CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00843050Updated Jul 27, 2012Results posted

A Phase II Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of P276-00 in Relapsed and/or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

A Phase 2 interventional study of P276-00 in Mantle Cell Lymphoma, sponsored by Piramal Enterprises Limited. Terminated at 20 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-07-27.

Sponsored by Piramal Enterprises Limited · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
The study was terminated based on interim results and all subjects were off study at that time. No major safety or tolerability concerns
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether P276-00 is safe and effective in treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma that is recurred after or not responding to at least one previous line of treatment.

Read the detailed description

Despite response rates of up to 97% with first-line standard or high-intensity chemotherapy, with or without stem-cell transplantation, most patients of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)relapse.Prognosis of MCL after first relapse is very poor with median survival of around 1 to 2 years. Therefore, novel therapies are required for relapsed and/or refractory MCL.Overexpression of Cyclin D1 as a result of t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation is the hallmark of MCL.It is postulated that Cyclin D1 may also have an oncogenic role independent of pRb in MCL.Therefore, inhibition of Cdk4-Cyclin D1 is a potentially promising target in MCL. P276-00 is a potent Cdk4-Cyclin D1 inhibitor worth exploring for its efficacy in MCL. Hence, this Phase II study is planned to examine the efficacy and safety of P276-00 in the treatment of patients with relapsed and/or refractory MCL.

This is an open-label, single-arm, 2-stage trial. Approximately 35 patients are planned to be enrolled into the study to obtain a total of 25 efficacy evaluable patients (patients who complete at least 2 cycles of study treatment and have tumor measurements at the end of 2 cycles). A total of 15 efficacy evaluable patients are planned to be treated in Stage I of the study. If ≥1 response (CR or PR) of any duration or ≥2 stable disease (SD) for ≥4 cycles are seen in the Stage I, then the study will continue into Stage II, in which additional patients will be treated until there are 10 additional efficacy evaluable patients.The study is divided into 3 periods: Screening, Treatment, and Follow-up. During the Screening Period, patients will provide written informed consent and be evaluated for inclusion and exclusion criteria. During the Treatment Period, patients will be administered P276-00 as intravenous (iv) infusion on Days 1 to 5 of each 21-day cycle for a minimum of 6 cycles and a maximum of 12 cycles, or until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity occurs. Safety and efficacy evaluations will be done on Days 1 to 5 and 11 of each cycle, and on Day 21 of every 2 cycles. Pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments will be done on Cycle 1, Day 1 (pre-dose and post-dose time points), and optional biomarker assessments will be done pre-dose within 4 weeks of Day 1 and post-dose on Day 4 or 5. The End-of-Last-Cycle Visit will occur at the end of Cycle 6, or if the patient continues study treatment beyond Cycle 6, it will occur at the end of the patient's last cycle; if the patient discontinues early, these assessments will be done as an Early Exit Visit. The Follow-up Visit will occur 4 weeks (±1 week) after the End-of-Last-Cycle Visit (or Early Exit Visit) for final safety assessments.Objective response rate is the primary end point for this study. Response evaluation will be performed using the International Working Group (IWG) revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Keywords

  • CKD inhibitor
  • Mantle Cell Lymphoma
03

In context

Lymphoma

5,578 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphoma; 825 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 13 is below the median of 40 across 4,508 interventional studies indexed under Lymphoma.

Browse Lymphoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Piramal Enterprises Limited is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Histological diagnosis of MCL and presence of either nuclear Cyclin D1 positivity by immunohistochemistry or t(11;14) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or conventional karyotyping
  • Documented progression or relapse after at least 1 line of prior chemotherapy
  • Presence of measurable disease
  • ECOG performance status 0, 1, or 2
  • Life expectancy of at least 3 months
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document (ICD)
  • Full recovery from all prior treatment toxicities of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade ≤ 1

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior radiation therapy, chemotherapy or biologic/targeted anticancer agents within 4 weeks of study drug administration
  • Prior treatment with monoclonal antibodies or any radio- or toxin- immunoconjugates within 3 months of study drug administration; however, a patient who has had rituximab treatment within 3 months and has had PD after such treatment is allowed in the study.
  • Prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation within 1 year of study drug administration
  • Current or prior CNS lymphoma
  • QTc > 450 msec
  • Unstable angina, myocardial infarction, CHF or stroke within previous 6 months of study drug administration
  • Presence of active and serious comorbidity and uncontrolled illness other than MCL
  • History of other prior malignancies except for properly treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of skin, in situ cervical cancer, in situ breast cancer or early stage prostate cancer
  • Hemoglobin \<8.0 gm/dL
  • Absolute neutrophil count \<1000/mm3
  • Platelet count \<50,000/mm3
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >3 × institutional upper limit of normal (ULN) (> 5 × institutional ULN if liver is involved with lymphoma or if patient has Gilbert's Disease)
  • Total bilirubin, >1.5 × institutional ULN (> 3 × institutional ULN if liver is involved with lymphoma or if patient has Gilbert's Disease)
  • Serum creatinine >1.5 × institutional ULN
  • Patients known to be suffering from infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), tuberculosis, Hepatitis C or Hepatitis B
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Women of childbearing potential or men not willing to use at least 2 approved methods of contraception (one of which being a barrier method) after signing the ICD, during the entire study and for at least 4 weeks following withdrawal from the study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
13 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    P276-00

    P276-00: All patients will receive P276-00 185 mg/m2/day as intravenous infusion over 30 minutes in 200 ml of 5% dextrose from day 1 to day 5 in each 21 days cycle for minimum 6 and maximum 12 cycles or until there is progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity

    Drug: P276-00

Interventions

  • DrugP276-00

    P276-00: All patients will receive P276-00 185 mg/m2/day as intravenous infusion over 30 minutes in 200 ml of 5% dextrose from day 1 to day 5 in each 21 days cycle for minimum 6 and maximum 12 cycles or until there is progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Best Overall Objective Response Rate

    The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of subjects achieving an objective response. The proportion of patients achieving an objective response is the best overall objective response rate.

    Time frame: End of every 2 cycles and end of the study treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of Response

    It is defined as the time from when the measurement criteria are met for complete or partial response until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively or clinically documented.

    Time frame: End of the study treatment

  2. Time to Progression

    It is defined as the time from day 1 of the study drug administration until the first date of progressive disease.

    Time frame: End of study treatment

07

Results

Posted Jul 27, 2012
Limitations and caveats
The Sponsor has terminated the study based on interim results. All subjects were off study at the time of termination. There are no major safety or tolerability concerns from this study. The study results published here are preliminary results.

Participant flow

This study was conducted across multiple centers in the United States and India.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneP276-00
Started13
Completed0
Not completed13

Outcome measures

PrimaryBest Overall Objective Response Rate

The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of subjects achieving an objective response. The proportion of patients achieving an objective response is the best overall objective response rate.

Time frame:
End of every 2 cycles and end of the study treatment
Reported as:
Mean · proportion of participants

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryDuration of Response

It is defined as the time from when the measurement criteria are met for complete or partial response until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively or clinically documented.

Time frame:
End of the study treatment
Reported as:
Median · proportion of participants

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryTime to Progression

It is defined as the time from day 1 of the study drug administration until the first date of progressive disease.

Time frame:
End of study treatment
Reported as:
Mean · years

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
P276-00—2/13 (15.4%)13/13 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventP276-00
Disease ProgressionGeneral disorders2/13
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/13
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/13
Elevated Creatinine,Renal and urinary disorders1/13
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders1/13
Herpes ZosterInfections and infestations1/13
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 71
Most frequent other events
EventP276-00
HypotensionCardiac disorders6/13
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders5/13
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders4/13
FatigueGeneral disorders4/13
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/13
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations2/13
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/13
Decrreased AppetiteGastrointestinal disorders2/13
DizzinessNervous system disorders2/13
Dry SkinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/13

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)P276-00
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years5
>=65 years8
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)P276-00
Mean65.8 ± 9.99
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)P276-00
Female4
Male9
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)P276-00
United States8
India5
08

Study locations

20 sites
  • Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
    Phoenix, Arizona 85054, United States
  • Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Arizona
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85259, United States
  • College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Hackensack University Medical Center
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
  • Gabrail Cancer Center Research
    Canton, Ohio 44718, United States
  • Gabrail Cancer Center Research
    Dover, Ohio 44622, United States
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232-5505, United States
  • Cancer Care Centers of South Texas
    New Braunfels, Texas 78130, United States
  • Cancer Care Centers of South Texas
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Room 2145
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
  • Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
    Seattle, Washington 98109, United States
  • Department of Medicine, University of Washington
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
  • Dept of Hematology/Oncology, University of Wisconsin- Madison
    Madison, Wisconsin 53792-5156, United States
  • Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences
    New Delhi, Delhi 10029, India
  • St. Johns Medical College & Hospital
    Bangalore, Karnataka 34, India
  • Malabar Institute of Medical Sciences
    Calicut, Kerala 16, India
  • Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre
    Mumbai, Maharashtra 400 026, India
  • Tata Memorial Hospital
    Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012, India
  • Cancer Care Clinic and Hospital
    Nagpur, Maharashtra 440012, India
  • Meenakshi mission hospital and research centre
    Madurai, Tamil nadu 625107, India
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 27, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00843050
Lead sponsor
Piramal Enterprises Limited
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 13, 2009
Start date
Nov 2009
Primary completion
Feb 2011
Completion
Aug 2012 (estimated)
Results posted
Jul 27, 2012
Last update
Jul 27, 2012

Study contacts

Brad Kahl, MD
principal investigator · Director of the Lymphoma Service and Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Wisconsin- Madison
Gabrail Nashat, MD
principal investigator · CEO, President, Gabrail Cancer Center
Martha Glenn, MD
principal investigator · Associate Professor of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City
Andre Goy, MD
principal investigator · Director of Lymphoma and Deputy Director of Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack
Roger Lyons, MD
principal investigator · President, Cancer Care Centers of South Texas , San Antonio
Nishitha Reddy, MD
principal investigator · Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville
Reena Nair, MD
principal investigator · Professor and Medical Oncologist, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
Anand Pathak, MD
principal investigator · Medical Oncologist, Cancer Care Clinic and Hospital, Nagpur, India
Vinod Raina, MD
principal investigator · Head Dept of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
N K Warrier, MD
principal investigator · Senior Consultant Oncologist, Malabar Institute of Medical Sciences, Calicut, India
Cecil Ross, MD
principal investigator · Consultant Oncologist, St. Johns Medical College & Hospital, Bangalore, India
Kirushna kumar, MD
principal investigator · Consultant Oncologist, Meenakshi mission hospital and research centre, Madurai, India
S H Advani, MD
principal investigator · Consultant Oncologist, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
Patrick Johnston, MD
principal investigator · Associate Professor of Medicine, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
Ajay Gopal, MD
principal investigator · Associate Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Craig Reeder, MD
principal investigator · Consultant, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Arizona

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion