CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01006889Updated Sep 28, 2016Results posted

Adding Exenatide to Insulin Therapy for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

A Phase 4 interventional study of Exenatide in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by University of Florida. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-28.

Sponsored by University of Florida · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary aim of the study is to determine the impact on hepatic steatosis of replacing premeal rapid-acting insulin for exenatide (Byetta) while maintaining bedtime long-acting detemir (Levemir) insulin in well-controlled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Secondary aims are to learn: 1) the efficacy and safety of such approach and whether it is an acceptable treatment strategy compared to intensified insulin therapy alone; 2) mechanisms of action (effects on insulin secretion and insulin action); 3) its impact on weight (can it prevent insulin-associated weight gain or cause weight loss) and rates of hypoglycemia; 4) if it may improve specific plasma biomarkers of disease activity in NAFLD and inflammatory markers common to both conditions - T2DM and NAFLD (hsCRP, ICAM, VCAM).

Read the detailed description

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major public health problem in the United States with \~2/3 of Americans that are overweight or frankly obese. Less well recognized is that obesity and T2DM are fueling another "silent epidemic": non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In NAFLD, hepatic fat accumulation ranges from simple steatosis to severe steatohepatitis (NASH), with necroinflammation and fibrosis that may progress to cirrhosis. Indeed, up to 40% of patients with NAFLD develop NASH and about \~15-20% of patients with NASH develop cirrhosis after 10 years. NASH is believed to be the most common cause of cryptogenic cirrhosis and ranking as the third leading indication for liver transplantation after alcohol and hepatitis C. The distinction between simple steatosis and NASH can only be done by means of a liver biopsy, but strategies that reduce fatty liver disease correlate with a reduction in steatohepatitis and fibrosis.

It is estimated that \~1/3 of the general population of the United States have fatty liver disease as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy (MRS), the gold-standard technique. It is also affecting the pediatric population, and while the natural history remains to be defined, most biopsies show some degree of fibrosis and cirrhosis has been reported in children as young as 10 years of age. Moreover, in the investigators experience using MRS for the past several years, \~80% of patients with T2DM have NAFLD. If the above is extrapolated to the overall population of the United States, there are \~15 million subjects with T2DM and NAFLD and more than 50 million overweight/obese individuals with NAFLD.

As awareness of NAFLD/NASH increases, health care providers are now confronted with the unique challenge of achieving good metabolic control while treating fatty liver disease in the same subject. Inadequate glycemic control appears to worsen and accelerate progression of fatty liver disease. Paradoxically, most patients with T2DM do not reach established treatment goals. Moreover, it appears that the way metabolic control achieved is important in NAFLD: while metformin may be beneficial in NASH and pioglitazone is highly effective, control of hyperglycemia by insulin therapy alone has modest benefit on hepatic fat accumulation. In addition, long-term insulin therapy in T2DM is frequently associated with inadequate compliance, weight gain, frequent hypoglycemia and overall poor patient satisfaction. This is of great concern as \~35-40% of patients with T2DM are treated with insulin. Therefore, there is an unmet need to find better ways to treat patients that fail oral agent therapy, targeting both hyperglycemia and excessive liver fatty deposition.

The investigators propose a strategy of adding exenatide to insulin therapy as a means to achieve better glycemic control while ameliorating hepatic steatosis (and improving hepatic insulin sensitivity), reduce body weight/total body fat (and visceral fat), decrease the risk of hypoglycemia by allowing a reduction in insulin doses (withdrawal of premeal insulin doses, reduction of basal long-acting insulin), and enhance insulin secretion and insulin action while improving the quality of life of patients with T2DM and NAFLD. As both T2DM and NAFLD will become more prevalent in the near future, this pilot study will likely set the stage for a large controlled multicenter trial with an approach that may be more effective than intensified insulin therapy alone.

The central hypothesis is that insulin resistance and fat-overload play a key role in NAFLD/NASH, a condition believed to arise at the molecular level from the inability of the mitochondria to adapt to fat oversupply. Excessive fatty acid flux from exogenous (dietary) and endogenous (insulin resistant adipose tissue/increased lipolysis) sources drive hepatic lipogenesis. Exenatide would potentially be a good treatment fit against hepatic steatosis by decreasing excess dietary intake and substrate supply, reducing fat mass and plasma FFA and by lowering exogenous insulin needs and chronic hyperinsulinemia. Mitigating chronic hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia is important as they drive hepatic fat synthesis through sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c (SREBP-1c) and carbohydrate regulatory element-binding protein (ChREBP) activity, respectively. Weight loss may also subdue systemic inflammation generated by dysfunctional adipose tissue, and at the local (hepatic) level, ameliorate fat-induced mitochondrial dysfunction (activation of Kupffer cells, local production of cytokines).

While no systematic studies have been published yet, exenatide has been shown to reverse hepatic steatosis in an obese animal model of NAFLD and in a case report in a 59 year old poorly controlled T2DM patient in whom liver fat by MRS was reduced from 15.8% to 4.3%. Dietary intervention remains as the current standard of care for NAFLD, but studies in general have been small, uncontrolled and led to variable histological results. It is widely accepted that weight loss is difficult to achieve and even harder to maintain in the long-term. Moreover, weight loss is particularly difficult in patients with T2DM on insulin therapy. Pharmacological therapy at large has been ineffective in NAFLD/NASH, including trials using antioxidants and cytoprotective agents such as pentoxyfilline, vitamin E and ursodeoxycholic acid. A modest benefit has been reported in small studies with metformin, but only our study using pioglitazone has shown in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, to be truly effective and safe in the treatment of patients with IGT or T2DM and NASH.

Considering the impact that NAFLD has on patients with T2DM as a serious co-morbidity ranging from its metabolic impact on glycemia and dyslipidemia, to potentially causing end-stage liver disease and cardiovascular disease, it is rather surprising that no prior studies have focused on novel pharmacological approaches such as the one proposed for the treatment of patients with NAFLD and T2DM.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Liver Diseases

2,081 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Diseases; 390 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 50 across 1,323 interventional studies indexed under Liver Diseases.

Browse Liver Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Florida is the lead sponsor of 1,254 studies on the registry; 201 are open to participants now.

Of its 170 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

To enter the study subjects must meet the following criteria:

  1. Have been on intensified insulin therapy with insulin detemir (Levemir) and premeal insulin aspart (Novolog®) for the previous 6 months.
  2. Be able to communicate meaningfully with the Investigator and be legally competent to provide written informed consent.
  3. Female patients must be non-lactating and must either be at least two years post-menopausal, or be using adequate contraceptive precautions (i.e. oral contraceptives, approved hormonal implant, intrauterine device, diaphragm with spermicide, condom with spermicide), or be surgically sterilized (i.e. bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy). Female patients who have undergone a hysterectomy are eligible for participation in the study. Female patients (except for those patients who have undergone a hysterectomy or a bilateral oophorectomy) are eligible only if they have a negative pregnancy test throughout the study period.
  4. Age range of 18 to 70 years (inclusive).
  5. Patients must have been on a stable dose of allowed chronic medications for 6 months prior to entering the double-blind treatment period.
  6. All participants must have the following laboratory values:

Hemoglobin ≥12 g/dl in males or ≥11 g/dl in females Serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dl AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) ≤2.5 times upper limit of normal Alkaline phosphatase ≤2.5 times upper limit of normal

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded if any of the following criteria are present:

  1. Individuals with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes and a FPG ≥ 300 mg/dl; poor compliance with insulin therapy.
  2. Subjects on sulfonylureas, metformin and/or TZDs unless the dose has been stable for at least 6 months prior to study entry.
  3. Patients on any of the following medications: thiazide or furosemide diuretics, beta-blockers, or other chronic medications with known adverse effects on glucose tolerance levels unless the patient has been on stable doses of such agents for the past two months before entry into the study. Patients may be taking stable doses of estrogens or other hormonal replacement therapy if the patient has been on these agents for the prior two months. Patients taking systemic glucocorticoids will be excluded.
  4. Past (within 1 year) or current history of alcohol abuse.
  5. Patients will be excluded if there is a history of clinically significant heart disease (New York Heart Classification greater than grade II), peripheral vascular disease (history of claudication), or pulmonary disease (dyspnea on exertion of one flight or less; abnormal breath sounds on auscultation) or chronic renal failure (serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dl).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Exenatide (twice daily)

    Patients with T2DM well-controlled on an intensified insulin regimen for the previous 6 months by the will have their insulin aspart discontinued and replaced for exenatide twice daily while continuing the bedtime detemir insulin. Safety and efficacy parameters will be measured before and after 6 months of treatment.

    Drug: Exenatide

Interventions

  • DrugExenatide

    The participants with T2DM well-controlled on an intensified insulin regimen for the previous 6 months with the combination of a premeal insulin injection of the drug aspart (Novolog) three times a day and a bedtime insulin injection of the drug detemir (Levemir). The dosage of the insulin is determined by the need by the need of the participant. The Exenatide treatment will consist of an injection of the insulin twice daily and will replace the premeal insulin regiment of aspart.

    Also known as: Byetta

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hepatic Steatosis

    Hepatic steatosis was assessed non-invasively by MRS.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. A1c

    Patients with controlled T2DM with bedtime insulin alone (n=5) or bedtime insulin and premeal rapid-acting insulin novolog (n=15) had eventide given twice daily for 6 months (if on premeal insulin it was stopped). The goal is to assess if adding SQ exenatide is effective to maintain optimal glycemic control in this population.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Change in Anthropometric Variables (Weight).

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Number of Severe Hypoglycemic (Glucose ≤40 mg/dL) Events.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Insulin Secretion (Hyperglycemic Clamp)

    Change in C-peptide levels vs. pretreatment in the first and second phase.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Percent Change From Baseline in Glucose Infusion (M Value) During Hyperglycemic Clamp

    M value represents glucose infusion change

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Lipid Profiles, Lipoprotein Analysis by NMR (LipoScience).

    Change in lipid levels vs. pretreatment.

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Change in Anthropometric Variables (BMI).

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Jul 29, 2016

Participant flow

24 subjects recruited at the ALMVA hospital and University Hospital starting in 2006

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneExenatide (Twice Daily)
Started20
Completed17
Not completed3
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject3

Outcome measures

PrimaryHepatic Steatosis

Hepatic steatosis was assessed non-invasively by MRS.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of liver fat
Hepatic Steatosis
Percentage of liver fatExenatide (Twice Daily)
Hepatic Steatosis4.0 ± 2.6
SecondaryA1c

Patients with controlled T2DM with bedtime insulin alone (n=5) or bedtime insulin and premeal rapid-acting insulin novolog (n=15) had eventide given twice daily for 6 months (if on premeal insulin it was stopped). The goal is to assess if adding SQ exenatide is effective to maintain optimal glycemic control in this population.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of A1c
A1c
percentage of A1cExenatide (Twice Daily)
A1c6.8 ± 0.7
SecondaryChange in Anthropometric Variables (Weight).
Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Kg
Change in Anthropometric Variables (Weight).
KgExenatide (Twice Daily)
Change in Anthropometric Variables (Weight).-4.7 ± 18.4
SecondaryNumber of Severe Hypoglycemic (Glucose ≤40 mg/dL) Events.
Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · number of events
Number of Severe Hypoglycemic (Glucose ≤40 mg/dL) Events.
number of eventsExenatide (Twice Daily)
Number of Severe Hypoglycemic (Glucose ≤40 mg/dL) Events.0
SecondaryInsulin Secretion (Hyperglycemic Clamp)

Change in C-peptide levels vs. pretreatment in the first and second phase.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · ng/ml
Insulin Secretion (Hyperglycemic Clamp)
ng/mlExenatide (Twice Daily)
Delta first phase insulin secretion-0.1 ± 1.6
Delta second phase insulin secretion1.1 ± 2.8
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Glucose Infusion (M Value) During Hyperglycemic Clamp

M value represents glucose infusion change

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage change vs pretreatment
Percent Change From Baseline in Glucose Infusion (M Value) During Hyperglycemic Clamp
percentage change vs pretreatmentExenatide (Twice Daily)
Percent Change From Baseline in Glucose Infusion (M Value) During Hyperglycemic Clamp30 ± 14
SecondaryLipid Profiles, Lipoprotein Analysis by NMR (LipoScience).

Change in lipid levels vs. pretreatment.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dl
Lipid Profiles, Lipoprotein Analysis by NMR (LipoScience).
mg/dlExenatide (Twice Daily)
Cholesterol-4 ± 29
Triglyceride21 ± 54
LDL-C-8 ± 26
HDL-C-1 ± 6
SecondaryChange in Anthropometric Variables (BMI).
Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Kg/m2
Change in Anthropometric Variables (BMI).
Kg/m2Exenatide (Twice Daily)
Change in Anthropometric Variables (BMI).-1.5 ± 4.7

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Exenatide (Twice Daily)—0/20 (0%)3/20 (15%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventExenatide (Twice Daily)
nauseaGeneral disorders3/20

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Exenatide (Twice Daily)
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years18
>=65 years2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Exenatide (Twice Daily)
Female3
Male17
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Exenatide (Twice Daily)
United States20
08

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of Texas H.S.C. at San Antonio and the San Antonio Audie L. Murphy VA Hospital
    San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 28, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01006889
Lead sponsor
University of Florida
Collaborators
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 3, 2009
Start date
Jan 2008
Primary completion
Dec 2009
Completion
Feb 2010
Results posted
Jul 29, 2016
Last update
Sep 28, 2016

Study contacts

Kenneth Cusi, M.D.
principal investigator · University of Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion