A Phase 4 interventional study of Exenatide in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by University of Florida. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-28.
Sponsored by University of Florida · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
The primary aim of the study is to determine the impact on hepatic steatosis of replacing premeal rapid-acting insulin for exenatide (Byetta) while maintaining bedtime long-acting detemir (Levemir) insulin in well-controlled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).
Secondary aims are to learn: 1) the efficacy and safety of such approach and whether it is an acceptable treatment strategy compared to intensified insulin therapy alone; 2) mechanisms of action (effects on insulin secretion and insulin action); 3) its impact on weight (can it prevent insulin-associated weight gain or cause weight loss) and rates of hypoglycemia; 4) if it may improve specific plasma biomarkers of disease activity in NAFLD and inflammatory markers common to both conditions - T2DM and NAFLD (hsCRP, ICAM, VCAM).
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major public health problem in the United States with \~2/3 of Americans that are overweight or frankly obese. Less well recognized is that obesity and T2DM are fueling another "silent epidemic": non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In NAFLD, hepatic fat accumulation ranges from simple steatosis to severe steatohepatitis (NASH), with necroinflammation and fibrosis that may progress to cirrhosis. Indeed, up to 40% of patients with NAFLD develop NASH and about \~15-20% of patients with NASH develop cirrhosis after 10 years. NASH is believed to be the most common cause of cryptogenic cirrhosis and ranking as the third leading indication for liver transplantation after alcohol and hepatitis C. The distinction between simple steatosis and NASH can only be done by means of a liver biopsy, but strategies that reduce fatty liver disease correlate with a reduction in steatohepatitis and fibrosis.
It is estimated that \~1/3 of the general population of the United States have fatty liver disease as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy (MRS), the gold-standard technique. It is also affecting the pediatric population, and while the natural history remains to be defined, most biopsies show some degree of fibrosis and cirrhosis has been reported in children as young as 10 years of age. Moreover, in the investigators experience using MRS for the past several years, \~80% of patients with T2DM have NAFLD. If the above is extrapolated to the overall population of the United States, there are \~15 million subjects with T2DM and NAFLD and more than 50 million overweight/obese individuals with NAFLD.
As awareness of NAFLD/NASH increases, health care providers are now confronted with the unique challenge of achieving good metabolic control while treating fatty liver disease in the same subject. Inadequate glycemic control appears to worsen and accelerate progression of fatty liver disease. Paradoxically, most patients with T2DM do not reach established treatment goals. Moreover, it appears that the way metabolic control achieved is important in NAFLD: while metformin may be beneficial in NASH and pioglitazone is highly effective, control of hyperglycemia by insulin therapy alone has modest benefit on hepatic fat accumulation. In addition, long-term insulin therapy in T2DM is frequently associated with inadequate compliance, weight gain, frequent hypoglycemia and overall poor patient satisfaction. This is of great concern as \~35-40% of patients with T2DM are treated with insulin. Therefore, there is an unmet need to find better ways to treat patients that fail oral agent therapy, targeting both hyperglycemia and excessive liver fatty deposition.
The investigators propose a strategy of adding exenatide to insulin therapy as a means to achieve better glycemic control while ameliorating hepatic steatosis (and improving hepatic insulin sensitivity), reduce body weight/total body fat (and visceral fat), decrease the risk of hypoglycemia by allowing a reduction in insulin doses (withdrawal of premeal insulin doses, reduction of basal long-acting insulin), and enhance insulin secretion and insulin action while improving the quality of life of patients with T2DM and NAFLD. As both T2DM and NAFLD will become more prevalent in the near future, this pilot study will likely set the stage for a large controlled multicenter trial with an approach that may be more effective than intensified insulin therapy alone.
The central hypothesis is that insulin resistance and fat-overload play a key role in NAFLD/NASH, a condition believed to arise at the molecular level from the inability of the mitochondria to adapt to fat oversupply. Excessive fatty acid flux from exogenous (dietary) and endogenous (insulin resistant adipose tissue/increased lipolysis) sources drive hepatic lipogenesis. Exenatide would potentially be a good treatment fit against hepatic steatosis by decreasing excess dietary intake and substrate supply, reducing fat mass and plasma FFA and by lowering exogenous insulin needs and chronic hyperinsulinemia. Mitigating chronic hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia is important as they drive hepatic fat synthesis through sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c (SREBP-1c) and carbohydrate regulatory element-binding protein (ChREBP) activity, respectively. Weight loss may also subdue systemic inflammation generated by dysfunctional adipose tissue, and at the local (hepatic) level, ameliorate fat-induced mitochondrial dysfunction (activation of Kupffer cells, local production of cytokines).
While no systematic studies have been published yet, exenatide has been shown to reverse hepatic steatosis in an obese animal model of NAFLD and in a case report in a 59 year old poorly controlled T2DM patient in whom liver fat by MRS was reduced from 15.8% to 4.3%. Dietary intervention remains as the current standard of care for NAFLD, but studies in general have been small, uncontrolled and led to variable histological results. It is widely accepted that weight loss is difficult to achieve and even harder to maintain in the long-term. Moreover, weight loss is particularly difficult in patients with T2DM on insulin therapy. Pharmacological therapy at large has been ineffective in NAFLD/NASH, including trials using antioxidants and cytoprotective agents such as pentoxyfilline, vitamin E and ursodeoxycholic acid. A modest benefit has been reported in small studies with metformin, but only our study using pioglitazone has shown in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, to be truly effective and safe in the treatment of patients with IGT or T2DM and NASH.
Considering the impact that NAFLD has on patients with T2DM as a serious co-morbidity ranging from its metabolic impact on glycemia and dyslipidemia, to potentially causing end-stage liver disease and cardiovascular disease, it is rather surprising that no prior studies have focused on novel pharmacological approaches such as the one proposed for the treatment of patients with NAFLD and T2DM.
2,081 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Diseases; 390 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 50 across 1,323 interventional studies indexed under Liver Diseases.
Browse Liver Diseases studies →University of Florida is the lead sponsor of 1,254 studies on the registry; 201 are open to participants now.
Of its 170 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (80%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
To enter the study subjects must meet the following criteria:
Hemoglobin ≥12 g/dl in males or ≥11 g/dl in females Serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dl AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) ≤2.5 times upper limit of normal Alkaline phosphatase ≤2.5 times upper limit of normal
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients will be excluded if any of the following criteria are present:
Patients with T2DM well-controlled on an intensified insulin regimen for the previous 6 months by the will have their insulin aspart discontinued and replaced for exenatide twice daily while continuing the bedtime detemir insulin. Safety and efficacy parameters will be measured before and after 6 months of treatment.
Drug: Exenatide
The participants with T2DM well-controlled on an intensified insulin regimen for the previous 6 months with the combination of a premeal insulin injection of the drug aspart (Novolog) three times a day and a bedtime insulin injection of the drug detemir (Levemir). The dosage of the insulin is determined by the need by the need of the participant. The Exenatide treatment will consist of an injection of the insulin twice daily and will replace the premeal insulin regiment of aspart.
Also known as: Byetta
Hepatic Steatosis
Hepatic steatosis was assessed non-invasively by MRS.
Time frame: 6 months
A1c
Patients with controlled T2DM with bedtime insulin alone (n=5) or bedtime insulin and premeal rapid-acting insulin novolog (n=15) had eventide given twice daily for 6 months (if on premeal insulin it was stopped). The goal is to assess if adding SQ exenatide is effective to maintain optimal glycemic control in this population.
Time frame: 6 months
Change in Anthropometric Variables (Weight).
Time frame: 6 months
Number of Severe Hypoglycemic (Glucose ≤40 mg/dL) Events.
Time frame: 6 months
Insulin Secretion (Hyperglycemic Clamp)
Change in C-peptide levels vs. pretreatment in the first and second phase.
Time frame: 6 months
Percent Change From Baseline in Glucose Infusion (M Value) During Hyperglycemic Clamp
M value represents glucose infusion change
Time frame: 6 months
Lipid Profiles, Lipoprotein Analysis by NMR (LipoScience).
Change in lipid levels vs. pretreatment.
Time frame: 6 months
Change in Anthropometric Variables (BMI).
Time frame: 6 months
24 subjects recruited at the ALMVA hospital and University Hospital starting in 2006
| Milestone | Exenatide (Twice Daily) |
|---|---|
| Started | 20 |
| Completed | 17 |
| Not completed | 3 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 3 |
Hepatic steatosis was assessed non-invasively by MRS.
| Percentage of liver fat | Exenatide (Twice Daily) |
|---|---|
| Hepatic Steatosis | 4.0 ± 2.6 |
Patients with controlled T2DM with bedtime insulin alone (n=5) or bedtime insulin and premeal rapid-acting insulin novolog (n=15) had eventide given twice daily for 6 months (if on premeal insulin it was stopped). The goal is to assess if adding SQ exenatide is effective to maintain optimal glycemic control in this population.
| percentage of A1c | Exenatide (Twice Daily) |
|---|---|
| A1c | 6.8 ± 0.7 |
| Kg | Exenatide (Twice Daily) |
|---|---|
| Change in Anthropometric Variables (Weight). | -4.7 ± 18.4 |
| number of events | Exenatide (Twice Daily) |
|---|---|
| Number of Severe Hypoglycemic (Glucose ≤40 mg/dL) Events. | 0 |
Change in C-peptide levels vs. pretreatment in the first and second phase.
| ng/ml | Exenatide (Twice Daily) |
|---|---|
| Delta first phase insulin secretion | -0.1 ± 1.6 |
| Delta second phase insulin secretion | 1.1 ± 2.8 |
M value represents glucose infusion change
| percentage change vs pretreatment | Exenatide (Twice Daily) |
|---|---|
| Percent Change From Baseline in Glucose Infusion (M Value) During Hyperglycemic Clamp | 30 ± 14 |
Change in lipid levels vs. pretreatment.
| mg/dl | Exenatide (Twice Daily) |
|---|---|
| Cholesterol | -4 ± 29 |
| Triglyceride | 21 ± 54 |
| LDL-C | -8 ± 26 |
| HDL-C | -1 ± 6 |
| Kg/m2 | Exenatide (Twice Daily) |
|---|---|
| Change in Anthropometric Variables (BMI). | -1.5 ± 4.7 |
Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exenatide (Twice Daily) | — | 0/20 (0%) | 3/20 (15%) |
| Event | Exenatide (Twice Daily) |
|---|---|
| nauseaGeneral disorders | 3/20 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Exenatide (Twice Daily) |
|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 18 |
| >=65 years | 2 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Exenatide (Twice Daily) |
|---|---|
| Female | 3 |
| Male | 17 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Exenatide (Twice Daily) |
|---|---|
| United States | 20 |
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Florida