CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00810615Updated Aug 13, 2018Results posted

Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury With Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Hyperbaric oxygen @ 2.4 ATA and Sham treatment in Brain Injury, Chronic, sponsored by San Antonio Military Medical Center. Completed. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-08-13.

Sponsored by San Antonio Military Medical Center · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) improves the cognitive function of OIF/OEF individuals who have chronic mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI). Cognitive function includes such things as thinking, remembering, recognition, concentration ability and perception. Traumatic brain injury is common with head injuries caused by blows to the head, nearby explosions, or concussion. Subjects will be assigned to an intervention or sham arm. Computer based cognitive tests will be used as outcome measures. Subjects are enrolled by invitation only.

Read the detailed description

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) did a comprehensive review of the literature focusing on TBI, stroke and cerebral palsy in Sep 2003. The study design and goals were based on the AHRQ recommendations for future hyperbaric oxygen for TBI research. This report stated, "The most important gap in the evidence is a lack of a good quality time-series study or controlled trial of the effects of HBOT on cognition, memory, and functional status in patients with deficits due to mild and moderate chronic TBI." The AHRQ Evidence Report further stated, "Lack of agreement on the dosage of HBOT and the duration of treatment is an important barrier to conducting good-quality clinical studies...Good-quality dose-ranging studies of HBOT for brain injury can be done, based on the model used by pharmaceutical manufacturers and the FDA. It is likely that the dosage of HBOT needs to be individualized based on the patient's age, clinical condition, and other factors". Although there are many anecdotal cases of TBI improvement with HBO, this case is backed with non-subjective data. The biological basis for why breathing 100% oxygen under pressurized conditions improves chronic neurological trauma remains unclear. There is some evidence that chronic TBI effects are related to the demyelization effect linked to the expression of a specific protease, calpain. This protease is also seen in demyelination delayed effects of carbon monoxide poisoning which is slowed by treatment with HBO. The "idling neuron" theory advocated in neurological studies suggest that HBO may increase metabolic performance of chronically impaired neurons that were marginally capable, enabling restoration of full function leading in turn to increased integrative plasticity. HBO has been shown to increase recruitment of stem cells from the bone marrow, suggesting that HBO may increase the rate at which damaged neuronal tissue can be reconstituted de novo. The proposed research will treat 25 subjects using HBO (2.4 ATA breathing 100% oxygen) and 25 subjects in a sham HBO treatment (1.3 ATA breathing air). Computer-based cognitive testing and the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for Military (PCL-M) will be administered pre- and post-HBOT as well as at intervals throughout the treatment. The cognitive test results and stem cell results will be analyzed within each subject at the various treatment points as well as cohort groups between each treatment leg. Cognitive test scores will also be compared to cognitive test population reference bases matched for gender and age. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2003 report also stated, "If there is a 1 percent chance that the treatment works, a rational decision maker would try it-there is a potential gain and no potential loss. On the other hand, if there are proven harms, and their severity and frequency are well described, the probability that the treatment works would have to be higher before most people would try it"

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Injury, Chronic

Keywords

  • chronic TBI
  • cognitive function
  • PTSD
  • HBO
  • hyperbaric
  • oxygen
  • chronic brain injury
03

In context

Brain Injuries

2,113 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 385 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 48 across 1,331 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries.

Browse Brain Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

San Antonio Military Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • neurology diagnosis of mild to moderate TBI
  • injury sustained during OIF/OEF military activities
  • perception of cognitive dysfunction following their injury
  • stable mental status for at least two months
  • stable psychotropic medication history for at least one month
  • ability to perform computer based cognitive testing (must be capable using a mouse and PDA pointer and readily view the displays)
  • TBI occurrence since 7 October 2001
  • ability to consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • medical conditions that prevent subject from participating in hyperbaric environments
  • previous hyperbaric oxygen treatments since being diagnosed with TBI
  • history of alcohol abuse
  • history of drug abuse
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Sham treatment

    Subject will breathe air at less than 1.3 Atmospheres Absolute (ATA) in three 30 minute periods separated by 10 minutes of breathing air at less that 1.3 ATA. Hyperbaric exposures will be done up to 5 times per week with a total number of 30 exposures.

    Other: Sham treatment

  • Experimental
    Hyperbaric oxygen 2.4 ATA

    Subject will breathe 100% oxygen at 2.4 Atmospheres Absolute (ATA) in three 30 minute periods separated by 10 minutes of breathing air at 2.4 ATA. Hyperbaric exposures will be done up to 5 times per week with a total number of 30 exposures.

    Other: Hyperbaric oxygen @ 2.4 ATA

Interventions

  • OtherHyperbaric oxygen @ 2.4 ATA

    Subject will breath 100% oxygen at 2.4 Atmospheres Absolute (ATA) in three 30 minute periods separated by 10 minutes of breathing air at 2.4 ATA. Hyperbaric exposures will be done up to 5 times per week with a total number of 30 exposures.

    Also known as: hyperbaric oxygen, HBOT, HBO

  • OtherSham treatment

    Also known as: sham exposure; 1.3 ATA air

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Computer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Verbal Memory

    The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) battery was developed at the University of Pittsburgh. It has a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 89.4% in discriminating between concussion and non-concussion groups. It consists of a medical history questionnaire regarding concussions and resultant symptoms including loss of consciousness, memory loss, confusion, headache, seizure activity, emotional state, and sleep patterns. There are four subtests given and scored by computer. These include verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and response time. The composite scores are specifically designed to determine changes within the individual, better or worse, over time. The verbal memory score demonstrates improvement as the score increases. The score range was 36.8 to 98.6.

    Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

  2. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Military Version (PCL-M) Scores

    The PCL-M is a self reported test in which a list of 17 problems and complaints are offered to the individual to score on a 1 to 5 scale with 1 designating "not at all", 2= "a little bit", 3= "moderately", 4= "quite a bit" and 5 designating "extremely". A sample complaint would be "repeated, disturbing dreams of a stressful military experience". Hence there is a possible total score range from 17 to 85. For military members, a score of 50 or above is indicative of PTSD. A change from baseline of 5-9 represents a reliable change and change of 10 or greater is a significant change.

    Time frame: baseline compared to the change at post hyperbaric exposures (30) series and the six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

  3. Computer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Visual Memory

    The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) battery was developed at the University of Pittsburgh. It has a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 89.4% in discriminating between concussion and non-concussion groups. It consists of a medical history questionnaire regarding concussions and resultant symptoms including loss of consciousness, memory loss, confusion, headache, seizure activity, emotional state, and sleep patterns. There are four subtests given and scored by computer. These include verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and response time. The composite scores are specifically designed to determine changes within the individual, better or worse, over time. The visual memory score demonstrates improvement as the score increases. The score range was 31.2 to 92.7.

    Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

  4. Computer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Processing Speed

    The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) battery was developed at the University of Pittsburgh. It has a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 89.4% in discriminating between concussion and non-concussion groups. It consists of a medical history questionnaire regarding concussions and resultant symptoms including loss of consciousness, memory loss, confusion, headache, seizure activity, emotional state, and sleep patterns. There are four subtests given and scored by computer. These include verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and response time. The composite scores are specifically designed to determine changes within the individual, better or worse, over time. The Processing Speed score demonstrates improvement as the score increases. The score range was 9.7 to 52.4.

    Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

  5. Computer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Reaction Time

    The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) battery was developed at the University of Pittsburgh. It has a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 89.4% in discriminating between concussion and non-concussion groups. It consists of a medical history questionnaire regarding concussions and resultant symptoms including loss of consciousness, memory loss, confusion, headache, seizure activity, emotional state, and sleep patterns. There are four subtests given and scored by computer. These include verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and response time. The composite scores are specifically designed to determine changes within the individual, better or worse, over time. The reaction time score demonstrates improvement as the score decreases. The score range was 0.42 to 1.84.

    Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

  6. Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Simple Reaction Time

    Braincheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate higher accuracy in each of the subtest. The simple reaction time range is 30 to 255.

    Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

  7. Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code Substitution

    Braincheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate higher accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 9 to 66. The scores in this section represent results of the code substitution subtest.

    Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

  8. Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Procedural Reaction Time

    Braincheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate higher accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 25 to 118. The scores in this section represent results of the procedural reaction time.

    Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

  9. Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Go-NoGo Reaction Time

    Braincheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate higher accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 41 to 174. The scores in this section represent results of the Go-NoGo reaction time subtest.

    Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

  10. Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Matching To Sample

    BrainCheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 6 to 50. The scores in this section represent results of the matching to sample subtest.

    Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

  11. Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code Sub Recall

    BrainCheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 6 to 135. The scores in this section represent results of the code sub recall subtest.

    Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional MRI

    Time frame: six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

  2. Stem Cells: CD_34

    A non-parametric regression 14 using the Theil estimator was fit to the observed data in order to demonstrate general trends for relations between measures of cognitive functioning and increased stem cells.

    Time frame: six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

07

Results

Posted Aug 13, 2018
Limitations and caveats
Caveats: Analysis used both repeated measures of analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and repeated measures analysis of variance (RMANOVA). Due to the results, analysis is currently identifying potential subgroups which may demonstrate significance.

Participant flow

Recruitment occurred from Nov 2008 - Nov 2010. Candidate subjects with a diagnosis of chronic truamatic brain injury (TBI) were identified by DoD neurologists. Those interested were screened for inclusion/exclusion criteria. 103 candidates were screened. 22 did not qualify; 31 were deferred (psychotropic medication or mental status unstable).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA
Started2525
Completed2424
Not completed11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11

Outcome measures

PrimaryComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Verbal Memory

The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) battery was developed at the University of Pittsburgh. It has a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 89.4% in discriminating between concussion and non-concussion groups. It consists of a medical history questionnaire regarding concussions and resultant symptoms including loss of consciousness, memory loss, confusion, headache, seizure activity, emotional state, and sleep patterns. There are four subtests given and scored by computer. These include verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and response time. The composite scores are specifically designed to determine changes within the individual, better or worse, over time. The verbal memory score demonstrates improvement as the score increases. The score range was 36.8 to 98.6.

Time frame:
Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Verbal Memory
units on a scaleSham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA
Baseline70.48 ± 13.0574.21 ± 12.03
six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series78.12 ± 16.08775.36 ± 15.230
PrimaryPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Military Version (PCL-M) Scores

The PCL-M is a self reported test in which a list of 17 problems and complaints are offered to the individual to score on a 1 to 5 scale with 1 designating "not at all", 2= "a little bit", 3= "moderately", 4= "quite a bit" and 5 designating "extremely". A sample complaint would be "repeated, disturbing dreams of a stressful military experience". Hence there is a possible total score range from 17 to 85. For military members, a score of 50 or above is indicative of PTSD. A change from baseline of 5-9 represents a reliable change and change of 10 or greater is a significant change.

Time frame:
baseline compared to the change at post hyperbaric exposures (30) series and the six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Military Version (PCL-M) Scores
units on a scaleSham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA
Baseline measurement48.88 ± 12.5950.38 ± 14.53
Post 30 hyperbaric exposures-10.125 ± 10.759-8.875 ± 8.789
6 Week Follow-up-8.292 ± 10.960-8.625 ± 10.761
Statistical analysis
  • Sham Treatment vs Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA · ANCOVA · p = 0.05A repeated measures model was designed so as to incorporate the adjust for the repeated (dependent) measures within individuals over time.
PrimaryComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Visual Memory

The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) battery was developed at the University of Pittsburgh. It has a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 89.4% in discriminating between concussion and non-concussion groups. It consists of a medical history questionnaire regarding concussions and resultant symptoms including loss of consciousness, memory loss, confusion, headache, seizure activity, emotional state, and sleep patterns. There are four subtests given and scored by computer. These include verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and response time. The composite scores are specifically designed to determine changes within the individual, better or worse, over time. The visual memory score demonstrates improvement as the score increases. The score range was 31.2 to 92.7.

Time frame:
Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Visual Memory
units on a scaleSham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA
Baseline56.56 ± 14.8659.8 ± 12.17
six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series64.72 ± 15.1966.8 ± 14.72
PrimaryComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Processing Speed

The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) battery was developed at the University of Pittsburgh. It has a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 89.4% in discriminating between concussion and non-concussion groups. It consists of a medical history questionnaire regarding concussions and resultant symptoms including loss of consciousness, memory loss, confusion, headache, seizure activity, emotional state, and sleep patterns. There are four subtests given and scored by computer. These include verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and response time. The composite scores are specifically designed to determine changes within the individual, better or worse, over time. The Processing Speed score demonstrates improvement as the score increases. The score range was 9.7 to 52.4.

Time frame:
Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Processing Speed
units on a scaleSham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA
Baseline30.26 ± 8.5029.62 ± 9.61
Six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series36.71 ± 10.4733.84 ± 10.30
PrimaryComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Reaction Time

The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) battery was developed at the University of Pittsburgh. It has a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 89.4% in discriminating between concussion and non-concussion groups. It consists of a medical history questionnaire regarding concussions and resultant symptoms including loss of consciousness, memory loss, confusion, headache, seizure activity, emotional state, and sleep patterns. There are four subtests given and scored by computer. These include verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and response time. The composite scores are specifically designed to determine changes within the individual, better or worse, over time. The reaction time score demonstrates improvement as the score decreases. The score range was 0.42 to 1.84.

Time frame:
Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Reaction Time
units on a scaleSham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA
Baseline0.739 ± 0.3220.725 ± 0.199
Six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series0.677 ± 0.1860.712 ± 0.266
PrimaryComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Simple Reaction Time

Braincheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate higher accuracy in each of the subtest. The simple reaction time range is 30 to 255.

Time frame:
Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Simple Reaction Time
units on a scaleSham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA
Baseline142.21 ± 60.68135.79 ± 61.48
Six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series174.96 ± 57.75171.83 ± 54.66
PrimaryComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code Substitution

Braincheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate higher accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 9 to 66. The scores in this section represent results of the code substitution subtest.

Time frame:
Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code Substitution
units on a scaleSham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA
Baeline39.20 ± 12.0837.42 ± 13.74
Post hyperbaric exposure 6 week follow up throughp43.39 ± 13.5640.71 ± 12.10
PrimaryComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Procedural Reaction Time

Braincheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate higher accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 25 to 118. The scores in this section represent results of the procedural reaction time.

Time frame:
Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Procedural Reaction Time
units on a scaleSham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA
Baseline81.63 ± 20.8281.17 ± 21.66
Post hyperbaric exposure 6 week follow up throughp85.78 ± 23.1686.78 ± 16.63
PrimaryComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Go-NoGo Reaction Time

Braincheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate higher accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 41 to 174. The scores in this section represent results of the Go-NoGo reaction time subtest.

Time frame:
Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Go-NoGo Reaction Time
units on a scaleSham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA
Baseline119.67 ± 31.03116.52 ± 23.33
Post hyperbaric exposure 6 week follow up throughp131.70 ± 31.43129.17 ± 25.67
PrimaryComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Matching To Sample

BrainCheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 6 to 50. The scores in this section represent results of the matching to sample subtest.

Time frame:
Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Matching To Sample
units on a scaleSham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA
Baseline20.00 ± 10.7023.71 ± 11.86
Post hyperbaric exposure 6 week follow up throughp28.22 ± 10.6324.42 ± 8.08
PrimaryComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code Sub Recall

BrainCheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 6 to 135. The scores in this section represent results of the code sub recall subtest.

Time frame:
Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code Sub Recall
units on a scaleSham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA
Baseline29.88 ± 16.6336.38 ± 19.77
Post hyperbaric exposure 6 week follow up throughp47.57 ± 24.0244.08 ± 12.07
SecondaryFunctional MRI
Time frame:
six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryStem Cells: CD_34

A non-parametric regression 14 using the Theil estimator was fit to the observed data in order to demonstrate general trends for relations between measures of cognitive functioning and increased stem cells.

Time frame:
six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Post-hocPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Only One Concussive Event

The purpose of a pilot study is to identify potential subgroups who may respond to treatment. The various composite scores were ranked and separated by subject and within groups for those who improved and those who did not. This allowed the application relative risk analysis using MedCalc (http://www.medcalc.org) to identify potential subgroups. Relative Risk of Improvement (RROI) was calculated against the concussion history items. Main categories were the number of concussive events, whether the subject had multiple non-concussive events or not, if there were two concussive events within a 48 hour period, the time expired from the last concussion to consent, the etiology of the event, and loss of consciousness. A concussive event was defined as one immediately followed with symptoms. This outcome measure analyzed PCL-M score decreases of 10 or more (significantly improved) in the individuals who experienced only one concussive event.

Time frame:
Baseline values compared to 30 post hyperbaric exposure or 6 week follow-up
Reported as:
Number · participants
PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Only One Concussive Event
participantsSham Treatment ImprovedSham Treatment Not ImprovedHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA ImprovedHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Not Improved
PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Only One Concussive Event4247
Statistical analysis
  • Sham Treatment Improved vs Sham Treatment Not Improved vs Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Improved vs Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Not Improved · Risk ratio (rr): 0.5455
Post-hocPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Two Concussive Events

The purpose of a pilot study is to identify potential subgroups who may respond to treatment. The various composite scores were ranked and separated by subject and within groups for those who improved and those who did not. This allowed the application relative risk analysis using MedCalc (http://www.medcalc.org) to identify potential subgroups. Relative Risk of Improvement (RROI) was calculated against the concussion history items. Main categories were the number of concussive events, whether the subject had multiple non-concussive events or not, if there were two concussive events within a 48 hour period, the time expired from the last concussion to consent, the etiology of the event, and loss of consciousness. A concussive event was defined as one immediately followed with symptoms. This outcome measure analyzed PCL-M score decreases of 10 or more (significantly improved) in individuals who experienced two concussive events.

Time frame:
Baseline values compared to 30 post hyperbaric exposure or 6 week follow-up
Reported as:
Number · participants
PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Two Concussive Events
participantsSham Treatment ImprovedSham Treatment Not ImprovedHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA ImprovedHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Not Improved
PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Two Concussive Events6532
Statistical analysis
  • Sham Treatment Improved vs Sham Treatment Not Improved vs Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Improved vs Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Not Improved · Risk ratio (rr): 1.10
Post-hocPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Three Concussive Events

The purpose of a pilot study is to identify potential subgroups who may respond to treatment. The various composite scores were ranked and separated by subject and within groups for those who improved and those who did not. This allowed the application relative risk analysis using MedCalc (http://www.medcalc.org) to identify potential subgroups. Relative Risk of Improvement (RROI) was calculated against the concussion history items. Main categories were the number of concussive events, whether the subject had multiple non-concussive events or not, if there were two concussive events within a 48 hour period, the time expired from the last concussion to consent, the etiology of the event, and loss of consciousness. A concussive event was defined as one immediately followed with symptoms. This outcome measure analyzed PCL-M score decreases of 10 or more (significantly improved) in individuals who experienced three concussive events.

Time frame:
Baseline values compared to 30 post hyperbaric exposure or 6 week follow-up
Reported as:
Number · participants
PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Three Concussive Events
participantsSham Treatment ImprovedSham Treatment Not ImprovedHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA ImprovedHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Not Improved
PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Three Concussive Events3242
Statistical analysis
  • Sham Treatment Improved vs Sham Treatment Not Improved vs Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Improved vs Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Not Improved · Risk ratio (rr): 1.1111
Post-hocPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Four or More Concussive Events

The purpose of a pilot study is to identify potential subgroups who may respond to treatment. The various composite scores were ranked and separated by subject and within groups for those who improved and those who did not. This allowed the application relative risk analysis using MedCalc (http://www.medcalc.org) to identify potential subgroups. Relative Risk of Improvement (RROI) was calculated against the concussion history items. Main categories were the number of concussive events, whether the subject had multiple non-concussive events or not, if there were two concussive events within a 48 hour period, the time expired from the last concussion to consent, the etiology of the event, and loss of consciousness. A concussive event was defined as one immediately followed with symptoms. This outcome measure analyzed PCL-M score decreases of 10 or more (significantly improved) in individuals who experienced four or more concussive events.

Time frame:
Baseline values compared to 30 post hyperbaric exposure or 6 week follow-up
Reported as:
Number · participants
PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Four or More Concussive Events
participantsSham Treatment ImprovedSham Treatment Not ImprovedHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA ImprovedHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Not Improved
PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Four or More Concussive Events2020
Statistical analysis
  • Sham Treatment Improved vs Sham Treatment Not Improved vs Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Improved vs Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Not Improved · Risk ratio (rr): 1.0
Post-hocPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Multiple Non-concussive Blast and/or Impact Exposures.

The purpose of a pilot study is to identify potential subgroups who may respond to treatment. The various composite scores were ranked and separated by subject and within groups for those who improved and those who did not. This allowed the application relative risk analysis using MedCalc (http://www.medcalc.org) to identify potential subgroups. Relative Risk of Improvement (RROI) was calculated for the number of concussive events, whether the subject had multiple non-concussive events or not, if there were two concussive events within a 48 hour period, the time expired from the last concussion to consent, the etiology of the event, and loss of consciousness. Many subjects had multiple blast and/or impact events without a concussion (asymptomatic), but had a flight or flight (danger response) experience. This outcome measure analyzed PCL-M score decreases of 10 or more (significantly improved) in individuals who experienced multiple non-concussive blast and/or impact events.

Time frame:
Baseline values compared to 30 post hyperbaric exposure or 6 week follow-up
Reported as:
Number · participants
PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Multiple Non-concussive Blast and/or Impact Exposures.
participantsSham Treatment ImprovedSham Treatment Not ImprovedHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA ImprovedHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Not Improved
PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Multiple Non-concussive Blast and/or Impact Exposures.11529
Post-hocPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, Measuring Time to Consent From the Last Concussion in Subjects With Multiple Concussions.

The purpose of a pilot study is to identify potential subgroups who may respond to treatment. The various composite scores were ranked and separated by subject and within groups for those who improved and those who did not. This allowed the application relative risk analysis using MedCalc (http://www.medcalc.org) to identify potential subgroups. Relative Risk of Improvement (RROI) was calculated for the number of concussive events, whether the subject had multiple non-concussive events or not, if there were two concussive events within a 48 hour period, the time expired from the last concussion to consent, the etiology of the event, and loss of consciousness. This outcome measure analyzed PCL-M score decreases of 10 or more (significantly improved) with consent within one year from the last concussion in subjects who had multiple concussions.

Time frame:
Baseline values compared to 30 post hyperbaric exposure or 6 week follow-up
Reported as:
Number · participants
PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, Measuring Time to Consent From the Last Concussion in Subjects With Multiple Concussions.
participantsSham Treatment ImprovedSham Treatment Not ImprovedHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA ImprovedHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Not Improved
PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, Measuring Time to Consent From the Last Concussion in Subjects With Multiple Concussions.1332

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sham Treatment—0/25 (0%)4/25 (16%)
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA—0/25 (0%)10/25 (40%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA
Ear blockEar and labyrinth disorders4/2510/25

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Sham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATATotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years252550
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Sham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATATotal
Mean28.4 ± 7.428.3 ± 8.128.3 ± 7.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATATotal
Female112
Male242448
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Sham TreatmentHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATATotal
United States252550
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00810615
Lead sponsor
San Antonio Military Medical Center
Responsible party
George Wolf (Study Director, San Antonio Military Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 18, 2008
Start date
Feb 2009
Primary completion
Jan 2011
Completion
Jan 2011
Results posted
Aug 13, 2018
Last update
Aug 13, 2018

Study contacts

E. George Wolf, M.D.
study director · SAMMC Hyperbaric Medicine
Leonardo C Profenna, M.D.
principal investigator · SAMMC Hyperbaric Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion