CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00710203DPNUpdated Apr 28, 2015Results posted

Dermatosis Papulosa Nigra

An interventional study of Pulsed dye laser and Curettage in Facial Dermatoses and Seborrheic Keratoses, sponsored by University of California, Davis. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-04-28.

Sponsored by University of California, Davis · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

DPN is a disorder among darkly pigmented patients, manifested by small, benign, variants of seborrheic keratoses, predominantly on the face.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of a 585 nm PDL for the treatment of Dermatosis Papulosa Nigra, and compare it to therapy with curettage (scraping the lesions off) and electrodesiccation (burning the lesions off).

02

Conditions studied

  • Facial Dermatoses
  • Seborrheic Keratoses

Keywords

  • Dermatosis Papulosa Nigra
  • seborrheic keratoses
03

In context

Keratosis, Actinic

364 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratosis, Actinic; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 60 across 315 interventional studies indexed under Keratosis, Actinic.

Browse Keratosis, Actinic studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Davis is the lead sponsor of 798 studies on the registry; 146 are open to participants now.

Of its 65 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 43 (66%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Over 18 years of age.
  • Able to give informed consent.
  • Desires removal of lesions.
  • Willing to come back for six week follow-up.
  • Willing to fill out post operative questionnaire.
  • At least 4 lesions less than 7 mm.
  • Diagnosis of Dermatosis Papulosa Nigra (DPN)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 18 years of age.
  • Pregnant.
  • Sensitive to laser energy.
  • History of Collagen Vascular Disorders.
  • History of Keloids.
  • History of post inflammatory hyperpigmentation.
  • Incarcerated.
  • Unable to give informed consent.
  • Unable to follow up for post operative evaluation.
  • Unable to complete patient visual analogue scale.
  • Unable to understand consent process or risks.
  • Unable to accept risk of scar, infection, minor bleeding, permanent or prolonged hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Pulsed dye laser

    Four lesions are selected on each subject for study. One lesion will be chosen for treatment with the pulsed dye laser with a 7 mm spot size. A single 10 J/cm2 pulse with 10 ms pulse duration will be used to treat the lesion.

    Device: Pulsed dye laser

  • Active comparator
    Curettage

    Four lesions are selected on each subject for study. A second lesion will be treated with curettage with or without anesthetic, depending on the patient's preference.

    Procedure: Curettage

  • Active comparator
    Electrodesiccation

    Four lesions are selected on each subject for study. A third lesion will be treated with electrodesiccation after infiltration of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine.

    Procedure: Electrodesiccation

  • Active comparator
    No treatment

    Four lesions are selected on each subject for study. A fourth lesion will not be treated and will serve as a control.

    Other: No treatment

Interventions

  • DevicePulsed dye laser

    One lesion will be chosen for treatment with the pulsed dye laser with a 7 mm spot size. A single 10 J/cm2 pulse with 10 ms pulse duration will be used to treat the lesion.

    Also known as: The study will involve the use of Cynosure Cynergy 585 nm Pulsed Dye LASER.

  • ProcedureCurettage

    A second lesion will be treated with curettage with or without anesthetic, depending on the patient's preference.

  • ProcedureElectrodesiccation

    A third lesion will be treated with electrodesiccation after infiltration of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine.

  • OtherNo treatment

    A fourth lesion will not be treated and will serve as a control.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Clearance of All Lesions

    The physician assessed percent clearance of all treated lesions and the control lesion.

    Time frame: 6 to 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Evidence of Hypopigmentation

    The physician assessed evidence of hypopigmentation.

    Time frame: 6 to 12 weeks

  2. Evidence of Hyperpigmentation

    The physician assessed evidence of hyperpigmentation.

    Time frame: 6 to 12 weeks

  3. Evidence of Scar

    The physician assessed evidence of scar.

    Time frame: 6 to 12 weeks

  4. Evidence of Texture Irregularities

    The physician assessed evidence of texture irregularities.

    Time frame: 6 to 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Mar 31, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStudy Arm
Started10
Completed10
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent Clearance of All Lesions

The physician assessed percent clearance of all treated lesions and the control lesion.

Time frame:
6 to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of lesion clearance
Percent Clearance of All Lesions
percentage of lesion clearancePulsed Dye LaserCurettageElectrodesiccationNo Treatment
Percent Clearance of All Lesions88 ± 24.0696 ± 16.8792.5 ± 9.6610 ± 0
Other pre-specifiedEvidence of Hypopigmentation

The physician assessed evidence of hypopigmentation.

Time frame:
6 to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · lesions
Evidence of Hypopigmentation
lesionsPulsed Dye LaserCurettageElectrodesiccationNo Treatment
Evidence of Hypopigmentation0000
Other pre-specifiedEvidence of Hyperpigmentation

The physician assessed evidence of hyperpigmentation.

Time frame:
6 to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · lesions
Evidence of Hyperpigmentation
lesionsPulsed Dye LaserCurettageElectrodesiccationNo Treatment
Evidence of Hyperpigmentation4450
Other pre-specifiedEvidence of Scar

The physician assessed evidence of scar.

Time frame:
6 to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · lesions
Evidence of Scar
lesionsPulsed Dye LaserCurettageElectrodesiccationNo Treatment
Evidence of Scar0000
Other pre-specifiedEvidence of Texture Irregularities

The physician assessed evidence of texture irregularities.

Time frame:
6 to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · lesions
Evidence of Texture Irregularities
lesionsPulsed Dye LaserCurettageElectrodesiccationNo Treatment
Evidence of Texture Irregularities1013

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pulsed Dye Laser—0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)
Curettage—0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)
Electrodesiccation—0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)
No Treatment—0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Study Arm
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years9
>=65 years1
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Study Arm
Mean51.60 ± 12.62
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Study Arm
Female8
Male2
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Study Arm
United States10
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, Davis Department of Dermatology
    Sacramento, California 95816, United States
09

References and documents

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 28, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00710203
Lead sponsor
University of California, Davis
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 4, 2008
Start date
Jul 2008
Primary completion
Dec 2009
Completion
Dec 2009
Results posted
Mar 31, 2014
Last update
Apr 28, 2015

Study contacts

Daniel Eisen, M.D.
principal investigator · University of California, Davis

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion