CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00927576Updated Jul 31, 2015Results posted

PC-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

An observational study in Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 78 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-07-31.

Sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
265
Ages
18 Years to 78 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators evaluated whether it was possible to improve the measurement of memory, attention, and executive function in patients who have suffered traumatic brain injury through the use of computer-based testing.

Note: the original design of the study was altered due to failure to recruit sufficient numbers of patients who were willing to undergo prolonged cognitive training.

Read the detailed description

Here we describe a series of computer-based tests that were used to evaluate memory, attention, and executive function in large groups of control subjects and in patients with chronic mild and moderate/severe TBI. This extensive battery of neuropsychological tests (NPTs) and subjective rating scale measures were obtained at study entry from the TBI cohort. NPT and rating scale data were compared to those obtained from control subjects to characterize the cognitive deficits following mild, moderate and severe TBI. .

Normative data were obtained by regressing the influences of age, education, and computer use on scores to create normed z-scores on different NPTs,. We hypothesized that patient with TBI would show deficits on tests of memory, attention, and executive function relative to their predicted z-scores (based on the aforementioned regression functions) and that deficits would be more pronounced in patients with severe TBI than in patients with mild TBI.

02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • cognitive training
  • neuroplasticity
  • cognitive impairment
  • recovery of function
  • memory
  • attention
03

In context

Brain Injuries

2,113 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 385 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 265 is above the median of 100 across 690 observational studies indexed under Brain Injuries.

Browse Brain Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

US Department of Veterans Affairs is the lead sponsor of 658 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 78 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Controls subjects of various ages (approximately 230), and TBI patients (approximately 30).

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Control subjects were required to meet the following inclusion criteria:

  • (a) fluency in the English language
  • (b) no current or prior history of bipolar disorder, mania, or schizophrenia
  • (c) no current substance abuse
  • (d) no concurrent history of neurologic disease known to affect cognitive functioning
  • (e) on a stable dosage of any required medication
  • (f) auditory functioning sufficient to understanding normal conversational speech and visual acuity normal or corrected to 20/40 or better

Exclusion criteria:

  • History of TBI

Exclusion Criteria for TBI patients:

  • TBI patients had to meet the same inclusion criteria as the controls with the exception that they were required to have a history of TBI. They also had to be in the chronic phase, i.e., 1-4 yrs post-injury.
  • Exclusion criteria:

    • current substance abuse
    • current psychiatric diagnosis other than PTSD
05

Study design

Observational model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
265 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Control subjects

    Control subjects = 237. These subjects underwent extensive testing with computerized neuropsychological tests including digit span testing, spatial span testing, simple reaction time testing, choice reaction time testing, finger tapping, verbal fluency, design fluency, verbal list learning, questionnaire completion, and the trail making test.

    Behavioral: Digit span testing · Behavioral: Spatial span testing · Behavioral: Finger tapping · Behavioral: Simple reaction time · Behavioral: Choice reaction time · Behavioral: Verbal fluency · Behavioral: Verbal list learning · Behavioral: Trail making test · Behavioral: Design fluency · Behavioral: Questionnaire completion

  • TBI patients

    TBI patients N = 28. These patients underwent extensive testing with computerized neuropsychological tests including digit span testing, spatial span testing, simple reaction time testing, choice reaction time testing, finger tapping, verbal fluency, design fluency, verbal list learning, questionnaire completion, and the trail making test.

    Behavioral: Digit span testing · Behavioral: Spatial span testing · Behavioral: Finger tapping · Behavioral: Simple reaction time · Behavioral: Choice reaction time · Behavioral: Verbal fluency · Behavioral: Verbal list learning · Behavioral: Trail making test · Behavioral: Design fluency · Behavioral: Questionnaire completion

Interventions

  • BehavioralDigit span testing

    Testing of short-term verbal memory with digit span

  • BehavioralSpatial span testing

    Testing of short-term visuospatial memory with spatial span.

  • BehavioralFinger tapping

    Testing motor speed with a finger tapping test.

  • BehavioralSimple reaction time

    Testing the time to respond to the appearance of a visual stimulus.

  • BehavioralChoice reaction time

    Testing the time needed to discriminate and respond to different visual stimuli.

  • BehavioralVerbal fluency

    Evaluating how many words are produced in 90s.

  • BehavioralVerbal list learning

    Evaluating short-term memory, learning, and memory interference in the recall of 12-word lists, presented three times. Evaluating long-term memory and recognition after a 20 min interval.

  • BehavioralTrail making test

    Evaluating visuomotor speed and executive function in Trail Making Tests, A and B. In the first, subjects connect successive numbers with the mouse. In the second, they connect numbers and letters in alternation.

  • BehavioralDesign fluency

    Subjects create the maximal number of 4-line patterns in 90 s.

  • BehavioralQuestionnaire completion

    Question completion time is measured on each question of the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder check list (PCL) and on the cognitive failures questionnaire.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Performance in TBI Patients and Controls

    Subjects were assessed on a set of cognitive tests. Here we describe the results on the simple reaction time test in which subjects respond as rapidly as possible to the computer-controlled occurrence of a visual stimulus by pressing a mouse button. Two control groups were used. One large control group underwent a single test to provide data from subjects with a broad range of age and education. The other, smaller, control group underwent three tests at weekly intervals to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the measure.

    Time frame: Subjects were tested in a single 2-hr session.

07

Results

Posted Jul 31, 2015
Limitations and caveats
Relatively small TBI group limits strength of conclusions. Not all of the results have yet been fully analyzed and subjected to peer-review.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControl SubjectsTBI Patients
Started23728
Cognitive testing23728
Completed23728
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPerformance in TBI Patients and Controls

Subjects were assessed on a set of cognitive tests. Here we describe the results on the simple reaction time test in which subjects respond as rapidly as possible to the computer-controlled occurrence of a visual stimulus by pressing a mouse button. Two control groups were used. One large control group underwent a single test to provide data from subjects with a broad range of age and education. The other, smaller, control group underwent three tests at weekly intervals to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the measure.

Time frame:
Subjects were tested in a single 2-hr session.
Reported as:
Mean · ms
Performance in TBI Patients and Controls
msSimple Reaction Time Test
Control group 1, n=189237.8 ± 27.8
Control group 2, n =48231.5 ± 17.72
Mild TBI, n =22228.0 ± 34.6
Severe TBI, n =4280.0 ± 42.4
Statistical analysis
  • Simple Reaction Time Test · ANOVA · p = < 0.001 · Difference in z-score, stbi vs. controls: 2.04for repeated measures with effect sizes (omega squared).
  • Simple Reaction Time Test · ANOVA · p = .50 (The P-value reflects the likelihood of detection a difference of the magnitude observed.) · Z-score difference between groups: -0.30

Adverse events

Collected over Entire study duration (4 years).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control Subjects—0/237 (0%)0/237 (0%)
TBI Patients—0/28 (0%)0/28 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Control SubjectsTBI PatientsTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years22228250
>=65 years15015
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Control SubjectsTBI PatientsTotal
Mean41.0 ± 21.342.4 ± 10.341.8 ± 14.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Control SubjectsTBI PatientsTotal
Female1071108
Male13027157
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Control SubjectsTBI PatientsTotal
United States23728265
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Atkins Whitmer D, Woods DL. Analysis of the cost effectiveness of a suicide barrier on the Golden Gate Bridge. Crisis. 2013;34(2):98-106. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000179. PubMed 23261913 ↗
  • Disbrow EA, Russo KA, Higginson CI, Yund EW, Ventura MI, Zhang L, Malhado-Chang N, Woods DL, Sigvardt KA. Efficacy of tailored computer-based neurorehabilitation for improvement of movement initiation in Parkinson's disease. Brain Res. 2012 May 3;1452:151-64. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.073. Epub 2012 Mar 9. PubMed 22459048 ↗
  • Whitaker KJ, Kang X, Herron TJ, Woods DL, Robertson LC, Alvarez BD. White matter microstructure throughout the brain correlates with visual imagery in grapheme-color synesthesia. Neuroimage. 2014 Apr 15;90:52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.054. Epub 2014 Jan 7. PubMed 24406309 ↗
  • Woods DL, Herron TJ, Yund EW, Hink RF, Kishiyama MM, Reed B. Computerized analysis of error patterns in digit span recall. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Aug;33(7):721-34. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2010.550602. PubMed 21957866 ↗
  • Hubel KA, Reed B, Yund EW, Herron TJ, Woods DL. Computerized measures of finger tapping: effects of hand dominance, age, and sex. Percept Mot Skills. 2013 Jun;116(3):929-52. doi: 10.2466/25.29.PMS.116.3.929-952. PubMed 24175464 ↗
  • Hubel KA, Yund EW, Herron TJ, Woods DL. Computerized measures of finger tapping: reliability, malingering and traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013;35(7):745-58. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2013.824070. Epub 2013 Aug 15. PubMed 23947782 ↗
  • Woods DL, Kishiyamaa MM, Lund EW, Herron TJ, Edwards B, Poliva O, Hink RF, Reed B. Improving digit span assessment of short-term verbal memory. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Jan;33(1):101-11. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2010.493149. PubMed 20680884 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 31, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00927576
Lead sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 25, 2009
Start date
Jul 2009
Primary completion
Mar 2013
Completion
Mar 2013
Results posted
Jul 31, 2015
Last update
Jul 31, 2015

Study contacts

David L. Woods, PhD
principal investigator · VA Northern California HCS

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion