A Phase 3 interventional study of Rabeprazole sodium and Esomeprazole in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), sponsored by Eisai Inc.. Completed at 88 sites in 13 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-12-21.
Sponsored by Eisai Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of Rabeprazole extended release (ER) 50 mg versus Esomeprazole 40 mg for healing and symptomatic relief among subjects with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. Subjects who meet all the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups, Rabeprazole ER 50 mg or Esomeprazole 40 mg for the treatment of moderate to severe erosive GERD.
1,067 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux; 188 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 1,061 is above the median of 72 across 712 interventional studies indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux.
Browse Gastroesophageal Reflux studies →Eisai Inc. is the lead sponsor of 360 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.
Of its 81 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 54 (67%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
KEY INCLUSION CRITERIA:
KEY EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Drug: Rabeprazole sodium
Drug: Esomeprazole
Rabeprazole ER 50 mg capsule, taken orally, once daily for 4-8 weeks.
Also known as: Aciphex
Esomeprazole 40 mg capsule, taken orally, once daily for 4-8 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (eGERD) Who Achieved Endoscopically-confirmed Healing by 8 Weeks
Healing at week 4 or 8 were based on improvement of eGERD of the Los Angeles (LA) classification of esophagitis Grade C or D from Baseline. Classifications include: Not Present: No breaks (erosions) in the esophageal mucosa (however, edema, erythema, or friability may be present). Grade A: One or more mucosal breaks not more than 5 mm in maximum length. Grade B: One or more mucosal breaks more than 5 mm in maximum length, but not continuous between the tops of 2 mucosal folds. Grade C: Mucosal breaks continuous between the tops of 2 or more mucosal folds, but involving less than 75% of the esophageal circumference. Gread D: Mucosal breaks involving at least 75% of the esophageal circumference.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Percentage of Participants With eGERD Who Achieved Endoscopically-confirmed Healing by 4 Weeks
Healing at week 4 or 8 were based on improvement of eGERD of the LA classification of esophagitis Grade C or D from Baseline. Classifications include: Not Present: No breaks (erosions) in the esophageal mucosa (however, edema, erythema, or friability may be present). Grade A: One or more mucosal breaks not more than 5 mm in maximum length. Grade B: One or more mucosal breaks more than 5 mm in maximum length, but not continuous between the tops of 2 mucosal folds. Grade C: Mucosal breaks continuous between the tops of 2 or more mucosal folds, but involving less than 75% of the esophageal circumference. Grade D: Mucosal breaks involving at least 75% of the esophageal circumference.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Diary-recorded Sustained Resolution of Heartburn by Week 4
During the first 4 weeks of the Double-blind Phase, participants were to record heartburn in a daily diary. Participant daily symptoms for the assessment of hearburn was based on a commonly used 4-point Likert scale of none, mild, moderate and severe. A participant was considered achieving sustained resolution of heartburn if the participant had maintained at least 7 consecutive heartburn-free days.
Time frame: Week 4
| Milestone | ESO 40 mg | RAB ER 50 mg |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 531 | 524 |
| Completed | 491 | 479 |
| Not completed | 40 | 45 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 5 | 7 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 14 | 22 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 8 | 6 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal of consent | 5 | 6 |
| Withdrew: Other | 8 | 4 |
During the first 4 weeks of the Double-blind Phase, participants were to record heartburn in a daily diary. Participant daily symptoms for the assessment of hearburn was based on a commonly used 4-point Likert scale of none, mild, moderate and severe. A participant was considered achieving sustained resolution of heartburn if the participant had maintained at least 7 consecutive heartburn-free days.
| Percentage of Participants | ESO 40 mg | RAB ER 50 mg |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | 48.2 | 48.3 |
| No | 46.3 | 44.3 |
| Missing | 5.5 | 7.4 |
Healing at week 4 or 8 were based on improvement of eGERD of the Los Angeles (LA) classification of esophagitis Grade C or D from Baseline. Classifications include: Not Present: No breaks (erosions) in the esophageal mucosa (however, edema, erythema, or friability may be present). Grade A: One or more mucosal breaks not more than 5 mm in maximum length. Grade B: One or more mucosal breaks more than 5 mm in maximum length, but not continuous between the tops of 2 mucosal folds. Grade C: Mucosal breaks continuous between the tops of 2 or more mucosal folds, but involving less than 75% of the esophageal circumference. Gread D: Mucosal breaks involving at least 75% of the esophageal circumference.
| Percentage of Participants | ESO 40 mg | RAB ER 50 mg |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | 75 | 80 |
| No | 20.3 | 14.9 |
| Missing | 4.7 | 5.2 |
Healing at week 4 or 8 were based on improvement of eGERD of the LA classification of esophagitis Grade C or D from Baseline. Classifications include: Not Present: No breaks (erosions) in the esophageal mucosa (however, edema, erythema, or friability may be present). Grade A: One or more mucosal breaks not more than 5 mm in maximum length. Grade B: One or more mucosal breaks more than 5 mm in maximum length, but not continuous between the tops of 2 mucosal folds. Grade C: Mucosal breaks continuous between the tops of 2 or more mucosal folds, but involving less than 75% of the esophageal circumference. Grade D: Mucosal breaks involving at least 75% of the esophageal circumference.
| Percentage of Participants | ESO 40 mg | RAB ER 50 mg |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | 50.3 | 54.8 |
| No | 47.8 | 42.6 |
| Missing | 1.9 | 2.7 |
Collected over For each participant, from the time of administartion of the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the administration of the last dose of study drug or up to resolution of adverse event or up to approximately 10 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESO 40 mg | — | 4/528 (0.8%) | 0/528 (0%) |
| RAB ER 50 mg | — | 4/518 (0.8%) | 0/518 (0%) |
| Event | ESO 40 mg | RAB ER 50 mg |
|---|---|---|
| Acute coronary syndromeCardiac disorders | 0/528 | 1/518 |
| Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders | 0/528 | 1/518 |
| Cholecystitis acuteHepatobiliary disorders | 0/528 | 1/518 |
| CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders | 0/528 | 1/518 |
| Transient ischaemic attackNervous system disorders | 0/528 | 1/518 |
| AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 1/528 | 0/518 |
| Subdural haematomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 1/528 | 0/518 |
| Oesophageal carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | 1/528 | 0/518 |
| Ovarian adenomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | 1/528 | 0/518 |
| Age, Continuous(Years) | ESO 40 mg | RAB ER 50 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 49 ± 13.09 | 48 ± 13.38 | 48.5 ± 13.23 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | ESO 40 mg | RAB ER 50 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 206 | 202 | 408 |
| Male | 325 | 322 | 647 |
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Eisai Inc.