ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00807664Updated Jan 16, 2018Results posted

Biatain Ag vs Biatain in the Treament of Leg Ulcers

An interventional study of Biatain Ag and Biatain in Leg Ulcers, sponsored by Coloplast A/S. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-16.

Sponsored by Coloplast A/S · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
182
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

the objective of this investigation is to demonstrate the effect of the foam dressing Biatain Ag, compared to Biatain foam dressing( a product which is similar but does not contain a silver complex, in the healing of leg ulcers that had failed to heal despite appropriate therapy

02

Conditions studied

  • Leg Ulcers

Browse trials for

03

In context

Leg Ulcer

302 studies on the registry are indexed under Leg Ulcer; 43 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 182 is above the median of 60 across 245 interventional studies indexed under Leg Ulcer.

Browse Leg Ulcer studies →

Lead sponsor

Coloplast A/S is the lead sponsor of 150 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    • Patients over 18 who have given written informed consent

      • Patients with a venous or predominantly venous leg ulcer (ankle-brachial index > 0.8) that is between 2 cm and 13 cm in all directions
      • Patients with a moderately or severely exudating leg ulcer in the phase of debridement or formation of granulation tissue
      • Patients with a leg ulcer that is not healing properly despite suitable and well-conducted local treatment in the four weeks prior to inclusion
      • Patients with a leg ulcer that has been treated with appropriate compression in the four weeks prior to inclusion
      • Patients who are available for monitoring for at least 10 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Patients whose leg ulcers are clinically infected (including erysipelas and cellulitis of the skin around the ulcer) requiring systemic antibiotic treatment

      • Patients who have undergone surgery on the saphenous trunk within the two months prior to inclusion
      • Patients whose leg ulcer being considered for the study has been treated with local antibiotics or antiseptics incl. dressings containing antibiotics or antiseptics in the four weeks prior to inclusion
      • Patients who have been taking systemic antibiotics in the two weeks prior to inclusion
      • Patients who have been taking systemic corticoids or cytostatics within the three months prior to inclusion
      • Patients with unbalanced diabetes at the discretion of the investigator
      • Patients with a known allergy to one of the components in Biatain Argent® or Biatain
      • Patients who are already taking part in another clinical study
      • Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
182 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Biatain Ag dressing

    Device: Biatain Ag

  • Active comparator
    2

    Biatain dressing

    Device: Biatain

Interventions

  • DeviceBiatain Ag

    Biatain Ag non adhesive ( ColoplastA/S), a polyurethane permeable backing film with an added silver complex, size 15X15. The product is CE marked

  • DeviceBiatain

    A standard polyurethane foam dressing Biatain non adhesive permeable backing film, size15X15 cm. the product is CE marked

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage Change of the Leg Ulcer Area Measured by Planimetry at Week 6 Compared to the Ulcer Area at Baseline

    The measure of the ulcer was to measure its greatest lenght and width with these two axes being at right angles. An average of three measurements was to calculated the area of the ulcer by the equation: Area= Lenght \*Width \* pi \[3.142\] / 4 All planimetry records (using double-sided tracing paper) were centrally assessed and read by a blinded person not aware of which treatment that was used.

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 42

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage Change of the Leg Ulcer Area Measured by Planimetry at Week 10 Compared to the Ulcer Area at Baseline

    The measure of the ulcer was to measure its greatest lenght and width with these two axes being at right angles. An average of three measurements was to calculated the area of the ulcer by the equation: Area= Lenght \*Width \* pi \[3.142\] / 4 All planimetry records (using double-sided tracing paper) were centrally assessed and read by a blinded person not aware of which treatment that was used.

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 70

  2. Total Number of Adverse Events

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 70

07

Results

Posted Dec 11, 2017

Participant flow

Patients could be in-patients, out-patients attending hospital clinics specialising in phlebo-angiology, dermatology or vascular surgery, or patients being treated in a non-hospital setting

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBiatain Ag Wound DressingBiatain Wound Dressing
Started8894
Completed7775
Not completed1119

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage Change of the Leg Ulcer Area Measured by Planimetry at Week 6 Compared to the Ulcer Area at Baseline

The measure of the ulcer was to measure its greatest lenght and width with these two axes being at right angles. An average of three measurements was to calculated the area of the ulcer by the equation: Area= Lenght \*Width \* pi \[3.142\] / 4 All planimetry records (using double-sided tracing paper) were centrally assessed and read by a blinded person not aware of which treatment that was used.

Time frame:
Day 0 to Day 42
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage change
Percentage Change of the Leg Ulcer Area Measured by Planimetry at Week 6 Compared to the Ulcer Area at Baseline
Percentage changeBiatain Ag Wound DressingBiatain Wound Dressing
Percentage Change of the Leg Ulcer Area Measured by Planimetry at Week 6 Compared to the Ulcer Area at Baseline-41.5 ± 38.8-35.0 ± 44.9
SecondaryPercentage Change of the Leg Ulcer Area Measured by Planimetry at Week 10 Compared to the Ulcer Area at Baseline

The measure of the ulcer was to measure its greatest lenght and width with these two axes being at right angles. An average of three measurements was to calculated the area of the ulcer by the equation: Area= Lenght \*Width \* pi \[3.142\] / 4 All planimetry records (using double-sided tracing paper) were centrally assessed and read by a blinded person not aware of which treatment that was used.

Time frame:
Day 0 to Day 70
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage change
Percentage Change of the Leg Ulcer Area Measured by Planimetry at Week 10 Compared to the Ulcer Area at Baseline
Percentage changeBiatain Ag Wound DressingBiatain Dressing
Percentage Change of the Leg Ulcer Area Measured by Planimetry at Week 10 Compared to the Ulcer Area at Baseline-59.7 (-78.8 to -40.6)-46.1 (-65.4 to -26.8)
SecondaryTotal Number of Adverse Events
Time frame:
Day 0 to Day 70
Reported as:
Number · Adverse Event
Total Number of Adverse Events
Adverse EventBiatain Ag Wound DressingBiatain Dressing
Mild, not related32
mild, possibly related10
Moderate, not related1111
moderate, possibly related22
moderate, related10
severe, not related21
severe, possibly related20
severe, related02
not specified, not related01

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Biatain Ag Wound Dressing—5/88 (5.7%)4/88 (4.5%)
Biatain Wound Dressing—7/94 (7.4%)2/94 (2.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent serious events
EventBiatain Ag Wound DressingBiatain Wound Dressing
Recurrance opposite leg mlum perforans pedis infectionInfections and infestations1/880/94
pneumoccal pneumonia hypoxemianteInfections and infestations1/880/94
Arteriopathie left lower limbVascular disorders1/880/94
Alteration of general stateSocial circumstances1/880/94
Attack of anginaCardiac disorders1/880/94
FallSocial circumstances0/881/94
pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/881/94
cardiac decompressionCardiac disorders0/881/94
acute pulmonary edemaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/881/94
important pain on right legMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/881/94
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBiatain Ag Wound DressingBiatain Wound Dressing
Maceration - eczema - redness - pain of wound and peri-wound skinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders4/882/94

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Biatain Ag Wound DressingBiatain Wound DressingTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years182543
>=65 years7069139
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Biatain Ag Wound DressingBiatain Wound DressingTotal
Mean75.1 ± 11.872.1 ± 12.473.5 ± 12.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Biatain Ag Wound DressingBiatain Wound DressingTotal
Female544498
Male345084
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Biatain Ag Wound DressingBiatain Wound DressingTotal
France383876
Germany252752
Belgium314
Denmark192443
United Kingdom347
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 16, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00807664
Lead sponsor
Coloplast A/S
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 12, 2008
Start date
Dec 2008
Primary completion
Apr 2010
Completion
Apr 2010
Results posted
Dec 11, 2017
Last update
Jan 16, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion