CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00731991Updated Aug 3, 2009

Art and Surface Electromyography (EMG)

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of ART and PNF in Fatigue, sponsored by Logan College of Chiropractic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-08-03.

Sponsored by Logan College of Chiropractic · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The general purpose of this research project is to use surface electromyography to compare the effect of Active Release Technique versus Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on the electrical activity of the upper trapezius muscle at rest and during contraction.

Read the detailed description

Both ART and PNF are soft tissue techniques used to decrease muscle hypertonicity, myospasm, and/or trigger points and increase the overall function of muscles.

Active-release technique, or ART®, is a form of myofascial therapy used in pain management that involves soft-tissue manipulation. ART has the expressed goal of restoring optimal texture, motion, and function of the soft tissue while releasing entrapped nerves or blood vessels. An injury to a soft-tissue structure commonly causes the muscle to shorten to guard or protect the area. A clinician who is performing ART makes a soft contact with one hand on the patient just distal to the injured area while the other hand develops tension on the soft tissue. While the contact tension is maintained, the structure is lengthened using an "active motion." During the motion, the lesion is palpated and the physical contact with the patient is changed or moved slightly in order to concentrate the tension in the appropriate tissue (Swann, et al).

Active Release Technique was developed by Dr. Michael Leahy and is widely used in rehabilitative and sports medicine for myofacial pain syndromes. The ART group will be treated by one investigator in concurrence with treatment methods outlined in Dr. Leahy's ART instructional manual. An ART treatment pass involves taking the tissue from a shortened position to a lengthened position while the administer maintains manual contact. We will perform three passes of ART with a 10 second rest period between passes. We will only perform ART on the symptomatic side (side that fits inclusion criteria); if both sides are involved, each side will be considered as a separate analysis.

The research backing ART is inadequate. Although there are numerous testimonials, limited published research studies could be found. Dr. George's study of the effect of ART, HVLA and no treatment on the temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscles showed no significant difference between the pre- and post-treatment mouth opening measurements. Another ART study of lateral epicondylitis concluded that the technique was successful in removing adhesions and promoting restoration of normal tissue but also stated that research was inadequate (Howitt, et al). A carpal tunnel study completed in 2006 used EMG to measure the effectiveness of ART. There were significant improvement in symptom severity and functional status after treatment, but no significant differences found in the EMG analyses (George, Tepe, and Busold 119-122).

Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching techniques are commonly used in the athletic and clinical environments to enhance both active and passive range of motion (ROM) with a view to optimizing motor performance and rehabilitation by elongating the muscle (Sharman, et al).

A second investigator will perform all the PNF using the published protocol from Warren Hammer, DC, MS, DABCO, in the text Functional Soft Tissue Examination and Treatment by Manual Methods, which is as follows:

The patient is supine with the examiner supporting the head so that the neck is in contralateral sidebending and ipsilateral rotation and flexion. The whole cervical spine and occiput is fixed and held in long-axis traction. With the other hand, the examiner contacts the shoulder with the forearm parallel to the table and pushes inferiorly to determine end feel. While maintaining the above position, the examiner asks the patient to resist by pushing the shoulder superiorly against the examiner's resistance for 7 seconds. The examiner then asks the patient to let go and, while stabilizing the head and neck, depresses the shoulder as far as possible for 12 seconds.

A previous study of PNF concluded that the technique caused short-term deficits in strength, power output, and muscle activation; it also increased ranges of motion (Marek, et al). A second previous study concluded that PNF caused an increase in electromyographic activity of the masticatory muscles (Olivo, et al).

Surface EMG is a reliable, non-invasive tool used for measuring muscular electrical activity. Electromyography (EMG) can provide unique information about the mechanical and motor control strategies during various types of muscle actions. EMG measures muscle activation, with surface EMG reflecting the algebraic sum of electric muscle action potentials that pass within the recording areas of the EMG electrodes. There, EMG amplitude quantifies muscle activation, which can be altered by the number of motor units recruited and the firing rates of the activated motor units. Thus, decreases in EMG amplitude due to decreases in muscle activation (Marek, et al). The surface EMG protocol will be performed completely by a third investigator.

Farina, et al published an article showing that the EMG can give reliable indications of muscle activity and fatigue. A previous study of muscle activity using surface EMG noted that based on visual inspections, all surface EMG variables showed consistent linear to moderately curvilinear behavior as a function of time (Muhammed, et al). Surface EMG has been widely used and accepted however care must be taken in pad placement as incorrect placement will give readings of improper musculature, as concluded in a study by Susan Mercer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fatigue

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Muscle
03

In context

Fatigue

1,860 studies on the registry are indexed under Fatigue; 376 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 54 across 1,440 interventional studies indexed under Fatigue.

Browse Fatigue studies →

Lead sponsor

Logan College of Chiropractic is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Not all of the below listed criteria must be present, but some combination of two or more should be present before the participant can be deemed to have hypertonic
  • hypertonic levator scapulae musculature.
  • Anterior head carriage
  • Internally rolled shoulders
  • Occupational risk of poor upper cross posture
  • Palpable muscular tightness
  • Tenderness to palpation of the area
  • Participant complaint of pain or tightness in the area

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants will be excluded from this study if they have a history of a trauma that lead to marked scar tissue in the upper trapezius muscle as this would alter the surface EMG readings due to injured and altered tissue.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    ART

    ART to the levator scapulae.

    Other: ART

  • Active comparator
    PNF

    PNF to the levator scapulae.

    Other: PNF

  • Placebo comparator
    Control

    No treatment will be given. The participant will sit in the treatment room with the doctor for 4 minutes.

    Other: No Treatment

Interventions

  • OtherART

    ART to the levator scapulae.

  • OtherPNF

    PNF to the levator scapulae.

  • OtherNo Treatment

    No treatment will be given. The participant will sit in the treatment room with the doctor for 4 minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Surface EMG

    Time frame: Participant receive Surface EMG then treatment with either ART or PNF followed by Surface EMG

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Logan College of Chiropractic
    Chesterfield, Missouri 63017, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 3, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00731991
Lead sponsor
Logan College of Chiropractic
First posted
Aug 11, 2008
Start date
Aug 2008
Primary completion
Nov 2008
Completion
Nov 2008
Last update
Aug 3, 2009

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion