CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00659646Updated Jan 27, 2022Results posted

The Safety and Efficacy of an Antibiotic Sponge in Diabetic Patients With Moderately Infected Foot Ulcers

A Phase 2 interventional study of gentamicin-collagen sponge and levofloxacin and Levofloxacin only in Diabetic Foot Ulcer, sponsored by Innocoll. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-27.

Sponsored by Innocoll · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the gentamicin-collagen sponge when combined with standard daily wound care and an oral antibiotic (levofloxacin) is safe and effective in treating moderately infected skin ulcers compared to treatment only with standard daily wound care and an oral antibiotic (levofloxacin).

Read the detailed description

Infected skin ulcers with diabetes can be very debilitating because they are difficult to heal. Diabetic ulcers are responsible for frequent health care visits, and are a major predictor of amputation. Diabetic ulcers can be caused by a patient's inability to sense pain or warmth as well as peripheral vascular disease, which causes diminished blood flow to the foot. Early aggressive treatment is necessary to treat infection and ultimately prevent the need for amputation.

Gentamicin is an antibiotic that is effective in treating certain kinds of infection. Collagen is a protein that is found in all mammals. The gentamicin-collagen sponge is a thin flat sponge made out of collagen that comes from cow tendons and containing gentamicin. When applied to an open ulcer, the collagen breaks down and the gentamicin is released into the ulcer, but very little is absorbed into the blood stream. The high levels of gentamicin in the open infected ulcer may help treat the infection.

In this study, all subjects will be given the necessary supplies and taught how to take care their foot ulcer. All subjects will also receive oral an antibiotic (levofloxacin). Additionally, subjects who are randomly assigned to receive the gentamicin-collagen sponge will place a gentamicin-collagen sponge on their ulcer during daily wound care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Keywords

  • Diabetes
  • ulcers
  • ulcerations
  • infection
03

In context

Diabetic Foot

1,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 222 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56 is close to the median of 60 across 826 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.

Browse Diabetic Foot studies →

Lead sponsor

Innocoll is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Is a man or woman aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years.
  • Has diabetes mellitus, according to the American Diabetes Association criteria.
  • Has a single infected skin ulcer below the knee, defined as "moderate" by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) Guidelines for whom, in the Investigator's opinion, intravenous (IV) or oral antimicrobial therapy is appropriate
  • Has had an x ray of the infected area within the 2 days immediately preceding or at Visit 1 (Baseline/Randomization) to document the presence or absence of osteomyelitis. Patients with osteomyelitis must receive appropriate surgical intervention to remove all necrotic and infected bone and otherwise meet enrollment criteria before being enrolled in the study.
  • Meets certain minimal laboratory criteria
  • Has an ankle brachial index (ABI) > or = 0.7 and ≤ 1.3. (Note: Patients with ABI \< 0.7 or > 1.3 may be included if they have either a transcutaneous oxygen pressure or a toe pressure > or = 40 mm Hg on limb with ulcer.)
  • If female, is nonpregnant (negative pregnancy test results at the Baseline/Randomization Visit) and nonlactating.
  • If female, is either not of childbearing potential (defined as postmenopausal for ≥ 1 year or surgically sterile [bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy]) or practicing a medically acceptable methods of birth control and agrees to continue with the regimen throughout the study
  • Willing to return to the study facility for the Final Study Visit.
  • Must be able to fluently speak and understand English and be able to provide meaningful written informed consent for the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a known history of hypersensitivity to gentamicin (or other systemic aminoglycosides) or levofloxacin or drugs in the same class, or any of the test article or reference product components.
  • Has a known hypersensitivity to bovine collagen.
  • Has any uncontrolled illnesses that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with interpreting the results of the study.
  • Has a target ulcer with a wound size > 10 × 10 cm.
  • Has gangrenous tissue of the affected limb that cannot be removed with a single debridement.
  • Has wound known to contain isolates resistant to levofloxacin.
  • Has a wound associated with prosthetic material or device.
  • Received any topical or systemic antimicrobial therapy within the 2 weeks prior to study entry (Visit 1 [Day 1]).
  • If severely immunocompromised, may be excluded at the discretion of the Investigator.
  • Has a history of alcohol or substance abuse in the past 12 months.
  • Has serum creatinine > 3 mg/dL, is undergoing dialysis (renal or peritoneal) or has a history of kidney transplant.
  • Has a history of myasthenia gravis or other neurological condition where gentamicin use is contraindicated as determined by the Investigator.
  • Has a history of epilepsy
  • Has a history of tendon disorders related to fluoroquinolone administration
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    A

    Gentamicin sponge applied into wound plus levofloxacin, 750 mg by mouth (po) or intravenous (IV) every 24 hours or, if ulcer culture results show resistance to levofloxacin, alternative antimicrobial therapy as determined by susceptibility testing

    Drug: gentamicin-collagen sponge and levofloxacin

  • Active comparator
    B

    Levofloxacin, 750 mg po or IV every 24 hours or, if ulcer culture results show resistance to levofloxacin, alternative antimicrobial therapy as determined by susceptibility testing

    Drug: Levofloxacin only

Interventions

  • Druggentamicin-collagen sponge and levofloxacin

    Topical Gentamicin Collagen Sponge: 10 × 10 cm in size And 750 mg tablet po every 24 hours or 750 mg IV administered by slow infusion over 90 minutes every 24 hours.

    Also known as: Collatamp G

  • DrugLevofloxacin only

    levofloxacin, 750 mg tablet po every 24 hours or 750 mg IV administered by slow infusion over 90 minutes every 24 hours

    Also known as: Tavanic, Levaquin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Visit 3 (Day 7)

    Number of participants with a clinical cure in each treatment group at Visit 3 (Day 7). Clinical Cure is defined as positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication.

    Time frame: Day 7 of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time Point

    Number of patients with positive clinical response, defined as those with a clinical outcome of "clinical cure" or "clinical improvement" in each treatment group at/by each time point

    Time frame: Day 3, 7, 10,14, 21, 28 and 42

  2. Number of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)

    clinical cure is defined as having a positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication

    Time frame: Day 3, 10, 14, 21, 28 & 42

  3. Number of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by Visit

    Time frame: Day 3, 7, 10, 14, 21 & 28

  4. Change From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2

    Wound Surface Area was measured in cm² Actual Values Total wound surface area was compared across treatments using 2-sample t-tests. Wound tracings were obtained at study visits by trained study personnel who were blinded to the patient data and regimen. A centralized imaging facility provided both wound perimeter and area measurements.

    Time frame: Day 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28 & 42

  5. Time to Clinical Cure

    clinical cure is defined as having a positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication

    Time frame: Days 1 through 49

  6. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain Assessment

    Measured on a Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) with the lowest possible value of 0 and highest 100 (0 - 100) at each time point. A lower score is better which means the patient experience lower pain. The score is calculated using the number of hours \* the VAS score. This represents the AUC (Area Under the Curve) of the pain intensities when calculated with the trapezoidal rule. For each measure outcome - the minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is 100\* the number of hours in that period.

    Time frame: Day 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28 & 42

  7. Lipsky Wound Score

    The Lipsky wound scoring scale consists of scoring categories for purulent drainage, non-purulent drainage, erythema, induration, tenderness, pain, local warmth and wound measurements. This wound scoring system allows us to take the size and depth of the wound into consideration as well as all signs and symptoms of inflammation and infection. A quantitative score that assess wounds both at baseline and during therapy to compare wound scores over time. The higher the score the worse the inflammation and/or infection is. The Lowest score possible is "3" and the highest score possible is "64".

    Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 42

07

Results

Posted Aug 30, 2021

Participant flow

Investigative medical sites

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGentamicin-collagen Sponge and LevofloxacinLevofloxacin
Started3818
Completed2310
Not completed158
Withdrew: Protocol violation128
Withdrew: Adverse event10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Protocol noncompliance after randomized10

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Visit 3 (Day 7)

Number of participants with a clinical cure in each treatment group at Visit 3 (Day 7). Clinical Cure is defined as positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication.

Time frame:
Day 7 of treatment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Visit 3 (Day 7)
ParticipantsGentamicin SpongeLevofloxacin
Number of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Visit 3 (Day 7)03
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time Point

Number of patients with positive clinical response, defined as those with a clinical outcome of "clinical cure" or "clinical improvement" in each treatment group at/by each time point

Time frame:
Day 3, 7, 10,14, 21, 28 and 42
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time Point
ParticipantsGentamicin SpongeLevofloxacin
Visit 2 Day 3249
Visit 3 Day 72610
Visit 4 Day 10257
Visit 5 Day 14246
Visit 6 Day 21143
Visit 7 Day 28103
Final Study Visit Day 422210
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)

clinical cure is defined as having a positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication

Time frame:
Day 3, 10, 14, 21, 28 & 42
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)
ParticipantsGentamicin SpongeNo Sponge
Visit 2 Day 300
Visit 4 Day 1010
Visit 5 Day 14103
Visit 6 Day 2140
Visit 7 Day 2891
Final Visit Day 42227
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by Visit
Time frame:
Day 3, 7, 10, 14, 21 & 28
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by Visit
ParticipantsGentamicin SpongeNo Sponge
Visit 2 Day 3201
Visit 3 Day 7242
Visit 4 Day 10232
Visit 5 Day 14182
Visit 6 Day 21120
Visit 7 Day 2850
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2

Wound Surface Area was measured in cm² Actual Values Total wound surface area was compared across treatments using 2-sample t-tests. Wound tracings were obtained at study visits by trained study personnel who were blinded to the patient data and regimen. A centralized imaging facility provided both wound perimeter and area measurements.

Time frame:
Day 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28 & 42
Reported as:
Mean · cm^2
Change From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2
cm^2Gentamicin SpongeNo Sponge
Visit 1 Day 15.11 ± 9.2491.24 ± 0.998
Visit 2 Day 34.50 ± 8.53.92 ± .78
Visit 3 Day 74.47 ± 8.19.76 ± .707
Visit 4 Day 104.31 ± 8.7301.14 ± 0.760
Visit 5 Day 144.14 ± 9.0410.95 ± .656
Visit 6 Day 212.93 ± 5.5171 ± 0.671
Visit 7 Day 282.67 ± 5.474.93 ± 0.606
Final Study Visit Day 423.73 ± 9.047.64 ± .846
SecondaryTime to Clinical Cure

clinical cure is defined as having a positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication

Time frame:
Days 1 through 49
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Time to Clinical Cure
DaysGentamicin SpongeNo Sponge
Time to Clinical Cure21 (14.0 to 28.0)14 (7.0 to 40.0)
SecondaryVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain Assessment

Measured on a Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) with the lowest possible value of 0 and highest 100 (0 - 100) at each time point. A lower score is better which means the patient experience lower pain. The score is calculated using the number of hours \* the VAS score. This represents the AUC (Area Under the Curve) of the pain intensities when calculated with the trapezoidal rule. For each measure outcome - the minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is 100\* the number of hours in that period.

Time frame:
Day 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28 & 42
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale*days
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain Assessment
score on a scale*daysGentamicin SpongeNo Sponge
Visit 1 Day 139.2 ± 36.7926.3 ± 21.77
Visit 2 Day 327.6 ± 32.2218.7 ± 19.60
Visit 3 Day 717.5 ± 23.5812.6 ± 19.67
Visit 4 Day 1017.2 ± 23.3413.6 ± 20.98
Visit 5 Day 1413.3 ± 20.9913.2 ± 21.45
Visit 6 Day 2122.9 ± 34.2014.3 ± 22.28
Visit 7 Day 2814.3 ± 30.969.3 ± 10.07
Final Study Visit Day4217.3 ± 28.842.3 ± 28.84
SecondaryLipsky Wound Score

The Lipsky wound scoring scale consists of scoring categories for purulent drainage, non-purulent drainage, erythema, induration, tenderness, pain, local warmth and wound measurements. This wound scoring system allows us to take the size and depth of the wound into consideration as well as all signs and symptoms of inflammation and infection. A quantitative score that assess wounds both at baseline and during therapy to compare wound scores over time. The higher the score the worse the inflammation and/or infection is. The Lowest score possible is "3" and the highest score possible is "64".

Time frame:
Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 42
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Lipsky Wound Score
score on a scaleGentamicin SpongeNo Sponge
Visit 1 Day 117.67 ± 4.49813.10 ± 5.043
Visit 2 Day 313.58 ± 4.37311 ± 3.771
Visit 3 Day 710.79 ± 4.3647.60 ± 4.300
Visit 4 Day 109.17 ± 4.1088.29 ± 3.147
Visit 5 Day 148.36 ± 4.3155.33 ± 1.633
Visit 6 Day 217.29 ± 3.9704.33 ± 2.309
Visit 7 Day 285.10 ± 2.873.67 ± 1.155
Final Study Visit Day 426.18 ± 4.2394.80 ± 2.251

Adverse events

Collected over Day 42. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Gentamicin Sponge0/38 (0%)5/38 (13.2%)4/38 (10.5%)
Levofloxacin0/18 (0%)1/18 (5.6%)1/18 (5.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventGentamicin SpongeLevofloxacin
Infected skin ulcerInfections and infestations0/381/18
CellulitisInfections and infestations1/380/18
Tendon ruptureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/380/18
HypoglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/380/18
Renal failureRenal and urinary disorders1/380/18
Wound haemorrhageVascular disorders1/380/18
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventGentamicin SpongeLevofloxacin
Blood creatinine increasedInvestigations2/381/18
Tinea pedisInfections and infestations2/380/18

Baseline characteristics

modified intent-to-treat

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Gentamicin SpongeLevofloxacinTotal
Mean61.1 ± 9.1755.1 ± 14.359.4 ± 10.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Gentamicin SpongeLevofloxacinTotal
Female9211
Male17825
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Gentamicin SpongeLevofloxacinTotal
United States261036
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Karr Foot Kare PA
    Lakeland, Florida 33813, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lipsky BA, Kuss M, Edmonds M, Reyzelman A, Sigal F. Topical application of a gentamicin-collagen sponge combined with systemic antibiotic therapy for the treatment of diabetic foot infections of moderate severity: a randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2012 May-Jun;102(3):223-32. doi: 10.7547/1020223. Erratum In: J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug;102(4):323. PubMed 22659765 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00659646
Lead sponsor
Innocoll
Collaborators
Premier Research Group plc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 16, 2008
Start date
Apr 2008
Primary completion
May 2009
Completion
Feb 2010
Results posted
Aug 30, 2021
Last update
Jan 27, 2022

Study contacts

David Prior
study director · Innocoll

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion