ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00692835Updated Oct 2, 2012

Immediate Postoperative Course of Patients With Mini Video Assisted Total Thyroidectomy (miVAT) Versus Classic Total Thyroidectomy (cTT)

An interventional study of Total Thyroidectomy (Mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy) and Total Thyroidectomy (Classic Thyroidectomy) in Goiter, sponsored by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki. Completed at 1 site in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-10-02.

Sponsored by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Protocol Synopsis

  • Protocol title: Immediate postoperative course of patients with mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy (miVAT) versus classic Thyroidectomy (cTT)
  • Purpose: Comparison of the immediate postoperative course and complications of the patients using the two techniques
  • Design: Prospective, single-center randomized study
  • Patient Population: Male or female subjects 18 years of age or older with nodular goiter who are scheduled for total thyroidectomy (miVAT or T)
  • No. of Subjects: 100 patients divided into two groups, estimated up to 1 year to enroll
  • Duration of Treatment: During the operation
  • Duration of Follow-up: Follow-up will be performed daily while hospitalized, and by phone till the 7th postoperative day
  • Endpoints: To evaluate the safety and cost-effectiveness of each technique
Read the detailed description

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Classic articles by Kocher, Halsted, Lahey, Crile and Riddell have provided surgeons with principles that have significantly reduced operative morbidity and mortality from thyroidectomy. Nowadays, surgery of the thyroid gland is considered safe with practically null mortality. Morbidity, although infrequent, is still a reason for concern. The complications directly attributed to total thyroidectomy are hypoparathyroidism, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, hemorrhage, oesophageal perforation and trachea instability and perforation. Furthermore, other complications, related to the surgical technique, such as seroma or wound infection, may also occur.

Several techniques are employed in order to resect the suffering thyroid gland. Classic total thyroidectomy (cTT) is considered today, the golden standard of total thyroid resection for nodular goiter. One the other hand, new technologies and great experience of several surgeons gave recently birth to a new technique named mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy (miVAT).

This protocol is designed to compare data in regards to cTT versus miVAT in the immediate postoperative period - hospitalization period.

2.0 OBJECTIVES

To compare the immediate postoperative course and complications of the patients using the two techniques (cTT and miVAT).

3.0 DESIGN AND STUDY POPULATION

The study is designed as a prospective randomized single center study. Any patient that is scheduled for a total thyroidectomy for nodular goiter with nodules less that 4cm will be offered participation in this study.

The study will be conducted until 100 patients are treated (50 in each group). It is estimated that it will take up to 1 year to enroll the patients and an additional one week to obtain the follow-up information

4.0 STUDY PROCEDURE

4.1 Pre-Surgery

Procedures preformed such as routine hospital examinations, antibiotic prophylactic treatment, anticoagulant treatment and diet will be according to the standard management protocol and will be recorded for the study. The following pre-surgery information will be recorded:

  1. Demographic information including: Age, gender, ethnicity
  2. Height, weight, BMI and ASA status
  3. Behavioral history (Smoking, alcohol or drug use)
  4. Preoperative labs (WBC, Ht, Hgb, SGOT, SGPT, LDH, Glc, Ure, Cre, K+, Na+, Ca2+,Mg2+, TP, ALB, fT3, fT4, TSH, PTH, PT, aPTT, INR)
  5. Diagnosis including clinical observations and previous imaging results
  6. FNA results (if any)
  7. Medications
  8. Current and past history of surgical and medical comorbidities
  9. Vocal cord assessment by indirect laryngoscopy

4.2 Intra-operative

The surgeon will perform the preplanned operation. Each recurrent laryngeal nerve has to be identified and its activity has to be recorded with the help of an electrode. The following intraoperative variables will be recorded for all patients:

  1. Surgery date
  2. Left laryngeal nerve activity
  3. Right laryngeal activity
  4. Method of devascularization of right lobe
  5. Method of devascularization of left lobe
  6. Technical complications
  7. Estimated blood loss
  8. Duration of surgery
  9. Difficulty of the operation (1=very difficult to 5=very easy)
  10. Operation performed
  11. Procedure related comments
  12. Usage of drains (number and type)
  13. Usage of haemostatic material

4.3 Pathology data form

The following pathology data will be recorded for all patients:

  1. Post-operative diagnosis including pathology report
  2. Weight of the gland
  3. Dimensions of the gland

4.4 Postoperative follow-up

Follow-up evaluation will be performed every day while hospitalized. There will be a contact by phone - if the patient is not hospitalized- every day until the 7th postoperative day. The following information will be recorded for all patients while they are hospitalized:

  1. Temperature (max for 24hour period)
  2. Wound infection
  3. Antibiotics
  4. Oral analgesic
  5. Parenteral narcotics
  6. Tolerating liquid and solids
  7. Average Pain score for patient resting and moving/day
  8. Postoperative labs (WBC, Ht, Hgb, SGOT, SGPT, LDH, Glc, Ure, Cre, K+, Na+, Ca2+,Mg2+, TP, ALB, fT3, fT4, TSH, PTH, PT, aPTT, INR)
  9. Date of hospital ready to be discharged and date discharged
  10. Blood in the drains (if any)
  11. Sign of hypoparathyroidism (Chvostek and Trousseau)
  12. Vocal alterations by patient (voice completely altered=10 to voice not altered=1)
  13. Vocal cord assessment by indirect laryngoscopy
  14. Comments

5.0 COMPLICATIONS AND ADVERSE EVENTS

The investigator is required to notify the coordinator of any serious adverse events. The coordinator is also required to notify the Ethics Committee according to local regulations and requirements.

Serious Adverse Events include:

  1. Death regardless of cause
  2. Any-life-threatening event
  3. Any hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
  4. Any event that results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity to the patient.

6.0 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The objective of this study is to compare the T with the miVAT techniques concerning the immediate postoperative course of the patients in relation to complications during and post procedure.

Statistical analysis included description of these intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and indication of patient characteristics associated with these outcomes.

In order to efficiently compare the two techniques random allocation of the patients within two groups (Group A=T and Group B=miVAT) was employed. All patient with even number were included in group A, while all patients with odd number were included in group B.

Since the study does not have pre-specified hypotheses all statistical analyses are exploratory and interpretation of results should be within this context.

7.0 DATA MONITORING PLAN

The coordinator will monitor all data accrual. Furthermore, the coordinator will review the progress of the clinical trial including safety data and ensure as possible that it is conducted, recorded and reported in accordance with the protocol, good clinical practice and the applicable regulatory requirements.

8.0 DATA CONFIDENTIALITY

Each patient ill be identified by his/her initials and a unique patient identification number. Source data will be stored with source documents. Only personnel responsible for collecting data and transcribing it into the case report forms will have access to the data. Records will remain on site in secure areas.

10.0 ETHICS

Prior to study institution review board (IRB) approval should be obtained. Any changes in the study protocol, informed consent forms, or investigator must be re-approved by the IRB. All patients enrolled in the study will provide their consent prior to entering the study. An informed consent form shall be signed and dated by the patient. The investigator will retain the forms as part of the study records.

This study will be executed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, in agreement with the guidelines for conducting a clinical investigation in accordance with the principles of ICH GCP outlined in the E6 document. By signing the present protocol, participants in the study commit themselves to carry it out in accordance with local legal requirements.

11.0 INFORMED CONSENT

All eligible patients should have the capacity to provide an informed consent. The above described inclusion and exclusion criteria were designed to ensure the entry of the appropriate population of patients to this study and will be approved by the local IRB. Screening for these criteria will be conducted by the coordinator.

Eligible patients will be educated about the research proposal by a study investigator. To determine whether the patient has understood the issues, he/she will be asked to describe what the research entails and whether they have any questions. All questions will be addressed prior to enrollment. The patient can refuse participation in the study at any time.

A written informed consent form will be generated. For each patient, a case report form (CRF) will be completed, providing general medical information and history.

02

Conditions studied

  • Goiter

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Goiter [C19.874.283]
  • Thyroid Neoplasms [C19.874.788]
03

In context

Goiter

66 studies on the registry are indexed under Goiter; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 100 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Goiter.

Browse Goiter studies →

Lead sponsor

Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki is the lead sponsor of 282 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient is over 18 years old
  2. Patient scheduled for a non-emergency operation
  3. Patient signs and dates a written form (ICF) and indicates an understanding of the study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient had a previous operation at the thyroid
  2. Patient is participating in another clinical trial which may affect this study's outcomes
  3. Patient in toxic condition (non euthyroid or hypothyroid )
  4. Patient receiving anticoagulation treatment for other medical condition
  5. Echographic evidence that the size at least one nodule is more than 4cm
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    A

    Patients with mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy (miVAT)

    Procedure: Total Thyroidectomy (Mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy)

  • Active comparator
    B

    Immediate postoperative course of patients with classic Thyroidectomy (cTT)

    Procedure: Total Thyroidectomy (Classic Thyroidectomy)

Interventions

  • ProcedureTotal Thyroidectomy (Mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy)

    Immediate postoperative course of patients with Thyroidectomy

  • ProcedureTotal Thyroidectomy (Classic Thyroidectomy)

    Immediate postoperative course of patients with Thyroidectomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative course of patients

    Time frame: 7 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • 3rd Department of Surgery, AHEPA University Hospital
    Thessaloniki, 55236, Greece
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 2, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00692835
Collaborators
AHEPA University Hospital
Responsible party
Papavramidis Theodossis (Elected lecturer, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 6, 2008
Start date
May 2008
Primary completion
Dec 2009
Completion
Sep 2012
Last update
Oct 2, 2012

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion