ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00964587DECIDEUpdated May 12, 2015

Cardiovascular Disease Education and Problem-Solving Training in People With Type 2 Diabetes

An interventional study of Education + Problem-Solving Training Self-Study and Education + Group Problem-Solving Training in Type 2 Diabetes, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 25 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-12.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
382
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if patient education and problem-solving training, delivered in self-study, group, and individual intervention modalities, will produce substantial improvements in CVD risk profile via improved self management in urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes and a high CVD risk profile.

Read the detailed description

African Americans with type 2 diabetes suffer excess disease burden, but cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors such as hyperglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia are modifiable with medical management and lifestyle modification. Patient diabetes education and counseling for behavior change are recommended standards of practice to facilitate effective self-management of these risk factors. However, for patients with low literacy or health literacy, accessibility and impact of educational and behavioral interventions are limited. Pilot research suggests that: a) literacy demand and behavioral activation characteristics of patient education modules can be adapted to facilitate learning in urban patients with low literacy, and b) combining literacy-adapted education with problem-solving training facilitates understanding and use of health information for performing self-management in the context of daily life (functional health literacy). Optimal modalities for delivery of a combined patient diabetes education and problem-solving training, and cost-effectiveness of this intervention model, however, are not known. The proposed study will address these needs by testing effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of literacy-adapted diabetes and CVD education and problem-solving training interventions in urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes and high CVD risk profile (suboptimal blood sugar, blood pressure, and/or lipids). The specific aims of the study are: a) to complete development of a package of literacy-adapted diabetes and CVD patient education materials by developing two video/DVDs addressing self-management recommendations appropriate to the needs, resources, and environment of the population; b) to randomize urban African-American adults with type 2 diabetes and a high CVD risk profile into one of four study arms: Usual Care (Arm 1), Literacy-Adapted Education and Problem-Solving Training Self-Study (Arm 2), Literacy-Adapted Education and Group Problem-Solving Training (Arm 3), and Literacy-Adapted Education and Individual Problem-Solving Training (Arm 4); c) to conduct baseline, 3-month post-intervention, and 6-month post-intervention assessment visits to analyze and compare effectiveness of the literacy-adapted education and problem-solving interventions, as compared to Usual Care, in improving the skills of knowledge, problem-solving and health literacy, behaviors of patient activation and diabetes self-management, and clinical outcomes of A1C, blood pressure and lipids; and d) to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of each intervention arm as compared to Usual Care. If proven effective, this research will yield low literacy diabetes and CVD patient education and self-management intervention tools for dissemination to high-risk urban minority populations. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness analysis will provide evidence to support decision-making regarding implementation of the models to achieve cardiovascular disease patient self-management goals in clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

  • diabetes self management education
  • problem-solving training
  • health behavior change
  • health literacy
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

9,589 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,332 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 382 is above the median of 81 across 7,713 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,809 studies on the registry; 314 are open to participants now.

Of its 208 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 144 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 25 years or older

    • Type 2 diabetes determined by physician diagnosis or self-report of type 2 diabetes confirmed by medical documentation or medication review
    • Black/African American by self-report
    • currently receiving care and able to provide contact information for a treating physician
    • residing in Baltimore, Maryland.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mentally incompetent to give informed consent
  • Severe cognitive impairment on the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status
  • Unable to complete assessment (interview, tests, venipuncture)
  • Comorbid conditions likely to lead to death in the next 3-5 years (e.g. cancer, AIDS, end-stage renal disease, active tuberculosis, Alzheimer's disease)
  • Planning to relocate from Baltimore region during the time period of the study or other reasons rendering person unable to attend visits to participate in intervention and follow-up assessments
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
382 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care

    Packet of standard print patient education materials on CVD and diabetes from the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA).

    Behavioral: Usual Care

  • Experimental
    Self Study

    One 90-minute educational session. Print materials and DVDs for self-study

    Behavioral: Education + Problem-Solving Training Self-Study

  • Experimental
    Group Problem-Solving Training

    One 90-minute education session. Group problem-solving training (eight, 90-minute sessions)

    Behavioral: Education + Group Problem-Solving Training

  • Experimental
    Individual Problem-Solving Training

    One 90-minute education session. Individual problem-solving training (eight, 60-minute sessions)

    Behavioral: Education + Individual Problem-Solving Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralEducation + Problem-Solving Training Self-Study

    * Education + Problem-Solving Training Self-Study * One session of Literacy-Adapted Diabetes and CVD Risk Education * Instructions and a schedule for use of the Literacy-Adapted Problem-Solving Workbook for self-study will be given to each participant.

    Also known as: Self-Management Training Self-Study, Project DECIDE Self-Study

  • BehavioralEducation + Group Problem-Solving Training

    * Education + Group Problem-Solving Training * One session of the Literacy-Adapted Diabetes and CVD Risk Education * Group problem-solving training eight, 90-minute sessions

    Also known as: Group Self-Management Training, Project DECIDE Group Training

  • BehavioralEducation + Individual Problem-Solving Training

    * Education + Individual Problem-Solving Training * One session of the Literacy-Adapted Diabetes and CVD Risk Education * Individual problem-solving training (eight, 60-minute sessions)

    Also known as: Individual Self-Management Training, Project DECIDE Individual Training

  • BehavioralUsual Care

    * Packet of print patient education materials about CVD and diabetes from the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA)given at baseline following randomization to Arm 1 * Scripted set of instructions will be given along with a verbal description of the materials and the content provided.

    Also known as: Standard Print Education Materials, Project DECIDE Usual Care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. HbA1C

    Time frame: Screening, 3 months post intervention, 6 months post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Blood pressure

    Time frame: Screening, 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention

  2. Lipid Panel

    Time frame: Screening, 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention

  3. Body Mass Index

    Time frame: Screening, 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention

  4. Health Problem Solving Scale

    Time frame: Screening, 1 week post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention

  5. Diabetes and CVD Knowledge Test

    Time frame: Screening, 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention

  6. Patient Activation Measure

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention

  7. Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Scale

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention

  8. Barriers to Self-Management

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Johns Hopkins School of Medicine/General Clinical Research Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
  • Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center/General Clinical Research Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21224, United States
  • Johns Hopkins School of Medicine/General Internal Medicine
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hill-Briggs F, Gemmell L. Problem solving in diabetes self-management and control: a systematic review of the literature. Diabetes Educ. 2007 Nov-Dec;33(6):1032-50; discussion 1051-2. doi: 10.1177/0145721707308412. PubMed 18057272 ↗
  • Hill-Briggs F, Smith AS. Evaluation of diabetes and cardiovascular disease print patient education materials for use with low-health literate populations. Diabetes Care. 2008 Apr;31(4):667-71. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1365. Epub 2008 Jan 17. PubMed 18202245 ↗
  • Hill-Briggs F, Gemmell L, Kulkarni B, Klick B, Brancati FL. Associations of patient health-related problem solving with disease control, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations in HIV and diabetes clinic samples. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 May;22(5):649-54. doi: 10.1007/s11606-006-0091-2. PubMed 17443373 ↗
  • Hill-Briggs F. Problem solving in diabetes self-management: a model of chronic illness self-management behavior. Ann Behav Med. 2003 Summer;25(3):182-93. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2503_04. PubMed 12763713 ↗
  • Hill-Briggs F, Renosky R, Lazo M, Bone L, Hill M, Levine D, Brancati FL, Peyrot M. Development and pilot evaluation of literacy-adapted diabetes and CVD education in urban, diabetic African Americans. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Sep;23(9):1491-4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0679-9. Epub 2008 Jun 3. PubMed 18521688 ↗
  • Majid HM, Schumann KP, Doswell A, Sutherland J, Hill Golden S, Stewart KJ, Hill-Briggs F. Development and evaluation of the DECIDE to move! Physical activity educational video. Diabetes Educ. 2012 Nov-Dec;38(6):855-9. doi: 10.1177/0145721712462748. Epub 2012 Oct 4. PubMed 23042504 ↗
  • Hill-Briggs F, Schumann KP, Dike O. Five-step methodology for evaluation and adaptation of print patient health information to meet the < 5th grade readability criterion. Med Care. 2012 Apr;50(4):294-301. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318249d6c8. PubMed 22354210 ↗
  • Fitzpatrick SL, Schumann KP, Hill-Briggs F. Problem solving interventions for diabetes self-management and control: a systematic review of the literature. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 May;100(2):145-61. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.12.016. Epub 2013 Jan 9. PubMed 23312614 ↗
  • Fitzpatrick SL, Golden SH, Stewart K, Sutherland J, DeGross S, Brown T, Wang NY, Allen J, Cooper LA, Hill-Briggs F. Effect of DECIDE (Decision-making Education for Choices In Diabetes Everyday) Program Delivery Modalities on Clinical and Behavioral Outcomes in Urban African Americans With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care. 2016 Dec;39(12):2149-2157. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0941. PubMed 27879359 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00964587
Responsible party
Felicia Hill-Briggs (Assoc. Professor of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 25, 2009
Start date
Aug 2010
Primary completion
Feb 2014
Completion
Feb 2014
Last update
May 12, 2015

Study contacts

Felicia Hill-Briggs, PhD, ABPP
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion