CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00906672INTEGRA®Updated May 14, 2026

Medico Economic Evaluation of Dermal Substitute Integra® for Coverage of Inferior Limb Traumatic Skin Loss

A Phase 3 interventional study of INTEGRA® and Flap technique in Leg Injuries, Ankle Injuries and Foot Injuries, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Completed at 7 sites in France. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-14.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
15 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Comparison of 2 techniques of surgery on patients with inferior limb traumatic wounds: the innovative technique Integra® and the technique of reference: the flap surgery.

Read the detailed description

Traumatic skin loss with bone or tendon exposure essentially affects inferior limbs. There are considered serious as they often lead to functional and esthetical consequences, and they generally affect young people.

Flap surgery is the treatment of reference for these skin losses. This technique requires expensive material and a lot of medical staff. The intervention and duration of hospitalisation are often long with heavy medication. Post surgery complications or disabling sequelea involve surgical re-interventions which increase duration of hospital stay and medical staff availability.

The dermal substitute Integra® (Integra LifeSciences Corporation) is an advanced wound care device comprised of a porous matrix of cross-linked bovine tendon collagen and glycosaminoglycan and a semi-permeable polysiloxane (silicone layer). This medical device allows formation of a neoderm. The silicon layer is a temporary layer which is removed when the neoderm is totally built. This surgery is fast, non-invasive, with short hospital stay and limited complications which can be treated easily.

Objective of the study: to assess medico-economic interest of innovative surgery using dermal substitute Integra® compared to the reference using flap surgery in the treatment of traumatic skin loss of inferior limbs. Assessment will be based on re-interventions incidence, long-term functional and esthetical scar results and total cost of each technique.

Study design: multicenter, randomized, open label, parallel design, clinical trial in 12 French plastic surgery / burn care centres.

Planned number of enrolled patients: 120 (80 patients receiving Integra® and 40 patients receiving the flap surgery). Patients will be randomized in 1 of the 2 groups, with an imbalance in favour of the innovative technique.

Duration of enrollment: 24 months Duration of patient follow up: 18 months

02

Conditions studied

  • Leg Injuries
  • Ankle Injuries
  • Foot Injuries

Keywords

  • Dermal substitute Integra®
  • Flap
  • graft
  • traumatic wound
  • medico economic costs
  • esthetical and functional scar results
03

In context

Leg Injuries

58 studies on the registry are indexed under Leg Injuries; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 72 is above the median of 50 across 40 interventional studies indexed under Leg Injuries.

Browse Leg Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 783 studies on the registry; 188 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • patient with skin loss traumatic or chronic wound
  • wound located from mid third of the leg to distal extremity of feet
  • with muscle and/or tendon and/or bone and/or articulation exposure
  • requiring a first surgical intervention for the coverage of the skin loss
  • patient eligible to the Integra® surgery techniques
  • patient with social security affiliation
  • written informed consent signed by the patient or representative

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bone fracture located in the skin loss
  • Non traumatic wound
  • Wound with muscle exposure only
  • Immunocompromised patient
  • Allergy to bovine collagen, glycosaminoglycans or silicon
  • patient with an healthstate that compromise the 18 months Follow-up
  • pregnant women / who intend to become pregnant within the 18 months of follow-up
  • Patient under administrative or legal supervision
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    INTEGRA®

    Device: INTEGRA®

  • Active comparator
    Flap technique

    Procedure: Flap technique

Interventions

  • DeviceINTEGRA®

    A plaque of dermal substitute Integra® is adjusted to the size of the wound and sutured. A negative pressure bandage is placed on the wound. 7 to 11 days post surgery, the Integra® silicone layer is removed and the neoderm is covered with a skin graft.

  • ProcedureFlap technique

    A flap is a part of skin, cutaneous tissue or muscle that is taken from an healthy area of the body and put on the damaged area for coverage.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of at least one complication requiring a surgical re-intervention

    Time frame: Within the first 18 months after surgery

  2. Persistence of an important / major trouble of the scar measured by a "scar-trouble scale" filled in by the patient.

    Time frame: at 18 month-follow up

  3. Auto-evaluation of patient's scar esthetical result with a visual analog scale.

    Time frame: at 18 month-follow up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of all post surgical complications

    Time frame: Within the first 18 months after surgery

  2. Duration of hospitalization and healing

    Time frame: Within the first 18 months after surgery

  3. Period until return to work and re-start of daily activities

    Time frame: Within the first 18 months after surgery

  4. Ïntensity of scar pain during cares evaluated with a visual analog scale and quality of life (EuroQol)

    Time frame: Within the first 18 months after surgery

  5. Human and medical requirements

    Time frame: Within the first 18 months after surgery

07

Study locations

7 sites
  • University Hospital
    Besançon, 25030, France
  • Universiy Hospital Bordeaux,
    Bordeaux, France
  • University Hospital
    Clermont-Ferrand, 53003, France
  • University Hospital
    Grenoble, 38043, France
  • University Hospital
    Montpellier, 34295, France
  • Saint Roch Hospital
    Nice, 06003, France
  • University Hospital
    Pointe à Pitre, 97159, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Leclere FM, Desnouveaux E, Choughri H, Casoli V. Acellular dermal matrix: New applications for free flap pedicle coverage - A prospective study in 10 patients. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2018 Aug;20(4):200-204. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2016.1248439. Epub 2018 Apr 18. PubMed 27779431 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00906672
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 21, 2009
Start date
Jun 2009
Primary completion
Jan 2014
Completion
Jan 2014
Last update
May 14, 2026

Study contacts

Geneviève CHENE, MD-PHD
study chair · USMR (University Hospital, Bordeaux)
Vincent CASOLI, MD-MHD
study director · University Hospital, Bordeaux

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion