CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01001429Updated Aug 21, 2017Results posted

Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol in Vitreoretinal Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of Dexmedetomidine infusion and propofol in Retinal Detachment, sponsored by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-21.

Sponsored by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
78
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators would like to determine if using Dexmedetomidine alone or in a reduced dose can prevent or reduce the incidence of adverse effects, while providing adequate sedation, and respiratory stability as compared to propofol.

Read the detailed description

Alpha2 adrenergic receptor agonist have been used increasingly as a new armamentarium to provide sedative/hypnotic, analgesic, anxiolytic and sympatholytic effects in the perioperative settings. Dexmedetomidine, a selective and specific alpha2- adrenoceptor agonist has unique properties that makes it an almost ideal sedative drug for monitored anesthesia care in procedures under local or regional block. Unlike other drugs use for sedation, dexmedetomidine induces sedation that is similar to natural sleep (readily arousable) without causing respiratory depression. It attenuates the stress-induced sympathoadrenal response seen with laryngoscopy and intubation. It has anesthetic and opioid sparing effects, hence it may be a useful adjunct to general anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care in patients susceptible to narcotic induced respiratory depression. Another unique property of dexmedetomidine is that its sedative effect is reversible with Atipamezole. A previous study wherein dexmedetomidine has been used in procedures under local and regional block had shown that it provides effective sedation and better operating condition without significant respiratory depression. As a supplement to general anesthesia, it has been shown to provide stable hemodynamics. However, it is associated with some adverse events such as hypertension, hypotension and bradycardia, these commonly occur during bolus administration of the recommended dose of 1ug/kg. Post-operatively it can cause nausea and vomiting. Vitreoretinal surgery requires either an injection of local anesthetic within the muscle cone (retrobulbar block),or into the periorbital space (peribulbar block). This can be done individually or in combination. This surgery can also be done under a safer technique of retrobulbar block that is given using a sub-tenon's approach through a snip peritomy; a blunt cannula can be used with this technique mitigating the complications of retrobulbar hemorrhage or inadvertent injection into the optic nerve sheath or perforation of the globe using a sharp needle. The anesthetic goal is to provide an immobile and uncongested operative field. Hemodynamic stability of the patient is also important since some patients that require this procedure are elderly with co-morbid conditions such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus and Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). In our study we would like to investigate if Dexmedetomidine alone and in a reduced dose can prevent or reduce the incidence of adverse effects, provide hemodynamic and respiratory stability, provide adequate sedation with patient and surgeon satisfaction and compare it with Propofol.

Objectives:

Primary:

  1. Adequate sedation
  2. Hemodynamic and respiratory stability intraoperatively

Secondary:

  1. surgeon satisfaction
  2. Time to achieved " street fitness " status
  3. subject satisfaction
  4. Hemodynamic stability in PACU
02

Conditions studied

  • Retinal Detachment

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • sedation for vitreoretinal surgery
03

In context

Retinal Detachment

207 studies on the registry are indexed under Retinal Detachment; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 78 is above the median of 50 across 136 interventional studies indexed under Retinal Detachment.

Browse Retinal Detachment studies →

Lead sponsor

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey is the lead sponsor of 496 studies on the registry; 130 are open to participants now.

Of its 38 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists rating of I-III
  • good renal and liver function

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • renal and hepatic insufficiency
  • uncontrolled diabetes
  • uncontrolled hypertension
  • severe cardiac disease Class III or IV
  • heart blocks
  • chronic use of sedatives, narcotics, alcohol or illicit drugs
  • allergy to either propofol or dexmedetomidine
  • pregnancy or inability to tolerate technique of the study drugs
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
78 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Propofol

    propofol 1mg/kg as a bolus intravenously followed by an infusion of 25-100 ug/kg/min

    Drug: propofol

  • Experimental
    dexmedetomidine infusion

    Subject will receive a bolus of0.5ug/kg intravenously over a period of 10-15 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.2-0.7ug/kg/hr of drug.

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine infusion

Interventions

  • DrugDexmedetomidine infusion

    bolus of 0.5ug/kg intravenously over a period of 10-15 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.2-0.7ug/kg/hr of drug

    Also known as: Precedex infusion

  • Drugpropofol

    propofol 1mg/kg intravenously as a bolus followed by 25-100ug/kg/min

    Also known as: Diprivan

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adequate Sedation Via Bispectral Index Score (BIS)and University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS)

    Bispectral Index Score measurement uses processed electroencephalogram signals to measure sedation depth of a scale from 0-100 (0=coma; 40-60=general anesthesia;60-90 sedated;100=awake) University of Michigan Sedation Scale (1-4) is an observational scale that quantifies sedation.1=normal response to verbal stimuli, 2=conscious sedation, responsive to tactile stimuli, 3= deeply sedated responsive to repeated or painful stimuli, 4=general anesthesia: not arousable.

    Time frame: Intraoperative up to 120 min

  2. Intraoperative Hemodynamic Stability

    systolic and diastolic blood pressure was recorded at 5 minute intervals up to 120 min and were averaged per study arm

    Time frame: Intraoperative up to 120 min

  3. Intraoperative Respiratory Stability

    respiratory rate data were recorded at 5 minutes intervals throughout the surgical procedure up to 120 mins for both groups and averaged per study arm

    Time frame: Intraoperative up to 120 min

  4. Intraoperative Heart Rate Stability

    Heart rate recorded at 5 minute intervals during surgery up to 120 min and averaged per study arm

    Time frame: Intraoperative up to 120 min

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Achieve "Street Fitness"

    Subjects will be kept in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) for a period of 2 hours. However it will be documented as to when, in the opinion of the PACU staff, the subject has met the criteria for discharge.

    Time frame: for 2 hours post-operatively in Post Anesthesia Care unit

  2. Surgeon Satisfaction for Adequate Sedation

    1=very poor, 2=poor,3=fair, 4=good, 5=excellent

    Time frame: at 10 minutes into the procedure

  3. Surgeon Satisfaction for Adequate Sedation at Completion of Procedure

    surgeon satisfaction graded on numerical scale 1=very poor. 2=poor, 3=fair 4=good, 5=excellent

    Time frame: immediately following the completion of the procedure up to one hour

  4. Patient Satisfaction

    1=very poor, 2=poor, 3=fair, 4=very good, 5=excellent

    Time frame: measured prior to discharge up to 2 hours

  5. Post Operative Hemodynamic Stability

    blood pressure documented at 30 minute intervals in PACU up to 120 min

    Time frame: 2 hours in PACU

  6. Hemodynamic Stability Post Operatively in PACU

    heart rate recorded at 30 min intervals in PACU up to 120 min

    Time frame: PACU to 2 hours post op

07

Results

Posted Aug 21, 2017
Limitations and caveats
Termination of study due to difficulty recruiting subjects who fit the study criteria.

Participant flow

Subjects were recruited the morning of surgery in the Same Day Surgery Suite

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePropofolDexmedetomidine Infusion
Started3938
Completed3937
Not completed01
Withdrew: Surgery cancelled01

Outcome measures

PrimaryAdequate Sedation Via Bispectral Index Score (BIS)and University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS)

Bispectral Index Score measurement uses processed electroencephalogram signals to measure sedation depth of a scale from 0-100 (0=coma; 40-60=general anesthesia;60-90 sedated;100=awake) University of Michigan Sedation Scale (1-4) is an observational scale that quantifies sedation.1=normal response to verbal stimuli, 2=conscious sedation, responsive to tactile stimuli, 3= deeply sedated responsive to repeated or painful stimuli, 4=general anesthesia: not arousable.

Time frame:
Intraoperative up to 120 min
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Adequate Sedation Via Bispectral Index Score (BIS)and University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS)
units on a scaleBIS Scores in Propofol Infusion GroupBIS Scores in Dexmedetomidine Infusion GroupUMSS Scores in Propofol Infusion GroupUMSS in Dexmedetomidine Infusion Group
Adequate Sedation Via Bispectral Index Score (BIS)and University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS)84.8 (77.5 to 92.1)88 (78 to 94).90 (.47 to 1.33).94 (.43 to 1.45)
Statistical analysis
  • BIS Scores in Propofol Infusion Group vs BIS Scores in Dexmedetomidine Infusion Group · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.04
  • UMSS Scores in Propofol Infusion Group vs UMSS in Dexmedetomidine Infusion Group · Regression, Linear · p = 0.68
SecondaryTime to Achieve "Street Fitness"

Subjects will be kept in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) for a period of 2 hours. However it will be documented as to when, in the opinion of the PACU staff, the subject has met the criteria for discharge.

Time frame:
for 2 hours post-operatively in Post Anesthesia Care unit
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Time to Achieve "Street Fitness"
minutesPropofolDexmedetomidine Infusion
Time to Achieve "Street Fitness"81 (54 to 108)85 (49.8 to 120)
PrimaryIntraoperative Hemodynamic Stability

systolic and diastolic blood pressure was recorded at 5 minute intervals up to 120 min and were averaged per study arm

Time frame:
Intraoperative up to 120 min
Reported as:
Mean · mm/Hg
Intraoperative Hemodynamic Stability
mm/HgPropofol Group -Mean Systolic Blood PressureDexmedetomidine Group-mean Systolic Blood PressurePropofol Group- Mean Diastolic Blood PressureDexmedetomidine Group- Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure
Intraoperative Hemodynamic Stability124.9 (108.7 to 141.1)114.6 (100.1 to 129.1)73.6 (61.1 to 86.1)66.2 (55.4 to 77.0)
PrimaryIntraoperative Respiratory Stability

respiratory rate data were recorded at 5 minutes intervals throughout the surgical procedure up to 120 mins for both groups and averaged per study arm

Time frame:
Intraoperative up to 120 min
Reported as:
Mean · breaths per minute
Intraoperative Respiratory Stability
breaths per minutePropofol GroupDexmedetomidine Group
Intraoperative Respiratory Stability17 (12 to 22)12 (8 to 16)
PrimaryIntraoperative Heart Rate Stability

Heart rate recorded at 5 minute intervals during surgery up to 120 min and averaged per study arm

Time frame:
Intraoperative up to 120 min
Reported as:
Mean · beats per minute
Intraoperative Heart Rate Stability
beats per minutePropofol GroupDexmedetomidine
Intraoperative Heart Rate Stability71 (58 to 84)64 (49 to 80)
SecondarySurgeon Satisfaction for Adequate Sedation

1=very poor, 2=poor,3=fair, 4=good, 5=excellent

Time frame:
at 10 minutes into the procedure
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Surgeon Satisfaction for Adequate Sedation
units on a scalePropofol GroupDexmedetomidine Group
Surgeon Satisfaction for Adequate Sedation4.62 (3 to 5)4.97 (3 to 5)
SecondarySurgeon Satisfaction for Adequate Sedation at Completion of Procedure

surgeon satisfaction graded on numerical scale 1=very poor. 2=poor, 3=fair 4=good, 5=excellent

Time frame:
immediately following the completion of the procedure up to one hour
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Surgeon Satisfaction for Adequate Sedation at Completion of Procedure
units on a scalePropofol GroupDexmedetomidine Group
Surgeon Satisfaction for Adequate Sedation at Completion of Procedure4.77 (3 to 5)4.89 (3 to 5)
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction

1=very poor, 2=poor, 3=fair, 4=very good, 5=excellent

Time frame:
measured prior to discharge up to 2 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient Satisfaction
units on a scalePropofolDexmedetomidine Group
Patient Satisfaction4.61 (3 to 5)4.43 (3 to 5)
SecondaryPost Operative Hemodynamic Stability

blood pressure documented at 30 minute intervals in PACU up to 120 min

Time frame:
2 hours in PACU
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Post Operative Hemodynamic Stability
mmHgPropofol GroupDexmedetomidine GroupPropofolDexmedetomidine
Post Operative Hemodynamic Stability124.9 (108.7 to 141.1)114.6 (100.1 to 129.1)73.6 (61.1 to 86.1)66.2 (55.4 to 77)
SecondaryHemodynamic Stability Post Operatively in PACU

heart rate recorded at 30 min intervals in PACU up to 120 min

Time frame:
PACU to 2 hours post op
Reported as:
Mean · beats per minute
Hemodynamic Stability Post Operatively in PACU
beats per minutePropofol GroupDexmedetomidine
Hemodynamic Stability Post Operatively in PACU74.1 (72 to 77)72 (71 to 73)

Adverse events

Collected over Heart rate, blood pressure, pulse oximetry are collected for all patients undergoing sedation or anesthesia for the entire time they are in the operating room which was between 1-2 hrs. Additionally heart rate, blood pressure, pulse oximetry were monitored for 2 hours in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit where patients are placed immediately following the procedure.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Propofol—0/39 (0%)0/39 (0%)
Dexmedetomidine Infusion—1/37 (2.7%)0/37 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPropofolDexmedetomidine Infusion
T wave inversion on EKGCardiac disorders0/391/37

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PropofolDexmedetomidine InfusionTotal
Mean40 (40 to 60)52 (42.8 to 61.2)46 (40 to 61.2)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PropofolDexmedetomidine InfusionTotal
Female111223
Male282553
total participants
total participants(participants)PropofolDexmedetomidine InfusionTotal
Number393776
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • UMDNJ-University Hospital
    Newark, New Jersey 07102, United States
  • University Hospital
    Newark, New Jersey 07102, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01001429
Lead sponsor
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 26, 2009
Start date
Oct 2009
Primary completion
Mar 2013
Completion
Nov 2013
Results posted
Aug 21, 2017
Last update
Aug 21, 2017

Study contacts

Anuradha Patel, MD
principal investigator · Rutgers /NJMS

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion