CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00708799Updated Apr 21, 2017

Efficacy of Macrolide Immunomodulation in Severe Sepsis.

A Phase 2 interventional study of Azithromycin on admission - not enrolled in the RCT in Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-21.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Safety evaluation due to recent publications.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2007, registered Jun 2008).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether macrolide treatment of patients with severe sepsis has an advantageous immunomodulatory and clinical effect compared to severe septic patients without macrolide therapy. Our main hypothesis is macrolide use in addition to standard therapy in severe septic patients has an advantageous immunomodulatory and clinical effect compared to patients with severe sepsis not treated with a macrolide.

Read the detailed description

In recent studies, the significant effects of macrolide antibiotics (azithromycin) on immune response, unrelated to their anti-microbial properties, have been appreciated. Clinical trials of macrolides added to -lactams in bacteremic Streptococcus pneumoniae community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) have consistently demonstrated an absolute risk reduction in mortality of 15% in most populations. Several cytokines including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) interleukin (IL) -1 and IL-8 which are generally proinflammatory and IL-6 and IL-10, which tend to be anti-inflammatory have been associated with sepsis. TNF is a cytokine that for a number of reasons is thought to play a central role in the pathogenesis of sepsis and septic shock. TNF concentrations are increased during clinical and experimental sepsis and increasing concentrations and especially persistence of high concentrations of TNF during sepsis are associated with decreased survival. Therefore, our primary aim is to determine whether macrolide treatment of patients with severe sepsis has an advantageous immunomodulatory and clinical effect compared to severe septic patients without macrolide therapy. Our main hypothesis is macrolide use in addition to standard therapy in severe septic patients has an advantageous immunomodulatory and clinical effect compared to patients with severe sepsis not treated with a macrolide.

02

Conditions studied

  • Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
03

In context

Sepsis

1,899 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 105 across 896 interventional studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subject, or legal representative, has given written informed consent.
  2. 18 years of age or older.
  3. SIRS is defined as two or more of:

    • Temperature > 38o C or \< 36oC
    • Heart rate > 90 beats/min
    • Respiratory rate > 20 breaths/min or PaCO2\< 32mmHg
    • White blood cell count > 12.000/mm3; \< 4000/mm3; or > 10% immature (band) forms.
  4. Presence of a suspected or proven infection. Patients with suspected infection must have evidence of an infection, such as white blood cells in a normally sterile body fluid, perforated viscus, chest x-ray consistent with pneumonia and associated with purulent sputum production, or a clinical syndrome associated with a high probability of infection (for example, purpura fulminans or ascending cholangitis).
  5. Presence of one or more sepsis-associated organ failure. The onset of the first sepsis-associated organ failure must occur within the 48-hour period immediately preceding initiation of study drug infusion. A patient must have an organ failure attributable to the sepsis episode. The organ failure must be newly developed and not explained by underlying disease processes or by effects of concomitant therapy.

    • Cardiovascular: An arterial systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 90 mm Hg or a mean arterial pressure (MAP) 70 mm Hg for at least 1 hour despite adequate fluid resuscitation, adequate intravascular volume status, or the need for vasopressors to maintain SBP 90 mm Hg or MAP 70 mm Hg.
    • Renal: Average urine output \<0.5 mL/kg/h for 1 hour despite adequate fluid resuscitation
    • Respiratory: Evidence of acute pulmonary dysfunction PaO2/FiO2 300 and, clinical exam or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure not suggestive of volume overload. If pneumonia is the suspected site of infection, the patient must have a PaO2/FiO2 200.
    • Hematology: Platelet count \<80,000/mm3 or a 50% decrease in platelet count from the highest value recorded over the last 3 days.
    • Unexplained metabolic acidosis: Defined by (1) pH 7.30 or base deficit 5.0 mEq/L or (2) plasma lactate level >1.5 times the upper limit of normal.

Adequate fluid resuscitation or adequate intravascular volume is defined as either pulmonary arterial wedge pressure 12 mm Hg or central venous pressure 8 mm Hg. Vasopressors is defined as dopamine 5 g/kg/min or any dose of norepinephrine, epinephrine, or phenylephrine. Dobutamine is not considered a vasopressor.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Macrolide therapy indicated for clinical condition. If after randomization, the treating physician determines that a macrolide is indicated and no other alternative antibiotic is appropriate, the patient will be excluded from the trial. However, if only one dose of azithromycin had been given and the treating physician decided to stop it, azithromycin might be administered.
  2. Known allergy to macrolides.
  3. Prolonged QT syndrome or on medications with increased risk of QT prolongation.
  4. Pregnant or lactating.

Immunosuppression as defined by:

  1. Chemotherapy within the last 30 days,
  2. Leukemia or lymphoma which is not in remission,
  3. Solid organ or bone marrow/stem cell transplant,
  4. Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection with CD4 count \< 200 cells/mm3,
  5. Chronic corticosteroid use equivalent to > 10 mg prednisone per day,
  6. Patient or family decision to limit ICU care.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1

    Standard antibiotic therapy +Azithromycin 500 mg intravenously daily for 5 days

    Other: Azithromycin on admission - not enrolled in the RCT

  • No intervention
    Arm 2

    Standard antibiotic therapy

Interventions

  • OtherAzithromycin on admission - not enrolled in the RCT

    One dose of azithromycin prior to inclusion to the RCT

    Also known as: Arm 3

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in cytokines expression

    Time frame: Between admission and day five of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. 28-day mortality

    Time frame: 28 days or discharge

07

Study locations

1 site
  • South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio, TX
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lopes Junior E, Leite HP, Pinho Franco MDC, Konstantyner T. Association of selenium status with endothelial activation during acute systemic inflammation in children. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2022 Feb;47:367-374. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.11.007. Epub 2021 Nov 14. PubMed 35063229 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 21, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00708799
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Collaborators
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 2, 2008
Start date
Nov 2007
Primary completion
Nov 2013
Completion
Nov 2013
Last update
Apr 21, 2017

Study contacts

Marcos I Restrepo, MD BA MSc
principal investigator · South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio, TX

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion