A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Fentanyl and Lansoprazole in Pain, Fracture, Sprain, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-09.
Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment
Among 72 studies testing fentanyl in Pain — 4 open to participants now, 4 under way, none of them phase 3. Fentanyl · Pain.
Among the 72 studies testing fentanyl in Pain, this one is the 36th largest by enrollment of the 70 interventional ones, is one of 5 that started in 2008, is one of 3 in phase 1/2, and was the 20th registered.
10,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,649 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 66 across 8,493 interventional studies indexed under Pain.
Browse Pain studies →4 of the 72 studies testing fentanyl in Pain are open now, in 2 countries. Each count lists the studies.
Fentanyl: first FDA approval 1968 (SUBLIMAZE PRESERVATIVE FREE), first EMA approval 2006. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →
Of the 929 Pain studies recruiting now, 384 (41%) set no upper age limit and 434 (47%) stop at 75 or younger; 146 take children under 18; 222 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years to 60 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →72 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 2002; this study’s year is marked. 5 started in 2008.
Median enrollment 62 across the 70 interventional studies. Of the 60 that completed or were terminated, 18 (30%) have results posted.
18 of 72 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,586 studies on the registry; 447 are open to participants now.
Of its 222 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 168 (76%) have results posted.
46 studies in Pain by Massachusetts General Hospital: 8 open now, 10 under way, none of them phase 3. Of 31 finished, 20 (65%) have results posted.
Among the 46 studies in Pain by Massachusetts General Hospital, this one is the 18th largest by enrollment of the 40 interventional ones, is one of 3 that started in 2008, is the only one in phase 1/2, and was the 5th registered.
Massachusetts General Hospital’s Pain studies by the year they started, since 2003.
2 of the studies testing fentanyl in Pain that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 0 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT06962306Duke UniversityOptimizing Perioperative Analgesia to Lower Pain Following Cleft Palate Surgery | 2027-06-04 |
| NCT06364540Antonios LikourezosNebulized Ketamine to Nebulized Fentanyl for Treating Acute Painful Conditions in the ED | 2027-06-30 |
Among the 72 studies testing fentanyl in Pain, from their registry updates:
Nothing recorded among them since 2026-09-25.
Among Massachusetts General Hospital’s 46 in Pain:
Assess whether transbuccal fentanyl provides more rapid relief of orthopedic pain, than does the comparator Percocet
Patients will be initially deemed eligible for study consideration if, after MGH ED nursing triage, an X-ray is ordered for suspected isolated extremity injury and the triage acuity level is "Minor". Study staff (physicians) will monitor the ED registration and triage areas to assess whether triaged patients are potentially eligible.
For ED patients with minor isolated injuries, X-rays are often ordered from triage, where there is a supervising physician (or nurse practitioner) available to examine patients and direct care. Either at triage (for patients undergoing care at that location) or when patients are moved to the ED's Minor Surgery area, the supervising healthcare provider will be approached immediately after that individual's evaluation of the patient, and before any pain medication is administered, to begin the process of eligibility ascertainment.
If the provider agrees that the patient may be a candidate for the study, the next step will be for the provider to ask the patient if study staff may approach to discuss the trial.
If the patient agrees to have study staff approach to discuss the trial, study personnel (all EM resident or Attending-level physicians) will be introduced by healthcare providers to potential subjects. Study staff will then converse with the patients about the study's aims, methodology, and risks, confirming eligibility and determining if patients will consent to participate.
Patients who are approached, but who are determined to be ineligible, will have no data recorded, other than their age and race/ethnicity and the reason they were ineligible.
If eligible patients provide written consent in the manner and form dictated by Partners guidelines, the study procedures will commence.
For eligible patients who do not give consent, study physicians will emphasize that patient care will be unaffected by their decision. No further contact will occur between study staff and those patients. No identifying information about such patients will be recorded, but their age and race/ethnicity will be recorded. (Recording this information will allow for subsequent assessment for selection bias, and will also help search for patterns in patient types refusing analgesia trial participation.)
The actual medication administration will involve the following steps:
Patients will be monitored by a study physician co-investigator physically present with the patient, for a total of 120 minutes after administration of medication. They will be asked q-5-minutes, through 60 minutes, to rate their pain and degree of nausea, as well as to describe any adverse reactions to the medication. Both pain and nausea levels will be recorded using 10-point scales. Use of such scales is common in the pain literature, and is an emerging tool for evaluation of nausea.1,2 Data collection for analgesia efficacy will cease after 60 minutes, but patients will be monitored for at least another 60 minutes to maximize safety; patients will be assessed for discharge suitability by treating clinicians/nurses in the same fashion as other ED patients who receive opioids.
Vital signs (respiratory rate, blood pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry) will be monitored for the two hours of the study. Continuous pulse oximetry will be used during the first study hour, and q5-minute spot-check pulse oximetry will be used during the second study hour; pulse oximetry monitoring will be changed to continuous mode during the second study hour if any spot-check reading falls below 98%. Other (non-pulse oximetry) vital signs will be monitored q5-minutes during the first study hour, and q15-minutes during the second study hour. These vital signs monitoring parameters represent the minimum for study subjects; treating clinicians or study staff physicians can increase the frequency of vital signs monitoring at their discretion. Any study subject not admitted to the hospital, will be discharged under the care of a responsible adult.
At the conclusion of the data collection period, patients will be asked if they would want to receive the same medication in the future. Other than a 24-hour telephone call (made only if patients agree), intended to assess for delayed problems such as nausea/vomiting, there will be no other study procedures or interventions.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
EXCLUSION:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Intervention Group: Subject receives: 1. placebo oral/swallowed pill 2. Fentanyl (Fentora) 100mcg rapidly dissolving transbuccal tablet
Drug: Fentanyl
Active Comparator Group: Subject receives: 1. Oxycodone/APAP (Percocet) 5/325 mg oral/swallowed pill 2. Lansoprazole 15 mg (Prevacid) comparator rapidly dissolving transbuccal tablet
Drug: Lansoprazole · Drug: Oxycodone
Fentanyl rapid dissolving tablet 100mcg
Also known as: Fentora
lansoprazole 15mg rapidly dissolving tablet
Also known as: Prevacid SoluTab
Oxycodone 5/325 mg tablet
Also known as: Percocet
Time to Analgesia
Time it took for subjects to achieve a pain score reduction of 2 units (on a 0 to 10 scale)
Time frame: 60 minutes
Pain Reduction
Number of subjects who reached pain reduction. A subject was deemed to have reached pain reduction if there was a two-point drop in pain scale (0-10).
Time frame: 60 minutes
Occurrence of Untoward Opioid Side Effects
Subjects were monitored for any signs of untoward opioid side effects.
Time frame: 120 minutes
| Milestone | Arm 1 / Fentora | Arm 2 / Percocet/Prevacid |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 30 | 30 |
| Completed | 30 | 30 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
Time it took for subjects to achieve a pain score reduction of 2 units (on a 0 to 10 scale)
| minutes | Arm 1 / Fentora | Arm 2 / Percocet/Prevacid |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Analgesia | 10 (5 to 15) | 35 (20 to 40) |
Number of subjects who reached pain reduction. A subject was deemed to have reached pain reduction if there was a two-point drop in pain scale (0-10).
| Participants | Arm 1 / Fentora | Arm 2 / Percocet/Prevacid |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Reduction | 30 | 24 |
Subjects were monitored for any signs of untoward opioid side effects.
| Participants | Arm 1 / Fentora | Arm 2 / Percocet/Prevacid |
|---|---|---|
| Occurrence of Untoward Opioid Side Effects | 0 | 1 |
Collected over 1 day after enrollment, subjects were contacted. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 / Fentora | — | 0/30 (0%) | 0/30 (0%) |
| Arm 2 / Percocet/Prevacid | — | 0/30 (0%) | 0/30 (0%) |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Arm 1 / Fentora | Arm 2 / Percocet/Prevacid | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 30 | 30 | 60 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Arm 1 / Fentora | Arm 2 / Percocet/Prevacid | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 29 ± 8 | 30 ± 12 | 30 ± 10 |
| Gender(Participants) | Arm 1 / Fentora | Arm 2 / Percocet/Prevacid | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 10 | 12 | 22 |
| Male | 20 | 18 | 38 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Arm 1 / Fentora | Arm 2 / Percocet/Prevacid | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 30 | 30 | 60.0 |
Plan to share: No — There is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Fentanyl
Massachusetts General Hospital →