CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT00797784DISCLUP2008Updated May 26, 2010

The Safety and Efficacy of Etanercept (Enbrel®) for the Treatment of Discoid Lupus Erythematosus

A Phase 2 interventional study of etanercept(Enbrel®) in Discoid Lupus Erythematosus (DLE), sponsored by Florida Academic Dermatology Centers. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-05-26.

Sponsored by Florida Academic Dermatology Centers · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2008), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A 20 week study to assess the safety and efficacy of etanercept(Enbrel®)for the treatment of Discoid Lupus Erythematosus

02

Conditions studied

  • Discoid Lupus Erythematosus (DLE)
03

In context

Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

1,202 studies on the registry are indexed under Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; 399 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 50 across 867 interventional studies indexed under Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic.

Browse Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic studies →

Lead sponsor

Florida Academic Dermatology Centers is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects with discoid lupus erythematosus .Subjects require to have confirmation of diagnosis by a skin biopsy .This can be undertaken at the screening visit if no previous biopsy confirmation available.

And;

  • Having failed steroids (topical, intralesional, systemic) and are candidates for antimalarial therapy
  • Negative ANA

Have no history of latent or active TB prior to screening.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects allergic to sunscreens
  • Prior treatment with anti-TNF therapies
  • Subjects who do not have a previous skin biopsy result confirming a DLE diagnosis and who are unwilling to undergo this procedure at screening.
  • Subjects currently receiving systemic steroid therapy (or have received in the last 3 months)
  • Known hypersensitivity to Enbrel® (etanercept) or any of its components or known to have antibodies to etanercept.
  • Prior or concurrent use of cyclophosphamide therapy
  • Concurrent sulfasalazine therapy.
  • Known HIV-positive status or known history of any other immuno-suppressing disease.
  • Any mycobacterial disease or high risk factors for tuberculosis (TB), such as family member with TB, positive purified protein derivative (PPD) or taking anti-tuberculosis medication
  • Active or chronic infection within 4 weeks before screening visit, or between the screening and baseline visits.
  • Severe comorbidities (diabetes mellitus requiring insulin; CHF of any severity; or myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within 6 months of screening visit; unstable angina pectoris; uncontrolled hypertension (sitting systolic BP \<80 mm Hg or > 160 or diastolic BP > 100 mm Hg); oxygen-dependent severe pulmonary disease; history of cancer within 5 years [other than resected cutaneous basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ cervical cancer])
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus, history of multiple sclerosis, transverse myelitis, optic neuritis or seizure disorder.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Interventions

  • Drugetanercept(Enbrel®)

    etanercept(Enbrel®) 50mgs subcutaneous (SC) injections twice weekly for 20 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients responding to study treatment using the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematous Disease Area Severity Index(CLASI)defined as a decrease of 50% form baseline.

    Time frame: 20 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline to week 20 in Dermatology Life Quality Index and Pysician's Global Assessment of disease measurements

    Time frame: 20 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Florida Academic Dermatology Centers
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
    • Annika M Grant, RN,MBA · Contact · annika@fadcenter.com · 305-324-2110
    • Francisco A Kerdel, M.D. · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 26, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00797784
Lead sponsor
Florida Academic Dermatology Centers
First posted
Nov 25, 2008
Start date
Oct 2008
Primary completion
Apr 2011 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2011 (estimated)
Last update
May 26, 2010

Study contacts

Annika M Grant, RN, MBA
Contact
annika@fadcenter.com
305 324 2110 ext. 210

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion