A Phase 2 interventional study of gentamicin-collagen sponge and levofloxacin and Levofloxacin only in Diabetic Foot Ulcer, sponsored by Innocoll. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-27.
Sponsored by Innocoll · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the gentamicin-collagen sponge when combined with standard daily wound care and an oral antibiotic (levofloxacin) is safe and effective in treating moderately infected skin ulcers compared to treatment only with standard daily wound care and an oral antibiotic (levofloxacin).
Infected skin ulcers with diabetes can be very debilitating because they are difficult to heal. Diabetic ulcers are responsible for frequent health care visits, and are a major predictor of amputation. Diabetic ulcers can be caused by a patient's inability to sense pain or warmth as well as peripheral vascular disease, which causes diminished blood flow to the foot. Early aggressive treatment is necessary to treat infection and ultimately prevent the need for amputation.
Gentamicin is an antibiotic that is effective in treating certain kinds of infection. Collagen is a protein that is found in all mammals. The gentamicin-collagen sponge is a thin flat sponge made out of collagen that comes from cow tendons and containing gentamicin. When applied to an open ulcer, the collagen breaks down and the gentamicin is released into the ulcer, but very little is absorbed into the blood stream. The high levels of gentamicin in the open infected ulcer may help treat the infection.
In this study, all subjects will be given the necessary supplies and taught how to take care their foot ulcer. All subjects will also receive oral an antibiotic (levofloxacin). Additionally, subjects who are randomly assigned to receive the gentamicin-collagen sponge will place a gentamicin-collagen sponge on their ulcer during daily wound care.
1,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 222 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 56 is close to the median of 60 across 826 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.
Browse Diabetic Foot studies →Innocoll is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Gentamicin sponge applied into wound plus levofloxacin, 750 mg by mouth (po) or intravenous (IV) every 24 hours or, if ulcer culture results show resistance to levofloxacin, alternative antimicrobial therapy as determined by susceptibility testing
Drug: gentamicin-collagen sponge and levofloxacin
Levofloxacin, 750 mg po or IV every 24 hours or, if ulcer culture results show resistance to levofloxacin, alternative antimicrobial therapy as determined by susceptibility testing
Drug: Levofloxacin only
Topical Gentamicin Collagen Sponge: 10 × 10 cm in size And 750 mg tablet po every 24 hours or 750 mg IV administered by slow infusion over 90 minutes every 24 hours.
Also known as: Collatamp G
levofloxacin, 750 mg tablet po every 24 hours or 750 mg IV administered by slow infusion over 90 minutes every 24 hours
Also known as: Tavanic, Levaquin
Number of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Visit 3 (Day 7)
Number of participants with a clinical cure in each treatment group at Visit 3 (Day 7). Clinical Cure is defined as positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication.
Time frame: Day 7 of treatment
Number of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time Point
Number of patients with positive clinical response, defined as those with a clinical outcome of "clinical cure" or "clinical improvement" in each treatment group at/by each time point
Time frame: Day 3, 7, 10,14, 21, 28 and 42
Number of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)
clinical cure is defined as having a positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication
Time frame: Day 3, 10, 14, 21, 28 & 42
Number of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by Visit
Time frame: Day 3, 7, 10, 14, 21 & 28
Change From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2
Wound Surface Area was measured in cm² Actual Values Total wound surface area was compared across treatments using 2-sample t-tests. Wound tracings were obtained at study visits by trained study personnel who were blinded to the patient data and regimen. A centralized imaging facility provided both wound perimeter and area measurements.
Time frame: Day 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28 & 42
Time to Clinical Cure
clinical cure is defined as having a positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication
Time frame: Days 1 through 49
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain Assessment
Measured on a Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) with the lowest possible value of 0 and highest 100 (0 - 100) at each time point. A lower score is better which means the patient experience lower pain. The score is calculated using the number of hours \* the VAS score. This represents the AUC (Area Under the Curve) of the pain intensities when calculated with the trapezoidal rule. For each measure outcome - the minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is 100\* the number of hours in that period.
Time frame: Day 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28 & 42
Lipsky Wound Score
The Lipsky wound scoring scale consists of scoring categories for purulent drainage, non-purulent drainage, erythema, induration, tenderness, pain, local warmth and wound measurements. This wound scoring system allows us to take the size and depth of the wound into consideration as well as all signs and symptoms of inflammation and infection. A quantitative score that assess wounds both at baseline and during therapy to compare wound scores over time. The higher the score the worse the inflammation and/or infection is. The Lowest score possible is "3" and the highest score possible is "64".
Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 42
Investigative medical sites
| Milestone | Gentamicin-collagen Sponge and Levofloxacin | Levofloxacin |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 38 | 18 |
| Completed | 23 | 10 |
| Not completed | 15 | 8 |
| Withdrew: Protocol violation | 12 | 8 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Protocol noncompliance after randomized | 1 | 0 |
Number of participants with a clinical cure in each treatment group at Visit 3 (Day 7). Clinical Cure is defined as positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication.
| Participants | Gentamicin Sponge | Levofloxacin |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Visit 3 (Day 7) | 0 | 3 |
Number of patients with positive clinical response, defined as those with a clinical outcome of "clinical cure" or "clinical improvement" in each treatment group at/by each time point
| Participants | Gentamicin Sponge | Levofloxacin |
|---|---|---|
| Visit 2 Day 3 | 24 | 9 |
| Visit 3 Day 7 | 26 | 10 |
| Visit 4 Day 10 | 25 | 7 |
| Visit 5 Day 14 | 24 | 6 |
| Visit 6 Day 21 | 14 | 3 |
| Visit 7 Day 28 | 10 | 3 |
| Final Study Visit Day 42 | 22 | 10 |
clinical cure is defined as having a positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication
| Participants | Gentamicin Sponge | No Sponge |
|---|---|---|
| Visit 2 Day 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Visit 4 Day 10 | 1 | 0 |
| Visit 5 Day 14 | 10 | 3 |
| Visit 6 Day 21 | 4 | 0 |
| Visit 7 Day 28 | 9 | 1 |
| Final Visit Day 42 | 22 | 7 |
| Participants | Gentamicin Sponge | No Sponge |
|---|---|---|
| Visit 2 Day 3 | 20 | 1 |
| Visit 3 Day 7 | 24 | 2 |
| Visit 4 Day 10 | 23 | 2 |
| Visit 5 Day 14 | 18 | 2 |
| Visit 6 Day 21 | 12 | 0 |
| Visit 7 Day 28 | 5 | 0 |
Wound Surface Area was measured in cm² Actual Values Total wound surface area was compared across treatments using 2-sample t-tests. Wound tracings were obtained at study visits by trained study personnel who were blinded to the patient data and regimen. A centralized imaging facility provided both wound perimeter and area measurements.
| cm^2 | Gentamicin Sponge | No Sponge |
|---|---|---|
| Visit 1 Day 1 | 5.11 ± 9.249 | 1.24 ± 0.998 |
| Visit 2 Day 3 | 4.50 ± 8.53 | .92 ± .78 |
| Visit 3 Day 7 | 4.47 ± 8.19 | .76 ± .707 |
| Visit 4 Day 10 | 4.31 ± 8.730 | 1.14 ± 0.760 |
| Visit 5 Day 14 | 4.14 ± 9.041 | 0.95 ± .656 |
| Visit 6 Day 21 | 2.93 ± 5.517 | 1 ± 0.671 |
| Visit 7 Day 28 | 2.67 ± 5.474 | .93 ± 0.606 |
| Final Study Visit Day 42 | 3.73 ± 9.047 | .64 ± .846 |
clinical cure is defined as having a positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication
| Days | Gentamicin Sponge | No Sponge |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Clinical Cure | 21 (14.0 to 28.0) | 14 (7.0 to 40.0) |
Measured on a Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) with the lowest possible value of 0 and highest 100 (0 - 100) at each time point. A lower score is better which means the patient experience lower pain. The score is calculated using the number of hours \* the VAS score. This represents the AUC (Area Under the Curve) of the pain intensities when calculated with the trapezoidal rule. For each measure outcome - the minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is 100\* the number of hours in that period.
| score on a scale*days | Gentamicin Sponge | No Sponge |
|---|---|---|
| Visit 1 Day 1 | 39.2 ± 36.79 | 26.3 ± 21.77 |
| Visit 2 Day 3 | 27.6 ± 32.22 | 18.7 ± 19.60 |
| Visit 3 Day 7 | 17.5 ± 23.58 | 12.6 ± 19.67 |
| Visit 4 Day 10 | 17.2 ± 23.34 | 13.6 ± 20.98 |
| Visit 5 Day 14 | 13.3 ± 20.99 | 13.2 ± 21.45 |
| Visit 6 Day 21 | 22.9 ± 34.20 | 14.3 ± 22.28 |
| Visit 7 Day 28 | 14.3 ± 30.96 | 9.3 ± 10.07 |
| Final Study Visit Day42 | 17.3 ± 28.84 | 2.3 ± 28.84 |
The Lipsky wound scoring scale consists of scoring categories for purulent drainage, non-purulent drainage, erythema, induration, tenderness, pain, local warmth and wound measurements. This wound scoring system allows us to take the size and depth of the wound into consideration as well as all signs and symptoms of inflammation and infection. A quantitative score that assess wounds both at baseline and during therapy to compare wound scores over time. The higher the score the worse the inflammation and/or infection is. The Lowest score possible is "3" and the highest score possible is "64".
| score on a scale | Gentamicin Sponge | No Sponge |
|---|---|---|
| Visit 1 Day 1 | 17.67 ± 4.498 | 13.10 ± 5.043 |
| Visit 2 Day 3 | 13.58 ± 4.373 | 11 ± 3.771 |
| Visit 3 Day 7 | 10.79 ± 4.364 | 7.60 ± 4.300 |
| Visit 4 Day 10 | 9.17 ± 4.108 | 8.29 ± 3.147 |
| Visit 5 Day 14 | 8.36 ± 4.315 | 5.33 ± 1.633 |
| Visit 6 Day 21 | 7.29 ± 3.970 | 4.33 ± 2.309 |
| Visit 7 Day 28 | 5.10 ± 2.87 | 3.67 ± 1.155 |
| Final Study Visit Day 42 | 6.18 ± 4.239 | 4.80 ± 2.251 |
Collected over Day 42. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gentamicin Sponge | 0/38 (0%) | 5/38 (13.2%) | 4/38 (10.5%) |
| Levofloxacin | 0/18 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | 1/18 (5.6%) |
| Event | Gentamicin Sponge | Levofloxacin |
|---|---|---|
| Infected skin ulcerInfections and infestations | 0/38 | 1/18 |
| CellulitisInfections and infestations | 1/38 | 0/18 |
| Tendon ruptureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 1/38 | 0/18 |
| HypoglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 1/38 | 0/18 |
| Renal failureRenal and urinary disorders | 1/38 | 0/18 |
| Wound haemorrhageVascular disorders | 1/38 | 0/18 |
| Event | Gentamicin Sponge | Levofloxacin |
|---|---|---|
| Blood creatinine increasedInvestigations | 2/38 | 1/18 |
| Tinea pedisInfections and infestations | 2/38 | 0/18 |
modified intent-to-treat
| Age, Continuous(years) | Gentamicin Sponge | Levofloxacin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 61.1 ± 9.17 | 55.1 ± 14.3 | 59.4 ± 10.9 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Gentamicin Sponge | Levofloxacin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 9 | 2 | 11 |
| Male | 17 | 8 | 25 |
| Region of Enrollment(Participants) | Gentamicin Sponge | Levofloxacin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 10 | 36 |
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Innocoll