ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00689117Updated May 30, 2017Results posted

A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of an Investigational Product Called CT Gel

A Phase 3 interventional study of CT Gel and Clindamycin Gel (clindamycin ) in Acne Vulgaris and Acne, sponsored by Stiefel, a GSK Company. Completed at 32 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-30.

Sponsored by Stiefel, a GSK Company (part of GlaxoSmithKline) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,649
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of CT Gel in subjects with acne vulgaris. The hypothesis is that CT Gel is superior to Clindamycin Gel, Tretinoin Gel and Vehicle Gel for the treatment of acne vulgaris.

Read the detailed description

CT Gel is a fixed-combination product that addresses the multifactorial factors of acne vulgaris pathogenesis. Based on numerous nonclinical pharmacology studies of each active ingredient, it is expected that this new product will have three biological actions: 1) comedolytic, 2) antimicrobial, and 3) anti-inflammatory.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acne Vulgaris
  • Acne

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Acne Vulgaris
  • Acne
03

In context

Acne Vulgaris

790 studies on the registry are indexed under Acne Vulgaris; 93 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,649 is above the median of 70 across 672 interventional studies indexed under Acne Vulgaris.

Browse Acne Vulgaris studies →

Lead sponsor

Stiefel, a GSK Company is the lead sponsor of 56 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

First submitted before Stiefel became part of GlaxoSmithKline.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female 12 years of age or older in good general health
  • Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) score of 2 or greater at Baseline

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any nodulo-cystic lesions at Baseline
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • History or presence of regional enteritis or inflammatory bowel disease or similar symptoms.
  • Treatment with estrogens, including oral, implanted and topical , androgens, or anti-androgenic agents for 12 weeks or less prior to study start.
  • Use of topical anti-acne medications within the past 2 weeks.
  • Use of topical or systemic antibiotics on the face within the past 2 weeks.
  • Use of topical or systemic within the past 2 weeks.
  • Use of systemic retinoids within the past 3 months.
  • Use of astringents, toners and skin cleansers for less than 2 weeks prior to the start of the study.
  • Concomitant use of facial product containing glycolic or other acids, masks, washes or soaps containing benzoyl peroxide or salicylic acid, non mild cleansers or moisturizers containing retinol, salicylic or α- or β-hydroxy acids.
  • Concomitant use of mega-doses of certain vitamins, such as vitamin D (>2000IU QD) vitamin B12, haloperidol, halogens such as iodide and bromide, lithium, hydantoin and phenobarbital.
  • Facial procedures (chemical or laser peel, microdermabrasion, etc.) within the past 2 weeks or during the study.
  • Concomitant use of tanning booths or sunbathing.
  • Known or previous allergic reaction to any of the active components, lincomycin, retinoids or of the study product
  • A significant medical history of or are currently
  • Current drug or alcohol abuse. (Drug screening not required.)
  • Use of any therapy within 4 weeks of enrollment.
  • Any other condition which, in the judgment of the investigator, would put the subject at unacceptable risk for participation in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,649 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    CT Gel

    Drug: CT Gel

  • Active comparator
    2

    Clindamycin Gel (clindamycin)

    Drug: Clindamycin Gel (clindamycin )

  • Active comparator
    3

    Tretinoin Gel (tretinoin)

    Drug: Tretinoin Gel (tretinoin)

  • Placebo comparator
    4

    Vehicle Gel

    Drug: Vehicle Gel

Interventions

  • DrugCT Gel

    Topical gel consisting of clindamycin 1% and tretinoin 0.025%, applied once daily in the evening for 12 weeks

  • Clindamycin 1% gel applied topically once daily in the evening for 12 weeks

  • Tretinoin 0.025% gel applied topically once daily in the evening for 12 weeks

  • DrugVehicle Gel

    Topical gel without clindamycin or tretinoin applied topically once daily in the evening for 12 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Absolute Change From Baseline in Lesion Counts (Total, Inflammatory, and Non-inflammatory) at Week 12 (End of Study)

    Acne lesion counts (inflammatory \[papules, pustules, nodules\], non-inflammatory \[open and closed comedones\], and total) were performed on the face of participants. Change from baseline is defined as Week 12 values minus Baseline values. The total lesion count is the sum of the inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  2. The Percentage of Participants Who Had a Minimum 2-grade Improvement in the Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline to Week 12

    The ISGA is a static ("snap-shot") evaluation of acne severity performed by an investigator/assessor at every visit. The ISGA score is measured on a 6-point ordinal scale, where 0=Clear and 5=Very Severe. Change is calculated as the Week 12 value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Lesion Counts (Inflammatory, Non-inflammatory, and Total) at Week 12

    Acne lesion counts (inflammatory \[papules, pustules, nodules\], non-inflammatory \[open and closed comedones\], and total) were performed on the face of participants. Change from baseline is defined as Week 12 values minus Baseline values. The total lesion count is the sum of the inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  2. The Percentage of Participants With a Subjects Global Assessment Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12

    The SGA score is a global evaluation of acne severity performed by participants at all visits and measured on a 5-point ordinal scale, where 0=My face is basically free of acne and 5=My face has blackheads and/or whiteheads. A score of 1=My face has several blackheads and/or whiteheads and small pimples, but there are no tender deep-seated bumps or cysts.

    Time frame: Week 12

  3. The Percentage of Participants Who Had ISGA Scores of 0 or 1 at Week 12

    The ISGA is a static ("snap-shot") evaluation of acne severity performed by an investigator/assessor at every visit. The ISGA score is measured on a 6-point ordinal scale, where 0=Clear and 5=Very Severe. A score of 1=Skin Almost Clear: rare non-inflammatory lesions present, with rare non-inflamed papules (papules must be resolving and may be hyper-pigmented, though not pink-red) requiring no futher treatment in the Investigator's opinion.

    Time frame: Week 12

07

Results

Posted Dec 2, 2010

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCT GelClindamycin GelTretinoin GelVehicle Gel
Started476467464242
Completed414416405211
Not completed62515931
Withdrew: Adverse event6050
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up26191711
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy1222
Withdrew: Non-compliance with study treatment3331
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject19182613
Withdrew: Unable to comply with visit schedule0011
Withdrew: Inclusion/exclusion criteria not met1200
Withdrew: Non-compliance with treatment regimen0100
Withdrew: Change/discontinuation of birth control1110
Withdrew: Use of prohibitive medication2130
Withdrew: Pregnancy0202
Withdrew: Incarceration2000
Withdrew: Fear of birth defects0010
Withdrew: Transportation1000
Withdrew: Patient withdrew from study0001
Withdrew: Personal reason0100
Withdrew: Dispensing error0100

Outcome measures

PrimaryAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lesion Counts (Total, Inflammatory, and Non-inflammatory) at Week 12 (End of Study)

Acne lesion counts (inflammatory \[papules, pustules, nodules\], non-inflammatory \[open and closed comedones\], and total) were performed on the face of participants. Change from baseline is defined as Week 12 values minus Baseline values. The total lesion count is the sum of the inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · lesions
Absolute Change From Baseline in Lesion Counts (Total, Inflammatory, and Non-inflammatory) at Week 12 (End of Study)
lesionsCT GelClindamycin GelTretinoin GelVehicle Gel
Inflammatory Lesion Counts-15.5 ± 10.33-14.5 ± 9.37-13.9 ± 11.05-11.1 ± 11.70
Non-Inflammatory Lesion Counts-23.2 ± 20.41-19.5 ± 19.72-22.1 ± 21.75-17.0 ± 20.58
Total Lesion Counts-38.7 ± 26.80-34.0 ± 25.16-36.0 ± 28.26-28.1 ± 27.26
Statistical analysis
  • CT Gel vs Clindamycin Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = 0.063 (Inflammatory lesion count)
  • CT Gel vs Tretinoin Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = 0.003 (Inflammatory lesion count)
  • CT Gel vs Vehicle Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (Inflammatory lesion count)
  • CT Gel vs Clindamycin Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = 0.004 (Non-inflammatory lesion count)
  • CT Gel vs Tretinoin Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = 0.550 (Non-inflammatory lesion count)
  • CT Gel vs Vehicle Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (Non-inflammatory lesion count)
  • CT Gel vs Clindamycin Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (Total lesion count)
  • CT Gel vs Tretinoin Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = 0.016 (Total lesion count)
  • CT Gel vs Vehicle Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (Total lesion count)
PrimaryThe Percentage of Participants Who Had a Minimum 2-grade Improvement in the Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline to Week 12

The ISGA is a static ("snap-shot") evaluation of acne severity performed by an investigator/assessor at every visit. The ISGA score is measured on a 6-point ordinal scale, where 0=Clear and 5=Very Severe. Change is calculated as the Week 12 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
The Percentage of Participants Who Had a Minimum 2-grade Improvement in the Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline to Week 12
percentage of participantsCT GelClindamycin GelTretinoin GelVehicle Gel
The Percentage of Participants Who Had a Minimum 2-grade Improvement in the Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline to Week 1236.326.626.120.2
Statistical analysis
  • CT Gel vs Clindamycin Gel · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.001 (Data based on Data on File documenting FDA reanalysis request)
  • CT Gel vs Tretinoin Gel · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (Data based on Data on File documenting FDA reanalysis request)
  • CT Gel vs Vehicle Gel · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (Data based on Data on File documenting FDA reanalysis request)
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Lesion Counts (Inflammatory, Non-inflammatory, and Total) at Week 12

Acne lesion counts (inflammatory \[papules, pustules, nodules\], non-inflammatory \[open and closed comedones\], and total) were performed on the face of participants. Change from baseline is defined as Week 12 values minus Baseline values. The total lesion count is the sum of the inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Lesion Counts (Inflammatory, Non-inflammatory, and Total) at Week 12
percent changeCT GelClindamycin GelTretinoin GelVehicle Gel
Inflammatory Lesions-60.5 ± 36.21-56.6 ± 44.99-54.5 ± 39.19-43.3 ± 44.9
Non-Inflammatory Lesions-51.1 ± 33.02-42.9 ± 36.6-47.3 ± 43.5-36.0 ± 39.14
Total Lesions-55.0 ± 30.47-49.0 ± 30.08-50.6 ± 34.82-39.1 ± 36.48
Statistical analysis
  • CT Gel vs Clindamycin Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = 0.065 (Inflammatory lesion count)
  • CT Gel vs Tretinoin Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = 0.002 (Inflammatory lesion count)
  • CT Gel vs Vehicle Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (Inflammatory lesion count)
  • CT Gel vs Clindamycin Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (Non-inflammatory lesion count)
  • CT Gel vs Tretinoin Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = 0.284 (Non-inflammatory lesion count)
  • CT Gel vs Vehicle Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (Non-inflammatory lesion count)
  • CT Gel vs Clindamycin Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (Total lesion count)
  • CT Gel vs Tretinoin Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = 0.028 (Total lesion count)
  • CT Gel vs Vehicle Gel · Ranked ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (Total lesion count)
SecondaryThe Percentage of Participants With a Subjects Global Assessment Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12

The SGA score is a global evaluation of acne severity performed by participants at all visits and measured on a 5-point ordinal scale, where 0=My face is basically free of acne and 5=My face has blackheads and/or whiteheads. A score of 1=My face has several blackheads and/or whiteheads and small pimples, but there are no tender deep-seated bumps or cysts.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · participants
The Percentage of Participants With a Subjects Global Assessment Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12
participantsCT GelClindamycin GelTretinoin GelVehicle Gel
The Percentage of Participants With a Subjects Global Assessment Score of 0 or 1 at Week 1262606250
Statistical analysis
  • CT Gel vs Clindamycin Gel · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.671
  • CT Gel vs Tretinoin Gel · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.919
  • CT Gel vs Vehicle Gel · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.002
SecondaryThe Percentage of Participants Who Had ISGA Scores of 0 or 1 at Week 12

The ISGA is a static ("snap-shot") evaluation of acne severity performed by an investigator/assessor at every visit. The ISGA score is measured on a 6-point ordinal scale, where 0=Clear and 5=Very Severe. A score of 1=Skin Almost Clear: rare non-inflammatory lesions present, with rare non-inflamed papules (papules must be resolving and may be hyper-pigmented, though not pink-red) requiring no futher treatment in the Investigator's opinion.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
The Percentage of Participants Who Had ISGA Scores of 0 or 1 at Week 12
percentage of participantsCT GelClindamycin GelTretinoin GelVehicle Gel
The Percentage of Participants Who Had ISGA Scores of 0 or 1 at Week 1243.136.633.822.7
Statistical analysis
  • CT Gel vs Clindamycin Gel · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.002
  • CT Gel vs Tretinoin Gel · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001
  • CT Gel vs Vehicle Gel · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
CT Gel—1/476 (0.2%)27/476 (5.7%)
Clindamycin Gel—1/467 (0.2%)34/467 (7.3%)
Tretinoin Gel—3/464 (0.6%)27/464 (5.8%)
Vehicle Gel—1/242 (0.4%)18/242 (7.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCT GelClindamycin GelTretinoin GelVehicle Gel
BronchitisInfections and infestations0/4760/4670/4641/242
ConcussionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/4760/4671/4640/242
Suicide attemptPsychiatric disorders0/4760/4671/4640/242
Ovarian cystReproductive system and breast disorders0/4760/4671/4640/242
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders0/4761/4670/4640/242
Infectious mononucleosisInfections and infestations1/4760/4670/4640/242
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventCT GelClindamycin GelTretinoin GelVehicle Gel
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations27/47634/46727/46418/242

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CT GelClindamycin GelTretinoin GelVehicle GelTotal
Mean20.8 ± 8.520.2 ± 8.120.2 ± 7.720.6 ± 8.420.4 ± 8.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CT GelClindamycin GelTretinoin GelVehicle GelTotal
Female269266264153952
Male20720120089697
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)CT GelClindamycin GelTretinoin GelVehicle GelTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native444315
Asian8811532
Black948510351333
Multiracial121619552
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander04217
White3583493241761207
Missing01113
08

Study locations

32 sites
  • Radiant Research
    Birmingham, Alabama 35209, United States
  • Coastal Clinical Research, Inc.
    Mobile, Alabama 33608, United States
  • Burke Pharmaceutical Research
    Hot Springs, Arkansas 71913, United States
  • Center for Dermatology, Cosmetic and Laser Surgery
    Fremont, California 94538, United States
  • University Clinical Trials
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • Longmont Medical Research Network
    Longmont, Colorado 80501, United States
  • FXM Research Corporation
    Miami, Florida 33175, United States
  • FXM Research - Miramar
    Miramar, Florida 33027, United States
  • Advanced Dermatolgy & Cosemtic Surgery
    Ormond Beach, Florida 32174, United States
  • Dermatology Specialists
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Massachusettes General Hospital - Clinical Unit for Research Trials in Skin
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Henry Ford Medical Center
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Minnesota Clinical Study Center
    Fridley, Minnesota 55432, United States
  • Skin Specialists, P.C.
    Omaha, Nebraska 68144, United States
  • Academic Dermatology Research
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, United States
  • Dermatology Research Associates, Inc.
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45230, United States
  • Yardley Dermatology Associates
    Yardley, Pennsylvania 19067, United States
  • Clinical Partners, LLC
    Johnston, Rhode Island 02919, United States
  • Dermatology Associates of Knoxville, P.C.
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37934, United States
  • Tennessee Clinical Research
    Nashville, Tennessee 37215, United States
  • DermResearch, Inc.
    Austin, Texas 78759, United States
  • J & S Studies, Inc.
    College Station, Texas 77840, United States
  • The Hair and Skin Research Treatment Center
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
  • Dermatology Research Center, Inc.
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84124, United States
  • Premier Clincial Research
    Spokane, Washington 99204, United States
  • Advanced Healthcare
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53209, United States
  • Dermatology And Skin Centre
    Belize City, Belize
  • Dr. Moguel's Clinic
    Belize City, Belize
  • K. Papp Clinical Research, Inc.
    Waterloo, Ontario N2J 1C4, Canada
  • Windsor Clinical Research Center, Inc.
    Windsor, Ontario N8W 5L7, Canada
  • Innovaderm Research, Inc.
    Montreal, Quebec H2K 4L5, Canada
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 2008, a primary completion of Apr 2009 and a completion of May 2009. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Dec 2010, 1 year 8 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Sep 2010.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 24, 2008
First posted
Jun 3, 2008
Start
Apr 2008
Primary completionActual
Apr 2009
CompletionActual
May 2009
Results delay requested
Sep 7, 2010
Results first posted
Dec 2, 2010
Last update
May 30, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 30, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00689117
Collaborators
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 3, 2008
Start date
Apr 2008
Primary completion
Apr 2009
Completion
May 2009
Results posted
Dec 2, 2010
Last update
May 30, 2017

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion