CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00597714Updated Jun 2, 2014Results posted

Efficacy Study of T Cell Depleted Allogeneic Non-myeloablative Stem Cell Transplant

A Phase 2 interventional study of Non-myeloablative Stem Cell Transplantation in Hodgkin's Disease, Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Myeloma, sponsored by David Rizzieri, MD. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-06-02.

Sponsored by David Rizzieri, MD · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
264
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The central hypothesis of this study is that use of a less toxic chemotherapy preparative regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in combination with T cell depletion with alemtuzumab for patients with high risk hematologic malignancies will allow effective control of disease and improved disease free and overall survival compared with historical expectations. Specifically, the objectives are to estimate toxicity, disease free, progression free, event free, and overall survival rates in patients treated with alemtuzumab T cell depleted, reduced intensity preparative regimen followed by allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation; evaluate immune recovery following this reduced intensity allogeneic immunotherapy; develop an in vitro assay to allow patient individualized targeted dosing.

Read the detailed description

The central hypothesis of this study is that use of a less toxic chemotherapy preparative regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in combination with T cell depletion with alemtuzumab for patients with high risk hematologic malignancies will allow effective control of disease and improved disease free and overall survival compared with historical expectations. Specifically, the objectives are to estimate toxicity, disease free, progression free, event free and overall survival rates in patients treated with an alemtuzumab T cell depleted, reduced intensity preparative regimen followed by allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation; evaluate immune recovery following this reduced intensity allogeneic immunotherapy; develop an in vitro assay to allow patient individualized targeted dosing. The study population is HIV negative, adult patients who are not pregnant but have confirmed diagnosis of disease; must have Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) performance status (PS) 0, 1, or 2; must have a 3-6/6 human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related donor or 8/8 (A, B, C, DRB1, DQ are the primary determinants) or better HLA-matched unrelated donor who is evaluated and deemed able to provide peripheral blood stem cells (PBPCs) and/or marrow by the transplant team. The target population of patients is those with a high chance of progressive lymphoid or myelomatous diseases, progressive myeloid diseases, marrow failure syndromes or myeloproliferative disorders.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hodgkin's Disease
  • Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma
  • Myeloma
  • Leukemia
  • Myelodysplasia

Keywords

  • Stem Cell Transplantation, Non-myeloablative
03

In context

Hodgkin Disease

885 studies on the registry are indexed under Hodgkin Disease; 132 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 264 is above the median of 44 across 726 interventional studies indexed under Hodgkin Disease.

Browse Hodgkin Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

David Rizzieri, MD is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Recipient Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must have their diagnosis confirmed at the transplant center.
  • Performance status must be Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) = 0, 1, or 2.
  • Subjects must have a 3-6/6 human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related donor or 8/8 or better allele level match matched unrelated donor (MUD) (at A,B, C, DRB1, DQ).
  • HIV negative.
  • Women of child bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 1 week of starting therapy.
  • Subjects > or equal to 18 years of age are eligible.
  • Subjects must have a Multi Gated Acquisition Scan (MUGA) and/or Echocardiography (ECHO) or cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) and or diffusing capacity testing of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) performed before transplant.
  • Specific populations:

    • Group A) Subjects with a high chance of progressive lymphoid or myelomatous diseases.
    • Group B) Subjects with a high chance of progressive myeloid diseases, marrow failure syndromes or myeloproliferative disorders

Recipient Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Subjects with other major medical or psychiatric illnesses which the treating physician feels could seriously compromise tolerance to this protocol.
  • Subjects with uncontrolled, progressive infections.
  • Subjects who are good candidates for long term disease control with standard chemotherapy or radiation or high dose therapy and autologous support.
  • Subjects with active central nervous system (CNS) disease.

Donor Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Donor must be capable of providing informed consent. If 14-17 years of age, a 'single patient exemption' from the local Institutional Review Board must be obtained.
  2. Donor must not have any medical condition which would make mobilization or apheresis more than a minimal risk, and should have the following:

    1. Adequate cardiac function by history and physical examination. Those with a history of cardiac failure or infarction should be evaluated by a cardiologist prior to donation
    2. Adequate hematopoietic function with hematocrit ≥ 30%, white blood cell count of 3000, and platelets 100,000.
  3. Females should not be pregnant or lactating and have a negative serum pregnancy test within 1 week of beginning mobilization if of child bearing potential.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
264 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cohort A - Lymphoid Disease

    Group A: Patients with a high chance of progressive lymphoid or myelomatous disease undergo Non-myeloablative Stem Cell Transplantation.

    Drug: Non-myeloablative Stem Cell Transplantation

  • Experimental
    Cohort B - Myeloid Disease

    Group B: Patients with a high chance of progressive myeloid diseases, marrow failure syndromes or myeloproliferative disorders undergo Non-myeloablative Stem Cell Transplantation.

    Drug: Non-myeloablative Stem Cell Transplantation

  • No intervention
    Donor

    Donor priming and apheresis will include filgrastim 8 mcg/kg subcutaneously twice daily for 4 days prior to stem cell collection and continuing until pheresis is completed. Alternative mobilization strategies may be employed at the investigator's discretion.

Interventions

  • DrugNon-myeloablative Stem Cell Transplantation

    The preparative regimen is 4 days of daily fludarabine at 40 mg/m2/d infused over 30 minutes; melphalan 140 mg/m2/d for 1 day administered over 15 minutes; 4 days of Alemtuzumab at 20 mg/d in 250 ml of normal saline infused over 3 hours. Group B's prep regimen will begin on day -5 or day -4 and busulfan 130mg/m2/d for 2 days over 3 hours. The peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) will be infused over 2-4 days. Patient evaluations will occur 2 times per week by physical exam for toxicity through day 45.

    Also known as: Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disease Free Survival

    Estimate disease free survival rates in participants treated with an alemtuzumab T cell depleted, reduced intensity preparative regimen followed by allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates after SCT were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We performed univariate comparisons by using the log-rank test. DFS was defined as the period of time between the day of transplantation and either disease relapse or death due to the disease. The following variables were considered as confounders: recipient age, recipient sex, disease (myeloid or lymphoid), disease risk (standard or high), and donor type (MRD, MUD, or HAPLO donor). The percentage of participants who were disease free at 2 years is reported by donor type.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Immune Recovery

    Evaluate immune recovery following this reduced intensity allogeneic immunotherapy. Quantification of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells was performed by flow cytometry on fresh peripheral blood at approximately 1 month before transplantation and then 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation. The immune recovery rates of the CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells in the MRD, MUD, and HAPLO groups were compared by performing an analysis of variance at each time point after transplantation. The median T cell counts at 12 months for each type of cell are reported by donor type.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Progression Free Survival

    Progression-free survival (PFS) rates after stem cell transplant were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We performed univariate comparisons by using the log-rank test. PFS was defined as the period of time between the day of transplantation and either the day underlying disease progression was documented or death occurred by any cause. The following variables were considered as confounders: recipient age, recipient sex, disease (myeloid or lymphoid), disease risk (standard or high), and donor type (MRD, MUD, or HAPLO donor). The percentage of participants progression free at 2 years is reported by donor type. Progression = \> 25% increase of serum M-protein and/or urine M-protein. Also, an absolute increase in bone marrow plasma cells \> 10%, new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Overall Survival

    Estimate overall survival rates in participants treated with an alemtuzumab T cell depleted, reduced intensity preparative regimen followed by allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates after SCT were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We performed univariate comparisons by using the log-rank test. OS was defined as the period of time between the day of transplantation and death. The following variables were considered as confounders: recipient age, recipient sex, disease (myeloid or lymphoid), disease risk (standard or high), and donor type (MRD, MUD, or HAPLO donor). The percentage of participants surviving 2 years by donor type is reported.

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Graft Failure

    Estimate toxicity including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in participants treated with an alemtuzumab T cell depleted, reduced intensity preparative regimen followed by allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Bone marrow aspiration and/or biopsy were performed 3-5 weeks after transplant to assess donor-cell engraftment. Primary Graft Failure was defined as a neutrophil count below 500/μL or the absence of donor-derived hematopoiesis (\<5%donor cells) before relapse, death, or re-transplantation. Secondary Graft Failure was defined as the achievement of primary engraftment and a subsequent decrease in neutrophils to 3 consecutive counts of less than 100/μL or the absence of donor-derived hematopoiesis (\<5% donor cells) before relapse, death, or re-transplantation.

    Time frame: 180 days

Other outcomes

  1. Graft Versus Host Disease

    Estimate toxicity including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in participants treated with an alemtuzumab T cell depleted, reduced intensity preparative regimen followed by allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Bone marrow aspiration and/or biopsy were performed 3-5 weeks after transplant to assess donor-cell engraftment. Acute or chronic GVHD was diagnosed and graded according to standard criteria. Toxicity was formally graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0.

    Time frame: 180 days

07

Results

Posted Jun 2, 2014

Participant flow

170 transplant recipients were recruited through the Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Program at Duke University Medical Center. Recruitment began in February, 2008 and ended in June, 2013. 33 recipients were screen failures. 94 donors were consented for leukapheresis.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCohort A - Lymphoid DiseaseCohort B - Myeloid DiseaseDonor
Started805794
Completed241184
Not completed564610
Withdrew: Death56460
Withdrew: Recipient death0010

Outcome measures

PrimaryDisease Free Survival

Estimate disease free survival rates in participants treated with an alemtuzumab T cell depleted, reduced intensity preparative regimen followed by allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates after SCT were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We performed univariate comparisons by using the log-rank test. DFS was defined as the period of time between the day of transplantation and either disease relapse or death due to the disease. The following variables were considered as confounders: recipient age, recipient sex, disease (myeloid or lymphoid), disease risk (standard or high), and donor type (MRD, MUD, or HAPLO donor). The percentage of participants who were disease free at 2 years is reported by donor type.

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Disease Free Survival
percentage of participantsCohort A & B- Lymphoid & Myeloid Disease
Matched Related Donors (MRD); n=3847 (29 to 63)
Matched Unrelated Donors (MUD); n=5323 (12 to 36)
Haploidentical related (HAPLO) donors; n=3316 (5 to 33)
SecondaryImmune Recovery

Evaluate immune recovery following this reduced intensity allogeneic immunotherapy. Quantification of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells was performed by flow cytometry on fresh peripheral blood at approximately 1 month before transplantation and then 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation. The immune recovery rates of the CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells in the MRD, MUD, and HAPLO groups were compared by performing an analysis of variance at each time point after transplantation. The median T cell counts at 12 months for each type of cell are reported by donor type.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Mean · T cells/μL
Immune Recovery
T cells/μLCohort A & B- Lymphoid & Myeloid Disease
Matched Related Donors (MRD) n=38 - CD3+ Tcells/uL700 ± 100
Matched Unrelated Donors(MUD) n=53 - CD3+Tcells/uL550 ± 150
Haploidentical related (HAPLO) n=33 -CD3+Tcells/uL500 ± 200
Matched Related Donors (MRD) n=38 - CD4+ Tcells/uL225 ± 30
Matched Unrelated Donors (MUD) n=53 -CD4+Tcells/uL140 ± 20
Haploidentical related (HAPLO) n=33 -CD4+Tcells/uL150 ± 55
Matched Related Donors (MRD) n=38 - CD8+ Tcells/uL420 ± 100
Matched Unrelated Donors (MUD) n=53 -CD8+Tcells/uL350 ± 150
Haploidentical related (HAPLO) n=33 -CD8+Tcells/uL300 ± 150
SecondaryProgression Free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) rates after stem cell transplant were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We performed univariate comparisons by using the log-rank test. PFS was defined as the period of time between the day of transplantation and either the day underlying disease progression was documented or death occurred by any cause. The following variables were considered as confounders: recipient age, recipient sex, disease (myeloid or lymphoid), disease risk (standard or high), and donor type (MRD, MUD, or HAPLO donor). The percentage of participants progression free at 2 years is reported by donor type. Progression = \> 25% increase of serum M-protein and/or urine M-protein. Also, an absolute increase in bone marrow plasma cells \> 10%, new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder.

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Progression Free Survival
percentage of participantsCohort A & B - Lymphoid & Myeloid Disease
Matched Related Donors (MRD) n=3843 (26 to 59)
Matched Unrelated Donors (MUD) n=5322 (11 to 34)
Haploidentical related (HAPLO) donor n=3315 (5 to 30)
SecondaryOverall Survival

Estimate overall survival rates in participants treated with an alemtuzumab T cell depleted, reduced intensity preparative regimen followed by allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates after SCT were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We performed univariate comparisons by using the log-rank test. OS was defined as the period of time between the day of transplantation and death. The following variables were considered as confounders: recipient age, recipient sex, disease (myeloid or lymphoid), disease risk (standard or high), and donor type (MRD, MUD, or HAPLO donor). The percentage of participants surviving 2 years by donor type is reported.

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Overall Survival
percentage of participantsCohort A & B - Lymphoid & Myeloid Disease
Matched Related Donors (MRD) n=3851 (33 to 66)
Matched Unrelated Donors (MUD) n=5322 (12 to 35)
Haploidentical related (HAPLO) donors n=3323 (10 to 39)
Other pre-specifiedGraft Versus Host Disease

Estimate toxicity including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in participants treated with an alemtuzumab T cell depleted, reduced intensity preparative regimen followed by allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Bone marrow aspiration and/or biopsy were performed 3-5 weeks after transplant to assess donor-cell engraftment. Acute or chronic GVHD was diagnosed and graded according to standard criteria. Toxicity was formally graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0.

Time frame:
180 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Graft Versus Host Disease
percentage of participantsCohort A & B - Lymphoid & Myeloid Disease
Grade II-IV GvHD (MRD n=38)16 (7 to 30)
Grade II-IV GvHD (MUD n=53)26 (14 to 39)
Grade II-IV GvHD (HAPLO n=33)46 (24 to 65)
Grade III-IV GvHD (MRD n=38)3 (0.2 to 12)
Grade III-IV GvHD (MUD=53)13 (5 to 25)
Grade III-IV GvHD (HAPLO n=33)27 (11 to 47)
SecondaryGraft Failure

Estimate toxicity including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in participants treated with an alemtuzumab T cell depleted, reduced intensity preparative regimen followed by allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Bone marrow aspiration and/or biopsy were performed 3-5 weeks after transplant to assess donor-cell engraftment. Primary Graft Failure was defined as a neutrophil count below 500/μL or the absence of donor-derived hematopoiesis (\<5%donor cells) before relapse, death, or re-transplantation. Secondary Graft Failure was defined as the achievement of primary engraftment and a subsequent decrease in neutrophils to 3 consecutive counts of less than 100/μL or the absence of donor-derived hematopoiesis (\<5% donor cells) before relapse, death, or re-transplantation.

Time frame:
180 days
Reported as:
Number · number of participants
Graft Failure
number of participantsCohort A & B - Lymphoid & Myeloid Disease
Graft Failure (MRD n=38)1
Graft Failure (MUD n=53)3
Graft Failure (HAPLO n=33)10

Adverse events

Collected over Participants will be evaluated at a minimum of 2 times per week by physical exam for toxicity following Version 3 of the NCI expanded common toxicity criteria through day 45 following the first infusion.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cohort A - Lymphoid Disease—16/80 (20%)77/80 (96.3%)
Cohort B - Myeloid Disease—10/57 (17.5%)52/57 (91.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 21
Most frequent serious events
EventCohort A - Lymphoid DiseaseCohort B - Myeloid Disease
Death - NOSGeneral disorders9/806/57
Infection - OtherInfections and infestations3/803/57
Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils (ANC <1.0 x 10e9/L)Infections and infestations2/803/57
Supraventricular and nodal arrhythmiaCardiac disorders2/800/57
Infection with grade 3 or 4 neutrophils (ANC <1.0 x 10e9/L)Infections and infestations2/800/57
Cardiac Ischemia/InfarctionCardiac disorders0/801/57
Febrile neutropeniaInfections and infestations1/801/57
Altered Mental StatusNervous system disorders1/801/57
CNS - Cerebrovascular IschemiaNervous system disorders0/801/57
Renal FailureRenal and urinary disorders1/801/57
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent other events
EventCohort A - Lymphoid DiseaseCohort B - Myeloid Disease
Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils (ANC <1.0 x 10e9/L)Infections and infestations53/8041/57
Infection with normal ANC or grade 1 or 2 neutrophilsInfections and infestations42/8018/57
Febrile neutropeniaInfections and infestations40/8022/57
Failure to EngraftBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/8013/57
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders17/804/57
Infection - OtherInfections and infestations14/804/57
CreatinineMetabolism and nutrition disorders8/801/57
HypoxiaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders6/805/57
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders7/801/57
Renal/Genitourinary - OtherRenal and urinary disorders7/802/57

Baseline characteristics

Participants who proceeded to therapy and transplant.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Cohort A - Lymphoid DiseaseCohort B - Myeloid DiseaseTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years7340113
>=65 years71724
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cohort A - Lymphoid DiseaseCohort B - Myeloid DiseaseTotal
Female352459
Male453378
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cohort A - Lymphoid DiseaseCohort B - Myeloid DiseaseTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American9615
White7051121
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cohort A - Lymphoid DiseaseCohort B - Myeloid DiseaseTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino8057137
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Cohort A - Lymphoid DiseaseCohort B - Myeloid DiseaseTotal
United States8057137
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Duke University Health System
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kanda J, Long GD, Gasparetto C, Horwitz ME, Sullivan KM, Chute JP, Morris A, Shafique M, Li Z, Chao NJ, Rizzieri DA. Reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation using alemtuzumab from HLA-matched related, unrelated, or haploidentical related donors for patients with hematologic malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Feb;20(2):257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Nov 20. PubMed 24269380 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00597714
Lead sponsor
David Rizzieri, MD
Responsible party
David Rizzieri, MD (Associate Professor of Medicine, Duke University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 18, 2008
Start date
Feb 2008
Primary completion
Jul 2013
Completion
Nov 2013
Results posted
Jun 2, 2014
Last update
Jun 2, 2014

Study contacts

David Rizzieri, MD
principal investigator · Duke Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion