ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00783185Updated Jan 12, 2010

Dual Diagnosis (Psychosis and Cannabismisuse): Comparison of Specialized Treatment Versus Unspecified Treatment

A Phase 1 interventional study of Cannabis-Consumption-Reduction-Training and Social competence Training in Psychotic Disorders, Marijuana Abuse and Intervention, sponsored by University of Konstanz. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-01-12.

Sponsored by University of Konstanz · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Intention of the study is to examine, if the symptomatology of dual diagnosis patients is less severe after a special indication training for reduction of cannabis consumption in comparison to unspecified trainings.

Point of interest is psychopathology and consumerism.

Read the detailed description

Dual diagnosis patients (psychosis and cannabis abuse) account for more clinical admissions than single diagnosis patients.

Cannabis misuse is a known risk factor for recurrence of psychosis.

A specified intervention on the basis of a manual for schizophrenic substance abusers is administered to inpatients in a specialized unit for young schizophrenic patients in a psychiatric hospital.

The control group, same indication (psychotic disorder and cannabis misuse) receives social competence training (specified for schizophrenic patients as well).

Admission to groups is randomly.

02

Conditions studied

  • Psychotic Disorders
  • Marijuana Abuse
  • Intervention

Keywords

  • psychotic disorders
  • cannabis
  • intervention
03

In context

Psychotic Disorders

1,655 studies on the registry are indexed under Psychotic Disorders; 298 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 68 across 1,358 interventional studies indexed under Psychotic Disorders.

Browse Psychotic Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Konstanz is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia and disorders with psychotic features
  • Misuse of cannabis during 12 months preceding admission to hospital

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not able to attend training twice a week for 45 minutes (concentration, attention, psychotic symptoms, agitation)
  • Discharge from hospital before completion of training
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ACT

    Anti-Cannabis-Consumption-Training

    Behavioral: Cannabis-Consumption-Reduction-Training

  • Active comparator
    CG

    Control group

    Behavioral: Social competence Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralCannabis-Consumption-Reduction-Training

    8 sessions within 4 weeks (twice a week, 45 minutes each) Cognitive behavioral therapy with focus on cannabis abuse

  • BehavioralSocial competence Training

    8 sessions within 4 weeks (twice a week, 45 minutes) training to develop and ameliorate social competences

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PANSS Positive and Negative Symptom Scale

    Time frame: post intervention, six months follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Urinstatus for cannabinoids

    Time frame: weekly during and post intervention, follow-up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Konstanz
    Konstanz, Baden-Wurttemberg 78462, Germany
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2006, a primary completion of Jun 2009 and a completion of Jan 2010. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 30, 2008
First posted
Oct 31, 2008
Start
Jan 2006
Primary completionActual
Jun 2009
CompletionActual
Jan 2010
Last update
Jan 12, 2010
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 12, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00783185
Lead sponsor
University of Konstanz
First posted
Oct 31, 2008
Start date
Jan 2006
Primary completion
Jun 2009
Completion
Jan 2010
Last update
Jan 12, 2010

Study contacts

Hans Watzl, Dr.
principal investigator · University of Konstanz

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion