CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00711906Updated Jan 18, 2016

Daily Co-trimoxazole Prophylaxis to Prevent Malaria in Pregnancy

A Phase 3 interventional study of Cotrimoxazole and Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in Malaria in Pregnancy, sponsored by Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium. Terminated at 2 sites in Zambia. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-01-18.

Sponsored by Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
Malaria prev. fell in the study area, so we cannot evaluate the primary endpoint
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
352
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Malaria is a major contributor of disease burden in Sub-Saharan Africa, and pregnant women and children are the most vulnerable population. Malaria in pregnancy increases the risks of abortion, prematurity, maternal anaemia, low birth weight (LBW), perinatal, neonatal and infant mortality. For prevention and control of malaria in pregnancy, Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPT), insecticide treated nets (ITNs) and case management for malaria and anemia are recommended.

HIV infection in pregnancy increases the risk of malaria, LBW, post-natal mortality and also of anaemia. In pregnant women, HIV infection decreases the efficacy of IPT with the medicine sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), which is the only treatment with proven efficacy and safety in IPT and is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). Unfortunately, there is a documented increase of resistance to SP, so cotrimoxazole (CTX) could be an alternative: many studies in Zambia and Uganda demonstrated that it reduces mortality and morbidity in HIV infected persons, and CTX prophylaxis significantly improves birth outcomes in immuno-suppressed HIV women. Unfortunately, there is not yet information on its effectiveness for preventing placental malaria infection, maternal anaemia and LBW. Thus in this study, we aim to establish the safety and efficacy of daily CTX in preventing malaria infection during pregnancy and its consequences, both in HIV infected and non-infected pregnant women. This information is urgently needed to assist to issue guidelines on IPT in pregnancy.

Read the detailed description

Malaria is a major contributor of disease burden in Sub-Saharan Africa, with pregnant women and children being the most vulnerable population. P. falciparum infection in pregnancy leads to parasite sequestration in placental vascular space, with increased risks of abortion, stillbirth, prematurity, intrauterine growth retardation, maternal anaemia, low birth weight (LBW), perinatal, neonatal and infant mortality. In low transmission areas, malaria can evolve towards severe disease with high risk of mortality. In endemic areas, it is still associated with maternal anaemia, LBW and stillbirth. For prevention and control of malaria in pregnancy, WHO recommends Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPT), insecticide treated nets (ITNs) and case management for malaria and anemia.

HIV in pregnancy increases the risk of malaria, LBW, post-natal mortality and also anaemia, suggesting a synergistic interaction between HIV and malaria.

In pregnant women, HIV-1 infection decreases the efficacy of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine(SP)IPT, although 2 or more doses in 2nd and 3rd trimesters still reduce peripheral parasitaemia, placental infections and maternal anaemia.

To date, SP is the only treatment with data on efficacy and safety in IPT: WHO recommends at least 2 doses after the first trimester. But there is a documented increase in SP resistance, so cotrimoxazole (CTX) could be an alternative: many studies in Zambia and Uganda demonstrated that it reduces mortality and morbidity in HIV infected individuals, and CTX prophylaxis significantly improves birth outcomes in women with CD4 count \<200. Concurrent administration of SP and CTX has been associated with increased incidence of severe adverse reactions in HIV-infected patient.

WHO has promoted CTX as alternative to SP for IPT in immuno-compromised HIV-infected pregnant women. Unfortunately, there is no information on effectiveness of daily CTX for preventing placental malaria infection, maternal anaemia and LBW. In the past, CTX has been used to treat malaria in children and daily use of CTX by non-pregnant HIV-infected adults has been associated with a 70% reductions of the incidence of clinical malaria.

In this study, we will target both HIV infected and non-infected pregnant women with CD4≥ 200/µL, with the aim to establish the safety and efficacy of daily CTX in preventing malaria infection during pregnancy and its consequences, by assuming that CTX is not inferior to SP in reducing placental parasitaemia: such information is urgently needed to assist to issue guidelines on IPT in pregnant women.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malaria in Pregnancy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Malaria
  • Pregnancy
  • HIV
  • Intermittent Preventive Treatment
  • Safety
  • Efficacy
03

In context

Malaria

1,299 studies on the registry are indexed under Malaria; 86 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 352 is above the median of 220 across 1,027 interventional studies indexed under Malaria.

Browse Malaria studies →

Lead sponsor

Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium is the lead sponsor of 103 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed pregnancy (through palpable fundus and/ or positive pregnancy test)
  • Gestational age between 16 and 28 weeks.
  • Informed consent by patient (or parent/ guardian if patient is less than 18 years of age)
  • No symptoms consistent with malaria
  • Willingness to deliver at the health facility
  • Willingness to adhere to all requirements of the study (including HIV-1 testing)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of allergy to study drugs, or previous history of allergy to sulpha drugs
  • History or presence of major illnesses likely to influence pregnancy outcome including diabetes mellitus, severe renal or heart disease, or active tuberculosis, prior to randomization;
  • Any significant illness that requires hospitalization;
  • Intent to move out of the study catchment's area before delivery or deliver at relative's home out of the catchment's area;
  • Prior enrolment in the study or concurrent enrolment in another study
  • Severe anaemia (Hb\<7 g/dl)
  • Previous history of unfavourable pregnancy outcome: pre-eclampsia, caesarean section, stillbirth.
  • Being HIV infected and already receiving CTX prophylaxis or ARV treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
352 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    HIV-negative women taking CTX as chemoprophylaxis

    Drug: Cotrimoxazole

  • Active comparator
    2

    HIV-negative women taking SP as IPT

    Drug: Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine

  • Experimental
    3

    HIV-positive women (CD4\> 200) taking CTX as chemoprophylaxis

    Drug: Cotrimoxazole

  • Active comparator
    4

    HIV-positive women (CD4 \> 200) taking SP as IPT

    Drug: Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine

Interventions

  • DrugCotrimoxazole

    Cotrimoxazole

    Also known as: CTX, Bactrim

  • DrugSulfadoxine-pyrimethamine

    Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine

    Also known as: SP, Fansidar

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To test the hypothesis that co-trimoxazole prophylaxis is not inferior to SP intermittent preventive treatment in preventing placental malaria.

    Time frame: Pregnancy

Secondary outcomes

  1. To evaluate efficacy of CTX prophylaxis in preventing malaria peripheral parasitaemia.

    Time frame: Pregnancy

  2. To evaluate efficacy of CTX prophylaxis in preventing perinatal mortality and in improving birth weight

    Time frame: At birth

  3. To establish the safety of CTX prophylaxis on the offspring by measuring the gestational age at delivery and birth weight.

    Time frame: At birth

  4. To compare the efficacy profile of CTX prophylaxis to that of SP intermittent preventive treatment.

    Time frame: Pregnancy

  5. To compare the safety profile of CTX prophylaxis to that of SP intermittent preventive treatment.

    Time frame: Pregnancy

  6. Spontaneous abortion

    Time frame: </=28 weeks gestation

  7. Pre-term delivery

    Time frame: <37 completed weeks

  8. Neonatal mortality

    Time frame: Within 28 days after birth

  9. Maternal mortality

    Time frame: Up to 6 weeks following delivery

  10. Major and minor birth defects

    Time frame: At birth and up to 6 weeks

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Choma hospital
    Choma, Zambia
  • Shampande Clinic
    Shampande, Zambia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Manyando C, Njunju EM, Mwakazanga D, Chongwe G, Mkandawire R, Champo D, Mulenga M, De Crop M, Claeys Y, Ravinetto RM, van Overmeir C, Alessandro UD, Van Geertruyden JP. Safety of daily co-trimoxazole in pregnancy in an area of changing malaria epidemiology: a phase 3b randomized controlled clinical trial. PLoS One. 2014 May 15;9(5):e96017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096017. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24830749 ↗

Related links

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 18, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00711906
Lead sponsor
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
Collaborators
Tropical Diseases Research Centre, Zambia
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 9, 2008
Start date
Feb 2009
Primary completion
Feb 2010
Completion
Sep 2010
Last update
Jan 18, 2016

Study contacts

Christine Manyando, MD
principal investigator · Tropical Diseases Research Centre
Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden, MD PhD
study director · Institute of Tropical Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion