ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00874874AngioNextUpdated Sep 17, 2026

Sorafenib in Treating Patients With Angiosarcoma That is Locally Advanced, Metastatic, or Unable to Be Removed by Surgery

A Phase 2 interventional study of sorafenib tosylate in Sarcoma, sponsored by Centre Oscar Lambret. Completed at 18 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 120 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.

Primary conditionHemangiosarcomaRegistry: SarcomaReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Sarcoma — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Hemangiosarcoma
Why
  1. The study's title name Hemangiosarcoma, a narrower term within Sarcoma.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own title. Of 46 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 72% were exactly right and 89% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 4% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Centre Oscar Lambret · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2008, registered Apr 2009).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
88
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 120 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Sorafenib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth and by blocking blood flow to the tumor.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well sorafenib works in treating patients with angiosarcoma that is locally advanced, metastatic, or unable to be removed by surgery.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Determine the rate of non-progression at 9 months in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic angiosarcoma treated with sorafenib tosylate.

Secondary

  • Determine the rate of non-progression at 60, 120, and 180 days.
  • Determine the median time to progression.
  • Determine overall survival.
  • Determine the best response rate.
  • Determine the clinical and biological factors that predict clinical benefit.
  • Evaluate tolerability by NCI CTCAE v3.0.
  • Correlate efficacy with plasma expression of genes implicated in controlling angiogenesis.
  • Explore the tumor expression of these genes in tissue from a tumor bank.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.

Patients are stratified according to disease type (cutaneous angiosarcoma [scalp, breast, or soft tissue] vs visceral angiosarcoma). All patients receive oral sorafenib tosylate twice daily for 9 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sarcoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • stage III adult soft tissue sarcoma
  • stage IV adult soft tissue sarcoma
  • recurrent adult soft tissue sarcoma
  • adult angiosarcoma
03

In context

Hemangiosarcoma Reclassified

99 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemangiosarcoma; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 88 is above the median of 64 across 83 interventional studies indexed under Hemangiosarcoma.

Browse Hemangiosarcoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Oscar Lambret is the lead sponsor of 130 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Compared within Hemangiosarcoma, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Sarcoma. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 120 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • confirmed angiosarcoma

    • Locally advanced or disease
    • Unresectable disease
  • No Kaposi sarcoma, hemangiopericytoma, or hemangioendothelioma
  • Measurable tumor with at least 1 by criteria
  • Tumor in a previously irradiated area must not show progression
  • No or meningeal tumors (symptomatic or asymptomatic)

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • 0-2
  • ≥ 3 months
  • WBC ≥ 3,000/mm³
  • ≥ 1,500/mm³
  • count ≥ 100,000/mm³
  • ≥ 9 g/dL
  • PT or and aPTT ≤ 1.5 times (ULN)

    • Anticoagulation treatment with heparin or vitamin K allowed if the above criteria are met
  • Liver transaminases ≤ 2.5 times ULN (≤ 5 times ULN in the presence of liver metastases)
  • Total ≤ 1.5 times ULN
  • Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN
  • Amylase and lipase ≤ 1.5 times ULN
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Weight loss from pre-disease weight \< 20% over the past 12 months
  • Able to swallow
  • No active or ischemic coronary artery disease
  • No myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
  • No class III-IV cardiac failure
  • No uncontrolled hypertension
  • No coagulopathy
  • No active uncontrolled peptic ulcer
  • No patients on renal dialysis
  • No active bacterial or fungal infection > v3.0 grade 2
  • No or or C positivity
  • No chronic unstable illness that could jeopardize patient safety or compliance
  • No other progressive or malignant tumor
  • No known or suspected allergy to sorafenib tosylate
  • No psychological, familial, social, or geographic situations that preclude clinical follow up
  • No patients deprived of liberty or under guardianship
  • No cardiac arrhythmia requiring antiarrhythmic medication (except beta-blockers or digoxin for chronic atrial fibrillation)
  • No epilepsy requiring antiepileptic drugs

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Patient Characteristics
  • No prior organ or peripheral stem cell transplantation
  • No more than 2
  • At least 28 days since prior treatment (systemic or major surgery)
  • No concurrent therapy for another
  • No concurrent inducers (e.g., rifampicin, St. John wort, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, dexamethasone)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(20)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
88 participants (actual)

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of non-progression at 9 months by RECIST criteria

07

Study locations

18 sites
  • Hôpital Jean Minjoz
    Besançon, 25503, France
  • Institut Bergonié
    Bordeaux, 33076, France
  • Centre François Baclesse
    Caen, 14076, France
  • Centre Jean Perrin
    Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France
  • Centre Georges François Leclerc
    Dijon, 21079, France
  • Centre Oscar Lambret
    Lille, 59020, France
  • Centre Léon Bérard
    Lyon, 69008, France
  • Institut Paoli-Calmettes
    Marseille, 13273, France
  • CHU La Timone
    Marseille, 13385, France
  • Centre Val d'Aurelle
    Montpellier, 34298, France
  • Centre Antoine Lacassagne
    Nice, 06189, France
  • Institut Curie
    Paris, 75005, France
  • Hôpital Saint-Louis
    Paris, 75010, France
  • Groupe Hospitalier Cochin Cancer Ouest AP-HP
    Paris, 75619, France
  • Centre Henri Becquerel
    Rouen, 76038, France
  • Centre René Gauducheau
    Saint-Herblain, 44805, France
  • Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire
    Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270, France
  • Institut Claudius Regaud
    Toulouse, 31052, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Penel N, Ray-Coquard I, Bal-Mahieu C, Chevreau C, Le Cesne A, Italiano A, Bompas E, Clisant S, Baldeyrou B, Lansiaux A, Robin YM, Bay JO, Piperno-Neumann S, Blay JY, Fournier C. Low level of baseline circulating VEGF-A is associated with better outcome in patients with vascular sarcomas receiving sorafenib: an ancillary study from a phase II trial. Target Oncol. 2014 Sep;9(3):273-7. doi: 10.1007/s11523-013-0299-0. Epub 2013 Nov 12. PubMed 24218035 ↗
  • Valentin T, Fournier C, Penel N, Bompas E, Chaigneau L, Isambert N, Chevreau C. Sorafenib in patients with progressive malignant solitary fibrous tumors: a subgroup analysis from a phase II study of the French Sarcoma Group (GSF/GETO). Invest New Drugs. 2013 Dec;31(6):1626-7. doi: 10.1007/s10637-013-0023-z. Epub 2013 Sep 5. PubMed 24005614 ↗
  • Ray-Coquard I, Italiano A, Bompas E, Le Cesne A, Robin YM, Chevreau C, Bay JO, Bousquet G, Piperno-Neumann S, Isambert N, Lemaitre L, Fournier C, Gauthier E, Collard O, Cupissol D, Clisant S, Blay JY, Penel N; French Sarcoma Group (GSF/GETO). Sorafenib for patients with advanced angiosarcoma: a phase II Trial from the French Sarcoma Group (GSF/GETO). Oncologist. 2012;17(2):260-6. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0237. Epub 2012 Jan 27. PubMed 22285963 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2008 to primary completion in Oct 2014, 77 months.

Of 28 phase 2 interventional studies under Hemangiosarcoma, half reached primary completion within 64 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 45 and three quarters within 91. This study's 77 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 2, 2009
First posted
Apr 3, 2009
StartActual
May 23, 2008
Primary completionActual
Oct 29, 2014
CompletionActual
May 23, 2018
Last update
Sep 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00874874
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 3, 2009
Start date
May 23, 2008
Primary completion
Oct 29, 2014
Completion
May 23, 2018
Last update
Sep 17, 2026

Study contacts

Nicolas Penel, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Centre Oscar Lambret

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Sorafenib

Start the discussion