CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00597623DORAUpdated Jul 26, 2012

Efficacy Study of an Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Alpha Agent in Patients With Hand Osteoarthritis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Adalimumab (Humira®) and Placebo in Hand Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-07-26.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Digital osteoarthritis (DO) which affects the interphalangeal joints and the Metacarpophalangeal (MCP) of the thumb is a common disease, the prevalence of which increases with age (36% of the population aged over 70). Certain forms of DO with clinical manifestations involving inflammatory features are particularly refractory to usual treatments (analgesics, NSAIDs, braces and local injections). The mechanism of osteoarthritis involves two major cytokines: interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha. TNF alpha is particularly involved in the inflammation process.

The aim of the present study is to study the efficacy of TNF alpha blockers (2 injections of adalimumab compared to placebo injections in patients with severe and refractory hand osteoarthritis.

We hope that such new therapeutic option may induce substantial pain relief.

Read the detailed description

Objective: To demonstrate the efficacy of two subcutaneous injections of anti-TNF alpha (adalimumab) in patients with DO refractory to usual treatments (NSAIDs - analgesics).

Design: Randomized placebo-controlled multicenter (20 sites (amendment 18/12/2008)) trial

Trial duration: 6 months follow-up per patient, total trial duration: 12 months

Number of patients: 84(up)

Dose of administration: Two subcutaneous injections separated by a 2-week interval of either adalimumab or placebo. Therapeutic precautions inherent to the prescription of anti-TNF alpha are based upon those recommended in rheumatoid arthritis. With only two injections of anti-TNF alpha, the risk of complications (infectious in particular) inherent to the anti-TNF alpha appears to be extremely slight.

Patient selection: Patients with digital osteoarthritis (DIP and PIP) according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (with a recent X-ray, less than 6 months, of the hands, showing signs of digital osteoarthritis), symptomatic for more than 3 months (at least three finger joints) and scored more than 40 mm on a pain visual analog scale (VAS) despite use of a level 1 analgesic (acetaminophen: 4 g daily) andNSAIDs. Main Exclusion criteria are contraindications to anti-TNF alpha according to international guidelines.

Methods: Patients will be seen at a screening visit, then during treatment administration (W0 and W2) and at follow-up visits: W6, 10, 14 and 26. NSAIDs will be stopped at the time of screening.

Efficacy evaluation: The efficacy endpoint is improvement in pain on a pain VAS at different times of assessment (primary endpoint at W6). A more than 50% improvement, in comparison with baseline, will be considered to be significant. Secondary endpoints are: number of tender joints, number of swollen joints, morning stiffness, global assessment of handicap by patient, global assessment of handicap by physician, the DREISER'S algofunctional index, Cochin hand index, weekly evolution of pain ( patient record), and recording of analgesic use (acetaminophen or NSAIDs).

Statistical data: Statistical analysis will be performed on the inter-group difference in the intention-to-treat population. khi-2 will be used only for criteria number 1.

Anticipated result: Significant superiority of adalimumab over placebo which would provide a therapeutic solution in difficult-to-treat patients with hand OA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hand Osteoarthritis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Osteoarthritis
  • Hand
  • Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha inhibitors
  • Biological Therapy
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 582 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 84 is above the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: 40-80
  • Men or women
  • Digital osteoarthritis (DIP and PIP) according to ACR criteria (with recent X-ray, dating from less than 6 months, of the hands showing radiological signs of digital osteoarthritis)
  • Symptomatic digital osteoarthritis for more than 3 months (at least every other day) despite taking analgesics and NSAIDs (except when there are contraindications to the latter therapeutic group)
  • Osteoarthritis affecting more than three finger joints
  • Pain more than 40 mm as evaluated by pain VAS (0-100 mm)
  • No contraindication to anti-TNF alpha treatments
  • No digital osteoarthritis surgery scheduled within the next 2 months
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women or women of reproductive potential without effective contraception
  • Known hypersensitivity
  • Patients having already been treated with an anti-TNF alpha
  • Finger osteoarthritis secondary to inflammatory rheumatism
  • Psoriasis
  • Existence of painful syndrome of upper limbs likely to interfere with the monitoring of pain (cervicobrachial neuralgia, incapacitating carpal tunnel syndrome, joint disorders of the elbow or shoulder)
  • Inflammatory rheumatism
  • Contraindications to anti-TNF alpha agents: patients with suspected reactivation of tuberculosis (phlyctenular IDR, past history of tuberculosis, chest X-ray deemed suspect) or known leukopenia (\< 3500 leukocytes), known hepatic cytolysis (transaminases more than twice normal), a history of serious allergy, concomitant infection, past history of serious systemic infection (septicemia), a history of known cancer within the past 5 years, history of multiple sclerosis
  • Skin disease incompatible with subcutaneous injection
  • Anticoagulant (oral) or treatment with heparin at a curative dose
  • Surgery scheduled within the coming 2 months
  • Finger surgery scheduled within the coming 6 months
  • Local injection of a corticosteroid in a symptomatic finger joint during the previous month
  • Local injection of hyaluronic acid in a symptomatic finger joint during the prior 3 months
  • Treatment with a slow-acting anti-osteoarthritis agent initiated and colchicine (amendment 26/06/2008) within the previous 3 months
  • Oral corticosteroids
  • Psychiatric illness
  • Non-controlled diabetes "mellitus"
  • Known viral hepatitis B or C, HIV infection
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
84 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    2 injections of Adalimumab (Humira®)

    Other: Adalimumab (Humira®)

  • Placebo comparator
    2

    2 injection of Placebo

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • OtherAdalimumab (Humira®)

    syringes for injections under cutaneous dose = 40mg vol = 0.8 ml

  • OtherPlacebo

    syringes under cutaneous vol = 8 ml

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Level of Pain on visual analogue scale

    Time frame: 4 weeks following the last injection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of tender joints

    Time frame: at weeks 4, 6, 10, 14, 26

  2. Number of swollen joints

    Time frame: at weeks 4, 6, 10, 14, 26

  3. Global assessment of handicap by patient

    Time frame: at weeks 4, 6, 10, 14, 26

  4. Global assessment of handicap by physician

    Time frame: at weeks 4, 6, 10, 14, 26

  5. Duration of morning stiffness

    Time frame: at weeks 4, 6, 10, 14, 26

  6. DREISER'S algofunctional index

    Time frame: at weeks 4, 6, 10, 14, 26

  7. Cochin hand index

    Time frame: at weeks 4, 6, 10, 14, 26

  8. Weekly pain recording, and recording of analgesic use (acetaminophen)

    Time frame: at weeks 4, 6, 10, 14, 26

  9. Percentage of non responders according to the number of patients requiring NSAIDS intake during the trial and/or rule out for lack of efficacy

    Time frame: from week 0 until week 26

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU Henri Mondor
    Créteil, 94000, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chevalier X, Ravaud P, Maheu E, Baron G, Rialland A, Vergnaud P, Roux C, Maugars Y, Mulleman D, Lukas C, Wendling D, Lafforgue P, Loeuille D, Foltz V, Richette P; French section of osteoarthritis. Adalimumab in patients with hand osteoarthritis refractory to analgesics and NSAIDs: a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Sep;74(9):1697-705. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205348. Epub 2014 May 9. PubMed 24817417 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 26, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00597623
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Collaborators
Abbott
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 18, 2008
Start date
Jan 2008
Primary completion
Jun 2010
Completion
Dec 2010
Last update
Jul 26, 2012

Study contacts

Xavier Chevalier, PU-PH
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion