CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00631176JITUpdated Jan 8, 2010

"Just-In-Time Training" in Pediatric Airway Management

An interventional study of Just-In-Time Training in Orotracheal Intubation, sponsored by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-01-08.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective interventional study to test the hypothesis that just-in-time training for pediatric airway management may improve patient safety and operational performance of orotracheal intubation and decreases intubation associated events in pediatric residents in the PICU. To test the hypothesis that high fidelity simulation may enhance the training efficacy and patient safety in simulation settings.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Appropriate airway management is the most critical point in pediatric resuscitation and pediatric critical care. It remains, however, a challenge for pediatric residents to learn and retain this critical skill. Recent report from our PICU showed pediatric residents participated only 28% of initial orotracheal intubation, and the rate of the first successful endotracheal tube placement was only 38% of all orotracheal intubation attempt. Repetitive poor-skilled intubation attempts may be associated with complication such as dental or laryngeal contusion, and prolonged intubation attempt may be associated with hypoxia and hemodynamic instability. In order to improve the operational performance in the efficacy (first attempt success rate) and safety (minimizing the associated events which could potentially lead to adverse events), a better training method is warranted.

Objectives:

To test the hypothesis that just-in-time training for pediatric airway management may improve patient safety and operational performance of orotracheal intubation and decreases intubation associated events in pediatric residents in the PICU. To test the hypothesis that high fidelity simulation may enhance the training efficacy and patient safety in simulation settings.

Study Design:

This is a prospective interventional study. During the eighteen months of study period, one of two on-call pediatric residents from 7 south PICU (24 beds) will receive 20 minutes of just-in-time pediatric airway management training. This training will occur before their shift starts before the morning round. This training will cover direct laryngoscopy technique, orotracheal intubation technique, confirmation of the tube placement and recognition of associated events. This training will be done with or without high fidelity simulation function. We will use SimBaby (Laerdal, Norway). The assignment will be randomized. The clinical data of orotracheal intubation are collected through NEAR-4 KIDS registry. Primary outcome is a change in a first attempt success rate by the residents in an overtrained group (7 South PICU) compared to standard training group (7 East PICU). The secondary outcome is the rate of resident participation in orotracheal intubation attempt, the number of intubation attempt before successful intubation by residents and the number of intubation associated events. The videotaped performance during the training is analyzed with Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (HFMEA) and will be compared between high fidelity simulation training group and low fidelity simulation training group. The evaluation system developed by HFMEA will be validated by a performance of experienced and non-experienced intubators. Furthermore, the real orotracheal intubation team performance in both PICUs will be evaluated with scale by a research assistant. The demographic and training data of participants of real PICU intubations will be collected. No patient identifiable information will be collected. This data will also be kept in a password-protected research computer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Orotracheal Intubation

Keywords

  • oral intubation
  • just in time
  • simulation education
  • high fidelity training
  • intubation training
  • intubation success
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia is the lead sponsor of 480 studies on the registry; 85 are open to participants now.

Of its 28 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 22 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Pediatric or Emergency Medicine Residents rotating through PICU in CHOP.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Anesthesiology residents
  2. Residents who had formal US training (ACGME accredited) in Neonatology or Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Critical Care Medicine or Anesthesiology.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
13 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    1
  • Experimental
    2

    Behavioral: Just-In-Time Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralJust-In-Time Training

    On-call pediatric residents from 7 south PICU (24 beds) will receive 20 minutes of just-in-time pediatric airway management training. This training will occur before their shift starts before the morning round. This training will cover direct laryngoscopy technique, orotracheal intubation technique, confirmation of the tube placement and recognition of associated events. This training will be done with or without high fidelity simulation function.

    Also known as: Over training, Intubation training, Rapid Refresher

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary endpoint will be the success of first intubation attempts by a resident.

    Time frame: per case

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 8, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00631176
Lead sponsor
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Collaborators
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
First posted
Mar 7, 2008
Start date
Jun 2007
Primary completion
Sep 2008
Completion
Dec 2009
Last update
Jan 8, 2010

Study contacts

Vinay Nadkarni, MD
principal investigator · Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion