ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00603954Updated Jan 26, 2022Results posted

Allogeneic HCT With HLA-matched Donors : a Phase II Randomized Study Comparing 2 Nonmyeloablative Conditionings

A Phase 2 interventional study of Conditioning regimen: TBI + Fludarabine and Conditioning regimen:TLI (8 Gy) + ATG in Hematological Malignancies, sponsored by University of Liege. Completed at 11 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-26.

Sponsored by University of Liege · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
107
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The present project aims at comparing two nonmyeloablative regimens currently used in 2 major HCT centers in the US for patients with HLA-matched related or unrelated donor: the one from the Seattle group consisting of 2 Gy TBI with fludarabine (90 mg/m²) versus the one from the Stanford group combining 8 Gy TLI with ATG.

Read the detailed description

I. OBJECTIVES

The present project aims at comparing two nonmyeloablative regimens currently used in 2 major HCT centers in the US for patients with HLA-matched related or unrelated donor: the one from the Seattle group consisting of 2 Gy TBI with fludarabine (90 mg/m²) versus the one from the Stanford group combining 8 Gy TLI with ATG.

II. DESIGN OF THE STUDY

The study is a multicenter, randomized phase II study, comparing two conditioning regimens. Sixty patients with HLA-matched donors will be randomized between the TBI or the DLI regimen. There will be a stratification between centers. There will be a stopping rule for graft rejection > 15% at day 180 (in each group separately), and for nonrelapse mortality > 35% at day 180 (in each group separately). If the stopping rules are not triggered after 60 patients and no statistically significant differences are seen between the 2 arms in terms of acute GVHD, graft rejection and survival, a second cohort of 40 patients will be included.

III. TREATMENT PLAN

III.1. Pre-transplant procedures Peripheral blood mononucleated cells from the patient as well as from the donor will be collected before conditioning, as per standard practice for all routine allogeneic HSC transplants. Part will be cryopreserved in 10 % DMSO and stored at -180°C in liquid nitrogen. The other part will be devoted to identification of specific donor and patient markers to be used in later measurements of chimerism.

III.2. Conditioning regimens The conditioning regimens used will be either the one developed in Seattle (TBI arm) or the one developed by the Stanford group (TLI arm). These 2 regimens have been extensively reported in major medical journals. In the TBI arm, conditioning will consist of fludarabine 30 mg/m2 on days -4, -3 and -2 (total dose 90 mg/m2), followed by a singe dose of 2 Gy TBI administered on day 0, at a low dose-rate (≈ 7 cGy/min), before infusion of cells. In the TLI arm, conditioning will consist of 8 Gy TLI and ATG. TLI will be administered by linear accelerator at a dose of 80 cGy daily, starting 11 days before transplantation, until a total of 10 doses (800 cGy) has been delivered. The irradiation will consist of a supradiaphragmatic mantle field, a subdiaphragmatic field including an inverted Y and splenic ports, encompassing all major lymphoid organs, including the thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes, as used in the treatment of Hodgkin's disease (Kaplan HS, Cancer Research 26:1268-1276, 1966). The Waldeyer ring is not included. ATG (Thymoglobulin®, Genzyme), at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg/d, will be given intravenously on days -11 through -7.

III.3. PBSC collection and transplantation PBSC mobilization and collection in the donor will be performed as per standard practice for all routine allogeneic HSC transplants. This is briefly described below.

The donor will be given SC injections of G-CSF at a dose of 10-15 µg/kg for 6 days (days -5 through 0). Additional doses of G-CSF may be given on days +1 and +2 if the first 2 leukaphereses do not yield sufficient numbers of CD34+ cells. G-CSF will generally be administered :

  • In the evening on days -5, -4, -3, -2;
  • Before 7:00 on days -1 and 0 (and on days 1 and 2 if necessary). Collection of PBSC will be carried out on day -1 and in the morning on day 0. Leukaphereses will be performed using a continuous flow blood cell separator and following a mononuclear cell collection protocol. The volume of blood processed will be 15-20 liters if donor is an adult or 10 liters/m2 if donor is a child. Anticoagulation will be performed with the ACD-A solution. The PBSC from the first day of harvest will be stored overnight at 4°C in the patient's own plasma. After the second harvest, PBSC from the first and second day of harvest will be infused into the patient.

Based on previous reports suggesting that higher dose of CD34 cells are associated with better outcomes after nonmyeloablative HCT, high doses of CD34+ cells (>6.5 x 106/kg) should be ideally administered. Nevertheless, to limit donor procedures, only two leukaphereses are required. However, in case the required minimal number of cells (3 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg recipient) cannot be obtained with the first two collections, additional leukaphereses should be carried out unless contra-indicated for the donor.

Cells will be infused through a central catheter according to standard procedures.

III.4. Other treatments of the recipient

III.4.1. Immunosuppressive therapy The immunosuppressive regimens used will be the one used in standard practice for routine NM-HCT at our centers, i.e. an association of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).

MMF will be administered orally from the evening of day 0 through day 28 (sibling recipients) or day 42 (alternative donor recipients) at the dose of 15 mg/kg t.i.d.

Tacrolimus will be given orally at the dose of 0.06 mg/kg bid starting on day -3. The dose will then be adapted according to through whole blood values following standard procedures (between 15 and 20 ng/ml the first 28 days and between 10-15 ng/ml thereafter). Full doses will be given until day 100 (sibling recipients) or 180 (alternative donor recipients). Doses will then be progressively tapered to be definitely discontinued by day 180 (sibling donors) or 365 (alternative donor recipients) in the absence of GVHD. Tacrolimus may be stopped earlier in case of disease progression or graft rejection or continued longer in case of low donor T-cell chimerism or GVHD.

GVHD will be assessed according to standard criteria. Therapy for acute or chronic GVHD will use standard procedures/current protocols.

III.4.2. Growth factors Growth factors will be used as per standard practice for all routine NM-HCT. No myeloid growth factor will be administered unless the granulocyte count falls below 1000/µl. Patients may then be treated with 5 µg/kg/day of G-CSF to maintain the granulocyte count > 1,000/µl. Erythropoietin may be administered as required.

III.4.3. Infection prophylaxis Infection prophylaxis against bacterial, fungal, viral and parasitic agents will be carried out as per standard practice for all routine NM-HCT.

III.4.4. Donor lymphocyte infusion Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) will be given as per standard practice for all routine NM-HCT. DLI may be given in case of poor T-cell chimerism or disease progression according to standard procedures/current protocols.

IV. PATIENTS' FOLLOW-UP

IV.1. Quality controls of cell products

IV.1.1. Peripheral blood of donor on days of PBSC collection As per standard practice for all routine allogeneic PBSC transplants.

IV.1.2. Leukapheresis product As per standard practice for all routine allogeneic PBSC transplants including determination of the number of TNC, CD34, CD3 , CD4 and CD8 cells transplanted.

IV.2. Toxicities of cell infusions Potential toxicities associated with PBSC infusions will be carefully monitored per the standard procedures.

IV.3. Chimerism The chimeric status of hematopoietic cells will be carefully monitored post-transplant, as per standard practice for all routine allogeneic transplants. Donor chimerism will be measured in whole blood as well as bone marrow. In addition, peripheral blood cells will be separated by RosetteSep procedure (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) to determine the proportion of donor and recipient cells in pure population of T (CD3+) cells. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for X and Y chromosome will be used preferentially for sex-mismatched HCT, while PCR techniques based on short tandem repeat (STR) markers will be used for sex-matched HCT. Pre-transplant donor and recipient peripheral WBC will serve to identify specific markers.

We define complete chimerism as the presence of >95% of T cells of donor origin and mixed chimerism as the presence of 6-94% of T cells of donor origin. Graft rejection is defined as the occurrence of T cell chimerism \< 5% and engraftment as the occurrence of more than 5% T cells of donor origin in the first month following the transplant.

The proportion of donor chimerism will be determined at the following time points:

  1. peripheral blood :

    • Days 28, 42, 60, 100, 180 and 365 post-transplant : whole blood and CD3+ cells;
    • Analyses on day 60 are only necessary when chimerism is \< 80% on days 28 and/or 42;
    • Analyses on whole blood on days 42, 100, 180 and 365 are only necessary when bone marrow analyses are not feasible/successful.
  2. bone marrow : • Days 42, 100, 180 and 365 post-transplant : whole bone marrow.

IV.4. Clinical data Patient will be carefully observed and the following clinical parameters will be recorded (see appendices B and C). Appendices B and C should be send not more than 3 months after the patient achieved the target day after HSCT (day 100, day 180, 1-yr, 2-yr, 3-yr, 4-yr and 5-yr) to Frederic Baron at the fax # 32-4-366 8855.

  • Incidence, timing and severity of acute GVHD, its treatment and outcome;
  • Incidence, timing and severity of chronic GVHD, its treatment and outcome;
  • Incidence, timing and severity of cytopenia, its treatment and outcome; number of platelet and RBC transfusions; G-CSF usage;
  • Time to achieve 500 neutrophils, 1000 neutrophils, 20 000 platelets and 50 000 platelets;
  • Duration of hospitalization, if any;
  • Incidence of bacterial infections;
  • Incidence of fungal infections;
  • Incidence of CMV infections (by quantitative PCR) and CMV disease;
  • Incidence of other viral infections;
  • Incidence of other infections;
  • Evolution of the primary malignant disease : response, relapse, its treatment and outcome;
  • Any other serious complication associated with the transplant procedure;
  • Death and survival.

IV.5. Immunologic data. In patients transplanted at the university of Liège, immune reconstitution in the patient will be monitored as per standard practice at ULg for all routine allogeneic transplants. For patients transplanted outside of the University of Liège and willing to participate to the immune recovery study, 50 mL of fresh heparinized blood collected on days 42, 100, 180, 365 and 730 can be send at room temperature to Olivier Dengis, Department of Clinical Hematology, CHU Sart-Tilman, B4000 Liège.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hematological Malignancies

Keywords

  • Nonmyeloablative conditioning.
  • Hematological malignancies.
  • GVHD.
03

In context

Hematologic Neoplasms

1,494 studies on the registry are indexed under Hematologic Neoplasms; 438 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 107 is above the median of 45 across 1,090 interventional studies indexed under Hematologic Neoplasms.

Browse Hematologic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Liege is the lead sponsor of 250 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

PATIENT

  1. Diseases

    Hematological malignancies confirmed histologically and not rapidly progressing:

    • AML in CR (defined as ≤ 5% marrow blasts and absence of blasts in the peripheral blood);
    • MDS with ≤ 5% marrow blasts and absence of blasts in the peripheral blood;
    • CML in CP;
    • MPS not in blast crisis and not with extensive marrow fibrosis,
    • ALL in CR;
    • Multiple myeloma not rapidly progressing;
    • CLL;
    • Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (aggressive NHL should have chemosensitive disease);
    • Hodgkin's disease with chemosensitive disease.
  2. Clinical situations

    • Theoretical indication for a standard allo-transplant, but not feasible because:

      • Age > 50 yrs;
      • Unacceptable end organ performance;
      • Patient's refusal.
    • Indication for a standard auto-transplant: perform mini-allotransplantation 2-6 months after standard autotransplant.
  3. Other inclusion criteria

    • Male or female; fertile patients must use a reliable contraception method;
    • Age \< 75 yrs;
    • Informed consent given by patient or his/her guardian if of minor age.

DONOR

  • Related to the recipient (sibling, parent or child) or unrelated;
  • Male or female;
  • Any age;
  • 10 of 10 (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1) HLA allele matched;
  • Weight > 15 Kg (because of leukapheresis);
  • Fulfills criteria for allogeneic PBSC donation according to standard procedures;
  • Informed consent given by donor or his/her guardian if of minor age, as per donor center standard procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

PATIENT

  • Any condition not fulfilling inclusion criteria;
  • HIV positive;
  • Non-hematological malignancy(ies) (except non-melanoma skin cancer) \< 3 years before nonmyeloablative HCT.
  • Life expectancy severely limited by disease other than malignancy;
  • Administration of cytotoxic agent(s) for "cytoreduction" within three weeks prior to initiating the nonmyeloablative transplant conditioning (Exceptions are hydroxyurea and imatinib mesylate);
  • CNS involvement with disease refractory to intrathecal chemotherapy.
  • Terminal organ failure, except for renal failure (dialysis acceptable)
  • Uncontrolled infection;
  • Karnofsky Performance Score \<70%;
  • Patient is a fertile man or woman who is unwilling to use contraceptive techniques during and for 12 months following treatment;
  • Patient is a female who is pregnant or breastfeeding;
  • Previous radiation therapy precluding the use of 2 Gy TBI or 8 Gy TLI;

DONOR

  • Any condition not fulfilling inclusion criteria;
  • Unable to undergo leukapheresis because of poor vein access or other reasons.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
107 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    TBI + fludarabine

    Conditioning regimen consisting of fludarabine 30 mg/m2 on days -4, -3 and -2 (total dose 90 mg/m2), followed by a singe dose of 2 Gy TBI administered on day 0, at a low dose-rate (≈ 7 cGy/min), before infusion of cells.

    Drug: Conditioning regimen: TBI + Fludarabine

  • Active comparator
    TLI + ATG

    Conditioning consisting of 8 Gy TLI and ATG. TLI will be administered by linear accelerator at a dose of 80 cGy daily, starting 11 days before transplantation, until a total of 10 doses (800 cGy) has been delivered. The irradiation will consist of a supradiaphragmatic mantle field, a subdiaphragmatic field including an inverted Y and splenic ports, encompassing all major lymphoid organs, including the thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes, as used in the treatment of Hodgkin's disease (Kaplan HS, Cancer Research 26:1268-1276, 1966). The Waldeyer ring is not included. ATG (Thymoglobulin®, Genzyme), at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg/d, will be given intravenously on days -11 through -7.

    Drug: Conditioning regimen:TLI (8 Gy) + ATG

Interventions

  • DrugConditioning regimen: TBI + Fludarabine

    2 Gy TBI, Fludarabine 90 mg/m²

    Also known as: total body irradiation (TBI) + fludarabine

  • DrugConditioning regimen:TLI (8 Gy) + ATG

    TLI 8 Gy + ATG (Thymoglobulin) 7.5 mg/kg

    Also known as: Total Lymphoid Irradiation (TLI) and Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD Between the 2 Groups

    Percentage of participants with aGVHD according grades: Grade I: rash skin \< 25 % area; bilirubin: 20-30 mg/ml; diarrhea: 500-1000 ml/day Grade II: rash skin 25-50 % area; bilirubin: 30-60 mg/ml; diarrhea: 10000-1500 ml/day Grade III:rash skin \> 50 % area; bilirubin: 60-150 mg/ml; diarrhea: \>1500 ml/day Grade IV: erythroderma; bilirubin: \> 150 mg/ml; diarrhea: \>2000 ml/day Grade IV is the worst grade Patients given a second allogeneic HCT were censured for GVHD analyses.

    Time frame: 180 days after HCT

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Graft Rejection as Defined by Whole Blood and T Cell Chimerism

    graft rejection are reported in outcome measure data table (defined as ≤ 5% donor chimerism in T cells, total white blood cells and/or total bone marrow cells).

    Time frame: 1 year after HCT

  2. Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD in the 2 Groups

    Comparaison of the number of Participants with chronic GVHD in the 2 groups

    Time frame: 2 years after HCT

  3. Incidences of Bacterial, Fungal and Viral Infections in the 2 Groups.

    Time frame: D100 after HCT

  4. Percentage of Relapse Rate in the 2 Groups

    Time frame: 1 year after HCT

  5. Quality and Timing of Immunologic Reconstitution: Concentration of ATG Levels

    Analyses of ATG levels in order to assess the immune system recuperation

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 3 and Day 10

  6. Percentage of Non Relapse Mortality in the 2 Groups

    Time frame: 1 year after HCT

  7. Percentage of 4-year Progression Free Survival in the 2 Groups

    Time frame: 4 year after HCT

  8. Percentage of 5-year Progression Free Survival in the 2 Groups

    Time frame: 5 year after HCT

  9. Percentage of 4-year Overall Survival in the 2 Groups

    Time frame: 4 year after HCT

  10. Percentage of 5-year Overall Survival in the 2 Groups

    Time frame: 5 year after HCT

07

Results

Posted Jan 26, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFlu-TBITLI-ATG
Started5047
Completed4945
Not completed12
Withdrew: Protocol violation12

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD Between the 2 Groups

Percentage of participants with aGVHD according grades: Grade I: rash skin \< 25 % area; bilirubin: 20-30 mg/ml; diarrhea: 500-1000 ml/day Grade II: rash skin 25-50 % area; bilirubin: 30-60 mg/ml; diarrhea: 10000-1500 ml/day Grade III:rash skin \> 50 % area; bilirubin: 60-150 mg/ml; diarrhea: \>1500 ml/day Grade IV: erythroderma; bilirubin: \> 150 mg/ml; diarrhea: \>2000 ml/day Grade IV is the worst grade Patients given a second allogeneic HCT were censured for GVHD analyses.

Time frame:
180 days after HCT
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants with aGVHD
Percentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD Between the 2 Groups
percentage of participants with aGVHDFlu-TBITLI-ATG
Percentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD Between the 2 Groups12.28.9
Statistical analysis
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Multivariate Cox models · p = 0.508
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.02
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.002
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Graft Rejection as Defined by Whole Blood and T Cell Chimerism

graft rejection are reported in outcome measure data table (defined as ≤ 5% donor chimerism in T cells, total white blood cells and/or total bone marrow cells).

Time frame:
1 year after HCT
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Graft Rejection as Defined by Whole Blood and T Cell Chimerism
participantsFlu-TBITLI-ATG
Number of Participants With Graft Rejection as Defined by Whole Blood and T Cell Chimerism34
Statistical analysis
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.09
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.03
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.01
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD in the 2 Groups

Comparaison of the number of Participants with chronic GVHD in the 2 groups

Time frame:
2 years after HCT
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD in the 2 Groups
percentage of participantsFlu-TBITLI-ATG
Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD in the 2 Groups40.818.8
Statistical analysis
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Multivariate Cox models · p = 0.0165
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Mutivariate · p = 0.010 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.3
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Multivariate · p = 0.0495 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.5
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Multivariate · p = 0.001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 3.8
SecondaryIncidences of Bacterial, Fungal and Viral Infections in the 2 Groups.
Time frame:
D100 after HCT
Reported as:
Number · participants
Incidences of Bacterial, Fungal and Viral Infections in the 2 Groups.
participantsFlu-TBITLI-ATG
Bacterial infection1925
Fungal infection37
CMV reactivation1521
Statistical analysis
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Fisher Exact · p = 0.15
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Fisher Exact · p = 0.19
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Fisher Exact · p = 0.12
SecondaryPercentage of Relapse Rate in the 2 Groups
Time frame:
1 year after HCT
Reported as:
Number · percentage of Relapse
Percentage of Relapse Rate in the 2 Groups
percentage of RelapseFlu-TBITLI-ATG
Percentage of Relapse Rate in the 2 Groups2250
Statistical analysis
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Cumulative incidence curves · p = 0.017 · Multivariate cox models: 2.3 · 95% CI 1.1 to 4.7
SecondaryQuality and Timing of Immunologic Reconstitution: Concentration of ATG Levels

Analyses of ATG levels in order to assess the immune system recuperation

Time frame:
Day 0, Day 3 and Day 10
Reported as:
Median · mg/L
Quality and Timing of Immunologic Reconstitution: Concentration of ATG Levels
mg/LTLI-ATG
Median ATG serum levels at day 04 (3.8 to 4.2)
Median ATG serum levels at day 32.2 (2.09 to 2.31)
Median ATG serum levels at day 100.95 (0.9025 to 0.9975)
Statistical analysis
  • TLI-ATG · Median difference (final values): 4
  • TLI-ATG · Mean difference (final values): 2.2
  • TLI-ATG · Mean difference (final values): 0.95
SecondaryPercentage of Non Relapse Mortality in the 2 Groups
Time frame:
1 year after HCT
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Non Relapse Mortality in the 2 Groups
percentage of participantsFlu-TBITLI-ATG
Percentage of Non Relapse Mortality in the 2 Groups2413
Statistical analysis
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Cumulative incidence curve · p = 0.5
SecondaryPercentage of 4-year Progression Free Survival in the 2 Groups
Time frame:
4 year after HCT
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of 4-year Progression Free Survival in the 2 Groups
percentage of participantsFlu-TBITLI-ATG
Percentage of 4-year Progression Free Survival in the 2 Groups5437
Statistical analysis
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Kaplan-Meier method · p = 0.14 · Multivariate analyses: 2 · 95% CI 1 to 4.1
SecondaryPercentage of 5-year Progression Free Survival in the 2 Groups
Time frame:
5 year after HCT
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of 5-year Progression Free Survival in the 2 Groups
percentage of participantsFlu-TBITLI-ATG
Percentage of 5-year Progression Free Survival in the 2 Groups5037
SecondaryPercentage of 4-year Overall Survival in the 2 Groups
Time frame:
4 year after HCT
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of 4-year Overall Survival in the 2 Groups
percentage of participantsFlu-TBITLI-ATG
Percentage of 4-year Overall Survival in the 2 Groups5354
Statistical analysis
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Kaplan-Meier method · p = 0.9 · Multivariate analyses: 1.2 · 95% CI 1 to 1.4
SecondaryPercentage of 5-year Overall Survival in the 2 Groups
Time frame:
5 year after HCT
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of 5-year Overall Survival in the 2 Groups
percentage of participantsFlu-TBITLI-ATG
Percentage of 5-year Overall Survival in the 2 Groups5355
Statistical analysis
  • Flu-TBI vs TLI-ATG · Kaplan-Meier method · p = 0.96 · Multivariate analyses: 1.2 · 95% CI 1 to 1.4

Adverse events

Collected over 5 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Flu-TBI22/49 (44.9%)41/49 (83.7%)15/49 (30.6%)
TLI-ATG19/45 (42.2%)41/45 (91.1%)21/45 (46.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 22
Most frequent serious events
EventFlu-TBITLI-ATG
Relapse/progressionBlood and lymphatic system disorders12/4922/45
chronic Graft versus Host DiseaseImmune system disorders20/4913/45
LungInfections and infestations7/492/45
Viral infectionInfections and infestations6/494/45
acute Graft versus Host DiseaseImmune system disorders5/495/45
Septic shockInfections and infestations5/495/45
Fever unknown originGeneral disorders3/495/45
Graft failureBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/494/45
GI complainsGastrointestinal disorders4/493/45
Neurologic troublesNervous system disorders4/491/45
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventFlu-TBITLI-ATG
CMV reactivationInfections and infestations15/4921/45

Baseline characteristics

13/107 included patients (6 in the Flu-TBI and 7 in the TLI-ATG arm) were excluded from analysis because they did not meet the inclusion criteria at the time of the start of the conditioning (disease relapse (5), ineligible for further irradiation (3), donor refusal (2), HLA-mismatched donor (2), and poor PS (1)).

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Flu-TBITLI-ATGTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years363571
>=65 years131023
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Flu-TBITLI-ATGTotal
Median60 (38 to 73)59 (32 to 71)60 (32 to 73)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Flu-TBITLI-ATGTotal
Female141630
Male352964
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Flu-TBITLI-ATGTotal
Netherlands426
Belgium454388
Donor: HLA-identical sibling/ 10/10 HLA-allele matched URD
Donor: HLA-identical sibling/ 10/10 HLA-allele matched URD(participants)Flu-TBITLI-ATGTotal
HLA-identical sibling292554
10/10 HLA-allele matched URD202040
08

Study locations

11 sites
  • AZ Gasthuisberg Leuven
    Leuven, Flamish Brabant 3000, Belgium
  • UZ Gent
    Ghent, Flanders Oost, Belgium
  • University Hospital Mont-Godinne
    Godinne, Namur, Belgium
  • AZ St-Jan
    Bruges, West Flanders, Belgium
  • UZA Stuyvenberg
    Antwerp, Belgium
  • UZA
    Antwerp, Belgium
  • Bordet Institute
    Brussels, Belgium
  • St Luc UCL
    Brussels, Belgium
  • UZ Brussels
    Brussels, Belgium
  • CHU Sart Tilman
    Liège, 4000, Belgium
  • University Hospital Maastricht
    Maastricht, Limburg 6200, Netherlands
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hannon M, Beguin Y, Ehx G, Servais S, Seidel L, Graux C, Maertens J, Kerre T, Daulne C, de Bock M, Fillet M, Ory A, Willems E, Gothot A, Humblet-Baron S, Baron F. Immune Recovery after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Following Flu-TBI versus TLI-ATG Conditioning. Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Jul 15;21(14):3131-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-3374. Epub 2015 Mar 16. PubMed 25779951 ↗
  • Baron F, Zachee P, Maertens J, Kerre T, Ory A, Seidel L, Graux C, Lewalle P, Van Gelder M, Theunissen K, Willems E, Emonds MP, De Becker A, Beguin Y. Non-myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation following fludarabine plus 2 Gy TBI or ATG plus 8 Gy TLI: a phase II randomized study from the Belgian Hematological Society. J Hematol Oncol. 2015 Feb 6;8:4. doi: 10.1186/s13045-014-0098-9. PubMed 25652604 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 26, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00603954
Responsible party
Yves Beguin (Prof, University of Liege) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 29, 2008
Start date
Jan 2008
Primary completion
Jul 2016
Completion
Jul 2016
Results posted
Jan 26, 2022
Last update
Jan 26, 2022

Study contacts

Frederic Baron, MD, PhD
study chair · CHU-ULg
Yves Beguin, MD, PhD
study chair · CHU-ULg
Johan Maertens, MD
principal investigator · KUL
Koen Theunissen, MD
principal investigator · KUL
Harry Schouten, MD
principal investigator · Maastricht University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion