CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00682838Updated Sep 1, 2016Results posted

Improving Obstructive Sleep Apnea Management Via Wireless Telemonitoring

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Self-management and Telemonitored care in Sleep Apnea Syndromes, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-01.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
280
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a major chronic condition affecting the quality of life of up to one-fifth of all Veterans. Because of disappointingly low adherence to the gold-standard treatment (continuous positive airway pressure therapy - CPAP), the Institute of Medicine has stated that new adherence strategies are needed that improve the quality of care, reduce social and economic costs, and help OSA patients live happier, healthier, and more productive lives through improved clinical management. The combination of a self-management approach along with emerging wireless technologies has strong potential to increase treatment adherence and improve outcomes.

Read the detailed description

The Sleep Apnea Self-Management Program (SASMP) was evaluated by conducting a randomized, controlled trial of the program compared to Usual Care in patients diagnosed with OSA and prescribed CPAP therapy. Participants randomized to the SASMP group attended 4 weekly educational sessions of approximately two hours each. A trained leader facilitated the program from a scripted manual. Key topics covered in this program included: (1) management of OSA symptoms, CPAP side effects, and weight loss; (2) maintaining social contacts and family relationships; and (3) dealing with symptoms of depression and worries about the future.

The primary aim of this study was to examine the effect of the SASMP, compared to Usual Care, on CPAP adherence. It is hypothesized that SASMP participants will have higher levels of CPAP adherence compared to those in the Usual Care group.

A second aim of the study was to examine the effect of the SASMP, compared to Usual Care, on proposed mediating variables derived from social cognitive theory (perceived self-efficacy, outcome expectations). It is hypothesized that SASMP participants would have higher levels of self-efficacy and outcome expectations compared to the Usual Care group.

And the third aim of the study was to measure the short- and long-term effects of the SASMP, compared to Usual Care, on health outcomes (e.g., OSA symptoms and OSA-specific HRQOL). It is hypothesized that improvements in OSA symptoms and OSA-specific HRQOL will be seen both initially and as maintained 6 months and 1 year after the start of the SASMP.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sleep Apnea Syndromes

Keywords

  • Treatment compliance
  • Self-management
  • Telemedicine
03

In context

Apnea

1,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Apnea; 159 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 280 is above the median of 50 across 965 interventional studies indexed under Apnea.

Browse Apnea studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosis of OSA
  2. Prescription for CPAP treatment by a sleep physician
  3. Being CPAP naïve (ie, no previous use of CPAP).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria were:

  1. Residence in a geographical area outside of San Diego County
  2. Fatal comorbidity (life expectancy less than 6 months as indicated by treating physician)
  3. Significant documented substance/chemical abuse
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Care provider)
Enrollment
280 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Self-Management (SM)

    Active Intervention - Self-management: Self-management Educational component focused on sleep apnea and CPAP from a self-management perspective

    Behavioral: Self-management

  • Active comparator
    Telemonitored Care (TC)

    Active Comparator - Telemonitored care: Telemonitored care Consists of CPAP therapist actively monitoring care at a distance, and acting on that data per a set protocol

    Behavioral: Telemonitored care

  • Experimental
    SM + TC

    Self-management and Telemonitored care: Combination of both SM + TC intervention

    Behavioral: Self-management · Behavioral: Telemonitored care

  • No intervention
    Usual care (UC)

    Control Group

Interventions

  • BehavioralSelf-management

    Self-management

  • BehavioralTelemonitored care

    Telemonitored care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Nightly CPAP Adherence

    Nightly CPAP adherence hours per night measured over the three-months period

    Time frame: 3 mos

07

Results

Posted Sep 1, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSelf-Management (SM)Telemonitored Care (TC)SM + TCUsual Care
Started65677573
Completed65677573
Not completed0000

Outcome measures

PrimaryNightly CPAP Adherence

Nightly CPAP adherence hours per night measured over the three-months period

Time frame:
3 mos
Reported as:
Mean · hours per night
Nightly CPAP Adherence
hours per nightSelf-managementTelemonitored CareSM+TCUsual Care
Nightly CPAP Adherence3.7 ± 1.83.7 ± 2.33.7 ± 2.23.2 ± 2.3
Statistical analysis
  • Self-management vs Telemonitored Care vs SM+TC vs Usual Care · t-test, 1 sided · p = 0.50

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Self-management—0/65 (0%)0/65 (0%)
Telemonitored Care—0/67 (0%)0/67 (0%)
SM+TC—0/75 (0%)0/75 (0%)
Usual Care—0/73 (0%)0/73 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

The target population for this study is all Veterans with OSA. It was expected that most participants would be middle-aged and older men and women, from a variety of ethnic backgrounds and with a full range of medical co-morbidities.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Self-managementTelemonitored CareSM+TCUsual CareTotal
<=18 years00000
Between 18 and 65 years56576662241
>=65 years91091139
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Self-managementTelemonitored CareSM+TCUsual CareTotal
Female32139
Male62657470271
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Self-managementTelemonitored CareSM+TCUsual CareTotal
United States65677573280
08

Study locations

1 site
  • VA San Diego Healthcare System
    San Diego, California 92161, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00682838
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Collaborators
University of California, San Diego
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 22, 2008
Start date
Jul 2009
Primary completion
May 2012
Completion
Jun 2012
Results posted
Sep 1, 2016
Last update
Sep 1, 2016

Study contacts

Carl J Stepnowsky, PhD
principal investigator · San Diego Veterans Healthcare System

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion