CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00705224Updated Jul 1, 2015Results posted

Effect of Insulin Resistance on the Safety and Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin Treatment in HCV (Study P05562)

An observational study in Hepatitis C, Chronic and Hepatitis C Virus, sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-07-01.

Sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
250
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) of any genotype will be treated with a standard treatment regimen (pegylated interferon and ribavirin) according to routine clinical practice in Russia. The objective of this study is to examine the influence of insulin resistance on the safety and efficacy of treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin and to determine the prevalence of insulin resistance in different populations of CHC patients.

Read the detailed description

consecutive patient sampling

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Hepatitis A

2,709 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis A; 142 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 250 is close to the median of 250 across 687 observational studies indexed under Hepatitis A.

Browse Hepatitis A studies →

Lead sponsor

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC is the lead sponsor of 2,114 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 489 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 362 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study will include naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) of any genotype who will be treated with a standard treatment regimen (pegylated interferon and ribavirin) according to routine clinical practice in Russia.

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed diagnosis of CHC according to local regulations
  • Naïve Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) CHC patient
  • No contraindications for PEG-IFN CHC therapy
  • Negative urine pregnancy test result (for females of childbearing potential) documented within the 24-hour period prior to the first dose of study drugs. Additionally, all female patients of childbearing potential and all males with female partners of childbearing potential must use two forms of effective contraception (combined) during treatment and 6 months after treatment end
  • Willingness to give written informed consent and willingness to participate in and comply with the study requirements.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PEG-IFN treatment in history
  • Contraindications for PEG-IFN CHC therapy
  • Females who are pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Male partners of females who are pregnant
  • Potentially unreliable participants, and those judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for the study.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
250 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with chronic hepatitis C

    Naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) of any genotype will be treated with a standard treatment regimen (pegylated interferon and ribavirin) according to routine clinical practice in Russia.

    Biological: Pegylated Interferon · Drug: Ribavirin

Interventions

  • BiologicalPegylated Interferon

    Routine treatment with a combination of any pegylated interferon and ribavirin was used according to the label/local practice in Russia. The treatment course duration complied with the labeled dosage regimen. Each dose of pegylated interferon was administered as a subcutaneous injection calculated as 1.5 mcg/kg once a week. Therapy duration varied from 24 to 48 weeks depending on Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype, viral load, activity and stage of hepatitis C. The Sponsor did not provide formal drug supply.

    Also known as: PegIntron, (SCH 54031)

  • DrugRibavirin

    Routine treatment with a combination of any pegylated interferon and ribavirin was used according to the label/local practice in Russia. The treatment course duration complied with the labeled dosage regimen. Ribavirin was taken orally as 200 mg gelatinous capsules. The daily dose varied from 800 to 1200 mg (depending on patient's body weight) twice daily in the morning and in the evening with meal. Therapy duration varied from 24 to 48 weeks depending on HCV genotype, viral load, activity and stage of hepatitis C. The Sponsor did not provide formal drug supply.

    Also known as: Rebetol, (SCH 18908)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study

    Sustained Virological response (SVR) was assessed at the end of the study (Visit 4) to investigate the presence or absence of SVR. SVR was defined as undetectable plasma hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV-RNA) at 24 weeks after termination of treatment. Visit 4 was considered Week 48 or Week 72 depending on a treatment duration of 24 or 48 weeks respectively.

    Time frame: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline

    SVR was assessed at the end of the study (Visit 4) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as Homeostasis model assessment - of insulin-resistance \[HOMA-IR\] \>3) to investigate the presence or absence of SVR. SVR was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at 24 weeks after termination of treatment. Visit 4 was considered Week 48 or Week 72 depending on a treatment duration of 24 or 48 weeks respectively.

    Time frame: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Response Following Treatment as Assessed at End of Treatment by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline

    Response following treatment (RFT) was assessed at the end of treatment (Visit 3) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as HOMA-IR \>3) to investigate the presence or absence of RFT. RFT was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at end of treatment. Visit 3 was considered Week 24 or Week 48 after treatment start depending on treatment duration.

    Time frame: Week 24 or 48 after treatment start

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline

    Virological relapse (VR) was assessed at the end of the study (Visit 4) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as HOMA-IR \>3) to investigate the percentage of participants who demonstrated VR. VR was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA (RFT +) at end of treatment (Visit 3- considered Week 24 or Week 48 after treatment start depending on treatment duration), but lost RFT (considered sustained non-Responders) at end of study (Visit 4- considered Week 48 or Week 72 depending on a treatment duration of 24 or 48 weeks respectively).

    Time frame: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Virological Response as Assessed at Visit 2 by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline

    Early Virological response (EVR) was assessed at 12 weeks after treatment start (Visit 2) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as HOMA-IR \>3) to investigate the percentage of participants who achieved EVR. EVR was defined as a substantial (greater than 2 log10) decrease in viral load (measured as International Units/milliliter) and/or negative Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based viral load qualitative result as assessed at visit 2 of the study.

    Time frame: Week 12 after treatment start

07

Results

Posted Sep 16, 2011

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePegylated Interferon and Ribavirin
Started250
Completed239
Not completed11
Withdrew: Adverse event1
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject3
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up5

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study

Sustained Virological response (SVR) was assessed at the end of the study (Visit 4) to investigate the presence or absence of SVR. SVR was defined as undetectable plasma hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV-RNA) at 24 weeks after termination of treatment. Visit 4 was considered Week 48 or Week 72 depending on a treatment duration of 24 or 48 weeks respectively.

Time frame:
24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study
Percentage of ParticipantsPegylated Interferon and Ribavirin
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study81.2 (76.0 to 86.3)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline

SVR was assessed at the end of the study (Visit 4) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as Homeostasis model assessment - of insulin-resistance \[HOMA-IR\] \>3) to investigate the presence or absence of SVR. SVR was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at 24 weeks after termination of treatment. Visit 4 was considered Week 48 or Week 72 depending on a treatment duration of 24 or 48 weeks respectively.

Time frame:
24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline
Percentage of ParticipantsHOMA-IR<=3HOMA-IR >3
Genotype I45.747.5
Genotype II14.37.5
Genotype III38.645.0
Other1.40
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Response Following Treatment as Assessed at End of Treatment by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline

Response following treatment (RFT) was assessed at the end of treatment (Visit 3) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as HOMA-IR \>3) to investigate the presence or absence of RFT. RFT was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at end of treatment. Visit 3 was considered Week 24 or Week 48 after treatment start depending on treatment duration.

Time frame:
Week 24 or 48 after treatment start
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Response Following Treatment as Assessed at End of Treatment by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline
Percentage of ParticipantsHOMA-IR<=3HOMA-IR >3
Genotype I50.652.9
Genotype II12.25.9
Genotype III35.941.2
Other1.30
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline

Virological relapse (VR) was assessed at the end of the study (Visit 4) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as HOMA-IR \>3) to investigate the percentage of participants who demonstrated VR. VR was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA (RFT +) at end of treatment (Visit 3- considered Week 24 or Week 48 after treatment start depending on treatment duration), but lost RFT (considered sustained non-Responders) at end of study (Visit 4- considered Week 48 or Week 72 depending on a treatment duration of 24 or 48 weeks respectively).

Time frame:
24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline
Percentage of ParticipantsHOMA-IR<=3HOMA-IR >3
Genotype I83.372.7
Genotype II00
Genotype III16.727.3
Other00
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Virological Response as Assessed at Visit 2 by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline

Early Virological response (EVR) was assessed at 12 weeks after treatment start (Visit 2) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as HOMA-IR \>3) to investigate the percentage of participants who achieved EVR. EVR was defined as a substantial (greater than 2 log10) decrease in viral load (measured as International Units/milliliter) and/or negative Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based viral load qualitative result as assessed at visit 2 of the study.

Time frame:
Week 12 after treatment start
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Virological Response as Assessed at Visit 2 by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline
Percentage of ParticipantsHOMA-IR<=3HOMA-IR >3
Genotype I51.354.0
Genotype II12.76.0
Genotype III34.840.0
Other1.30

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin—2/250 (0.8%)177/250 (70.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPegylated Interferon and Ribavirin
Drug Exposure During PregnancyInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/250
Acoustic NeuritisNervous system disorders1/250
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPegylated Interferon and Ribavirin
Influenza Like IllnessGeneral disorders91/250
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders90/250
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders69/250
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders50/250
AstheniaGeneral disorders31/250
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders30/250
Weight DecreasedInvestigations26/250
DepressionPsychiatric disorders25/250
PyrexiaGeneral disorders17/250
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders14/250

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin
Mean36.0 ± 9.78
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin
Female104
Male146
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00705224
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 25, 2008
Start date
May 2008
Primary completion
Aug 2010
Completion
Aug 2010
Results posted
Sep 16, 2011
Last update
Jul 1, 2015

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion