CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00677898Updated Apr 27, 2015Results posted

A Patient-Centered Approach to Improve Screening for Side Effects of Second Generation Antipsychotics (SGAs)

An interventional study of Patient-centered computerized tool and Written educational materials in Schizophrenia and Psychotic Disorders, sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-04-27.

Sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
239
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if individuals with serious mental illnesses exposed to a patient-centered computerized tool versus printed educational materials have higher rates of screening for the metabolic side effects of second-generation antipsychotic medications and different patterns of communication with their prescribers about screening.

Read the detailed description

Project Background/Rationale: Second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) medications are widely used to treat psychotic disorders but are associated with metabolic side effects such as weight gain, glucose dysregulation, and hyperlipidemia that may contribute to the high rates of cardiovascular disease observed in individuals with serious mental illness (SMI). Adherence to guidelines for regular screening for the metabolic side effects of SGAs is inadequate. Patient-centered care, characterized by an effective partnership between clinicians and patients that promotes active participation by patients in their own care, improves health outcomes and satisfaction in the general population. In order to increase rates of screening for the metabolic side effects of SGAs, we propose to design a patient-centered computerized tool that provides veterans with SMI with personalized health information on how well their care adheres to screening recommendations. The computerized tool will use principles shown to enhance usability in persons with cognitive impairments.

Project Objectives: The objectives of this study are to determine the effect of exposure to a patient-centered computerized tool compared to enhanced treatment as usual (e-TAU) on: (1) rates of screening for and identification of health problems associated with the metabolic side effects of SGAs; (2) patterns of patient-centered communication around screening for metabolic side effects and VA patients' self-efficacy in communicating with their psychiatrists about screening; (3) VA patients' preferences for obtaining health information and participating in decision-making about screening; and (4) VA patients' perceptions of their psychiatrists' participatory decision-making styles around screening.

Project Methods: A total of 240 veterans with psychotic disorders prescribed SGAs and in regular contact with their prescribing clinicians in outpatient mental health clinics in the VA Maryland Health Care System will be recruited for this randomized controlled trial. Half of participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention condition in which they will view a brief computer program that provides personalized health information on adherence to guidelines for screening of metabolic side effects that is designed to facilitate discussion with psychiatrists about appropriate screening. The other half of participants will receive enhanced treatment-as-usual (e-TAU) consisting of printed information on the metabolic side effects of SGAs and general recommendations for screening. Participants will be exposed to the intervention or e-TAU up to 3 times immediately prior to a visit with their prescriber over the one-year study period. Rates of screening for the metabolic side effects of SGAs will be obtained from patients' computerized medical records. A single prescriber visit for each participant will be audiotaped and coded with the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) to characterize patterns of patient-clinician communication around screening for metabolic side effects. Baseline and 12-month follow-up interview assessments with veterans will be used to acquire information on self-efficacy, their preferences for obtaining health information and participating in decisions regarding side effect screening, and important covariates such as severity of psychiatric illness.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia
  • Psychotic Disorders

Keywords

  • Patient-Centered Care
  • Adverse effects
  • Antipsychotics
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,471 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 472 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 239 is above the median of 70 across 2,872 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

US Department of Veterans Affairs is the lead sponsor of 658 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Agreement obtained from the treating clinician that the patient is clinically stable enough to participate in the study and can be contacted for recruitment
  • Agreement obtained from treating clinician to have a single visit with the patient audio taped
  • Patient age 18-70 years
  • Diagnosis of a psychotic disorder (schizophrenia, affective psychosis, major depression with psychotic features)
  • Currently prescribed any SGA medication (aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone) by a clinician in a VA Maryland Healthcare System (VAMHCS) mental health clinic
  • Had at least two outpatient visits with the prescribing clinician in the past year - Decisional capacity to provide informed consent
  • Ability to read at a 4th grade reading level

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of dementia or other organic brain syndrome or traumatic brain injury
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
239 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patient-centered computerized tool

    A brief computer program that provides personalized health information to patients prescribed second-generation antipsychotic medications on adherence to guidelines for screening of metabolic side effects

    Behavioral: Patient-centered computerized tool

  • Active comparator
    Written educational materials

    Printed information on the metabolic side effects of second-generation antipsychotic medications and general recommendations for screening

    Behavioral: Written educational materials

Interventions

  • BehavioralPatient-centered computerized tool

    A brief computer program that provides personalized health information to patients prescribed second-generation antipsychotic medications on adherence to guidelines for screening of metabolic side effects

  • BehavioralWritten educational materials

    Printed information on the metabolic side effects of second-generation antipsychotic medications and general recommendations for screening

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: Body Mass Index

    Guidelines recommend that body mass index be evaluated every 3 months

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: Blood Pressure

    Guidelines recommend that blood pressure be evaluated every 3 months

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: Blood Glucose/HbA1c

    Guidelines recommend that blood glucose/HbA1c be evaluated every year

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: LDL Cholesterol

    Guidelines recommend that LDL cholesterol be evaluated every 2 years

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: HDL Cholesterol

    Guidelines recommend that HDL cholesterol be evaluated every 2 years

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: Triglycerides

    Guidelines recommend that triglycerides be evaluated every 2 years

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Results

Posted Sep 12, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePatient-centered Computerized ToolWritten Educational Materials
Started119120
Completed99102
Not completed2018

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: Body Mass Index

Guidelines recommend that body mass index be evaluated every 3 months

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of days in the study period
Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: Body Mass Index
percentage of days in the study periodPatient-centered Computerized ToolWritten Educational Materials
Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: Body Mass Index81.4 ± 22.576.1 ± 26.2
PrimaryPercentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: Blood Pressure

Guidelines recommend that blood pressure be evaluated every 3 months

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of days in the study period
Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: Blood Pressure
percentage of days in the study periodPatient-centered Computerized ToolWritten Educational Materials
Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: Blood Pressure83.5 ± 21.878.5 ± 27.5
PrimaryPercentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: Blood Glucose/HbA1c

Guidelines recommend that blood glucose/HbA1c be evaluated every year

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of days in the study period
Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: Blood Glucose/HbA1c
percentage of days in the study periodPatient-centered Computerized ToolWritten Educational Materials
Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: Blood Glucose/HbA1c97.7 ± 10.796.2 ± 14.8
PrimaryPercentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: LDL Cholesterol

Guidelines recommend that LDL cholesterol be evaluated every 2 years

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of days in study period
Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: LDL Cholesterol
percentage of days in study periodPatient-centered Computerized ToolWritten Educational Materials
Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: LDL Cholesterol93.7 ± 17.095.1 ± 14.3
PrimaryPercentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: HDL Cholesterol

Guidelines recommend that HDL cholesterol be evaluated every 2 years

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of days in study period
Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: HDL Cholesterol
percentage of days in study periodPatient-centered Computerized ToolWritten Educational Materials
Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: HDL Cholesterol94.1 ± 16.695.2 ± 14.3
PrimaryPercentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: Triglycerides

Guidelines recommend that triglycerides be evaluated every 2 years

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of days in the study period
Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: Triglycerides
percentage of days in the study periodPatient-centered Computerized ToolWritten Educational Materials
Percentage of Days in the Study Period That a Patient's Screening for Metabolic Side Effects of Second-generation Antipsychotic Medications Adheres to Guidelines: Triglycerides94.1 ± 16.694.5 ± 15.1

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Patient-centered Computerized Tool—2/119 (1.7%)0/119 (0%)
Written Educational Materials—2/120 (1.7%)0/120 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPatient-centered Computerized ToolWritten Educational Materials
DeathGeneral disorders2/1192/120
Psychiatric hospitalizationPsychiatric disorders0/1191/120

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Patient-centered Computerized ToolWritten Educational MaterialsTotal
Mean55.1 ± 8.053.5 ± 8.654.3 ± 8.3
Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Patient-centered Computerized ToolWritten Educational MaterialsTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years111116227
>=65 years8412
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Patient-centered Computerized ToolWritten Educational MaterialsTotal
Female121426
Male107106213
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Patient-centered Computerized ToolWritten Educational MaterialsTotal
United States119120239
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Park SG, Derman M, Dixon LB, Brown CH, Klingaman EA, Fang LJ, Medoff DR, Kreyenbuhl J. Factors associated with shared decision-making preferences among veterans with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Dec 1;65(12):1409-13. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400131. Epub 2014 Nov 17. PubMed 25178383 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00677898
Lead sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 15, 2008
Start date
Mar 2010
Primary completion
Mar 2012
Completion
Jun 2013
Results posted
Sep 12, 2014
Last update
Apr 27, 2015

Study contacts

Julie Anne Kreyenbuhl, PhD
principal investigator · Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion