CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00658528Updated Dec 21, 2015Results posted

Rabeprazole Extended-Release 50 mg Versus Esomeprazole 40 mg for Healing and Symptomatic Relief of Moderate to Severe Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Rabeprazole sodium and Esomeprazole in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), sponsored by Eisai Inc.. Completed at 88 sites in 13 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-12-21.

Sponsored by Eisai Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,061
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of Rabeprazole extended release (ER) 50 mg versus Esomeprazole 40 mg for healing and symptomatic relief among subjects with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. Subjects who meet all the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups, Rabeprazole ER 50 mg or Esomeprazole 40 mg for the treatment of moderate to severe erosive GERD.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

Keywords

  • GERD
  • erosive GERD
  • erosive esophagitis
03

In context

Gastroesophageal Reflux

1,067 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux; 188 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,061 is above the median of 72 across 712 interventional studies indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Browse Gastroesophageal Reflux studies →

Lead sponsor

Eisai Inc. is the lead sponsor of 360 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Of its 81 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 54 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

KEY INCLUSION CRITERIA:

  1. Male or female, ages 18 to 75 years.
  2. History of GERD symptoms for at least 3 months immediately before screening.
  3. Heartburn for at least 2 days a week for at least 1 month before screening.
  4. Esophageal erosions of Los Angeles (LA) grades C or D based on EGD taken within 14 days prior to enrollment.
  5. Subjects who are H. pylori negative based on a screening test.
  6. Females should be either of non-childbearing potential or of childbearing potential. Females of childbearing potential must have negative pregnancy tests prior to randomization. Female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to use medically acceptable methods of contraception.
  7. Subjects must be able to read, write, and understand the language of the symptom diary.

KEY EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  1. Current or a history of esophageal motility disorders.
  2. Current or a history of Barrett's esophagus. Current esophageal strictures or esophagitis (known or suspected to be due to etiology other than GERD such as infection or medications).
  3. Current or a history of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and other acid hypersecretory conditions, or current gastric or duodenal ulcer.
  4. Current or a history of cancer, with the exception of fully excised skin basal cell carcinoma.
  5. Inflammatory bowel disease.
  6. Unstable diabetes mellitus.
  7. History of esophageal, gastric and duodenal surgery except simple suturing of an ulcer.
  8. Subjects who require daily use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), oral steroids (->;= 20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), or aspirin (->; 325 mg/day).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
1,061 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Drug: Rabeprazole sodium

  • Active comparator
    2

    Drug: Esomeprazole

Interventions

  • DrugRabeprazole sodium

    Rabeprazole ER 50 mg capsule, taken orally, once daily for 4-8 weeks.

    Also known as: Aciphex

  • DrugEsomeprazole

    Esomeprazole 40 mg capsule, taken orally, once daily for 4-8 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (eGERD) Who Achieved Endoscopically-confirmed Healing by 8 Weeks

    Healing at week 4 or 8 were based on improvement of eGERD of the Los Angeles (LA) classification of esophagitis Grade C or D from Baseline. Classifications include: Not Present: No breaks (erosions) in the esophageal mucosa (however, edema, erythema, or friability may be present). Grade A: One or more mucosal breaks not more than 5 mm in maximum length. Grade B: One or more mucosal breaks more than 5 mm in maximum length, but not continuous between the tops of 2 mucosal folds. Grade C: Mucosal breaks continuous between the tops of 2 or more mucosal folds, but involving less than 75% of the esophageal circumference. Gread D: Mucosal breaks involving at least 75% of the esophageal circumference.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

  2. Percentage of Participants With eGERD Who Achieved Endoscopically-confirmed Healing by 4 Weeks

    Healing at week 4 or 8 were based on improvement of eGERD of the LA classification of esophagitis Grade C or D from Baseline. Classifications include: Not Present: No breaks (erosions) in the esophageal mucosa (however, edema, erythema, or friability may be present). Grade A: One or more mucosal breaks not more than 5 mm in maximum length. Grade B: One or more mucosal breaks more than 5 mm in maximum length, but not continuous between the tops of 2 mucosal folds. Grade C: Mucosal breaks continuous between the tops of 2 or more mucosal folds, but involving less than 75% of the esophageal circumference. Grade D: Mucosal breaks involving at least 75% of the esophageal circumference.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Diary-recorded Sustained Resolution of Heartburn by Week 4

    During the first 4 weeks of the Double-blind Phase, participants were to record heartburn in a daily diary. Participant daily symptoms for the assessment of hearburn was based on a commonly used 4-point Likert scale of none, mild, moderate and severe. A participant was considered achieving sustained resolution of heartburn if the participant had maintained at least 7 consecutive heartburn-free days.

    Time frame: Week 4

07

Results

Posted Jun 23, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneESO 40 mgRAB ER 50 mg
Started531524
Completed491479
Not completed4045
Withdrew: Adverse event57
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1422
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject86
Withdrew: Withdrawal of consent56
Withdrew: Other84

Outcome measures

SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Diary-recorded Sustained Resolution of Heartburn by Week 4

During the first 4 weeks of the Double-blind Phase, participants were to record heartburn in a daily diary. Participant daily symptoms for the assessment of hearburn was based on a commonly used 4-point Likert scale of none, mild, moderate and severe. A participant was considered achieving sustained resolution of heartburn if the participant had maintained at least 7 consecutive heartburn-free days.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Diary-recorded Sustained Resolution of Heartburn by Week 4
Percentage of ParticipantsESO 40 mgRAB ER 50 mg
Yes48.248.3
No46.344.3
Missing5.57.4
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (eGERD) Who Achieved Endoscopically-confirmed Healing by 8 Weeks

Healing at week 4 or 8 were based on improvement of eGERD of the Los Angeles (LA) classification of esophagitis Grade C or D from Baseline. Classifications include: Not Present: No breaks (erosions) in the esophageal mucosa (however, edema, erythema, or friability may be present). Grade A: One or more mucosal breaks not more than 5 mm in maximum length. Grade B: One or more mucosal breaks more than 5 mm in maximum length, but not continuous between the tops of 2 mucosal folds. Grade C: Mucosal breaks continuous between the tops of 2 or more mucosal folds, but involving less than 75% of the esophageal circumference. Gread D: Mucosal breaks involving at least 75% of the esophageal circumference.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 8
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (eGERD) Who Achieved Endoscopically-confirmed Healing by 8 Weeks
Percentage of ParticipantsESO 40 mgRAB ER 50 mg
Yes7580
No20.314.9
Missing4.75.2
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With eGERD Who Achieved Endoscopically-confirmed Healing by 4 Weeks

Healing at week 4 or 8 were based on improvement of eGERD of the LA classification of esophagitis Grade C or D from Baseline. Classifications include: Not Present: No breaks (erosions) in the esophageal mucosa (however, edema, erythema, or friability may be present). Grade A: One or more mucosal breaks not more than 5 mm in maximum length. Grade B: One or more mucosal breaks more than 5 mm in maximum length, but not continuous between the tops of 2 mucosal folds. Grade C: Mucosal breaks continuous between the tops of 2 or more mucosal folds, but involving less than 75% of the esophageal circumference. Grade D: Mucosal breaks involving at least 75% of the esophageal circumference.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With eGERD Who Achieved Endoscopically-confirmed Healing by 4 Weeks
Percentage of ParticipantsESO 40 mgRAB ER 50 mg
Yes50.354.8
No47.842.6
Missing1.92.7

Adverse events

Collected over For each participant, from the time of administartion of the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the administration of the last dose of study drug or up to resolution of adverse event or up to approximately 10 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ESO 40 mg—4/528 (0.8%)0/528 (0%)
RAB ER 50 mg—4/518 (0.8%)0/518 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventESO 40 mgRAB ER 50 mg
Acute coronary syndromeCardiac disorders0/5281/518
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/5281/518
Cholecystitis acuteHepatobiliary disorders0/5281/518
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders0/5281/518
Transient ischaemic attackNervous system disorders0/5281/518
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/5280/518
Subdural haematomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/5280/518
Oesophageal carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/5280/518
Ovarian adenomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/5280/518

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)ESO 40 mgRAB ER 50 mgTotal
Mean49 ± 13.0948 ± 13.3848.5 ± 13.23
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ESO 40 mgRAB ER 50 mgTotal
Female206202408
Male325322647
08

Study locations

88 sites
  • Anaheim, California 92801, United States
  • Isidro Casanova, La Matanza, BUE 1765, Argentina
  • Ramos Mejia, BUE 1221, Argentina
  • San Isidro, BUE B1642BHH, Argentina
  • Capital Federal, CBA C1425DND, Argentina
  • Mendoza, MEN 5500, Argentina
  • Rosario, SFE S2000BLG, Argentina
  • Rosario, SFE S2000CRF, Argentina
  • Rosario, SFE S2000CVB, Argentina
  • San Juan, SJN 5447, Argentina
  • Five Dock, New South Wales 2046, Australia
  • Carina Heights, Queensland 4152, Australia
  • Kippa Ring, Queensland 4021, Australia
  • Box Hill, Victoria 3128, Australia
  • Frankston, Victoria 3199, Australia
  • Malvern, Victoria 3144, Australia
  • Plovdiv, 4000, Bulgaria
  • Sofia, 1233, Bulgaria
  • Sofia, 1407, Bulgaria
  • Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria
  • Sofia, 1709, Bulgaria
  • Stara Zagora, 6000, Bulgaria
  • Varna, 9010, Bulgaria
  • Saint John, New Brunswick E2K 1J5, Canada
  • St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador A1A 3R5, Canada
  • Guelph, Ontario N1H 3R3, Canada
  • Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada
  • Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 5G8, Canada
  • Toronto, Ontario M6H 3M1, Canada
  • Windsor, Ontario N8W 1E6, Canada
  • Montreal, Quebec H1T 2M4, Canada
  • Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A1, Canada
  • Pointe-Claire, Quebec H9R 3J1, Canada
  • Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 1J5, Canada
  • Quebec, G1L 3L5, Canada
  • Quebec, G1R 2J6, Canada
  • Santiago, Chile
  • Vioa del Mar, Chile
  • Rijeka, 51 000, Croatia
  • Zagreb, 10 000, Croatia
  • Tartu, 51014, Estonia
  • Dieppe 76, 76200, France
  • La Chaussee St. Victor 41, 41260, France
  • Lyon Cedex 369, 69437, France
  • Marseille 13, 13009, France
  • Nice Cedex 36, 6100, France
  • Berlin, BE 10967, Germany
  • Berlin, BE 13509, Germany
  • Mannheim, BW 68167, Germany
  • Muenchen, BY 81669, Germany
  • Dietzenbach, HE 63128, Germany
  • Marburg, HE 35033, Germany
  • Wiesbaden, HE 65185, Germany
  • Hamburg, HH 22143, Germany
  • Dortmund, NW 44137, Germany
  • Lienen/Kattenve nne, NW 49536, Germany
  • Muenster, NW 48159, Germany
  • Budapest, 1036, Hungary
  • Dunaujvaros, 2400, Hungary
  • Kisber, 2870, Hungary
  • Miskolc, 3530, Hungary
  • Nagykanizsa, 8800, Hungary
  • Nyiregyhaza, 4400, Hungary
  • Szentes, 6600, Hungary
  • Veszprem, 8200, Hungary
  • Zalaegerszeg, 8900, Hungary
  • New Delhi, Delhi 110 060, India
  • New Delhi, Delhi 110002, India
  • New Delhi, Delhi 110017, India
  • Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380006, India
  • Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India
  • Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462038, India
  • Aurangabad, Maharashtra 431005, India
  • Mumbai, Maharashtra 400 022, India
  • Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012, India
  • Mumbai, Maharashtra 400016, India
  • Mumbai, Maharashtra 400020, India
  • Nagpur, Maharashtra 440012, India
  • Pune, Maharashtra 411001, India
  • Pune, Maharashtra 411004, India
  • Pune, Maharashtra PUNE-411013, India
  • Thane, Maharashtra 400001, India
  • Ludhiana, Punjab 141008, India
  • Jaipur, Rajasthan 302001, India
  • Jaipur, Rajasthan 302004, India
  • Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226003, India
  • Riga, LV-1002, Latvia
  • Riga, LV-1005, Latvia
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Laine L, Katz PO, Johnson DA, Ibegbu I, Goldstein MJ, Chou C, Rossiter G, Lu Y. Randomised clinical trial: a novel rabeprazole extended release 50 mg formulation vs. esomeprazole 40 mg in healing of moderate-to-severe erosive oesophagitis - the results of two double-blind studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jan;33(2):203-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04516.x. Epub 2010 Nov 30. PubMed 21114792 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 21, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00658528
Lead sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 15, 2008
Start date
Feb 2008
Primary completion
Sep 2009
Completion
Jan 2010
Results posted
Jun 23, 2015
Last update
Dec 21, 2015

Study contacts

Yufang Lu, MD, PhD
study director · Eisai Inc.
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion