CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00662428INCAUpdated Jun 21, 2012

Increasing Cost-effectiveness of Inpatient Treatment of Affective Disorders

An interventional study of Symptom based discharge management and Treatment as usual in Depressive Disorder, sponsored by University Hospital Freiburg. Completed at 5 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-06-21.

Sponsored by University Hospital Freiburg · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
202
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The cost-effectiveness of a new, guideline oriented sequential inpatient - outpatient treatment model will be investigated. Secondary outcomes are: patient satisfaction, practitioners' satisfaction and influence on work.

Read the detailed description

Great diversity concerning duration of inpatient treatment of depression in psychiatric-psychotherapeutic hospitals is often used as an argument for the possible reduction of length of stay. Yet shorter duration of inpatient treatment of depressive episodes has not been examined systematically concerning clinical outcomes and health economic consequences. In this study the cost-effectiveness of a new sequential inpatient-outpatient treatment model will be examined. The research hypothesis is that the new treatment model will be more cost-effective than treatment as usual. The design provides a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in four psychiatric-psychotherapeutic clinics with a total of 240 patients. First medical practitioners and psychologist will receive a retraining concerning guideline-based care and the new treatment model will be implemented in the hospitals. New patients admitted to one of the hospitals will then be assigned randomly to one of the two study conditions und prospectively examined at five measuring times: Condition A (control group) contains treatment as usual (individual treatment programme, discharge after remission), Condition B (intervention group) contains the sequential inpatient-outpatient treatment (guideline-based treatment, discharge after partly remission: BDI \<20, outpatient treatment in the hospital and guided transfer to outpatient care).

Primary outcome is the reduction of costs of treatment in relation to reduction of symptoms. Secondary outcomes will be reduction of the depressive pathology as well as the extent of satisfaction among patients and practitioners. A total of 240 patients will be examined from admission until 12 month after discharge. Both information from the patients and the practitioners will be charged with well implemented and established instruments (psychiatric basic documentation system, BADO). A specific questionnaire will be used to measure the practitioners' satisfaction and the consequences of the sequential inpatient-outpatient treatment. To answer the main question about the cost-effectiveness analyses of central health economic outcome variables (direct and indirect costs of treatment) will be performed. This study is going to give differentiated and scientific evidence of the efficiency of a new sequential inpatient-outpatient treatment for depressive disorders. The participation of psychiatric-psychotherapeutic hospitals with different functions and structures in the public health care systems (academic medical centre, psychiatric department of general hospital, psychiatric centres) enable the evaluation of the new treatment model under diverse structural and organizational conditions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depressive Disorder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • cost-benefit analysis
  • practice guideline
  • inpatients
03

In context

Depressive Disorder

4,845 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder; 514 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 202 is above the median of 80 across 3,999 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder.

Browse Depressive Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Freiburg is the lead sponsor of 91 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Current depressive episode at time of admission
  • ICD-10 diagnosis:

    • Depressive episode, F 32.xx
    • Recurrent depressive episode, F 33.xx
  • Depression is primary treatment indication
  • The ability to give informed consent
  • Sufficient German language skills
  • Being resident sufficiently close to the hospital for being able to take part in the outpatient program
  • permanent residence

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dementia
  • Alcohol or drug dependence (not misuse)
  • Psychotic symptoms
  • Schizoaffective disorders
  • Bipolar disorders
  • Schizophrenia
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
202 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Other: Symptom based discharge management

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Other: Treatment as usual

Interventions

  • OtherSymptom based discharge management

    Depressive symptoms of patients are weekly assessed by Beck Depression Inventory (BDI II). Patients are discharged when BDI-score is under 20 points. Patients are treated in the same hospital for two more weeks as outpatients before being referred to outpatient care (general practitioner or specialist).

  • OtherTreatment as usual

    Treatment as usual is the usual stationary depression treatment which consists of a combination of several psychopharmacological and psychotherapeutical treatments. Duration of treatment is varying widely.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cost-effectiveness: ratio of treatment response and treatment costs

    Time frame: one year after discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Symptom reduction

    Time frame: at discharge, 6 month after discharge, and one year after discharge

  2. patient satisfaction

    Time frame: at discharge

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • Krankenhaus Hofheim
    Hofheim, Hessen 65719, Germany
  • Bezirkskrankenhaus Bayreuth
    Bayreuth, D-95445, Germany
  • Freiburg University Medical Center, Dept. of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
    Freiburg, D-79104, Germany
  • Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
    Karlsruhe, D-76133, Germany
  • Klinikum am Weissenhof
    Weinsberg, D-74189, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hölzel L.P., Bermejo I. & Härter M. (2011). Geordnetes Entlassmanagement - Bewertung eines neuen Behandlungsmodells zur Verkürzung der Verweildauer bei depressiven Erkrankungen. Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 108, 1050-1051.
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 21, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00662428
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Freiburg
Collaborators
German Medical Association
Responsible party
Martin Härter (Prof. Dr. Dr., University Hospital Freiburg) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 21, 2008
Start date
May 2008
Primary completion
Sep 2010
Completion
Aug 2011
Last update
Jun 21, 2012

Study contacts

Martin Härter, Prof. Dr. Dr.
principal investigator · Freiburg University Medical Center, Dept. of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Isaac Bermejo, Dr.
principal investigator · Freiburg University Medical Center, Dept. of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Lars P Hölzel, Dr.
study chair · Freiburg University Medical Center, Dept. of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion