A Phase 4 interventional study of EMLA in Pain, sponsored by Federal University of Minas Gerais. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 1 Hour to 7 Days, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-07-25.
Sponsored by Federal University of Minas Gerais · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care
In this randomized controlled study the investigators intended to compare analgesic effects of EMLA and/or oral glucose in 60 preterm neonate during arterial function and PICC installation.
It is a randomised controlled clinical trial, double blinded, with the purpose to compare the use of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (lidocaine and prilocaine) and/or the oral solution of glucose 25% in the prevention and treatment of pain in preterm neonates with gestational between 28-37 weeks old.
The pain evaluation will be done using NIPS scale, and also physiologic variables (HR, MAP, oxygen saturation level and crie) during two painful procedures performed in the neonatal intensive care units:arterial puncture (n=30) and peripherally inserted central catheters (n=30). All procedures will have clinical indication and will not be implemented by the researcher.The newborns will be randomized into three groups: A (EMLA and glucose; n=20),B (EMLA AND placebo; n=20) and C (anesthetic cream placebo and oral glucose; n=20).
All newborns will be subjected to some kind of therapeutic intervention, the objective of this study is validate the application of control measures and treatment of pain for these two procedures that cause mild and moderate pain.
2,450 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 945 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 70 across 2,101 interventional studies indexed under Pain.
Browse Pain studies →Federal University of Minas Gerais is the lead sponsor of 152 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Received glucose oral and topical EMLA
Drug: EMLA
Received glucose and no EMLA
Drug: EMLA
Received oral placebo and EMLA
Drug: EMLA
Drug pages: Lidocaine · Prilocaine
0.5g topical EMLA
Also known as: Lidocaine and prilocaine cream
Compare analgesic efficacy of EMLA versus oral glucose
Time frame: From the first to seven day of life
Evaluate analgesic synergism of EMLA versus oral glucose
Time frame: First to seven day of life
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drugs tested here: Lidocaine · Prilocaine
Federal University of Minas Gerais →