CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04832295Updated Jun 29, 2026

Photo-supported Conversations About Well-being

An interventional study of photo-supported conversations and Care as usual in Stress Disorder, sponsored by Kronoberg County Council. Recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 67 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-29.

Sponsored by Kronoberg County Council · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
20 Years to 67 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim is to to investigate photo-supported conversations about well-being by the intervention Be WellTM in addition to care as usual within primary care, compared to a control group, for patients with stress-related diagnosis. The intention is to examine the outcomes measures regarding exhaustion, balance of activities in everyday life, client satisfaction, depression and anxiety quality of life, sense of coherence and work ability. The study has been approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board.

The project has a quasi-experimental design using mixed methods. A total of 70 patients (35 to the intervention group and 35 to the control group) will be included. Inclusion criteria are patients with stress-related disorder in primary care, aged 20-67 years, who are on sick leave or risk being on sick leave. Exclusion criteria are severe somatic disorders, neuropsychiatric diagnosis, psychosis and language or cognitive problems that implies difficulties to answer questionnaires.

After informed consent, the intervention group receive, in addition to care as usual, photo-supported conversations about well-being, that is conducted over time for increased training. The intervention involves 12 sessions takes part during 12-15weeks. With cell phones the patients photograph what they relate to well-being in everyday life. The photos are enlarged and used for reflecting conversations with their therapist.

Before and after intervention, and 6 months after intervention the patient meets a project assistant and respond questionnaires as well as qualitative interviews. The control group has the same measure points. Outcome measures are compared with a control group who receive care as usual in primary care. Data will be collected by questionnaires for exhaustion, balance of activities in everyday life, client satisfaction, depression and anxiety, quality of life, sense of coherence and work ability. Qualitative data from interviews about life situation and treatment experiences will also be analyzed. An additional aim is to investigate how therapists experience performing a health promoting intervention, collected from qualitative interviews.

The project is involving the Kronoberg County Council and Jönköping County Council. Gatekeepers will recruit patients and occupational therapists will perform the intervention. The research team comprise of researchers from Kronoberg County Council, Linnaeus University, Jönköping University and University of Gothenburg.

Read the detailed description

The project has the following research questions:

  • How are the participants' work ability, health and well-being affected by the photo-supported intervention?
  • Primary outcome is self-rated symptoms of exhaustion.
  • Secondary outcomes are self-rated balance of activities in everyday life, client satisfaction, depression and anxiety, quality of life, sense of coherence and work ability.

The interviews deals about:

  • How do the participants perceive their life situation, within as well as beyond paid work, before and after the intervention?
  • How do the participants perceive their participation photo-supported conversations about well-being intervention (Be Well)?
  • How do the therapists perceive the delivery of the intervention "Be Well"?

Non-parametric statistics will be used for analyzing quantitative data. Thematic, phenomenological, qualitative content analyses and semiotic methods will be used for qualitative data.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stress Disorder

Keywords

  • Health promotion
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 67 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • stress related disorder F43.8 (ICD-10)
  • stress related disorder F43.9 (ICD-10)
  • on sick leave
  • risk being on sick leave

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe somatic disorders
  • neuropsychiatric diagnosis
  • psychosis
  • language problems that implies difficulties to answer questionnaires
  • cognitive problems that implies difficulties to answer questionnaires
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Photo-supported conversations about well-being, in addition to care as usual

    Other: photo-supported conversations · Other: Care as usual

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Care as usual

    Other: Care as usual

Interventions

  • Otherphoto-supported conversations

    Sessions 1-4: Before each of the sessions, the client photographs that which is related to their well-being and send these to the therapist before the session. The therapist enlarges each of the photographs into the size of A4. The conversation departures from the photographs and the client is encouraged to talk about each of them and they ways it relates to their well-being. Potential strategies for everyday life are discussed. Session 5-10: short virtual meetings of approximately 15-20 minutes with the aim to follow the client, confirm their process and support them towards increased well-being. Session 11: reflecting upon all their previous photographs. Session 12: reflecting future everyday life upon their photographs.

    Also known as: Be Well

  • OtherCare as usual

    Medication, psychological treatment

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Exhaustion

    Symptoms of exhaustion measured by Karolinska Exhaustion Disorder Scale (KEDS) (Besèr et al., 2014) min=0 , max=54 , the higher the worse

    Time frame: Up to 9 months after enrollment

  2. Work ability

    Work ability measured by Worker Role Self-assessment (WRS-18) (Ekbladh et al., 2000) min=15 , max= 90, the higher the better

    Time frame: Up to 9 months after enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Balance of activities in everyday life

    Balance of activities in everyday life measured by the Occupational Balance questionnaire (OBQ11) (Håkansson et al., 2020) min=0 , max=33, the higher the better

    Time frame: Change from baseline to after treatment, and 6 months

  2. Client Satisfaction

    Client Satisfaction measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) (Larsen et al., 1979) min=8, max=32, the higher the better

    Time frame: Up to 9 months after enrollment

  3. Depression and anxiety

    Symptoms of Depression and anxiety measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Zigmond \& Snaith, 1983), min=0, max=42, the higher the worse

    Time frame: Up to 9 months after enrollment

  4. Life quality

    Quality of life measured with the Manchester Short Assessment of quality of life (MANSA) (Priebe et al., 1999), min=12, max=84, the higher the better

    Time frame: Up to 9 months after enrollment

  5. Sense of coherence

    Sense of coherence measured with the Sense of Coherence Scale (SoC) ((Antonovsky, 1987), min=13, max=91, the higher the better

    Time frame: Up to 9 months after enrollment

Other outcomes

  1. Interview

    situation in everyday life, and what causes stress at home and at work, and what contributes to well-being despite living with stress

    Time frame: Up to 9 months after enrollment

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Gunnarsson AB, Wagman P, Sternudd HT, Holmberg S, Holmgren K, Horberg U. A study protocol of the photo-supported conversations about the well-being intervention (Be Well) for people with stress related disorders. BMC Psychol. 2021 Aug 21;9(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00625-3. PubMed 34419148 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04832295
Lead sponsor
Kronoberg County Council
Collaborators
Linnaeus University, Göteborg University, Jonkoping University, Region Jönköping County
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 5, 2021
Start date
Jan 1, 2020
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2024
Completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 29, 2026

Study contacts

Birgitta A Gunnarsson, PhD
Contact
birgitta.gunnarsson@kronoberg.se
+46470589078
Birgitta A Gunnarsson, PhD
study chair · Kronoberg County Council

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion