CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00985842Updated Jun 29, 2018

Study to Determine if Different Prosthetic Sockets Effect How Much Oxygen is in the Tissue of Lower Limb Amputees While They Are Walking

An interventional study of Pe-Lite and sleeve suspension socket and Total Surface bearing a socket with a sleeve suspension but without suction in Amputation, Diabetes Complications and Leg Injuries, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-06-29.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
7
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Amputee gait produces periodic occlusion of residual limb blood vessels. During the stance phase of gait, body weight cause the prosthesis to compresses the soft tissue of the residual limb and occlude blood flow. This occlusion can be relieved during swing phase, but may depend on type of prosthesis. The purpose of the proposed research is to: (1) discover the range of tissue oxygenation in the intact and residual lower limbs of dysvascular amputees during gait and (2) to learn which of five different prosthetic limb systems provides greater tissue oxygenation.

Read the detailed description

The amount of oxygen in residual limb tissue is an important health status indicator; resistance to infection, promotion of wound healing, production of collagen, and epithelialization all correlate with higher oxygen levels. Unfortunately, simply donning a lower limb prosthesis may limit circulation and reduce the level of tissue oxygenation. This reduction may be compounded by the biomechanical forces of gait. The compressive loads of the body's weight during stance and the inertial loads of the prosthesis during swing may further occlude circulation, albeit by different mechanisms.

For the dysvascular lower limb amputee, the choice of prosthetic socket and suspension system may impact the overall health of their residual limb and wound healing capacity. An inappropriate choice may lead to skin irritation, tissue breakdown, discomfort, and reduced mobility. For these patients, any component that reduces tissue oxygenation is a significant problem because compromised circulation can forestall wound healing.

The objective of the proposed research is to use photo-oximetry to discover which of five different prosthetic limb systems results in higher residual limb tissue oxygenation during both rest and gait. This experiment will enable evidence-based decision making on this clinically relevant problem. Using a prospective, randomized cross-over experimental design and the investigators' photo-oximetry system, the investigators will measure and compare the tissue oxygenation along the medial and lateral surfaces (3 sites each) of the residual limb during rest and walking.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amputation
  • Diabetes Complications
  • Leg Injuries
  • Traumatic Amputation

Keywords

  • Artificial limbs
  • Gait
  • Oximetry
  • Prosthesis
  • Rehabilitation
03

In context

Diabetes Complications

218 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Complications; 48 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 7 is below the median of 70 across 133 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Complications.

Browse Diabetes Complications studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

All subjects must meet the following inclusion criteria:

  • unilateral transtibial amputee of diabetic etiology between the ages of 18 and 70,
  • have been fit with a prosthesis and have used a prosthesis for at least one year,
  • wear the prosthesis at least 4 hours per day,
  • ambulate without upper extremity aids, and
  • have no history of injurious falls within the previous six months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects will be excluded if:

  • they have a significant lower extremity pain condition, musculoskeletal disorder, or neurological deficit that interferes with their ability to pursue typical daily activities or alters their gait characteristics or
  • their residual limb is ulcerated.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
7 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Arm 1

    Comparison of five different clinically used suspension and socket systems

    Device: Pe-Lite and sleeve suspension socket · Device: Total Surface bearing a socket with a sleeve suspension but without suction · Device: Total surface bearing suction socket with a pin lock suspension · Device: Total surface bearing suction socket with a sleeve suspension · Device: Vacuum-assisted socket system (Harmony System, Otto Bock)

Interventions

  • DevicePe-Lite and sleeve suspension socket

    Prosthetic socket worn by the amputee that has a Pe-lite foam liner between the socket and the residual limb. It is suspended from the residual limb using a sleeve at the top of the socket.

  • DeviceTotal Surface bearing a socket with a sleeve suspension but without suction

    Prosthetic socket worn by the amputee where the fit of the socket touches every part of the residual limb. This socket is suspended from the residual limb using a sleeve at the top of the socket.

  • DeviceTotal surface bearing suction socket with a pin lock suspension

    Prosthetic socket worn by the amputee where the fit of the socket touches every part of the residual limb. This socket is suspended from the residual limb using a pin that protrudes from the bottom of the liner into the socket that is then locked in place by the amputee.

  • DeviceTotal surface bearing suction socket with a sleeve suspension

    Prosthetic socket worn by the amputee where the fit of the socket touches every part of the residual limb. This socket using vacuum suction plus a sleeve at the top of the prosthetic socket to enhance the security of the suspension.

  • DeviceVacuum-assisted socket system (Harmony System, Otto Bock)

    Prosthetic socket worn by the amputee where the a vacuum pump, in this case a mechanically-activated pump, creates a vacuum between the socket and the limb. This vacuum suspends the prosthetic limb from the amputee's residual limb.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Oxygen in tissue

    Tissue oxygen saturation (StO2)

    Time frame: Comparison of five different systems will be performed in one session occurring on one day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA
    Seattle, Washington 98108, United States
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 29, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00985842
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Collaborators
University of Washington
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 29, 2009
Start date
Nov 1, 2009
Primary completion
Oct 26, 2012
Completion
Oct 26, 2012
Last update
Jun 29, 2018

Study contacts

Glenn K Klute, PhD
principal investigator · VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion