CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00879255CPTVTELUpdated May 12, 2015Results posted

Telemental Health and Cognitive Processing Therapy for Rural Combat Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

A Phase 3 interventional study of Cognitive Processing Therapy Group Videoteleconference and Cognitive Processing Therapy Group In-Person in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-12.

Sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
125
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The immediate objective of this project was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a telemental health modality (video-teleconferencing) for providing an evidence-based group intervention (Cognitive Processing Therapy; CPT) to rural OIF/OEF Reservists, National Guardsmen, and veterans suffering with PTSD.

Read the detailed description

The project was a 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial which conducted a direct comparison of the VTC and in-person modalities using rigorous methodology and a sophisticated analysis of equivalency between clinical and process outcome domains. In addition, cost effectiveness of this modality will be addressed. Approximately 130 combat Reservists, National Guardsmen, or veterans were recruited from multiple clinical sites. Prospective participants received a comprehensive assessment at baseline to determine eligibility. The exclusion criteria selected are consistent with large PTSD randomized clinical trials as well as research using the CPT protocol with military populations with PTSD. The treatment was delivered twice a week over 6 weeks by a doctoral level psychologist. Quality control procedures were incorporated into the study's design to ensure integrity, fidelity and standard administration of the CPT intervention across both conditions. Participants received additional assessments at mid-treatment, immediately post-treatment, and at 3 and 6 months post-treatment. Outcome domains include: 1) clinical outcomes (symptom severity, social functioning); 2) process outcomes (perception of treatment, satisfaction, group therapy alliance, treatment compliance, and attrition and treatment credibility); and (3) cost-effectiveness outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Keywords

  • cognitive processing therapy
  • combat
  • veterans
  • PTSD
  • Telemental Health
  • Videoteleconference
  • outcome
  • Rural
  • Remote
  • CPT
  • VTC
03

In context

Stress Disorders, Traumatic

1,147 studies on the registry are indexed under Stress Disorders, Traumatic; 108 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 125 is above the median of 60 across 908 interventional studies indexed under Stress Disorders, Traumatic.

Browse Stress Disorders, Traumatic studies →

Lead sponsor

US Department of Veterans Affairs is the lead sponsor of 658 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosis of current combat related PTSD determined by the Clinician Administered PSTD Scale (CAPS-IV)
  • participants taking psychoactive medications have to have a stable regimen for at least 45 days prior to study entry

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • active psychotic symptoms/disorder as determined by the SCID for DSM-IV
  • active homicidal or suicidal ideation as determined by the structured clinical interview
  • any significant cognitive impairment or history of Organic Mental Disorder as determined by the structured clinical interview
  • active (current) substance dependence as determined by the SCID (lifetime substance dependence/abuse not excluded)
  • unwillingness to refrain from substance abuse during treatment
  • female veterans
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
125 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Videoteleconferencing CPT

    The experimental arm is the group condition that received the CPT treatment via videoteleconferencing modality as compared to the experimental condition which is via face-to-face traditional modality. Cognitive Processing Therapy Group Videoteleconference is delivered to male combat veterans who have been diagnosed with PTSD, through videoteleconference.

    Behavioral: Cognitive Processing Therapy Group Videoteleconference

  • Active comparator
    Face-to-Face CPT

    The control arm is the group condition that received the CPT treatment via face-to-face traditional modality as compared to the experimental condition which is via videoteleconferencing modality. Cognitive Processing Therapy Group In-Person is delivered to male combat veterans who have been diagnosed with PTSD, in-person, rather than through videoteleconference.

    Behavioral: Cognitive Processing Therapy Group In-Person

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive Processing Therapy Group Videoteleconference

    Cognitive Processing Group Therapy is delivered to male combat veterans who have been diagnosed with PTSD, through videoteleconference.

    Also known as: CPT-VT

  • BehavioralCognitive Processing Therapy Group In-Person

    Cognitive Processing Group Therapy is delivered to male combat veterans who have been diagnosed with PTSD, in-person, rather than through videoteleconference.

    Also known as: CPT-NP

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, for DSM-IV (CAPS IV)

    The CAPS is a 30-item interview measure that assesses the frequency and intensity of PTSD symptoms during the past month and the impact these symptoms have had on social and occupational functioning. The CAPS also provides a global scale score of PTSD severity (range 0 - 136) with higher scores indicating worse symptoms, which was used as the primary outcome measure. Scores reported here are differences between individuals follow up scores (e.g. post-treatment CAPS score assessed at two-weeks following end of treatment) minus their baseline CAPS scores, such that negative numbers represent reductions in CAPS scores (or improvement) over time.

    Time frame: Post-treatment (two-weeks following end of treatment)

  2. Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, for DSM-IV (CAPS IV)

    The CAPS is a 30-item interview measure that assesses the frequency and intensity of PTSD symptoms during the past month and the impact these symptoms have had on social and occupational functioning. The CAPS also provides a global scale score of PTSD severity (range 0 - 136) with higher scores indicating worse symptoms, which was used as the primary outcome measure. Scores reported here are differences between individuals follow up scores (e.g. 3-month post-treatment) minus their baseline CAPS scores, such that negative numbers represent reductions in CAPS scores (or improvement) over time.

    Time frame: 3-month Post-treatment

  3. Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, for DSM-IV (CAPS IV)

    The CAPS is a 30-item interview measure that assesses the frequency and intensity of PTSD symptoms during the past month and the impact these symptoms have had on social and occupational functioning. The CAPS also provides a global scale score of PTSD severity (range 0 - 136) with higher scores indicating worse symptoms, which was used as the primary outcome measure. Scores reported here are differences between individuals follow up scores (e.g. 6-month post-treatment) minus their baseline CAPS scores, such that negative numbers represent reductions in CAPS scores (or improve) over time.

    Time frame: 6 months post-treatment

07

Results

Posted Mar 2, 2015
Limitations and caveats
For patients in rural areas, their local mental health facilities may not have access to videoteleconferencing technology.There were no women veterans as study participants. Participants with acute safety concerns or current substances were excluded.

Participant flow

This study included 13 group cohorts plus 1 pilot group cohort. Not counting the cohort 1 pilot, approximately 246 combat Reservists, National Guardsmen, or Veterans from multiple VA Pacific Island Health Care System clinical sites were assessed for eligibility, and 125 were subsequently randomized into treatment groups.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneVideoteleconferencing CPTFace-to-Face CPT
Started6164
Received allocated intervention:5156
Completed posttreatment follow-up5055
Completed 3-mo follow-up4849
Completed4545
Not completed1619

Outcome measures

PrimaryClinician Administered PTSD Scale, for DSM-IV (CAPS IV)

The CAPS is a 30-item interview measure that assesses the frequency and intensity of PTSD symptoms during the past month and the impact these symptoms have had on social and occupational functioning. The CAPS also provides a global scale score of PTSD severity (range 0 - 136) with higher scores indicating worse symptoms, which was used as the primary outcome measure. Scores reported here are differences between individuals follow up scores (e.g. post-treatment CAPS score assessed at two-weeks following end of treatment) minus their baseline CAPS scores, such that negative numbers represent reductions in CAPS scores (or improvement) over time.

Time frame:
Post-treatment (two-weeks following end of treatment)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, for DSM-IV (CAPS IV)
units on a scaleVideoteleconferencing CPTFace-to-Face CPT
Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, for DSM-IV (CAPS IV)-15.97 ± 3.21-11.22 ± 2.89
Statistical analysis
  • Videoteleconferencing CPT vs Face-to-Face CPT · noninferiority analysis · p = > .05 (The noninferiority margin is the maximum clinically meaningful amount by which VTC can be "worse than" the in-person delivery to allow for a conclusion of noninferiority (a priori set to 10 CAPS points).) · Mean difference (final values): -4.75 · 95% CI -11.92 to 2.42The noninferiority hypothesis would be supported if the 95% Confidence Interval of the difference in CAPS scores between the 2 conditions (VTC minus in-person scores) is less than the present noninferiority margin (10 CAPS points).
PrimaryClinician Administered PTSD Scale, for DSM-IV (CAPS IV)

The CAPS is a 30-item interview measure that assesses the frequency and intensity of PTSD symptoms during the past month and the impact these symptoms have had on social and occupational functioning. The CAPS also provides a global scale score of PTSD severity (range 0 - 136) with higher scores indicating worse symptoms, which was used as the primary outcome measure. Scores reported here are differences between individuals follow up scores (e.g. 3-month post-treatment) minus their baseline CAPS scores, such that negative numbers represent reductions in CAPS scores (or improvement) over time.

Time frame:
3-month Post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, for DSM-IV (CAPS IV)
units on a scaleVideoteleconferencing CPTFace-to-Face CPT
Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, for DSM-IV (CAPS IV)-14.22 ± 3.72-9.46 ± 3.32
Statistical analysis
  • Videoteleconferencing CPT vs Face-to-Face CPT · noninferiority design · p = > .05 (The noninferiority margin is the maximum clinically meaningful amount by which VTC can be "worse than" the in-person delivery to allow for a conclusion of noninferiority (a priori set to 10 CAPS points).) · Mean difference (final values): -4.76 · 95% CI -11.65 to 2.13The noninferiority hypothesis would be supported if the 95% Confidence Interval of the difference in CAPS scores between the 2 conditions (VTC minus in-person scores) is less than the present noninferiority margin (10 CAPS points).
PrimaryClinician Administered PTSD Scale, for DSM-IV (CAPS IV)

The CAPS is a 30-item interview measure that assesses the frequency and intensity of PTSD symptoms during the past month and the impact these symptoms have had on social and occupational functioning. The CAPS also provides a global scale score of PTSD severity (range 0 - 136) with higher scores indicating worse symptoms, which was used as the primary outcome measure. Scores reported here are differences between individuals follow up scores (e.g. 6-month post-treatment) minus their baseline CAPS scores, such that negative numbers represent reductions in CAPS scores (or improve) over time.

Time frame:
6 months post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, for DSM-IV (CAPS IV)
units on a scaleVideoteleconferencing CPTFace-to-Face CPT
Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, for DSM-IV (CAPS IV)-15.17 ± 3.52-9.61 ± 3.29
Statistical analysis
  • Videoteleconferencing CPT vs Face-to-Face CPT · noninferiority test · p = > .05 (The noninferiority margin is the maximum clinically meaningful amount by which VTC can be "worse than" the in-person delivery to allow for a conclusion of noninferiority (a priori set to 10 CAPS points).) · Mean difference (final values): -5.56 · 95% CI -16.26 to 5.14The noninferiority hypothesis would be supported if the 95% Confidence Interval of the difference in CAPS scores between the 2 conditions (VTC minus in-person scores) is less than the present noninferiority margin (10 CAPS points).

Adverse events

Collected over The study was monitored for adverse events from 2009 to 2013.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Videoteleconferencing CPT—0/61 (0%)0/61 (0%)
Face-to-Face CPT—0/64 (0%)0/64 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Male combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Videoteleconferencing CPTFace-to-Face CPTTotal
Mean56.1 ± 11.854.6 ± 13.255.3 ± 12.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Videoteleconferencing CPTFace-to-Face CPTTotal
Female000
Male6164125
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Videoteleconferencing CPTFace-to-Face CPTTotal
United States6164125
08

Study locations

1 site
  • VA Pacific Islands Health Care System, Honolulu, HI
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96819-1522, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Morland LA, Greene CJ, Rosen C, Mauldin PD, Frueh BC. Issues in the design of a randomized noninferiority clinical trial of telemental health psychotherapy for rural combat veterans with PTSD. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Nov;30(6):513-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Jul 1. PubMed 19576299 ↗
  • Morland LA, Hynes AK, Mackintosh MA, Resick PA, Chard KM. Group cognitive processing therapy delivered to veterans via telehealth: a pilot cohort. J Trauma Stress. 2011 Aug;24(4):465-9. doi: 10.1002/jts.20661. Epub 2011 Jul 25. PubMed 21793047 ↗
  • Morland LA, Mackintosh MA, Greene CJ, Rosen CS, Chard KM, Resick P, Frueh BC. Cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder delivered to rural veterans via telemental health: a randomized noninferiority clinical trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 May;75(5):470-6. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08842. PubMed 24922484 ↗
  • Glassman LH, Mackintosh MA, Wells SY, Wickramasinghe I, Walter KH, Morland LA. Predictors of Quality of Life Following Cognitive Processing Therapy Among Women and Men With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Mil Med. 2020 Jun 8;185(5-6):e579-e585. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz474. PubMed 32077948 ↗
  • Raab PA, Mackintosh MA, Gros DF, Morland LA. Examination of the Content Specificity of Posttraumatic Cognitions in Combat Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Psychiatry. 2015;78(4):328-40. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2015.1082337. PubMed 26745686 ↗
  • Raab PA, Mackintosh MA, Gros DF, Morland LA. Impact of comorbid depression on quality of life in male combat Veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(5):563-76. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.05.0130. PubMed 26466310 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00879255
Lead sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 9, 2009
Start date
Oct 2008
Primary completion
Sep 2013
Completion
Jun 2014
Results posted
Mar 2, 2015
Last update
May 12, 2015

Study contacts

Leslie A Morland, PsyD
principal investigator · VA Pacific Islands Health Care System, Honolulu, HI

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion