procedure involves removal of part of the cervical stellate ganglia and thoracic ganglia of level 2 to 4. These ganglia house the left and right sided nerves that feed the heart and have been implicated in the occurrence of fast abnormal rhythms that cause defibrillator shocks and sudden death. Stimulation of these nerves has been shown to increase the incidence of sudden death and fast abnormal heart rhythms that lead to internal defibrillator shocks called ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. Removal of the ganglia of these nerves in animal and human studies has been shown to decrease the incidence of life threatening abnormal rhythms and sudden death.The procedure takes less than 45 minutes on each side and can be performed endoscopically.

We are inviting patients to participate in this clinical trial who have undergone at least one catheter ablation procedure for ventricular tachycardia but have continued to experience recurrent arrhythmias (ICD shocks) or who have a type of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation that can not be treated with catheter ablation procedures. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either routine care + cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) or routine care without cardiac sympathetic denervation. We are asking 40 individuals (approximate age range 18-80 years) who continue to experience ICD shocks to participate in this research study but only half these individual will be randomized to cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sudden Cardiac Death
  • Ventricular Tachycardia
  • Ventricular Fibrillation
  • Cardiomyopathy

Keywords

  • Sudden cardiac death
  • Ventricular tachycardia
  • Ventricular fibrillation
  • Cardiomyopathy
  • Internal cardiac defibrillator shocks
  • Internal cardiac defibrillator therapies
03

In context

Cardiomyopathies

1,176 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiomyopathies; 287 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 51 across 609 interventional studies indexed under Cardiomyopathies.

Browse Cardiomyopathies studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,142 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 91 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Appropriate ICD shock for VT after at least one catheter ablation of VT procedure, OR appropriate ICD shock for VT and underwent electrophysiology study/ablation procedure where the procedure was not successful (i.e. determined that VT comes from an inaccessible location or VT was not inducible and could not be targeted or continued to have inducible VT at the end of the procedure) OR appropriate ICD shock for VT and not a candidate for VT ablation (i.e. patients with presence polymorphic VT or ventricular fibrillation, LV thrombus)).
  2. Presence of structural heart disease as defined as EF ≤ 50% or presence of ventricular scar as detected by imaging modalities or electroanatomic mapping, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac sarcoidosis, or arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.
  3. Patient is taking at least one anti-arrhythmic drug or has documented intolerance or toxicity to at least one anti-arrhythmic drug.
  4. 18 years of age or older at time of enrollment
  5. Able and willing to comply with all pre- and follow-up testing and requirements.
  6. Provision of signed informed consent and stated willingness to comply with all study procedures for duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. Active ongoing cardiac ischemia as assessed by: ECG, cardiac enzymes, symptoms, coronary angiography with evidence of significant epicardial coronary stenosis (>70%), or stress testing. (Note: positive troponin assay due to ICD shocks is not an exclusion criterion).
  2. Any medical or non-medical condition likely to prevent completion of trial.
  3. Contraindication to cardiac sympathetic denervation (i.e. unlikely to tolerate general anesthesia, single-lung ventilation, severe pulmonary disease, or severe pulmonary hypertension) or previous cardiac sympathetic denervation procedure.
  4. Left ventricular assist device or status post orthotopic heart transplantation
  5. Severe thrombocytopenia (platelets \< 50,000) or Coagulopathy (INR > 2.0) that is not due to medications or a reversible cause.
  6. Women who are pregnant (as evidenced by pregnancy test if pre-menopausal).
  7. Unable or unwilling to comply with protocol requirements.
  8. NYHA class IV heart failure symptoms.
  9. Known channelopathy such as long QT syndrome and catecholaminergic polymorphic VT.
  10. Clinical VT rate \< 150 bpm
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Routine Care + Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation (CSD)

    Patients in this arm receive routine care and undergo cardiac sympathetic denervation. The procedure must be scheduled to occur within one month of randomization. Follow-up Visits * Follow up at 4 weeks after optimization of medical therapy and surgery * All patients are followed at the ICD clinic at 7 months or as needed. * Information regarding ICD therapy and arrhythmias will be obtained from ICD interrogations at the follow up visits. * Monthly phone calls will be used to determine for interval events, including presence of side-effects. VT Ablation is permitted in both arms for ICD shock after optimization.

    Procedure: Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation (CSD) · Drug: Routine Care

  • Placebo comparator
    Routine Care

    Patients in this arm remain on prescribed drug regimen and will not undergo CSD. Follow-up Visits * Medical follow up at 4 weeks after optimization of medical therapy. * All patients are followed at the ICD clinic at 7 months or as needed. * Information regarding ICD therapy and arrhythmias will be obtained from ICD interrogations at the follow up visits. * Monthly phone calls will be used to determine for interval events, including presence of side-effects. VT Ablation is permitted in both arms for ICD shock after optimization.

    Drug: Routine Care

Interventions

  • ProcedureCardiac Sympathetic Denervation (CSD)

    Cardiac sympathetic denervation is performed using an endoscopic procedure called VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy). The surgeon removes the lower half of the stellate ganglia in addition to the thoracic ganglia of T2 - T4 on both the right and left side. The VATS procedure provides a minimally invasive endoscopic approach that is safe and effective. The procedure can be completed in less than 45 minutes on each side.

  • DrugRoutine Care

    Anti-arrhythmic medications are continued for the duration of the study unless discontinued or adjusted to due to drug toxicity, intolerance, or ICD shock. All anti-arrhythmic medications (whether in the routine care or surgical arm) can be adjusted at the discretion of the treating physician.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to ICD shock, death, or cardiac transplantation

    To compare the time to first occurrence of appropriate ICD shock, death or cardiac transplantation in CSD+routine care vs. routine care groups.

    Time frame: 7 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of ICD shocks

    To compare the number of ICD shocks in patients with Routine Care + CSD to Routine Care.

    Time frame: 7 months

  2. Number of appropriate ICD therapies (including ATPs ) and sustained VT below ICD detection

    To compare the number of appropriate ICD therapies and VT episodes below ICD detection in patients with Routine Care + CSD to Routine Care.

    Time frame: 7 months

  3. Serious adverse events

    To assess the occurrence of serious adverse events in patients treated with Routine Care + CSD and Routine Care.

    Time frame: 7 months

  4. Number and etiology of hospitalizations

    Number and etiology of hospitalization will be compared in the control vs. intervention group.

    Time frame: 7 months

  5. Number of deaths or cardiac transplantations

    Number of deaths or cardiac transplantation in both arms of the study will be compared.

    Time frame: 7 months

07

Study locations

3 of 3 sites recruiting
  • UCLA Health
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
    • Marmar M Vaseghi, MD, PhD · Contact · mvaseghi@mednet.ucla.edu · 310-206-2235
    • Marmar Vaseghi, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Kalyanam Shivkumar, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
  • OHSU
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
    Recruiting
  • Vanderbilt University
    Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mahajan A, Moore J, Cesario DA, Shivkumar K. Use of thoracic epidural anesthesia for management of electrical storm: a case report. Heart Rhythm. 2005 Dec;2(12):1359-62. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.09.004. No abstract available. PubMed 16360091 ↗
  • Stephenson EA, Berul CI. Electrophysiological interventions for inherited arrhythmia syndromes. Circulation. 2007 Aug 28;116(9):1062-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.655779. No abstract available. PubMed 17724272 ↗
  • Nademanee K, Taylor R, Bailey WE, Rieders DE, Kosar EM. Treating electrical storm : sympathetic blockade versus advanced cardiac life support-guided therapy. Circulation. 2000 Aug 15;102(7):742-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.7.742. PubMed 10942741 ↗
  • Tygesen H, Wettervik C, Claes G, Drott C, Emanuelsson H, Solem J, Lomsky M, Radberg G, Wennerblom B. Long-term effect of endoscopic transthoracic sympathicotomy on heart rate variability and QT dispersion in severe angina pectoris. Int J Cardiol. 1999 Aug 31;70(3):283-92. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(99)00101-1. PubMed 10501343 ↗
  • Schwartz PJ, Priori SG, Cerrone M, Spazzolini C, Odero A, Napolitano C, Bloise R, De Ferrari GM, Klersy C, Moss AJ, Zareba W, Robinson JL, Hall WJ, Brink PA, Toivonen L, Epstein AE, Li C, Hu D. Left cardiac sympathetic denervation in the management of high-risk patients affected by the long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2004 Apr 20;109(15):1826-33. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000125523.14403.1E. Epub 2004 Mar 29. PubMed 15051644 ↗
  • Li J, Wang L, Wang J. Video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for congenital long QT syndromes. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Apr;26(4 Pt 1):870-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.t01-1-00152.x. PubMed 12715848 ↗
  • Ouriel K, Moss AJ. Long QT syndrome: an indication for cervicothoracic sympathectomy. Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 Oct;3(5):475-8. doi: 10.1016/0967-2109(95)94444-2. PubMed 8574528 ↗
  • Lobato EB, Kern KB, Paige GB, Brown M, Sulek CA. Differential effects of right versus left stellate ganglion block on left ventricular function in humans: an echocardiographic analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2000 Jun;12(4):315-8. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(00)00158-6. PubMed 10960205 ↗
  • Schlack W, Dinter W. Haemodynamic effects of a left stellate ganglion block in ASA I patients. An echocardiographic study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2000 Feb;17(2):79-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.2000.00606.x. PubMed 10758450 ↗
  • Bourke T, Vaseghi M, Michowitz Y, Sankhla V, Shah M, Swapna N, Boyle NG, Mahajan A, Narasimhan C, Lokhandwala Y, Shivkumar K. Neuraxial modulation for refractory ventricular arrhythmias: value of thoracic epidural anesthesia and surgical left cardiac sympathetic denervation. Circulation. 2010 Jun 1;121(21):2255-62. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.929703. Epub 2010 May 17. PubMed 20479150 ↗
  • Ajijola OA, Vaseghi M, Mahajan A, Shivkumar K. Bilateral cardiac sympathetic denervation: why, who and when? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2012 Aug;10(8):947-9. doi: 10.1586/erc.12.93. No abstract available. PubMed 23030281 ↗
  • Johnson JP, Ahn SS, Choi WC, Masciopinto JE, Kim KD, Filler AG, Desalles AA. Thoracoscopic sympathectomy: techniques and outcomes. Neurosurg Focus. 1998 Feb 15;4(2):e4. doi: 10.3171/foc.1998.4.2.7. PubMed 17206769 ↗
  • Vaseghi M, Gima J, Kanaan C, Ajijola OA, Marmureanu A, Mahajan A, Shivkumar K. Cardiac sympathetic denervation in patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias or electrical storm: intermediate and long-term follow-up. Heart Rhythm. 2014 Mar;11(3):360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.11.028. Epub 2013 Nov 28. PubMed 24291775 ↗
  • Vaseghi M, Barwad P, Malavassi Corrales FJ, Tandri H, Mathuria N, Shah R, Sorg JM, Gima J, Mandal K, Saenz Morales LC, Lokhandwala Y, Shivkumar K. Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation for Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jun 27;69(25):3070-3080. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.035. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 8;70(6):811. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.038. PubMed 28641796 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified data will be shared with other investigators upon request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01013714
Lead sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Collaborators
Oregon Health and Science University
Responsible party
Marmar Vaseghi (Associate Professor of Medicine/Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 16, 2009
Start date
Jul 26, 2021
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 19, 2024

Study contacts

Marmar Vaseghi, MD, PhD
Contact
mvaseghi@mednet.ucla.edu
310-206-2235
Marmar Vaseghi, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of California, Los Angeles

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion