CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00589563Updated Sep 10, 2014Results posted

Sirolimus, Tacrolimus, and Antithymocyte Globulin in Preventing Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Patients Undergoing a Donor Stem Cell Transplant For Hematological Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of anti-thymocyte globulin and cyclophosphamide in Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders, Graft Versus Host Disease and Infection, sponsored by City of Hope Medical Center. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-09-10.

Sponsored by City of Hope Medical Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
2 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Giving chemotherapy and total-body irradiation before a donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It also stops the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. The donated stem cells may replace the patient's immune cells and help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect). Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can also make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving tacrolimus, sirolimus, antithymocyte globulin, and methotrexate before and after transplant may stop this from happening.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well sirolimus, tacrolimus, and antithymocyte globulin work in preventing graft-versus-host disease in patients undergoing a donor stem cell transplant for hematological cancer .

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • To determine the incidence and severity of acute- and chronic-graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after HLA-matched or -mismatched unrelated donor hematopoietic peripheral blood transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies scheduled to receive immunosuppressive combination of sirolimus, tacrolimus, and anti-thymocyte globulin as GVHD prophylaxis.
  • To determine the safety of this combination in the first six months post-transplant.

Secondary

  • To determine the time-to-engraftment, non-relapse mortality rate, overall and disease-free survival, incidence of disease relapse, and incidence of opportunistic infections with this GVHD prophylaxis.

OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to conditioning regimen (fludarabine phosphate and melphalan vs fractionated total-body irradiation [FTBI] and etoposide vs FTBI and cyclophosphamide) and degree of donor/recipient HLA mismatch (high-risk vs low-risk).

  • Conditioning regimen: Patients receive 1 of 3 standard conditioning regimens beginning on day -9 or -8 and continuing to day -1 or 0.
  • Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: Patients receive HLA-matched or mismatched unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cells on day 0.
  • Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis: Patients receive tacrolimus IV continuously beginning on day -3 and then orally when tolerated, oral sirolimus on days -3 and -2, anti-thymocyte globulin IV over 4-8 hours on days -3 to 0, and methotrexate* IV on days 1, 3, and 6. Tacrolimus and sirolimus continue for 3-6 months (with taper).

NOTE: *Only patients with high-risk HLA mismatch receive treatment with methotrexate.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed periodically for up to 2 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders
  • Graft Versus Host Disease
  • Infection
  • Leukemia
  • Lymphoma
  • Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Neoplasm
  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
  • Precancerous Condition
  • Secondary Myelofibrosis
  • Small Intestine Cancer

Keywords

  • graft versus host disease
  • infection
  • adult favorable prognosis Hodgkin lymphoma
  • adult unfavorable prognosis Hodgkin lymphoma
  • childhood favorable prognosis Hodgkin lymphoma
  • childhood unfavorable prognosis Hodgkin lymphoma
  • cutaneous B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  • recurrent adult Hodgkin lymphoma
  • recurrent cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  • recurrent/refractory childhood Hodgkin lymphoma
  • stage I adult Hodgkin lymphoma
  • stage I childhood Hodgkin lymphoma
  • stage I cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  • stage II adult Hodgkin lymphoma
  • stage II childhood Hodgkin lymphoma
  • stage II cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  • stage III adult Hodgkin lymphoma
  • stage III childhood Hodgkin lymphoma
  • stage III cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  • stage IV adult Hodgkin lymphoma
  • stage IV childhood Hodgkin lymphoma
  • stage IV cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  • anaplastic large cell lymphoma
  • angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma
  • Burkitt lymphoma
  • contiguous stage II adult Burkitt lymphoma
  • contiguous stage II adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
  • contiguous stage II adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma
  • contiguous stage II adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma
  • contiguous stage II adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma
  • contiguous stage II adult lymphoblastic lymphoma
  • contiguous stage II grade 1 follicular lymphoma
  • contiguous stage II grade 2 follicular lymphoma
  • contiguous stage II grade 3 follicular lymphoma
  • contiguous stage II mantle cell lymphoma
  • contiguous stage II marginal zone lymphoma
  • contiguous stage II small lymphocytic lymphoma
  • extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue
  • nodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma
  • noncontiguous stage II adult Burkitt lymphoma
  • noncontiguous stage II adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
  • noncontiguous stage II adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma
  • noncontiguous stage II adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma
  • noncontiguous stage II adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma
  • noncontiguous stage II adult lymphoblastic lymphoma
  • noncontiguous stage II grade 1 follicular lymphoma
  • noncontiguous stage II grade 2 follicular lymphoma
  • noncontiguous stage II grade 3 follicular lymphoma
  • noncontiguous stage II mantle cell lymphoma
  • noncontiguous stage II marginal zone lymphoma
  • noncontiguous stage II small lymphocytic lymphoma
  • recurrent adult Burkitt lymphoma
  • recurrent adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
  • recurrent adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma
  • recurrent adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma
  • recurrent adult grade III lymphomatoid granulomatosis
  • recurrent adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma
  • recurrent adult lymphoblastic lymphoma
  • recurrent adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma
  • recurrent childhood anaplastic large cell lymphoma
  • recurrent childhood grade III lymphomatoid granulomatosis
  • recurrent childhood lymphoblastic lymphoma
  • recurrent childhood small noncleaved cell lymphoma
  • recurrent grade 1 follicular lymphoma
  • recurrent grade 2 follicular lymphoma
  • recurrent grade 3 follicular lymphoma
  • recurrent grade I lymphomatoid granulomatosis
  • recurrent grade II lymphomatoid granulomatosis
  • recurrent mantle cell lymphoma
  • recurrent marginal zone lymphoma
  • recurrent small lymphocytic lymphoma
  • small intestine lymphoma
  • splenic marginal zone lymphoma
  • stage I adult Burkitt lymphoma
  • stage I adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
  • stage I adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma
  • stage I adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma
  • stage I adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma
  • stage I adult lymphoblastic lymphoma
  • stage I adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma
  • stage III adult Burkitt lymphoma
  • stage III adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
  • stage III adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma
  • stage III adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma
  • stage III adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma
  • stage III adult lymphoblastic lymphoma
  • stage III adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma
  • stage III childhood anaplastic large cell lymphoma
  • stage III childhood lymphoblastic lymphoma
  • stage III childhood small noncleaved cell lymphoma
  • stage III grade 1 follicular lymphoma
  • stage III grade 2 follicular lymphoma
  • stage III grade 3 follicular lymphoma
  • stage III mantle cell lymphoma
  • stage III marginal zone lymphoma
  • stage III small lymphocytic lymphoma
  • stage IV adult Burkitt lymphoma
  • stage IV adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
  • stage IV adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma
  • stage IV adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma
  • stage IV adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma
  • stage IV adult lymphoblastic lymphoma
  • stage IV adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma
  • stage IV childhood anaplastic large cell lymphoma
  • stage IV childhood lymphoblastic lymphoma
  • stage IV childhood small noncleaved cell lymphoma
  • stage IV grade 1 follicular lymphoma
  • stage IV grade 2 follicular lymphoma
  • stage IV grade 3 follicular lymphoma
  • stage IV mantle cell lymphoma
  • stage IV marginal zone lymphoma
  • stage IV small lymphocytic lymphoma
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia in remission
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia with 11q23 (MLL) abnormalities
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13;q22)
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(15;17)(q22;q12)
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(16;16)(p13;q22)
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22)
  • childhood acute myeloid leukemia in remission
  • recurrent adult acute myeloid leukemia
  • recurrent childhood acute myeloid leukemia
  • secondary acute myeloid leukemia
  • adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission
  • childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission
  • recurrent adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  • recurrent childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  • accelerated phase chronic myelogenous leukemia
  • chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia
  • refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • relapsing chronic myelogenous leukemia
  • stage I chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • stage II chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • stage III chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • stage IV chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • stage I multiple myeloma
  • stage II multiple myeloma
  • stage III multiple myeloma
  • childhood myelodysplastic syndromes
  • de novo myelodysplastic syndromes
  • myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable
  • previously treated myelodysplastic syndromes
  • secondary myelodysplastic syndromes
  • atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL negative
  • chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
  • juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia
  • primary myelofibrosis
  • secondary myelofibrosis
03

In context

Lymphoma

5,578 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphoma; 825 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 40 across 4,508 interventional studies indexed under Lymphoma.

Browse Lymphoma studies →

Lead sponsor

City of Hope Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 670 studies on the registry; 181 are open to participants now.

Of its 30 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 12 (40%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Diagnosis of hematological malignancy including any of the following:

    • Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in any complete remission (CR) or partial response (PR)
    • Hodgkin lymphoma in any CR or PR
    • Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in any CR

      • Bone marrow blasts \< 20% within 4 weeks of transplant and peripheral blood absolute blast count \< 500/µL on the day of initiation of conditioning for patients with non-CR AML or ALL
    • Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) treated or untreated
    • Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic or accelerated phase
    • Multiple myeloma in any CR or PR
    • Chronic lymphocytic leukemia in CR or PR 2 or greater
    • Myelofibrosis and other myeloproliferative disorders

      • Bone marrow blasts \< 20% within 4 weeks of transplant and peripheral blood absolute blast count \< 500/µL on the day of initiation
  • High-risk disease defined as AML or ALL > CR1, accelerated phase CML, recurrent aggressive lymphoma, or active lymphoproliferative disease at transplant
  • Low-risk disease defined as AML or ALL in CR1, chronic phase CML, or low-grade lymphoproliferative disorder with controlled disease at transplant
  • Must be planning to receive 1 of the following conditioning regimens at City of Hope:

    • Fludarabine phosphate and melphalan for patients with hematological malignancies and contraindications for conventional myeloablative regimens due to age, co-morbidity, or previous transplant
    • Fractionated total-body irradiation (FTBI) and etoposide for patients with AML and ALL or CML in accelerated phase
    • FTBI and cyclophosphamide for patients with NHL, AML, CML, and MDS
  • Suitable unrelated donor available

    • HLA-matched or mismatched
    • Peripheral blood stem cells available
    • No bone marrow or ex vivo-engineered or processed graft (e.g., CD34-positive, T-cell depletion)
  • No uncontrolled CNS disease

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Karnofsky performance status (PS) 70-100% or ECOG PS 0-2
  • Creatinine \< 1.3 mg/dL or creatinine clearance ≥ 70 mL/min
  • Ejection fraction > 45%
  • Direct bilirubin \< 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • ALT and AST \< 3 times ULN
  • Forced vital capacity, FEV1, and DLCO > 45% of predicted
  • Able to cooperate with oral medication intake
  • No active donor or recipient serology positive for HIV
  • No known contraindication to administration of sirolimus, tacrolimus, or anti-thymocyte globulin
  • No active hepatitis B or C
  • Negative pregnancy test

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • Concurrent participation in other clinical trials for prevention or treatment of viral, bacterial, or fungal disease allowed provided agents do not interact with agents used in the current study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Fludarabine/Melphalan Conditioning

    Fludarabine/Melphalan Conditioning with Sirolimus, Tacrolimus and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (+/- methotrexate) for GvHD Prophylaxis

    Biological: anti-thymocyte globulin · Drug: fludarabine phosphate · Drug: melphalan · Drug: methotrexate · Drug: sirolimus · Drug: tacrolimus · Procedure: allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation · Procedure: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation · Procedure: nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation · Procedure: peripheral blood stem cell transplantation · Radiation: total-body irradiation

  • Experimental
    FTBI/Cytoxan Conditioning

    FTBI/Cytoxan Conditioning with Sirolimus, Tacrolimus and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (+/- methotrexate) for GvHD Prophylaxis

    Biological: anti-thymocyte globulin · Drug: cyclophosphamide · Drug: methotrexate · Drug: sirolimus · Drug: tacrolimus · Procedure: allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation · Procedure: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation · Procedure: nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation · Procedure: peripheral blood stem cell transplantation · Radiation: total-body irradiation

  • Experimental
    FTBI/Etoposide Conditioning

    FTBI/Etoposide Conditioning with Sirolimus, Tacrolimus and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (+/- methotrexate) for GvHD Prophylaxis

    Biological: anti-thymocyte globulin · Drug: etoposide · Drug: methotrexate · Drug: sirolimus · Drug: tacrolimus · Procedure: allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation · Procedure: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation · Procedure: nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation · Procedure: peripheral blood stem cell transplantation · Radiation: total-body irradiation

Interventions

  • Biologicalanti-thymocyte globulin

    0.5 mg/kg on day -3, 1.5 mg/kg on day -2 and 2.5 mg/kg on day -1 or day 0 from stem cell transplant

  • Drugcyclophosphamide

    60mg/kg on days -5 and -4 from stem cell transplant

  • Drugetoposide

    60mg/kg on day -4 from stem cell transplant

  • Drugfludarabine phosphate

    Fludarabine 25 mg/m2/d from days -9 to -5 from stem cell transplant

  • Drugmelphalan

    Melphalan 140 mg/m2 on day -4 from stem cell transplant

  • Drugmethotrexate

    For high risk HLA-mismatch transplant only: 5 mg/m2 on days +1, +3 and +6 from stem cell transplant

  • Drugsirolimus

    Adults: 12 mg loading dose on day -3 from stem cell transplant followed by 4 mg orally single morning daily dose. Pediatric Patients \<40kg: 3 mg/m2 orally on day -3 from stem cell transplant followed by 1 mg/m2 orally single morning daily dose

  • Drugtacrolimus

    0.02 mg/kd/d CIV beginning on day -3 from stem cell transplant

  • Procedureallogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

    The target peripheral blood stem cell dose will be 5-10 x 106/kg actual body weight

  • Procedurehematopoietic stem cell transplantation

    The target peripheral blood stem cell dose will be 5-10 x 106/kg actual body weight

  • Procedurenonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

    Fludarabine 25 mg/m2/d from days -9 to -5 from stem cell transplant, Melphalan 140 mg/m2 on day -4 from stem cell transplant

  • Procedureperipheral blood stem cell transplantation

    The target peripheral blood stem cell dose will be 5-10 x 106/kg actual body weight

  • Radiationtotal-body irradiation

    1320 cGy in 11 fractions from day -8 to day -5 or day -9 to day -6 prior to stem cell transplant

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumulative Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) at Day 100

    Patients were evaluated for the development of acute GVHD within the first 100 days post HSCT. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was determined using competing risk analysis. Competing risks for acute GVHD were death and nonengraftment.

    Time frame: 100 Days Post Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT)

  2. Severity of Acute GVHD

    All patients were considered for the evaluation of the severity of acute GVHD.

    Time frame: 100 Days Post HSCT

  3. Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD

    Patients were evaluated for the development of chronic GVHD from 101 days post HSCT to last contact or documented evidence of the disease. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was determined using competing risk analysis. Competing risks for GVHD were death and nonengraftment.

    Time frame: 2 year point estimate was provided.

  4. Severity of Chronic GVHD

    All Patients were considered for the evaluation of chronic GVHD severity.

    Time frame: Patients were evaluated until they developed chronic GVHD, a median of 130 days post HSCT

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Absolute Neutrophil Count Recovery (Engraftment)

    Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery is defined as an ANC of ≥ 0.5 x 10\^9/L (500/mm3) for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days

    Time frame: Patients were evaluated until neutrophil recovery, a median of 15 days post HSCT

  2. Time to Platelet Count Recovery (Engraftment)

    Platelet recovery is defined as the first date of three consecutive laboratory values ≥ 25 x 10\^9 L obtained on different days.

    Time frame: Patients were evaluated until platelet recovery, a median of 14 days

  3. Occurence of Infections Including Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Reactivation

    Participants were monitored throughout the trial (median of 28 months) for various infections/complications.

    Time frame: Median Follow Up: 28 months (Range: 1-49 months)

  4. Occurrence of Thrombotic Microangiopathy

    Participants were monitored throughout the trial (median of 28 months) for various infections/complications. This is the number of participants who developed TMA.

    Time frame: Median Follow Up: 28 Months (Range: 1-49 months)

  5. Occurence of Sinusoidal Obstructive Syndrome (SOS)

    Participants were monitored throughout the trial (median of 28 months) for various infections/complications. This is the number of participants who developed SOS.

    Time frame: Median Follow Up: 28 Months (Range: 1-49 Months)

  6. Non-relapse Mortality at 100 Days Post HSCT

    Patients were evaluated for non-relapse mortality (NRM) throughout the study. Non-relapse mortality was considered any death not attributable to relapse or disease progression. The cumulative incidence of NRM was determined using competing risk analysis. Competing risks for NRM were death due to disease progression, relapse and nonengraftment.

    Time frame: 100 day point estimate was provided

  7. Non-relapse Mortality at Two Years Post HSCT

    Patients were evaluated for non-relapse mortality (NRM) throughout the study. Non-relapse mortality was considered any death not attributable to relapse or disease progression. The cumulative incidence of NRM was determined using competing risk analysis. Competing risks for NRM were death due to disease progression, relapse and nonengraftment.

    Time frame: 2 year point estimate was provided.

  8. Overall Survival at Two Years Post HSCT

    Patients were evaluated for survival (OS) throughout the study. Kaplan Meier estiamtes were calculated for overall survival using time from HSCT to death of any cause or for surviving patients last contact date.

    Time frame: 2 year point estimate was provided.

  9. Event Free Survival at Two Years Post HSCT

    Patients were evaluated for event free survival (EFS) throughout the study. Events were defined as death, relapse, progression, or nonengraftment. Kaplan Meier estimates were calculated as time from HSCT to event.

    Time frame: 2 year point estimate was provided.

  10. Incidence of Disease Relapse/Progression at 2 Years Post HSCT

    Patients were evaluated for relapse/progression post transplant throughout the study. The cumulative incidence of relapse/progression was determined using competing risk analysis. Competing risks for relapse were non-relapse mortality and nonengraftment.

    Time frame: 2 year point estimate was provided.

07

Results

Posted Aug 12, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAll Patients
Started32
Completed32
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryCumulative Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) at Day 100

Patients were evaluated for the development of acute GVHD within the first 100 days post HSCT. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was determined using competing risk analysis. Competing risks for acute GVHD were death and nonengraftment.

Time frame:
100 Days Post Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients developing aGVHD
Cumulative Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) at Day 100
Percentage of patients developing aGVHDAll Patients
Cumulative Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) at Day 10037.3 (22.4 to 62.0)
PrimarySeverity of Acute GVHD

All patients were considered for the evaluation of the severity of acute GVHD.

Time frame:
100 Days Post HSCT
Reported as:
Number · participants
Severity of Acute GVHD
participantsAll Patients
No Acute GVHD9
Yes - Grade I9
Yes- Grade II9
Yes- Grade III1
Yes - Grade IV0
No- Inevaluable (graft failures)4
SecondaryTime to Absolute Neutrophil Count Recovery (Engraftment)

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery is defined as an ANC of ≥ 0.5 x 10\^9/L (500/mm3) for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days

Time frame:
Patients were evaluated until neutrophil recovery, a median of 15 days post HSCT
Reported as:
Median · Days
Time to Absolute Neutrophil Count Recovery (Engraftment)
DaysAll Patients
Time to Absolute Neutrophil Count Recovery (Engraftment)14.5 (10 to 26)
SecondaryTime to Platelet Count Recovery (Engraftment)

Platelet recovery is defined as the first date of three consecutive laboratory values ≥ 25 x 10\^9 L obtained on different days.

Time frame:
Patients were evaluated until platelet recovery, a median of 14 days
Reported as:
Median · Days
Time to Platelet Count Recovery (Engraftment)
DaysAll Patients
Time to Platelet Count Recovery (Engraftment)14 (10 to 40)
SecondaryOccurence of Infections Including Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Reactivation

Participants were monitored throughout the trial (median of 28 months) for various infections/complications.

Time frame:
Median Follow Up: 28 months (Range: 1-49 months)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Occurence of Infections Including Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Reactivation
participantsAll Patients
Neither CMV or EBV16
CMV reactivation only9
EBV only3
Both CMV and EBV4
SecondaryOccurrence of Thrombotic Microangiopathy

Participants were monitored throughout the trial (median of 28 months) for various infections/complications. This is the number of participants who developed TMA.

Time frame:
Median Follow Up: 28 Months (Range: 1-49 months)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Occurrence of Thrombotic Microangiopathy
participantsAll Patients
Occurrence of Thrombotic Microangiopathy7
SecondaryOccurence of Sinusoidal Obstructive Syndrome (SOS)

Participants were monitored throughout the trial (median of 28 months) for various infections/complications. This is the number of participants who developed SOS.

Time frame:
Median Follow Up: 28 Months (Range: 1-49 Months)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Occurence of Sinusoidal Obstructive Syndrome (SOS)
participantsAll Patients
Occurence of Sinusoidal Obstructive Syndrome (SOS)1
SecondaryNon-relapse Mortality at 100 Days Post HSCT

Patients were evaluated for non-relapse mortality (NRM) throughout the study. Non-relapse mortality was considered any death not attributable to relapse or disease progression. The cumulative incidence of NRM was determined using competing risk analysis. Competing risks for NRM were death due to disease progression, relapse and nonengraftment.

Time frame:
100 day point estimate was provided
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients with a NRM
Non-relapse Mortality at 100 Days Post HSCT
Percentage of patients with a NRMAll Patients
Non-relapse Mortality at 100 Days Post HSCT9.4 (3.2 to 27.5)
SecondaryNon-relapse Mortality at Two Years Post HSCT

Patients were evaluated for non-relapse mortality (NRM) throughout the study. Non-relapse mortality was considered any death not attributable to relapse or disease progression. The cumulative incidence of NRM was determined using competing risk analysis. Competing risks for NRM were death due to disease progression, relapse and nonengraftment.

Time frame:
2 year point estimate was provided.
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients with a NRM
Non-relapse Mortality at Two Years Post HSCT
Percentage of patients with a NRMAll Patients
Non-relapse Mortality at Two Years Post HSCT15.6 (7.0 to 35.0)
SecondaryOverall Survival at Two Years Post HSCT

Patients were evaluated for survival (OS) throughout the study. Kaplan Meier estiamtes were calculated for overall survival using time from HSCT to death of any cause or for surviving patients last contact date.

Time frame:
2 year point estimate was provided.
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients who died
Overall Survival at Two Years Post HSCT
Percentage of patients who diedAll Patients
Overall Survival at Two Years Post HSCT65.6 (53.7 to 75.2)
SecondaryEvent Free Survival at Two Years Post HSCT

Patients were evaluated for event free survival (EFS) throughout the study. Events were defined as death, relapse, progression, or nonengraftment. Kaplan Meier estimates were calculated as time from HSCT to event.

Time frame:
2 year point estimate was provided.
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients with an event
Event Free Survival at Two Years Post HSCT
Percentage of patients with an eventAll Patients
Event Free Survival at Two Years Post HSCT61.3 (49.9 to 70.8)
PrimaryCumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD

Patients were evaluated for the development of chronic GVHD from 101 days post HSCT to last contact or documented evidence of the disease. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was determined using competing risk analysis. Competing risks for GVHD were death and nonengraftment.

Time frame:
2 year point estimate was provided.
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients developing cGVHD
Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD
Percentage of patients developing cGVHDAll Patients
Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD62.5 (47.8 to 81.7)
PrimarySeverity of Chronic GVHD

All Patients were considered for the evaluation of chronic GVHD severity.

Time frame:
Patients were evaluated until they developed chronic GVHD, a median of 130 days post HSCT
Reported as:
Number · participants
Severity of Chronic GVHD
participantsAll Patients
No Chronic GVHD4
Yes- Limited4
Yes - Extensive17
No- Inevaluable (graft failure/died <day 100)7
SecondaryIncidence of Disease Relapse/Progression at 2 Years Post HSCT

Patients were evaluated for relapse/progression post transplant throughout the study. The cumulative incidence of relapse/progression was determined using competing risk analysis. Competing risks for relapse were non-relapse mortality and nonengraftment.

Time frame:
2 year point estimate was provided.
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients who relapsed
Incidence of Disease Relapse/Progression at 2 Years Post HSCT
Percentage of patients who relapsedAll Patients
Incidence of Disease Relapse/Progression at 2 Years Post HSCT12.5 (5.0 to 31.3)

Adverse events

Collected over 180 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All Patients—9/31 (29%)31/31 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 19
Most frequent serious events
EventAll Patients
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders2/31
Multi-organ failureGeneral disorders2/31
Opportunistic infectionInfections and infestations2/31
SepsisInfections and infestations2/31
Renal failureRenal and urinary disorders2/31
Blood disorderBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/31
Atrial flutterCardiac disorders1/31
Myocardial ischemiaCardiac disorders1/31
Ill-defined disorderGeneral disorders1/31
PainGeneral disorders1/31
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 228
Most frequent other events
EventAll Patients
Hemoglobin decreasedBlood and lymphatic system disorders31/31
Leukocyte count decreasedInvestigations31/31
Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations31/31
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations31/31
Blood glucose increasedMetabolism and nutrition disorders31/31
Serum calcium decreasedMetabolism and nutrition disorders31/31
Serum magnesium decreasedMetabolism and nutrition disorders31/31
Serum sodium decreasedMetabolism and nutrition disorders31/31
FatigueGeneral disorders30/31
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations30/31

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Patients
Median59.5 (19 to 71)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Patients
Female19
Male13
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)All Patients
United States32
Diagnosis
Diagnosis(participants)All Patients
Acute Myeloid Leukemia14
Myelodysplastic Syndrome6
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia3
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia3
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma3
Myeloproliferative Disorder2
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia1
Disease Status (American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Guidelines)
Disease Status (American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Guidelines)(participants)All Patients
Standard Risk14
High/Intermediate Risk18
Patient/Donor Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection status
Patient/Donor Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection status(participants)All Patients
Positive/Negative12
Positive/Positive12
Negative/Negative3
Negative/Positive5
Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Match Type
Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Match Type(participants)All Patients
10/10 Matched18
1 Mismatch12
2 Mismatches1
3 Mismatches1
Conditioning Regimen
Conditioning Regimen(participants)All Patients
Fludarabine/Melphalan23
Fractionated Total Body Irradiation/Cytoxan4
Fractionated Total Body Irradiation/Etoposide5

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
    Phoenix, Arizona 85006, United States
  • City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Duarte, California 91010-3000, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00589563
Lead sponsor
City of Hope Medical Center
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 9, 2008
Start date
May 2007
Primary completion
Feb 2012
Completion
Feb 2012
Results posted
Aug 12, 2014
Last update
Sep 10, 2014

Study contacts

Ryotaro Nakamura, MD
study chair · City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion