ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07312370Updated Mar 23, 2026

Esomeprazole Plus Sucralfate for Post-ESD Ulcer Healing

A Phase 4 interventional study of Esomeprazole (Intravenous) and Esomeprazole (Oral) in Early Gastric Cancer, Gastric Dysplasia and Gastric Neoplasms, sponsored by LanZhou University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-23.

Sponsored by LanZhou University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an established treatment for early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions. Post-ESD artificial ulcers may lead to complications including delayed bleeding (3-15%) and prolonged healing. Current guidelines recommend high-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), but evidence for additional mucosal protective agents remains limited.

This study aims to evaluate whether combining sucralfate suspension with standard intravenous esomeprazole therapy improves ulcer healing and reduces complications after gastric ESD compared to esomeprazole alone.

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, outcome-assessor-blinded trial. A total of 120 patients undergoing gastric ESD will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either:

  • Intervention group: Intravenous esomeprazole 40mg twice daily (3 days) followed by oral esomeprazole 40mg once daily PLUS sucralfate suspension 1g twice daily for 8 weeks
  • Control group: Intravenous esomeprazole 40mg twice daily (3 days) followed by oral esomeprazole 40mg once daily for 8 weeks The primary outcome is ulcer reduction rate at 4 weeks post-ESD, assessed by endoscopy. Secondary outcomes include complete ulcer healing rate at 8 weeks, delayed bleeding rate, symptom scores, and safety parameters.

This study will provide high-quality evidence regarding the role of sucralfate as an adjunctive therapy for post-ESD ulcer management and may inform future clinical guidelines.

02

Conditions studied

  • Early Gastric Cancer
  • Gastric Dysplasia
  • Gastric Neoplasms
  • Peptic Ulcer With Haemorrhage
  • Gastric Ulcer

Keywords

  • Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
  • Gastric Cancer
  • Ulcer Healing
  • Proton Pump Inhibitor
  • Post-ESD Ulcer
  • Early Gastric Neoplasm
03

In context

Stomach Neoplasms

3,399 studies on the registry are indexed under Stomach Neoplasms; 992 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 66 across 2,499 interventional studies indexed under Stomach Neoplasms.

Browse Stomach Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

LanZhou University is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18-80 years, male or female
  2. Diagnosed with early gastric cancer or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia planned for gastric ESD
  3. Lesion location: Gastric corpus, antrum, or angle (cardiac lesions may be included but will require subgroup analysis)
  4. Successful en bloc resection achieved by ESD
  5. Post-ESD artificial ulcer diameter ≥2 cm
  6. Complete coagulation of all visible vessels during ESD procedure
  7. performance status 0-1
  8. Able to comply with follow-up visits and endoscopic examinations
  9. Voluntary participation with written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous gastric surgery history
  2. Active peptic ulcer disease (confirmed by pre-ESD endoscopy) within 1 month
  3. Recent upper gastrointestinal bleeding (within 1 month, excluding tumor-related bleeding)
  4. Severe heart, liver, or kidney dysfunction ( class C, class III-IV, or CKD stage 4-5)
  5. Coagulation disorders ( >1.5 or count \<50×10⁹/L)
  6. Uncontrolled diabetes ( >9%)
  7. Known allergy or to PPIs or sucralfate
  8. Use of PPIs, H2 receptor antagonists, or mucosal protective agents within 2 weeks prior to ESD
  9. Long-term anticoagulant therapy that cannot be discontinued (e.g., warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants)
  10. Long-term NSAIDs or aspirin (>100mg/day) that cannot be discontinued
  11. Unsuccessful complete (en bloc) resection (piecemeal resection)
  12. Intraoperative perforation
  13. Uncontrolled active bleeding during ESD
  14. Pregnancy or lactation
  15. Women of not using adequate
  16. Concurrent participation in another clinical trial
  17. Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, makes the patient unsuitable for study participation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Esomeprazole + Sucralfate (Intervention Group)

    * Days 1-3: Esomeprazole 40mg intravenously every 12 hours * Days 4-56: Esomeprazole 40mg orally once daily (before breakfast) + Sucralfate suspension 1g orally twice daily (1 hour before breakfast and at bedtime on empty stomach)

    Drug: Esomeprazole (Intravenous) · Drug: Esomeprazole (Oral) · Drug: Sucralfate Suspension · Procedure: Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)

  • Active comparator
    Esomeprazole Alone (Control Group)

    * Days 1-3: Esomeprazole 40mg intravenously every 12 hours * Days 4-56: Esomeprazole 40mg orally once daily (before breakfast)

    Drug: Esomeprazole (Intravenous) · Drug: Esomeprazole (Oral) · Procedure: Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)

Interventions

  • Esomeprazole 40mg intravenously every 12 hours for 3 days (Days 1-3 post-ESD)

    Also known as: Esomeprazole Sodium

  • Esomeprazole 40mg orally once daily, taken before breakfast, for 8 weeks (Days 4-56)

    Also known as: Esomeprazole Magnesium

  • Sucralfate suspension 1g (one sachet) orally twice daily for 8 weeks. Administered 1 hour before breakfast and at bedtime on empty stomach (2-3 hours after dinner). Should be taken separately from other medications (≥1-2 hours apart).

  • ProcedureGastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)

    Standardized gastric ESD procedure including lesion marking, submucosal injection, circumferential incision, submucosal dissection, and complete coagulation of all visible vessels at the ulcer base.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ulcer Reduction Rate at 4 Weeks Post-ESD

    The percentage reduction in ulcer area from baseline (immediately post-ESD) to 4 weeks, calculated as: Ulcer Reduction Rate (%) = \[(Baseline ulcer area - Week 4 ulcer area) / Baseline ulcer area\] × 100

    Time frame: 4 weeks after ESD procedure (±3 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ulcer Reduction Rate at 8 Weeks Post-ESD

    Same calculation method as primary outcome, assessed at 8 weeks

    Time frame: 8 weeks after ESD procedure (±3 days)

  2. Ulcer Stage at 4 Weeks (Sakita Classification)

    Classification of ulcer healing stage according to Sakita classification: A1 (active with thick coat), A2 (healing with thinning coat), H1 (healing with regenerating epithelium, red), H2 (healing with thickened epithelium, red fading), S1 (scar stage, red), S2 (scar stage, white). Assessed by blinded endoscopists.

    Time frame: 4 weeks after ESD procedure (±3 days)

  3. Complete Ulcer Healing Rate at 8 Weeks

    Proportion of patients achieving complete ulcer healing defined as scar stage (S1 or S2) on Sakita classification at 8 weeks post-ESD

    Time frame: 8 weeks after ESD procedure (±3 days)

  4. Incidence of Delayed Bleeding

    Occurrence of delayed post-ESD bleeding defined as: hematemesis or melena accompanied by hemoglobin decrease ≥2 g/dL, or requiring blood transfusion or endoscopic hemostatic intervention. Time of bleeding occurrence will be recorded.

    Time frame: From 24 hours post-ESD up to 8 weeks

  5. Change in Epigastric Pain Score

    Severity of epigastric pain assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Change from baseline at each time point will be calculated.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 7, Week 4, and Week 8

  6. Change in Bloating Score

    Severity of bloating assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no bloating) to 10 (worst imaginable bloating). Change from baseline at each time point will be calculated.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 7, Week 4, and Week 8

  7. Change in Acid Reflux Score

    Severity of acid reflux assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no reflux) to 10 (worst imaginable reflux). Change from baseline at each time point will be calculated.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 7, Week 4, and Week 8

  8. Change in Quality of Life Score

    Quality of life assessed using EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, which evaluates five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) with five levels each, plus a visual analog scale (0-100). Change from baseline will be calculated.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, and Week 8

  9. Rate of Rehospitalization Due to ESD-Related Complications

    Proportion of patients requiring rehospitalization due to post-ESD complications including delayed bleeding, severe pain, or other ESD-related adverse events

    Time frame: From Day 0 through Week 8

  10. Need for Endoscopic Hemostatic Intervention

    Proportion of patients requiring emergency or urgent endoscopic hemostatic procedures (such as hemoclipping, coagulation, or injection therapy) for post-ESD bleeding

    Time frame: From Day 0 through Week 8

  11. Incidence of Adverse Events

    Frequency and severity of all adverse events and serious adverse events, categorized by organ system and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0

    Time frame: From Day 0 through Week 8

  12. Medication Compliance Rate

    Percentage of prescribed medication doses actually taken by the patient, calculated as: (Actual medication days / Expected medication days) × 100%. Assessed using medication diary and pill/sachet count. Compliance ≥80% will be considered good.

    Time frame: Throughout 8-week treatment period

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Takeuchi T, Ota K, Harada S, Edogawa S, Kojima Y, Tokioka S, Umegaki E, Higuchi K. The postoperative bleeding rate and its risk factors in patients on antithrombotic therapy who undergo gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep 6;13:136. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-136. PubMed 24010587 ↗
  • Tanaka S, Terasaki M, Kanao H, Oka S, Chayama K. Current status and future perspectives of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc. 2012 May;24 Suppl 1:73-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01252.x. PubMed 22533757 ↗
  • Pimentel-Nunes P, Libanio D, Bastiaansen BAJ, Bhandari P, Bisschops R, Bourke MJ, Esposito G, Lemmers A, Maselli R, Messmann H, Pech O, Pioche M, Vieth M, Weusten BLAM, van Hooft JE, Deprez PH, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022. Endoscopy. 2022 Jun;54(6):591-622. doi: 10.1055/a-1811-7025. Epub 2022 May 6. PubMed 35523224 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07312370
Lead sponsor
LanZhou University
Responsible party
Zhaofeng Chen (Clinical Professor, LanZhou University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 31, 2025
Start date
Apr 20, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 23, 2026

Study contacts

Qiangqiang Tian
Contact
tianqq2023@lzu.edu.cn
86+15009460497
Zhaofeng Chen
Contact
zhfchen@lzu.edu.cn
86+15009460497

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Sucralfate

Start the discussion