ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00852995Updated Oct 24, 2016Results posted

Dose Finding Study of HP802-247 in Venous Leg Ulcers

A Phase 2 interventional study of HP802-247 and Placebo (Vehicle) in Venous Leg Ulcer and Venous Stasis Ulcers, sponsored by Healthpoint. Completed at 30 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-10-24.

Sponsored by Healthpoint (part of Smith & Nephew, Inc.) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
228
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a 16-week study for subjects with a venous leg ulcer between the knee and ankle. This research is being done to determine the effectiveness of two dosing frequencies and two different concentrations of HP802-247, together with standard care, compared to placebo, plus standard care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Venous Leg Ulcer
  • Venous Stasis Ulcers

Keywords

  • Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU)
  • Venous Stasis Ulcer (VSU)
  • VLU
  • VSU
  • Leg Ulcer
  • Leg Wound
03

In context

Varicose Ulcer

369 studies on the registry are indexed under Varicose Ulcer; 77 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 228 is above the median of 60 across 309 interventional studies indexed under Varicose Ulcer.

Browse Varicose Ulcer studies →

Lead sponsor

Healthpoint is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

First submitted before Healthpoint became part of Smith & Nephew, Inc..

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Provide .
  • Willing to comply with protocol instructions, including allowing all study assessments.
  • Have a venous leg ulcer (venous etiology)between the knee and ankle, at or above the malleolus.
  • Venous insufficiency confirmed by duplex Doppler ultrasound examination for valvular or venous incompetence.
  • Target ulcer duration greater than or equal to 6 weeks but less than or equal to 24 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant or lactating
  • Therapy with another agent within thirty (30) days of Screening, or during the study.
  • A target ulcer of non-venous etiologies.
  • Refusal of or inability to tolerate compression therapy.
  • Therapy of the target ulcer with tissue-engineered cell-based skin equivalents within 30 days preceding the Screening Visit.
  • Therapy of the target ulcer with topical growth factors within 1 week preceding the Screening Visit.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
228 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    A - Low Q7D

    Low dose HP802-247, applied at each visit

    Biological: HP802-247

  • Experimental
    B - Low Q14D

    Low dose HP802-247 applied at Visits 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and Placebo at Visits 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

    Biological: HP802-247

  • Experimental
    C - High Q7D

    High dose HP802-247, applied at each visit

    Biological: HP802-247

  • Experimental
    D - High Q14D

    High dose HP802-247, applied at Visits 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and Placebo at Visits 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

    Biological: HP802-247

  • Placebo comparator
    E - Vehicle

    Placebo (Vehicle), applied at each visit

    Biological: Placebo (Vehicle)

Interventions

  • BiologicalHP802-247

    One dose of HP802-247 consists of 260 microliters (uL) containing keratinocytes and fibroblasts totaling 0.5 x 10-6 power or 5.0 x 10-6 power cells per mL, plus fibrin.

  • BiologicalPlacebo (Vehicle)

    Placebo (Vehicle) consisting of: Component 1 - acellular fibrinogen solution; Component 2 - acellular thrombin solution

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Average Percent (%) Change From Baseline in the Target Wound Area in Each Treatment Group Over the Twelve-week Double-blind Treatment Period.

    For each treatment group the area of each subject's target ulcer was measured on a weekly basis, for up to 12 weeks, or until wound closure, whichever occurred first, using a laser-based wound imaging system in conjunction with software to measure area. An average of the 12 measurements were assessed.

    Time frame: Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period, or until wound closure, which ever occurred first

Secondary outcomes

  1. Kaplan-Meier Probability of Non-Closure

    This key secondary outcome was the days to wound closure based on a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

    Time frame: 14 weeks - the final visit for one subject was delayed by two weeks

  2. Percent of Change From Baseline in Target Wound Area at Each of the Twelve Double-blind Treatment Weeks.

    For each treatment group the area of each subject's target ulcer was measured on a weekly basis, for up to 12 weeks, using a laser-based wound imaging system in conjunction with software to measure area.

    Time frame: Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period, or until wound closure, which ever occurred first

  3. Proportion of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Decrease in Target Wound Area From Baseline Through Week 13

    The area of each subject's target wound was measured at each visit and the proportion of subjects with a decrease in area from baseline ≥ 50% was calculated for each treatment group.

    Time frame: Over the 12 week treatment period or until the wound closed, which ever occurred first.

  4. Percentage of Participants With Complete Wound Closure at Each Visit

    Treatment groups were compared for the proportion of wounds closed at each weekly visit. For subjects who dropped from the study, their remaining visit values were imputed using LOCF.

    Time frame: Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period

  5. Target Ulcer Pain Was Measured Using a Visual Analog Scale [Range: 0mm - 100mm]. Subjects Marked Their Pain Level on a 100 mm Horizontal Line, With a Short Vertical Line Across the Scale, 0 Denoting no Pain and 100mm the Maximum Pain.

    Target ulcer pain was measured using a Visual Analog Scale \[Range: 0mm - 100mm\]. Subjects marked their pain level on a 100 mm horizontal line, with a short vertical line across the scale, 0 denoting no pain and 100mm the maximum pain. Each weekly measurement is reported as the average of all subjects scores at each week per treatment group.

    Time frame: Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period

  6. Median Time to Achieve Complete Wound Closure, Based on Based on a Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis, Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.

    This key secondary outcome was the days to wound closure based on a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

    Time frame: 14 weeks - the final visit for one subject was delayed by two weeks

07

Results

Posted Mar 14, 2016

Participant flow

Subjects were screened at 34 sites in the US and one in Canada, between June 11, 2009 and May 5, 2011; sites included independent and hospital wound clinics and private practice sites.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneB - Low Q14DA - Low Q7DD - High Q14DC - High Q7DE - HP802-247 Vehicle
Started4643444550
Completed3842394046
Not completed81554
Withdrew: Adverse event10400
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject40012
Withdrew: Non-compliance00020
Withdrew: Progressive disease10021
Withdrew: Physician decision10000
Withdrew: Protocol violation00001
Withdrew: Moved out of area10000

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Average Percent (%) Change From Baseline in the Target Wound Area in Each Treatment Group Over the Twelve-week Double-blind Treatment Period.

For each treatment group the area of each subject's target ulcer was measured on a weekly basis, for up to 12 weeks, or until wound closure, whichever occurred first, using a laser-based wound imaging system in conjunction with software to measure area. An average of the 12 measurements were assessed.

Time frame:
Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period, or until wound closure, which ever occurred first
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
The Average Percent (%) Change From Baseline in the Target Wound Area in Each Treatment Group Over the Twelve-week Double-blind Treatment Period.
percent changeB - Low Q14DA - Low Q7DD - High Q14DC - High Q7DE - HP802-247 Vehicle
The Average Percent (%) Change From Baseline in the Target Wound Area in Each Treatment Group Over the Twelve-week Double-blind Treatment Period.-77.11 ± 21.95-70.15 ± 21.66-68.14 ± 26.29-72.89 ± 27.27-60.38 ± 29.79
Statistical analysis
  • B - Low Q14D vs E - HP802-247 Vehicle · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.00028
  • A - Low Q7D vs E - HP802-247 Vehicle · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0899
  • D - High Q14D vs E - HP802-247 Vehicle · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.1586
  • C - High Q7D vs E - HP802-247 Vehicle · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0295
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Probability of Non-Closure

This key secondary outcome was the days to wound closure based on a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Time frame:
14 weeks - the final visit for one subject was delayed by two weeks
Reported as:
Number · Probability of Non-Closure
Kaplan-Meier Probability of Non-Closure
Probability of Non-ClosureE - HP802-247 VehicleB - Low Q14DA - Low Q7DD - High Q14DC - High Q7D
01 week110.97711
02 weeks10.9780.97710.978
03 weeks0.980.9340.9770.9530.889
04 weeks0.9180.9340.9070.9070.867
05 weeks0.8980.710.8140.7910.707
06 weeks0.8340.5960.8140.7910.661
07 weeks0.7060.5960.6280.7410.591
08 weeks0.6630.4310.5810.5370.543
09 weeks0.5340.3590.5580.5370.445
10 weeks0.5120.3320.5580.5370.418
11 weeks0.5120.3320.3930.460.418
12 weeks0.5120.2760.3930.3790.288
13 weeks0.420.2370.3930.320.288
14 weeks0.4200.3930.320.288
SecondaryPercent of Change From Baseline in Target Wound Area at Each of the Twelve Double-blind Treatment Weeks.

For each treatment group the area of each subject's target ulcer was measured on a weekly basis, for up to 12 weeks, using a laser-based wound imaging system in conjunction with software to measure area.

Time frame:
Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period, or until wound closure, which ever occurred first
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percent change
Percent of Change From Baseline in Target Wound Area at Each of the Twelve Double-blind Treatment Weeks.
Percent changeE - HP802-247 VehicleB - Low Q14DA - Low Q7DD - High Q14DC - High Q7D
Tx Week 1-22.94 ± 3.97-38.88 ± 4.14-27.89 ± 4.27-25.88 ± 4.26-34.97 ± 4.17
Tx Week 2-39.94 ± 4.9-58.95 ± 5.11-46.06 ± 5.26-43.69 ± 5.26-49.89 ± 5.14
Tx Week 3-47.30 ± 5.0-65.56 ± 5.22-53.5 ± 5.37-55.2 ± 5.37-56.66 ± 5.25
Tx Week 4-59.55 ± 5.28-73.46 ± 5.51-62.14 ± 5.68-60.68 ± 5.68-63.92 ± 5.55
Tx Week 5-60.54 ± 5.29-79.98 ± 5.52-68.95 ± 5.68-61.87 ± 5.68-72.41 ± 5.55
Tx Week 6-63.93 ± 4.63-81.05 ± 4.83-76.01 ± 4.98-74.7 ± 4.97-81.06 ± 4.86
Tx Week 7-65.38 ± 4.64-87.22 ± 4.84-79.84 ± 4.99-77.63 ± 4.98-79.81 ± 4.87
Tx Week 8-66.62 ± 5.04-83.00 ± 5.26-80.6 ± 5.42-81.58 ± 5.42-81.98 ± 5.3
Tx Week 9-69.03 ± 4.78-83.28 ± 4.99-83.96 ± 5.14-84.28 ± 5.14-86.17 ± 5.02
Tx Week 10-76.19 ± 3.39-89.65 ± 3.54-85.79 ± 3.65-86.98 ± 3.65-87.74 ± 3.56
Tx Week 11-77.05 ± 3.57-89.26 ± 3.72-87.49 ± 3.84-83.37 ± 3.83-87.54 ± 3.75
Tx Week 12-80.69 ± 3.54-90.67 ± 3.69-86.87 ± 3.8-84.52 ± 3.8-86.93 ± 3.72
Statistical analysis
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D vs A - Low Q7D vs D - High Q14D vs C - High Q7D · ANCOVA · p = .037 (Treatment Week 01)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D vs A - Low Q7D vs D - High Q14D vs C - High Q7D · ANCOVA · p = .064 (Treatment Week 02)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D vs A - Low Q7D vs D - High Q14D vs C - High Q7D · ANCOVA · p = .161 (Treatment Week 03)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D vs A - Low Q7D vs D - High Q14D vs C - High Q7D · ANCOVA · p = .39 (Treatment Week 04)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D vs A - Low Q7D vs D - High Q14D vs C - High Q7D · ANCOVA · p = .079 (Treatment Week 05)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D vs A - Low Q7D vs D - High Q14D vs C - High Q7D · ANCOVA · p = .069 (Treatment Week 06)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D vs A - Low Q7D vs D - High Q14D vs C - High Q7D · ANCOVA · p = .026 (Treatment Week 07)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D vs A - Low Q7D vs D - High Q14D vs C - High Q7D · ANCOVA · p = .133 (Treatment Week 08)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D vs A - Low Q7D vs D - High Q14D vs C - High Q7D · ANCOVA · p = .089 (Treatment Week 09)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D vs A - Low Q7D vs D - High Q14D vs C - High Q7D · ANCOVA · p = .057 (Treatment Week 10)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D vs A - Low Q7D vs D - High Q14D vs C - High Q7D · ANCOVA · p = .127 (Treatment Week 11)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D vs A - Low Q7D vs D - High Q14D vs C - High Q7D · ANCOVA · p = 0.395 (Treatment Week 12)
SecondaryProportion of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Decrease in Target Wound Area From Baseline Through Week 13

The area of each subject's target wound was measured at each visit and the proportion of subjects with a decrease in area from baseline ≥ 50% was calculated for each treatment group.

Time frame:
Over the 12 week treatment period or until the wound closed, which ever occurred first.
Reported as:
Number · Responders
Proportion of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Decrease in Target Wound Area From Baseline Through Week 13
RespondersE - HP802-247 VehicleB - Low Q14DA - Low Q7DD - High Q14DC - High Q7D
Visit 28175613
Visit 32229202021
Visit 42834232431
Visit 53238282734
Visit 63640323136
Visit 73639333442
Visit 83643383541
Visit 93643363741
Visit 104140383740
Visit 114244393943
Visit 124042423741
Visit 134545403840
Statistical analysis
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0133 (Visit 02)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs A - Low Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3839 (Visit 02)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs D - High Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.5721 (Visit 02)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.232 (Visit 02)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0787 (Visit 03)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs A - Low Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.7919 (Visit 03)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs D - High Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.6881 (Visit 03)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9832 (Visit 03)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0466 (Visit 04)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs A - Low Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8435 (Visit 04)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs D - High Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8743 (Visit 04)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2884 (Visit 04)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0387 (Visit 05)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs A - Low Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8461 (Visit 05)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs D - High Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9574 (Visit 05)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2994 (Visit 05)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1024 (Visit 06)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs A - Low Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8759 (Visit 06)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs D - High Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9008 (Visit 06)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4618
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2439 (Visit 07)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs A - Low Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.749 (Visit 07)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs D - High Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3749 (Visit 07)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.015 (Visit 07)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0078 (Visit 08)
  • A - Low Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.07 (Visit 08)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs D - High Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.208 (Visit 08)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0413 (Visit 08)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0054 (Visit 09)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs A - Low Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2031 (Visit 09)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs D - High Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0894 (Visit 09)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0288 (Visit 09)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.6964 (Visit 10)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs A - Low Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.59 (Visit 10)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs D - High Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.7146 (Visit 10)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.5008 (Visit 10)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1235 (Visit 11)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs A - Low Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.5488 (Visit 11)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs D - High Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4343 (Visit 11)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1114 (Visit 11)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2119 (Visit 12)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs A - Low Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0194 (Visit 12)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs D - High Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.506 (Visit 12)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2317 (Visit 12)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1144 (Visit 13)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs A - Low Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.6786 (Visit 13)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs D - High Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.7735 (Visit 13)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.758 (Visit 13)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Complete Wound Closure at Each Visit

Treatment groups were compared for the proportion of wounds closed at each weekly visit. For subjects who dropped from the study, their remaining visit values were imputed using LOCF.

Time frame:
Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Complete Wound Closure at Each Visit
percentage of participantsE - HP802-247 VehicleB - Low Q14DA - Low Q7DD - High Q14DC - High Q7D
Week 0104.32.302.2
Week 022.08.72.37.011.1
Week 038.023.99.314.020.0
Week 0410.030.418.620.928.9
Week 0516.037.025.623.333.3
Week 0624.047.839.527.940.0
Week 0728.052.241.939.544.4
Week 0836.058.741.948.851.1
Week 0936.060.955.848.855.6
Week 1040.060.960.553.562.2
Week 1140.065.258.160.564.4
Week 1246.069.658.165.164.4
Statistical analysis
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.017 (Week 04)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .041 (Week 04)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs D - High Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .017 (Week 05)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .011 (Week 06)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .014 (Week 07)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .029 (Week 08)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .021 (Week 09)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .041 (Week 10)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .044 (Week 10)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .013 (Week 11)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .024 (Week 11)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .027 (Week 12)
SecondaryTarget Ulcer Pain Was Measured Using a Visual Analog Scale [Range: 0mm - 100mm]. Subjects Marked Their Pain Level on a 100 mm Horizontal Line, With a Short Vertical Line Across the Scale, 0 Denoting no Pain and 100mm the Maximum Pain.

Target ulcer pain was measured using a Visual Analog Scale \[Range: 0mm - 100mm\]. Subjects marked their pain level on a 100 mm horizontal line, with a short vertical line across the scale, 0 denoting no pain and 100mm the maximum pain. Each weekly measurement is reported as the average of all subjects scores at each week per treatment group.

Time frame:
Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Target Ulcer Pain Was Measured Using a Visual Analog Scale [Range: 0mm - 100mm]. Subjects Marked Their Pain Level on a 100 mm Horizontal Line, With a Short Vertical Line Across the Scale, 0 Denoting no Pain and 100mm the Maximum Pain.
units on a scaleE - HP802-247 VehicleB - Low Q14DA - Low Q7DD - High Q14DC - High Q7D
Baseline30.82 ± 31.2221.11 ± 25.2328.6 ± 21.7729.84 ± 26.3625.47 ± 27.7
Week 0321.68 ± 25.0113.37 ± 18.6116.87 ± 19.2218.81 ± 22.1514.42 ± 18.17
Week 0610.72 ± 18.2210.35 ± 20.437.35 ± 13.3612.25 ± 17.9611.61 ± 19.03
Week 099.3 ± 14.968.85 ± 18.534.53 ± 9.5411.51 ± 18.297.01 ± 13.63
Week 127.95 ± 13.346.83 ± 11.723.28 ± 6.8313.22 ± 20.716.61 ± 13.43
SecondaryMedian Time to Achieve Complete Wound Closure, Based on Based on a Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis, Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.

This key secondary outcome was the days to wound closure based on a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Time frame:
14 weeks - the final visit for one subject was delayed by two weeks
Reported as:
Median · Days to Closure
Median Time to Achieve Complete Wound Closure, Based on Based on a Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis, Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.
Days to ClosureE - HP802-247 VehicleB - Low Q14DA - Low Q7DD - High Q14DC - High Q7D
Median Time to Achieve Complete Wound Closure, Based on Based on a Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis, Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.71 (57 to NA)50 (37 to 66)64 (43 to NA)57 (50 to 85)57 (43 to 71)
Statistical analysis
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · ANCOVA · p = 0.0211 (P-value for Kaplan-Meier Days to Closure)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs B - Low Q14D · Regression, Cox · p = .0212 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.83 · 95% CI 1.09 to 3.04
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs A - Low Q7D · ANCOVA · p = 0.59
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs A - Low Q7D · Regression, Cox · p = 0.53 (This is the P-value for the Cox Hazard Ratio) · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.19 · 95% CI .69 to 2.05
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs D - High Q14D · ANCOVA · p = 0.26Kaplan-Meier Days to Closure
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs D - High Q14D · Regression, Cox · p = 0.19 (This is the P-value for the Cox Proportional Hazard Ratio) · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.43 · 95% CI 0.84 to 2.44
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · ANCOVA · p = 0.10 (P-value for Kaplan Meier Days to Closure)
  • E - HP802-247 Vehicle vs C - High Q7D · Regression, Cox · p = 0.06 (P-value for Cox Proportional Hazard Ratio) · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.64 · 95% CI 0.97 to 2.77

Adverse events

Collected over The duration of the 12-week treatment period. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
E - HP802-247 Vehicle—4/50 (8%)26/50 (52%)
B - Low Q14D—4/46 (8.7%)15/46 (32.6%)
A - Low Q7D—3/43 (7%)19/43 (44.2%)
D - High Q14D—3/43 (7%)16/44 (36.4%)
C - High Q7D—2/45 (4.4%)17/45 (37.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent serious events
EventE - HP802-247 VehicleB - Low Q14DA - Low Q7DD - High Q14DC - High Q7D
Pneumonia pneumococcalInfections and infestations0/500/461/430/430/45
Neoplasm malignantNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/500/460/431/430/45
Alcohol withdrawal syndromePsychiatric disorders0/500/461/430/430/45
Acute respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/500/460/431/430/45
Peripheral vascular disorderVascular disorders0/500/461/431/430/45
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/500/460/430/431/45
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders1/500/460/430/431/45
Localised infectionInfections and infestations0/500/460/430/431/45
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/501/460/430/430/45
Gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/501/460/430/430/45
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 19
Most frequent other events
EventE - HP802-247 VehicleB - Low Q14DA - Low Q7DD - High Q14DC - High Q7D
Skin and subcutaneousSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders14/504/466/437/448/45
Infections and infestationsInfections and infestations9/504/468/434/448/45
Skin ulcerSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders8/503/463/434/445/45
Injury, poisoning and procedural complicationsInjury, poisoning and procedural complications4/502/464/434/441/45
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/503/461/431/443/45
General disorders and administration site conditionsGeneral disorders3/502/460/432/440/45
CellulitisInfections and infestations3/501/462/430/440/45
ExcoriationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/500/462/430/440/45
Psychiatric disordersNervous system disorders0/500/462/430/440/45
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/501/462/430/440/45

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)E - HP802-247 VehicleB - Low Q14DA - Low Q7DD - High Q14DC - High Q7DTotal
Mean62.1 ± 14.161.7 ± 15.762.6 ± 15.459.8 ± 15.061.8 ± 16.161.6 ± 15.2
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(years)E - HP802-247 VehicleB - Low Q14DA - Low Q7DD - High Q14DC - High Q7DTotal
Female Age69.1 (49 to 90)61.8 (24 to 87)67.7 (33 to 89)65.1 (27 to 89)69.7 (39 to 94)66.5 (24 to 94)
Male Age58.4 (33 to 91)61.6 (24 to 88)60.1 (28 to 93)56.0 (22 to 75)58.2 (24 to 80)59.0 (22 to 93)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)E - HP802-247 VehicleB - Low Q14DA - Low Q7DD - High Q14DC - High Q7DTotal
Female172014222093
Male3326292225135
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)E - HP802-247 VehicleB - Low Q14DA - Low Q7DD - High Q14DC - High Q7DTotal
Hispanic or Latino11141071355
Not Hispanic or Latino3932333732173
Unknown or Not Reported000000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)E - HP802-247 VehicleB - Low Q14DA - Low Q7DD - High Q14DC - High Q7DTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native100001
Asian000011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000000
Black or African American910912848
White3734303033164
More than one race000000
Unknown or Not Reported3242314
08

Study locations

30 sites
  • University of AZ College of Medicine
    Tucson, Arizona 85724, United States
  • Center for Clinical Research
    Castro Valley, California 94546, United States
  • ILD Consulting, Inc.
    Encinitas, California 92024, United States
  • Vascular Surgery Associates
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • UCSD Wound Treatment and Research Center
    San Diego, California 92013, United States
  • University of Miami
    Miami, Florida 33186, United States
  • Doctors Research Network
    South Miami, Florida 33143, United States
  • Robert J. Snyder
    Tamarac, Florida 33321, United States
  • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
    Chicago, Illinois 60154, United States
  • Passavant Area Hospital
    Jacksonville, Illinois 62650, United States
  • Rosalind Franklin University
    North Chicago, Illinois 60064, United States
  • Southern Illinois University
    Springfield, Illinois 62702, United States
  • Johns Hopkins Wound Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21231, United States
  • Boston Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States
  • New England Sinai Hospital
    Stoughton, Massachusetts 02972, United States
  • Advanced Foot and Ankle Center
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89119, United States
  • Vincent Giacalone
    Emerson, New Jersey 07630, United States
  • St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center
    New York, New Jersey 10025, United States
  • Overlook Hospital Wound Healing Program
    Summit, New Jersey 07901, United States
  • University of North Carolina
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Harrisburg Foot and Ankle Center
    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17112, United States
  • Center for Advanced Wound Care
    Reading, Pennsylvania 19601, United States
  • Arlington Research Center
    Arlington, Texas 76011, United States
  • Wound Care Consultants
    Dallas, Texas 75093, United States
  • Southwest Regional Wound Care Center
    Lubbock, Texas 79410, United States
  • Peripheral Vascular Associates
    San Antonio, Texas 78205, United States
  • Dixie Regional Medical Center's Wound Clinic
    St. George, Utah 84770, United States
  • Lake Washington Vascular, LLC
    Bellevue, Washington 98004, United States
  • Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center Wound Clinic
    Spokane, Washington 99204, United States
  • Aging Rehabilitation & Geriatric Care Research Center
    London, Ontario N6C5J1, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kirsner RS, Marston WA, Snyder RJ, Lee TD, Cargill DI, Slade HB. Spray-applied cell therapy with human allogeneic fibroblasts and keratinocytes for the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers: a phase 2, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 Sep 15;380(9846):977-85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60644-8. Epub 2012 Aug 3. PubMed 22863328 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2009, a primary completion of Apr 2011 and a completion of Jul 2011. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Mar 2016, 4 years 11 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Sep 2013.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 26, 2009
First posted
Feb 27, 2009
Start
Feb 2009
Primary completionActual
Apr 2011
CompletionActual
Jul 2011
Results delay requested
Sep 12, 2013
Results first posted
Mar 14, 2016
Last update
Oct 24, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 24, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00852995
Lead sponsor
Healthpoint
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 27, 2009
Start date
Feb 2009
Primary completion
Apr 2011
Completion
Jul 2011
Results posted
Mar 14, 2016
Last update
Oct 24, 2016

Study contacts

Herbert B Slade, MD
study chair · Healthpoint
William Marston, MD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina
Robert Kirsner, MD
principal investigator · University of Miami
Robert J Snyder, MD
principal investigator · Robert J Snyder

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Topical Wound Spray HP802-247

Start the discussion