ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00976989Updated Feb 6, 2017Results posted

A Study of Pertuzumab in Combination With Herceptin and Chemotherapy in Participants With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche. Completed at 55 sites in 20 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-06.

Sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
225
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This 3 arm study will assess the tolerability, safety and efficacy of 3 neoadjuvant treatment regimens in participants with locally advanced, inflammatory or early stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Before surgery, participants will be randomized to receive either A) 6 cycles of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab (Herceptin), with 5-fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (FEC) for cycles 1-3 and docetaxel for cycles 4-6, or B) FEC for cycles 1-3 followed by pertuzumab plus trastuzumab with docetaxel for cycles 4-6, or C) 6 cycles of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab with docetaxel and carboplatin. Pertuzumab will be administered at a loading dose of 840 mg intravenously (iv), then 420 mg iv 3-weekly, trastuzumab at a loading dose of 8 mg/kg iv, then 6 mg/kg iv 3-weekly, docetaxel at 75 mg/m\^2 iv, increased to 100 mg/m\^2 iv 3-weekly, and FEC and carboplatin iv 3-weekly at standard doses. Following surgery participants will receive trastuzumab 6 mg/kg iv 3-weekly for a total of 1 year, as well as adequate chemo-, radio- and hormone therapy. Anticipated time on study treatment is 4-12 months, and target sample size is 200-300.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 225 is above the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche is the lead sponsor of 2,101 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Of its 330 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 248 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • female participants, age >/=18 years
  • advanced, inflammatory or early stage unilateral invasive breast cancer
  • -positive breast cancer
  • baseline (LVEF) >/=55%

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • disease (Stage IV) or bilateral breast cancer
  • previous anticancer therapy or radiotherapy for any
  • other malignancy, except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or basal cell carcinoma
  • cardiovascular disease
  • current chronic treatment with of >10mg methylprednisolone or equivalent
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HER2

HER2 is a protein, made from the ERBB2 gene, that drives the growth of some cancers. A study may look for a level of the protein, extra copies of the gene, or a particular change in it.

In breast cancer, protein tests are read as HER2-positive, HER2-low or HER2-negative; other cancers use their own rules. Check which test result the study requires.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
225 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based chemotherapy

    5-Fluorouracil, epirubicin with cyclophosphamide (FEC), trastuzumab (T) and pertuzumab (P) every three weeks for three cycles, followed by docetaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab every three weeks, for three cycles as neoadjuvant therapy. Trastuzumab every three weeks from Cycle 7 up to Cycle 17 as adjuvant therapy post-surgery.

    Drug: Pertuzumab · Drug: Trastuzumab · Drug: FEC · Drug: Docetaxel

  • Experimental
    T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based chemotherapy

    FEC every three weeks for three cycles, followed by docetaxel, trastuzumab (T) and pertuzumab (P) every three weeks, for three cycles as neoadjuvant therapy. Trastuzumab every three weeks from Cycle 7 up to Cycle 21 as adjuvant therapy post-surgery.

    Drug: Pertuzumab · Drug: Trastuzumab · Drug: FEC · Drug: Docetaxel

  • Experimental
    T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline chemotherapy

    Trastuzumab, carboplatin, docetaxel (TCH) and pertuzumab (P) every three weeks, for six cycles as neoadjuvant therapy. Trastuzumab every three weeks from Cycle 7 up to Cycle 17 as adjuvant therapy post-surgery.

    Drug: Pertuzumab · Drug: TCH

Interventions

  • 840 mg loading dose intravenously (IV), then 420 mg IV 3-weekly.

    Also known as: Perjeta

  • 8 mg/kg loading dose IV, then 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks.

    Also known as: Herceptin

  • DrugFEC

    5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m\^2, epirubicin 100 mg/m\^2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2.

  • 75 mg/m\^2 for the first dose; 100 mg/m\^2 if no dose limiting toxicity occurs.

  • DrugTCH

    Trastuzumab followed by carboplatin at target area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) 6 and docetaxel at a starting dose of 75 mg/m\^2. All treatments were given every three weeks by the IV route.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Cardiac Events as Assessed by the Investigator

    Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) as assessed by the Investigator, including Grade 3, 4 or 5 symptomatic LVSD with symptomatic cardiac events.

    Time frame: From baseline up to approximately 3.5 years

  2. Safety: Percentage of Participants With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Decline During Pre-operative (Neoadjuvant) Period

    Percentage of participants with LVEF measures decline of ≥ 10% from baseline and to a value of \<50% during the pre-operative (neoadjuvant) period.

    Time frame: From baseline up to approximately 18 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy: Percentage of Participants With Complete Pathological Response (pCR)

    pCR is defined as the absence of invasive neoplastic cells at microscopic examination of the tumor remnants after surgery following primary systemic therapy. pCR is evaluated after 6 cycles of treatment and surgery or following withdrawal from the study whichever occurs sooner.

    Time frame: At surgery, after 18 weeks (6 cycles) of treatment

  2. Efficacy: Clinical Response Rate

    Tumor response is defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) and is identified as per local practice. Clinical response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a response of CR or PR at any time pre-surgery. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by mammogram or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical breast examination (CBE), CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.

    Time frame: During each 3-week cycle of 6 total cycles: up to 18 weeks

  3. Efficacy: Time to Clinical Response

    Time to clinical response is defined as the time from the date of first dose received to the first date of assessment of clinical response. Clinical response is defined as a response of CR or PR at any time pre-surgery. Per RECIST v1.0 for target lesions and assessed by mammogram or MRI and CBE, CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.

    Time frame: Up to 18 weeks

  4. Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Achieving Breast Conserving Surgery

    This is the percentage of participants who achieved breast conserving surgery out of the intent-to-treat population without inflammatory breast cancer, as these participants received mastectomy irrespective of their response to neoadjuvant (pre-operative) treatment.

    Time frame: At approximately 18 weeks

  5. Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Without an Overall Survival (OS) Event

    Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death from any cause. Participants who were alive or lost to follow-up were censored at the last known alive date. Participants with no post-baseline information were censored at the date of randomization plus one day.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study up to 5 years

  6. Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Event

    The DFS was defined as the time from the first date of no disease (i.e., date of surgery) to the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death. PD was assessed using RECIST v1.0 and MRI and CBE. It was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Any evidence of contralateral disease in situ was not considered as PD. Participants who were withdrawn from the study without documented PD were censored at the date of the last assessment when the participant was known to be disease-free.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study up to 5 years

  7. Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Event

    Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documentation of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was assessed using RECIST v1.0 and MRI and CBE. It was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Participants who were withdrawn from the study without documented PD were censored at the date of the last assessment when the participant was known to be free from PD. Participants without post-baseline assessments but known to be alive were censored at the time of randomization plus one day.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study up to 5 years

  8. Safety: Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Symptoms Associated With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)

    Percentage of participants with signs or symptoms of cardiac events.

    Time frame: From Baseline to end of Neoadjuvant Period (up to 18 weeks), Adjuvant Period (up to 1.5 years), Follow-up Period (up to 3.5 years)

  9. Safety: Percentage of Participants With Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Events

    Percentage of participants with LVEF events without signs or symptoms of cardiac events.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of Neoadjuvant Period (up to 18 weeks), Adjuvant Period (up to 1.5 years), Follow-up Period (up to 3.5 years)

  10. Safety: Maximum Decrease in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Measures

    Maximum decrease in LVEF measures is the change from baseline at worst treatment value. LVEF is measured as percentage.

    Time frame: From baseline up to approximately 3.5 years

07

Results

Posted Jun 20, 2016

Participant flow

This study included 3 periods: Neoadjuvant (pre-operative) period and surgery, adjuvant (post-operative) period and post-treatment follow-up period.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Started737577
Completed606360
Not completed131217
Withdrew: Violation of selection criteria at entry101
Withdrew: Death5710
Withdrew: Refused treatment435
Withdrew: Failure to return210
Withdrew: Recurrence of disease010
Withdrew: Other101

Outcome measures

PrimarySafety: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Cardiac Events as Assessed by the Investigator

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) as assessed by the Investigator, including Grade 3, 4 or 5 symptomatic LVSD with symptomatic cardiac events.

Time frame:
From baseline up to approximately 3.5 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Cardiac Events as Assessed by the Investigator
percentage of participantsT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Cardiac Events as Assessed by the Investigator02.71.3
PrimarySafety: Percentage of Participants With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Decline During Pre-operative (Neoadjuvant) Period

Percentage of participants with LVEF measures decline of ≥ 10% from baseline and to a value of \<50% during the pre-operative (neoadjuvant) period.

Time frame:
From baseline up to approximately 18 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Decline During Pre-operative (Neoadjuvant) Period
percentage of participantsT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Decline During Pre-operative (Neoadjuvant) Period5.65.33.9
SecondaryEfficacy: Percentage of Participants With Complete Pathological Response (pCR)

pCR is defined as the absence of invasive neoplastic cells at microscopic examination of the tumor remnants after surgery following primary systemic therapy. pCR is evaluated after 6 cycles of treatment and surgery or following withdrawal from the study whichever occurs sooner.

Time frame:
At surgery, after 18 weeks (6 cycles) of treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants With Complete Pathological Response (pCR)
percentage of participantsT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants With Complete Pathological Response (pCR)61.6 (49.5 to 72.8)57.3 (45.4 to 68.7)66.2 (54.6 to 76.6)
SecondaryEfficacy: Clinical Response Rate

Tumor response is defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) and is identified as per local practice. Clinical response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a response of CR or PR at any time pre-surgery. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by mammogram or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical breast examination (CBE), CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.

Time frame:
During each 3-week cycle of 6 total cycles: up to 18 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Efficacy: Clinical Response Rate
percentage of participantsT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Efficacy: Clinical Response Rate91.894.789.6
SecondaryEfficacy: Time to Clinical Response

Time to clinical response is defined as the time from the date of first dose received to the first date of assessment of clinical response. Clinical response is defined as a response of CR or PR at any time pre-surgery. Per RECIST v1.0 for target lesions and assessed by mammogram or MRI and CBE, CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.

Time frame:
Up to 18 weeks
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Efficacy: Time to Clinical Response
weeksT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Efficacy: Time to Clinical Response3.6 (3 to 6)6.3 (6 to 7)4.9 (4 to 6)
SecondaryEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Achieving Breast Conserving Surgery

This is the percentage of participants who achieved breast conserving surgery out of the intent-to-treat population without inflammatory breast cancer, as these participants received mastectomy irrespective of their response to neoadjuvant (pre-operative) treatment.

Time frame:
At approximately 18 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Achieving Breast Conserving Surgery
percentage of participantsT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Achieving Breast Conserving Surgery21.716.727.0
SecondaryEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without an Overall Survival (OS) Event

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death from any cause. Participants who were alive or lost to follow-up were censored at the last known alive date. Participants with no post-baseline information were censored at the date of randomization plus one day.

Time frame:
From baseline to end of study up to 5 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Without an Overall Survival (OS) Event
percentage of participantsT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Without an Overall Survival (OS) Event93.290.787.0
SecondaryEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Event

The DFS was defined as the time from the first date of no disease (i.e., date of surgery) to the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death. PD was assessed using RECIST v1.0 and MRI and CBE. It was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Any evidence of contralateral disease in situ was not considered as PD. Participants who were withdrawn from the study without documented PD were censored at the date of the last assessment when the participant was known to be disease-free.

Time frame:
From baseline to end of study up to 5 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Event
percentage of participantsT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Event85.588.184.7
SecondaryEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Event

Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documentation of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was assessed using RECIST v1.0 and MRI and CBE. It was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Participants who were withdrawn from the study without documented PD were censored at the date of the last assessment when the participant was known to be free from PD. Participants without post-baseline assessments but known to be alive were censored at the time of randomization plus one day.

Time frame:
From baseline to end of study up to 5 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Event
percentage of participantsT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Event86.385.381.8
SecondarySafety: Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Symptoms Associated With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)

Percentage of participants with signs or symptoms of cardiac events.

Time frame:
From Baseline to end of Neoadjuvant Period (up to 18 weeks), Adjuvant Period (up to 1.5 years), Follow-up Period (up to 3.5 years)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Symptoms Associated With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)
percentage of participantsT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Neoadjuvant Period (n=72, 75, 76)1.42.70
Adjuvant Period (n= 68, 65, 67)001.5
Follow-up Period (n=70, 75, 74)01.30
SecondarySafety: Percentage of Participants With Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Events

Percentage of participants with LVEF events without signs or symptoms of cardiac events.

Time frame:
From baseline to end of Neoadjuvant Period (up to 18 weeks), Adjuvant Period (up to 1.5 years), Follow-up Period (up to 3.5 years)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Events
percentage of participantsT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Neoadjuvant Period (n=72, 75, 76)5.64.02.6
Adjuvant Period (n= 66, 64, 63)3.004.8
Follow-up Period (n=21, 18, 23)011.14.3
SecondarySafety: Maximum Decrease in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Measures

Maximum decrease in LVEF measures is the change from baseline at worst treatment value. LVEF is measured as percentage.

Time frame:
From baseline up to approximately 3.5 years
Reported as:
Mean · percentage (ejection fraction)
Safety: Maximum Decrease in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Measures
percentage (ejection fraction)T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Safety: Maximum Decrease in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Measures-6.6 ± 5.15-8.4 ± 5.66-7.0 ± 6.48

Adverse events

Collected over Up to approximately 5 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy—23/72 (31.9%)72/72 (100%)
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy—18/75 (24%)73/75 (97.3%)
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy—31/76 (40.8%)76/76 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 54
Most frequent serious events
EventT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Febrile NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders10/724/7511/76
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/723/754/76
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/723/751/76
Left ventricular dysfunctionCardiac disorders1/723/751/76
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/720/750/76
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/720/752/76
Neutropenic infectionInfections and infestations0/722/751/76
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/722/750/76
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/720/752/76
Mucosal inflammationGeneral disorders0/720/752/76
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 91
Most frequent other events
EventT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders46/7244/7555/76
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders35/7239/7542/76
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders38/7241/7534/76
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders36/7233/7537/76
FatigueGeneral disorders30/7228/7533/76
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders29/7227/7530/76
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders14/728/7529/76
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders5/721/7523/76
HeadacheNervous system disorders20/7215/7516/76
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders19/729/7517/76

Baseline characteristics

Safety population included all participants who were randomized and received study drug.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapyTotal
Mean49.6 ± 11.4150.5 ± 10.7050.6 ± 10.5850.6 ± 10.86
Gender
Gender(Participants)T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapyTotal
Female737577225
Male0000
08

Study locations

55 sites
  • Nassau, N9311, Bahamas
  • Banja Luka, 78000, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Sarajevo, 71000, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Porto Alegre, RS 90610-000, Brazil
  • Sao Paulo, SP 01317-000, Brazil
  • Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada
  • Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada
  • Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A4, Canada
  • Pula, 52100, Croatia
  • Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
  • Kiel, 24105, Germany
  • Regensburg, 93053, Germany
  • Trier, 54290, Germany
  • Troisdorf, 53840, Germany
  • Ulm, 89075, Germany
  • Heraklion, 71110, Greece
  • Thessaloniki, 56429, Greece
  • Roma, Lazio 00168, Italy
  • Monza, Lombardia 20900, Italy
  • S. Fermo della Battaglia (CO), Lombardia 22020, Italy
  • Daegu, 702-210, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul, 152-703, Korea, Republic of
  • Mexico City, 06760, Mexico
  • Xalapa, 91130, Mexico
  • Auckland, 1023, New Zealand
  • Aveiro, 3814-501, Portugal
  • Lisboa, 1099-023, Portugal
  • Bucharest, 050098, Romania
  • Cluj Napoca, 400015, Romania
  • Iasi, 700106, Romania
  • Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
  • Belgrade, 11080, Serbia
  • Durban, 4058, South Africa
  • Durban, 4091, South Africa
  • Pretoria, 0002, South Africa
  • San Sebastian, Guipuzcoa 20014, Spain
  • Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Cordoba, 14004, Spain
  • Madrid, 28222, Spain
  • Eskilstuna, 63188, Sweden
  • Stockholm, 17176, Sweden
  • Sundsvall, 85186, Sweden
  • Umea, 90185, Sweden
  • Baden, 5405, Switzerland
  • Zürich, 8008, Switzerland
  • Zürich, 8091, Switzerland
  • Taichung, 404, Taiwan
  • Taipei, 00112, Taiwan
  • Bournemouth, BH7 7DW, United Kingdom
  • Derby, DE1 2QY, United Kingdom
  • Guildford, GU2 5XX, United Kingdom
  • Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
  • Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
  • Truro, TR1 3LJ, United Kingdom
  • Westcliffe-on-sea, SS0 0RY, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hickish T, Harvey V, Eniu A, Waldron-Lynch M, Eng-Wong J, Kirk S, Cortes J. Long-term efficacy analysis of the randomised, phase II TRYPHAENA cardiac safety study: Evaluating pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2018 Jan;89:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Dec 8. PubMed 29223479 ↗
  • Swain SM, Schneeweiss A, Gianni L, Gao JJ, Stein A, Waldron-Lynch M, Heeson S, Beattie MS, Yoo B, Cortes J, Baselga J. Incidence and management of diarrhea in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with pertuzumab. Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):761-768. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw695. Erratum In: Ann Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;29(4):1075. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx336. Ann Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;29(7):1607. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx802. Ann Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;30(8):1404. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy538. PubMed 28057664 ↗
  • Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hegg R, Tausch C, Deb R, Ratnayake J, McNally V, Ross G, Kiermaier A, Cortes J. Evaluating the predictive value of biomarkers for efficacy outcomes in response to pertuzumab- and trastuzumab-based therapy: an exploratory analysis of the TRYPHAENA study. Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Jul 8;16(4):R73. doi: 10.1186/bcr3690. PubMed 25005255 ↗
  • Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hickish T, Harvey V, Eniu A, Hegg R, Tausch C, Seo JH, Tsai YF, Ratnayake J, McNally V, Ross G, Cortes J. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRYPHAENA). Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2278-84. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt182. Epub 2013 May 22. PubMed 23704196 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2009, a primary completion of Jun 2011 and a completion of Jan 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jun 2016, 5 years after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 14, 2009
First posted
Sep 15, 2009
Start
Nov 2009
Primary completionActual
Jun 2011
CompletionActual
Jan 2016
Results first posted
Jun 20, 2016
Last update
Feb 6, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 6, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00976989
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 15, 2009
Start date
Nov 2009
Primary completion
Jun 2011
Completion
Jan 2016
Results posted
Jun 20, 2016
Last update
Feb 6, 2017

Study contacts

Clinical Trials
study director · Hoffmann-La Roche
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Pertuzumab

Start the discussion