CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00976638MOSAR-ICUUpdated Aug 6, 2012

Clinical Trial to Reduce Antibiotic Resistance in European Intensive Cares

An interventional study of Chromogenic surveillance and Molecular surveillance in Hospital Acquired Infections, sponsored by UMC Utrecht. Completed at 13 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-08-06.

Sponsored by UMC Utrecht · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14,318
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Colonization of patients with Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria (AMRB) like Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA), Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBL) enterobacteriaceae leads to infections; and ultimately to adverse outcomes (eg prolonged hospital stay, death). This is an urgent problem in Europe, especially in Intensive Care Units (ICUs).

In this trial, colonization of patients with these AMRB will be assessed in the baseline period (6m). In phase 2 the effect of a Hygiene Improvement Program, including Chlorhexidine body washings and a Hand Hygiene training program, will be assessed (6m). In phase 3 units will be randomized to either Active Surveillance with Chromagar based tests or a Molecular based tests.

Study Hypothesis: the abovementioned interventions will reduce ICU-acquired colonization rates with MRSA, VRE and ESBL.

Read the detailed description

A cluster-randomized trial with a stepped wedge design will be conducted in adult ICU's throughout Europe

The MOSAR-ICU trial is motivated by three primary considerations:

  1. Advances in behavioral sciences and research about (hand) hygiene compliance have allowed a better understanding of barriers to increase compliance with (hand) hygiene practices within healthcare institutions;
  2. Recent investigations have identified new rapid tests, both chromogenic media and molecular based tests, which may help identifying previously unknown carriage of AMRB at the time of admission; and
  3. Currently practiced procedures, such as regular surveillance of all patients and daily cleansing of ICU patients with Chlorhexidine, have not been evaluated properly for their effectiveness.

In conclusion, evidence base derived recommendations from prospective studies regarding the costeffectiveness of different control strategies are lacking.

This study assess the impact of the three interventions on ICU acquired colonisation rates for AMRB(MRSA,VRE and ESBL).

Study design: Multi-center, cluster-randomised clinical trial.

Study population: Adult patients admitted to the ICU.

Intervention: The first phase of the study will be a 6-month baseline period to determine acquisition rates of AMRB during current standard practice in the individual participating centers (including currently performed surveillance strategies). The second phase will consist of a Hygiene Improvement Program to improve standard precautions and hand hygiene; and daily washing of all ICU patients with Chlorhexidine gluconate (HIP; 6 months). In both periods Contact Precautions (contact isolation) will be implemented for carriers of AMRB, as identified upon clinical cultures and following current practice of individual wards. In the third phase of the study (12 months) units will be randomized, and all interventions of phase 2 will be continued in all units. Half of the units will implement surveillance (admission and twice weekly cultures) of all admitted patients for carriage of MRSA and VRE using chromogenic agar. The other half will add molecular based rapid testing of ALL admission cultures for MRSA and VRE in addition to twice weekly screening of all patients with Chromagar based tests for MRSA, VRE and ESBL.

Main study endpoints: ICU-acquired colonization rates with MRSA, VRE and ESBL.

Primary Objective: To evaluate the impact of enhanced standard barrier precautions and rapid screening with targeted isolation of patients carrying AMRB on transmission of AMRB.

Secondary Objectives:

  • Evaluate the impact of interventions on ICU-acquired bacteremia rates with MRSA, VRE or ESBL.
  • Evaluate the impact of the HIP intervention on frequency and quality of hand hygiene, the application of standard precautions and the use of contact precautions during patient care.
  • Evaluate the effect of the three strategies on other patient outcomes, including length of stay and in hospital mortality.
  • Evaluate the overall antibiotic use and effectiveness of empirical treatment of ICU-acquired bacteremia.
  • Evaluate the effect of the three strategies on the incidence density of new acquisitions with MRSA, VRE and ESBL individually.
02

Conditions studied

  • Hospital Acquired Infections

Keywords

  • Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria
  • Hospital acquired infections
  • Colonization
  • Bacteremia
  • MRSA
  • VRE
  • ESBL
  • Intensive Care
  • ICU
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14,318 is above the median of 120 across 4,200 interventional studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

UMC Utrecht is the lead sponsor of 350 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • colonization with either MRSA, VRE or ESBL is endemic
  • at least one dedicated infection control physician
  • ability to obtain, store and analyze surveillance cultures
  • at least 8 ICU beds; all of which have possibility for mechanical ventilation
  • ability to collect the data required for analysis
  • written approval of the institution's IRB
  • signed protocol signature page

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • burn units
  • cardiothoracic units
  • pediatric and neonatal ICUs
  • ICU is currently using rapid diagnostic testing in their screening program for AMRB
  • ICU is planning to enroll subjects in studies testing investigational agents for the purpose of eradicating or preventing colonization with MRSA, VRE or ESBL or devices or practice management strategies that have colonization and/or infection with AMRB as an outcome
  • using SOD/ SDD or any topical antimicrobial therapy
  • using chlorhexidine body washings
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
14,318 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Chromogenic Arm

    Active surveillance of colonization with MRSA or VRE by chromogenic agar with isolation of positive patients.

    Other: Chromogenic surveillance

  • Active comparator
    Molecular Arm

    Active surveillance of colonization with MRSA and VRE by PCR; and of ESBL by chromogenic agar with isolation of positive patients

    Other: Molecular surveillance

Interventions

  • OtherChromogenic surveillance

    All admitted patients are screened on admission for MRSA and VRE by chromogenic agar and isolated when positive

    Also known as: chromogenic screening

  • OtherMolecular surveillance

    All patients are screened for MRSA and VRE by PCR; and for ESBL by chromogenic agar on admission. Positive patients are isolated

    Also known as: molecular screening

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Colonization with MRSA, VRE and ESBL

    By taking surveillance swabs from nose, perineum and wounds (if present) on admission we will assess whether patients are colonized with MRSA, VRE and ESBL at the moment of ICU admission. Swabs will be processed on chromogenic agars.

    Time frame: On admission

  2. Colonization with MRSA, VRE and ESBL

    By taking surveillance swabs twice weekly from nose, perineum and wounds (if present) we will assess whether patients become colonized with MRSA, VRE and ESBL during ICU stay. Swabs will be processed on chromogenic agars. Note: for patients admitted for longer than 21 days, surveillance is reduced to once weekly.

    Time frame: During ICU stay

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence density of new acquisitions with MRSA, VRE and ESBL individually.

    In phase 2, we implement a hygiene improvement program. We will assess if this program reduces the number of patients acquiring colonization with MRSA, VRE and ESBL. We will measure colonization as stated in the primary outcome measure. In phase 3, we will implement direct feedback of screening results, and isolation of colonized patients. Swabs will be processed either by chromogenic agar (a) or molecular tests (b). Thus, the effect of these interventions on incidence density of new acquisitions of MRSA, VRE or ESBL will be assessed.

    Time frame: Acquired during ICU stay (median LOS 14 days)

  2. ICU-acquired bacteremia rates with MRSA,VRE or ESBL.

    We will collect data on all bacteremias occuring during ICU stay, after completion of the trial. We include all bacteremias with s aureus (MSSA and MRSA), e faecium/ e faecalis ("S" and "R") and enterobacteriaceae ("S" and "R"). Data will be collected from the microbiology labs.

    Time frame: Acquired during ICU stay (median LOS 14 days)

  3. 28 day-mortality

    We will collect length of stay, and disposition at d28 as well as disposition at discharge from the ICU. Data will be collected in the online CRF.

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Study locations

13 sites
  • Hopital Henri Mondor
    Creteil, 94000, France
  • Raymond Poincare Hospital
    Garches, F-92380, France
  • Hopital Paris Saint Joseph
    Paris, 75674, France
  • Laikon General Hospital
    Athens, 11527, Greece
  • University General Hospital Attikon
    Athens, 12462, Greece
  • San Camillo Forlanini Hospital
    Rome, 00152, Italy
  • Paul Stradins University Hospital
    Riga, LV-1008, Latvia
  • Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg
    Luxembourg, L-1210, Luxembourg
  • Hospital Geral de Sto Antonio
    Porto, 4260-363, Portugal
  • Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro
    Vila Real, 5000-508, Portugal
  • University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases
    Golnik, 4204, Slovenia
  • University Medical Center Ljubljana
    Ljubljana, SI 1000, Slovenia
  • Hospital Clinic Y Provencal
    Barcelona, 8025, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Derde LPG, Cooper BS, Goossens H, Malhotra-Kumar S, Willems RJL, Gniadkowski M, Hryniewicz W, Empel J, Dautzenberg MJD, Annane D, Aragao I, Chalfine A, Dumpis U, Esteves F, Giamarellou H, Muzlovic I, Nardi G, Petrikkos GL, Tomic V, Marti AT, Stammet P, Brun-Buisson C, Bonten MJM; MOSAR WP3 Study Team. Interventions to reduce colonisation and transmission of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in intensive care units: an interrupted time series study and cluster randomised trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Jan;14(1):31-39. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70295-0. Epub 2013 Oct 23. Erratum In: Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Jan;14(1):11. PubMed 24161233 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 6, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00976638
Lead sponsor
UMC Utrecht
Responsible party
MJM Bonten (MD, PhD, UMC Utrecht) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 14, 2009
Start date
Jun 2008
Primary completion
May 2011
Completion
May 2011
Last update
Aug 6, 2012

Study contacts

Marc Bonten, Prof, MD
principal investigator · UMC Utrecht

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion