CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00839488Updated Oct 16, 2013

Comparison of Intravenous Pantoprazole and Famotidine for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis

A Phase 4 interventional study of pantoprazole 40 mg iv and famotidine 20 mg iv in Stomach Ulcer, sponsored by Far Eastern Memorial Hospital. Terminated at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-10-16.

Sponsored by Far Eastern Memorial Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
the chief of GS left the hopsital and the successor did't want to keep on this study
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Although stress ulcer is a complication that can cause significant mortality and morbidity in critical patients with risk factors, there is still lack of consensus about its prophylaxis. There are also few data available from Taiwan. H2 blockers are commonly used due to convenience. Some prefer sucralfate (a mucosal protective agent) for the sake of less association with nosocomial pneumonia. Recently, proton pump inhibitors were shown to have good prophylactic effects for stress ulcer. Pantoprazole (iv) is the first intravenous form of proton pump inhibitor that was approved by FDA. There are some reports about its application for treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding. It also has good acid suppression effect in patients under critical care. We expect that intravenous pantoprazole will have a role in stress ulcer prophylaxis.

We will enroll those patients that have received major abdominal surgery and admitted to surgical ICU. After obtaining the consent, we will give them prophylactic drugs for 7 days within 24 hours. They are randomly allocated to 2 groups. Group I: pantoprazole 40 mg iv bolus stat and then qd ; Group II: famotidine 20 mg iv bolus stat and then q12h. We will monitor the following data: operation type \& time, APACHE II score, CBC, CXR, stool character and OB test, NG aspirate. If clinical evidence of UGI bleeding occurs, endoscopic examination will be performed. We define the end point as overt bleeding, death or transfer out of ICU. We will compare the prevalence of UGI bleeding and ventilator associated pneumonia in these 2 groups

Read the detailed description

Patient selection: those receive major abdominal operation (estimated postopeartive ICU stay more than 7 days); agree and give their consent(by their surrogate)within 24 hours after admissionto SICU; those are less than 18 y/o, pregnant, history of allergy to esomeprazole or famotidine, already have GI bleding are excluded Randomized to 2 groups: (1) 1st group to receuve pantoprazole 40 mg iv bolus stat and then qd, (2)2nd group to receive famotidine 20 mg iv bolus stat and then q12h;prophylactically used for 7 days; estimated enrollment of 60 patients for each group Monitoring items: recording opeartion procedure and time; APACHE II score at baseline, CBC、CXR at basleine and qod, stool OB at baseline; NG drainage、sputum、stool character, ICU routine (TPR, BP);ICU stay,mortality rate at 30 days; EGD perfomed according to decision of attending physician End points: apparant UGI bleeding(tarry stool, meatemesus, large amount(more than 60 ml) of coffee ground from NG、decrease of Hb more than 2g/dl and endoscopically proved lesion), mortality; ventilator associated pneumonia: new and persistent hazziness in CXR \& examination of tracheal aspirate, judged by chest specialist

02

Conditions studied

  • Stomach Ulcer

Keywords

  • pantoprazole
  • famotidine
  • stomach ulcer
  • digestive system surgical procedure
03

In context

Stomach Ulcer

112 studies on the registry are indexed under Stomach Ulcer; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 6 is below the median of 265 across 86 interventional studies indexed under Stomach Ulcer.

Browse Stomach Ulcer studies →

Lead sponsor

Far Eastern Memorial Hospital is the lead sponsor of 253 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • those recieved major abdominal surgery (estimated admission to sirgical ICU more than 7 days); give written consent and was randomized within 24 hours of admission

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age less than 18 y/o; pregnant; allergy to famotidine or pantoprazole; have had GI bleeding
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    I

    pantoprazole 40 mg iv qd

    Drug: pantoprazole 40 mg iv

  • Active comparator
    II

    famotidine 20 mg q12h

    Drug: famotidine 20 mg iv

Interventions

  • Drugpantoprazole 40 mg iv

    pnatoprazole 40 mg iv qd

    Also known as: Pantoloc iv

  • Drugfamotidine 20 mg iv

    famotidine 20 mg q12h

    Also known as: gaster iv

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. apparant upper gastrointestinal bleeding

    Time frame: 7 days, within the interval of drug prophylaxis

Secondary outcomes

  1. microscopic gastrointestinal bleeding, ventilator associated pneumonia

    Time frame: 7 days, within the interval of drug prophaxis

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
    Taipei, 22050, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cook DJ, Fuller HD, Guyatt GH, Marshall JC, Leasa D, Hall R, Winton TL, Rutledge F, Todd TJ, Roy P, et al. Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med. 1994 Feb 10;330(6):377-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199402103300601. PubMed 8284001 ↗
  • Maier RV, Mitchell D, Gentilello L. Optimal therapy for stress gastritis. Ann Surg. 1994 Sep;220(3):353-60; discussion 360-3. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199409000-00011. PubMed 8092901 ↗
  • Lu WY, Rhoney DH, Boling WB, Johnson JD, Smith TC. A review of stress ulcer prophylaxis in the neurosurgical intensive care unit. Neurosurgery. 1997 Aug;41(2):416-25; discussion 425-6. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199708000-00017. PubMed 9257310 ↗
  • Lam NP, Le PD, Crawford SY, Patel S. National survey of stress ulcer prophylaxis. Crit Care Med. 1999 Jan;27(1):98-103. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199901000-00034. PubMed 9934901 ↗
  • Cook DJ, Reeve BK, Guyatt GH, Heyland DK, Griffith LE, Buckingham L, Tryba M. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients. Resolving discordant meta-analyses. JAMA. 1996 Jan 24-31;275(4):308-14. PubMed 8544272 ↗
  • Allen ME, Kopp BJ, Erstad BL. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the postoperative period. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004 Mar 15;61(6):588-96. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/61.6.588. PubMed 15061430 ↗
  • Kantorova I, Svoboda P, Scheer P, Doubek J, Rehorkova D, Bosakova H, Ochmann J. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 May-Jun;51(57):757-61. PubMed 15143910 ↗
  • Tryba M, Cook D. Current guidelines on stress ulcer prophylaxis. Drugs. 1997 Oct;54(4):581-96. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199754040-00005. PubMed 9339962 ↗
  • Martin LF, Booth FV, Karlstadt RG, Silverstein JH, Jacobs DM, Hampsey J, Bowman SC, D'Ambrosio CA, Rockhold FW. Continuous intravenous cimetidine decreases stress-related upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage without promoting pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 1993 Jan;21(1):19-30. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199301000-00009. PubMed 8420726 ↗
  • Driks MR, Craven DE, Celli BR, Manning M, Burke RA, Garvin GM, Kunches LM, Farber HW, Wedel SA, McCabe WR. Nosocomial pneumonia in intubated patients given sucralfate as compared with antacids or histamine type 2 blockers. The role of gastric colonization. N Engl J Med. 1987 Nov 26;317(22):1376-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198711263172204. PubMed 2891032 ↗
  • Fabian TC, Boucher BA, Croce MA, Kuhl DA, Janning SW, Coffey BC, Kudsk KA. Pneumonia and stress ulceration in severely injured patients. A prospective evaluation of the effects of stress ulcer prophylaxis. Arch Surg. 1993 Feb;128(2):185-91; discussion 191-2. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420140062010. PubMed 8431119 ↗
  • Pal BK, Roy-Burman P. RNA tumor virus phosphoproteins: subvirion location of the multiple phosphorylated species. Virology. 1977 Dec;83(2):423-7. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(77)90188-x. No abstract available. PubMed 201091 ↗
  • Lasky MR, Metzler MH, Phillips JO. A prospective study of omeprazole suspension to prevent clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding from stress ulcers in mechanically ventilated trauma patients. J Trauma. 1998 Mar;44(3):527-33. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199803000-00020. PubMed 9529184 ↗
  • Huggins RM, Scates AC, Latour JK. Intravenous proton-pump inhibitors versus H2-antagonists for treatment of GI bleeding. Ann Pharmacother. 2003 Mar;37(3):433-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1C115. PubMed 12639176 ↗
  • Hsu PI, Lo GH, Lo CC, Lin CK, Chan HH, Wu CJ, Shie CB, Tsai PM, Wu DC, Wang WM, Lai KH. Intravenous pantoprazole versus ranitidine for prevention of rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding peptic ulcers. World J Gastroenterol. 2004 Dec 15;10(24):3666-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i24.3666. PubMed 15534928 ↗
  • Trepanier EF. Intravenous pantoprazole: a new tool for acutely ill patients who require acid suppression. Can J Gastroenterol. 2000 Nov;14 Suppl D:11D-20D. doi: 10.1155/2000/608413. PubMed 11110607 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 16, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00839488
Lead sponsor
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
Responsible party
Tzong-Hsi Lee (Chief of Division of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 9, 2009
Start date
Apr 2008
Primary completion
Mar 2009
Completion
Apr 2009
Last update
Oct 16, 2013

Study contacts

Tzong Hsi Lee, MD
principal investigator · Far Eastern Memorial Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion