CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00916721SCPUpdated Sep 19, 2014Results posted

Memory Reconsolidation Blockade as a Novel Intervention for Nicotine Dependence

A Phase 3 interventional study of Propranolol and Placebo in Smoking Cessation, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-09-19.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
113
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Smoking is the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality in the US. While approximately 70% of smokers attempt to quit each year, only 5-15% maintain abstinence for 12 months, even with effective pharmacological and psychological interventions. Novel therapies are needed for smoking cessation and relapse prevention. Previous studies show that early post-cessation craving or urge to smoke is a powerful predictor of relapse. A current model of the pathogenesis of addiction maintains that a substance of abuse causes a marked increase release in phasic dopamine release, which in turn strengthens or increases the salience of the memory of the drug experience, leading to a powerful and persistent memory that is easily activated, leading to drug craving and often to drug use. This highly salient memory is also implicated in the physiological arousal associated with craving responses to smoking cues. This process is thought to be implicated in relapse to drug use after even long periods of abstinence. Recent animal research indicates that retrieval returns a consolidated memory such as those associated with drug craving, to a labile state from which it must be restabilized to persist in a process termed reconsolidation. If memories of drug-related experiences are labile when reactivated, this could represent a window of opportunity in which the memory of drug use that underlies drug craving can be influenced pharmacologically. Our hypothesis is that post-reactivation administration of the B-adrenergic blocker, propranolol, following retrieval of drug-associated memories will reduce the strength or salience of the memory by influencing reconsolidation, a process called memory reconsolidation blockade. In this study we will test the hypothesis that a single dose of propranolol given one hour prior to smoking-related cue exposure (post-reactivation treatment) will decrease psychophysiological responses to smoking cues one week later and will predict clinical response to an ensuing series of 6 post-reactivation treatments with script-driven imagery and propranolol. In order to do so, we propose to conduct a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of post-reactivation treatment with propranolol in 50 adult smokers. Outcome measures will include in physiological responses to smoking-related cues after one and six post-reactivation treatments and smoking behavior during the treatment and during a 3-month follow-up period.

Read the detailed description

SPECIFIC AIMS

  1. To evaluate, in current smokers, the efficacy of a single dose of study medication given an hour prior to smoking-related cue exposure (post-reactivation treatment) on psychophysiological response to smoking cues one week later.
  2. To evaluate, during the smoking cessation process, the clinical effect of study medication in an ensuing series of 6 post-reactivation treatments on psychophysiologic response to smoking cues measured one week after the last post-reactivation treatment.
  3. To evaluate whether medication effect on psychophysiologic response during a single memory reactivation session with script-driven imagery will predict clinical response to an ensuing series of 6 post-reactivation treatments with script-driven imagery and study medication.
  4. . To assess whether a single post-reactivation treatment or series of six post-reactivation treatments is associated with reduction in self-reported craving for cigarettes as assessed with the Tiffany QSU.
  5. To assess whether a series of six post-reactivation treatments is associated with reduction in smoking as assessed with self-report of cigarettes smoked per day and expired air Carbon monoxide.

To achieve these aims, we will conduct a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in a convenience sample of 50 smokers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Smoking Cessation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Smoking cessation
  • propranolol
  • memory reconsolidation blockade
  • craving
03

In context

Tobacco Use Disorder

968 studies on the registry are indexed under Tobacco Use Disorder; 126 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 113 is above the median of 89 across 851 interventional studies indexed under Tobacco Use Disorder.

Browse Tobacco Use Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,536 studies on the registry; 446 are open to participants now.

Of its 214 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 161 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy smokers aged 18-65 who have smoked at least 10 cigarettes/day for the past 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion:

  • Age \<18 or >65
  • Systolic blood pressure \<100 mm Hg;
  • Medical condition that contraindicates the administration of propranolol, e.g., history of congestive heart failure, heart block, insulin-dependent diabetes, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or asthma. With regard to asthma, because many persons who say they have had an asthma attack, especially as a child, may only have had hay fever, another allergy, or another non-asthmatic episode, a blanket exclusion criterion may be overly restrictive. Therefore, asthma attacks will only be exclusionary if they a.) occurred within the past ten years, b.) occurred at any time in life if induced by a B-blocker, or c.) are currently being treated, regardless of the date of last occurrence. Cardiological consultation will be obtained as necessary;
  • Previous adverse reaction to, or non-compliance with, a B-blocker;
  • Current use of medication that may involve potentially dangerous interactions with propranolol, including, other B-blockers, antiarrhythmics, or calcium channel blockers.
  • Use of drugs of abuse other than nicotine or caffeine, such as opiates, marijuana, cocaine, or amphetamines, as determined by saliva or urine testing;
  • Pregnancy (in women of child-bearing potential, a pregnancy test will be performed) or breast-feeding;
  • Current PTSD, or psychotic, melancholic, or bipolar disorder
  • Diagnosis of major depressive disorder in the past 6 months or HAM-D score >15 at screening
  • Current participation in any additional nicotine dependence treatment.
  • An urgent need to stop smoking: subjects who receive placebo may not achieve optimal smoking cessation results.
  • Inability to understand the study's procedures, risks, and side effects, or to otherwise give informed consent for participation;
  • Subject candidate does not understand English
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
113 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Propranolol

    propranolol

    Drug: Propranolol

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    sugar pill

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugPropranolol

    Visit 2 (first smoking-related memory reactivation session) the subject will be given 0.67 mg/kg (minimum 40 mg; maximum 80 mg) of short-acting propranolol (or placebo) rounded to the nearest 10 mg. Ninety minutes after this dose, if subject has tolerated the short-acting dose well, and if systolic blood pressure has not fallen by 10 mmHg or more to below 100 mmHg, the subject will be given oral long-acting propranolol 1 mg/kg (minimum 60 mg; maximum 120 mg) or placebo rounded to the nearest 20 mg. . If the subject tolerates the combination dose well, during treatment phase (from visit 7 to 12), both the short- and long-acting doses will be given together immediately prior to memory reactivation.

    Also known as: Inderal

  • DrugPlacebo

    Visit 2 (first smoking-related memory reactivation session) the subject will be given 0.67 mg/kg (minimum 40 mg; maximum 80 mg) of short-acting propranolol (or placebo) rounded to the nearest 10 mg. Ninety minutes after this dose, if subject has tolerated the short-acting dose well, and if systolic blood pressure has not fallen by 10 mmHg or more to below 100 mmHg, the subject will be given oral long-acting propranolol 1 mg/kg (minimum 60 mg; maximum 120 mg) or placebo rounded to the nearest 20 mg. . If the subject tolerates the combination dose well, during treatment phase (from visit 7 to 12), both the short- and long-acting doses will be given together immediately prior to memory reactivation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the Skin Conductance Level, Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery

    Skin conductance level was obtained through 9-mm (sensor diameter) Ag/AgCl electrodes filled with isotonic paste placed on the non-dominant hypothenar surface using a constant-voltage technique. A Coulbourn Modular Instrument System was used to measure SC during 4 periods; baseline, reading, imagery and recovery.

    Time frame: skin conductance was measured at visit 3, after presentation of two neutral and two smoking scripts

  2. Change in Heart Rate (Beats Per Minute), Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery

    Heart rate was measured through 9-mm (sensor diameter) Ag/AgCl electrodes filled with electrolytic paste and placed on the medial surface of each forearm. Amplified electrocardiogram signal will input to a tachometer that will provide a voltage output reflecting interbeat interval, which will be transformed to HR. A Coulbourn Modular Instrument System was used to measure HR during 4 periods; baseline, reading, imagery and recovery

    Time frame: Heart rate was measured at visit 3, after presentation of two neutral and two smoking scripts

  3. Change in the Corrugator Muscle (EMG) Level, Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery

    Corrugator EMG will be obtained through Ag/AgCl electrodes. The amplified EMG signal will be integrated using a 300-msec. time constant. A Coulbourn Modular Instrument System was used to measure corrugator EMG during 4 periods; baseline, reading, imagery and recovery

    Time frame: Corrugator EMG level was measured at visit 3, after presentation of two neutral and two smoking scripts

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Craving Level to Smoking Cues Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery

    Craving level will be measured using a 8 point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of craving. Participants will be ask "How much do you want a cigarette right now" Participants will answer accordingly: 0=no desire at all; 7=unable to resist craving

    Time frame: Craving level was measured at visit 3, after presentation of two neutral and two smoking scripts

07

Results

Posted Sep 19, 2014
Limitations and caveats
Subjects were asked to not smoke for 12 hrs prior propranolol.Then were permitted to smoke throughout the week prior physiologic testing.Possibly each smoking experience presented a potential opportunity for the creation of new smoking memories.

Participant flow

Treatment seeking adults smokers were enrolled from May 2008 to March 2010 at the Center for Addiction Medicine of the Massachusetts General Hospital, in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidelines, and the International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practices Guidelines.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePropranololPlacebo
Started3539
Completed2529
Not completed1010
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Withdrew: Adverse event63
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject22
Withdrew: Protocol violation24

Outcome measures

SecondaryChange in Craving Level to Smoking Cues Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery

Craving level will be measured using a 8 point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of craving. Participants will be ask "How much do you want a cigarette right now" Participants will answer accordingly: 0=no desire at all; 7=unable to resist craving

Time frame:
Craving level was measured at visit 3, after presentation of two neutral and two smoking scripts
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Craving Level to Smoking Cues Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery
units on a scalePropranololPlacebo
Change in Craving Level to Smoking Cues Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery5.52 ± 1.14.3 ± 2.1
PrimaryChange in the Skin Conductance Level, Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery

Skin conductance level was obtained through 9-mm (sensor diameter) Ag/AgCl electrodes filled with isotonic paste placed on the non-dominant hypothenar surface using a constant-voltage technique. A Coulbourn Modular Instrument System was used to measure SC during 4 periods; baseline, reading, imagery and recovery.

Time frame:
skin conductance was measured at visit 3, after presentation of two neutral and two smoking scripts
Reported as:
Mean · µS
Change in the Skin Conductance Level, Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery
µSPropranololPlacebo
Change in the Skin Conductance Level, Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery0.107 ± 0.728-0.040 ± 0.337
Statistical analysis
  • Propranolol vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.05Multiple significance testing:we adjusted p-value by controlling the expected proportion of falsely rejected hypotheses:false discovery rate,Benjamini
PrimaryChange in Heart Rate (Beats Per Minute), Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery

Heart rate was measured through 9-mm (sensor diameter) Ag/AgCl electrodes filled with electrolytic paste and placed on the medial surface of each forearm. Amplified electrocardiogram signal will input to a tachometer that will provide a voltage output reflecting interbeat interval, which will be transformed to HR. A Coulbourn Modular Instrument System was used to measure HR during 4 periods; baseline, reading, imagery and recovery

Time frame:
Heart rate was measured at visit 3, after presentation of two neutral and two smoking scripts
Reported as:
Mean · beats per minute
Change in Heart Rate (Beats Per Minute), Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery
beats per minutePropranololPlacebo
Change in Heart Rate (Beats Per Minute), Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery0.877 ± 2.2851.162 ± 2.064
PrimaryChange in the Corrugator Muscle (EMG) Level, Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery

Corrugator EMG will be obtained through Ag/AgCl electrodes. The amplified EMG signal will be integrated using a 300-msec. time constant. A Coulbourn Modular Instrument System was used to measure corrugator EMG during 4 periods; baseline, reading, imagery and recovery

Time frame:
Corrugator EMG level was measured at visit 3, after presentation of two neutral and two smoking scripts
Reported as:
Mean · µV
Change in the Corrugator Muscle (EMG) Level, Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery
µVPropranololPlacebo
Change in the Corrugator Muscle (EMG) Level, Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery0.479 ± 1.3091.464 ± 3.394

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Propranolol—1/35 (2.9%)6/35 (17.1%)
Placebo—0/39 (0%)0/39 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPropranololPlacebo
major depressive episode and worsen anxietyPsychiatric disorders1/350/39
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPropranololPlacebo
bradycardiaVascular disorders6/350/39

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)PropranololPlaceboTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years353974
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PropranololPlaceboTotal
Mean41.6 ± 10.942.5 ± 9.8442.1 ± 10.23
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PropranololPlaceboTotal
Female81220
Male272754
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)PropranololPlaceboTotal
United States353974
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital - Center For Addiction Medicine
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lee JL, Everitt BJ, Thomas KL. Independent cellular processes for hippocampal memory consolidation and reconsolidation. Science. 2004 May 7;304(5672):839-43. doi: 10.1126/science.1095760. Epub 2004 Apr 8. PubMed 15073322 ↗
  • Alberini CM. Mechanisms of memory stabilization: are consolidation and reconsolidation similar or distinct processes? Trends Neurosci. 2005 Jan;28(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.11.001. PubMed 15626497 ↗
  • Suzuki A, Josselyn SA, Frankland PW, Masushige S, Silva AJ, Kida S. Memory reconsolidation and extinction have distinct temporal and biochemical signatures. J Neurosci. 2004 May 19;24(20):4787-95. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5491-03.2004. PubMed 15152039 ↗
  • McGaugh JL. The amygdala modulates the consolidation of memories of emotionally arousing experiences. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:1-28. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144157. PubMed 15217324 ↗
  • Pitman RK, Sanders KM, Zusman RM, Healy AR, Cheema F, Lasko NB, Cahill L, Orr SP. Pilot study of secondary prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder with propranolol. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Jan 15;51(2):189-92. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01279-3. PubMed 11822998 ↗
  • Vaiva G, Ducrocq F, Jezequel K, Averland B, Lestavel P, Brunet A, Marmar CR. Immediate treatment with propranolol decreases posttraumatic stress disorder two months after trauma. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Nov 1;54(9):947-9. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00412-8. Erratum In: Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Dec 15;54(12):1471. PubMed 14573324 ↗
  • Przybyslawski J, Roullet P, Sara SJ. Attenuation of emotional and nonemotional memories after their reactivation: role of beta adrenergic receptors. J Neurosci. 1999 Aug 1;19(15):6623-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-15-06623.1999. PubMed 10414990 ↗
  • Debiec J, Ledoux JE. Disruption of reconsolidation but not consolidation of auditory fear conditioning by noradrenergic blockade in the amygdala. Neuroscience. 2004;129(2):267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.08.018. PubMed 15501585 ↗
  • Orr SP, Metzger LJ, Pitman RK. Psychophysiology of post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2002 Jun;25(2):271-93. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(01)00007-7. PubMed 12136501 ↗
  • Diergaarde L, Schoffelmeer AN, De Vries TJ. Beta-adrenoceptor mediated inhibition of long-term reward-related memory reconsolidation. Behav Brain Res. 2006 Jun 30;170(2):333-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.02.014. Epub 2006 Apr 5. PubMed 16600394 ↗
  • Bernardi RE, Lattal KM, Berger SP. Postretrieval propranolol disrupts a cocaine conditioned place preference. Neuroreport. 2006 Sep 18;17(13):1443-7. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000233098.20655.26. PubMed 16932155 ↗
  • Robinson MJ, Franklin KB. Central but not peripheral beta-adrenergic antagonism blocks reconsolidation for a morphine place preference. Behav Brain Res. 2007 Aug 22;182(1):129-34. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.05.023. Epub 2007 May 24. PubMed 17604134 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00916721
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Responsible party
A. Eden Evins (Director Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 9, 2009
Start date
Apr 2008
Primary completion
Jul 2010
Completion
Jan 2011
Results posted
Sep 19, 2014
Last update
Sep 19, 2014

Study contacts

A. Eden Evins, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion