CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00585286Updated Jan 15, 2014Results posted

Fractional Resurfacing Device for Treatment of Acne Scarring

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of 10,600 nm fractional carbon dioxide laser system in Acne and Scar, sponsored by University of California, Irvine. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-01-15.

Sponsored by University of California, Irvine · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new investigational laser device for treatment of acne scarring, for improvement in the appearance of surface texture and topography (recessed or uneven surfaces).

Read the detailed description

Thirty subjects between two research locations with an acne scar severity score greater than 4 will receive up to 3 treatments with an FDA IDE and Institutional Review Board approved 10,600nm fractional carbon dioxide laser system. Improvement of acne scarring is evaluated at 1 month and 3 months post-treatment.

Post-treatment responses evaluated are immediate erythema, immediate edema, and any other immediate responses. Evaluations are conducted immediate post treatment and one week post-treatment. Key safety data include the severity scoring of post-treatment responses, as well as by photodocumentation.

The incidence of side effects such as scarring, pigmentary changes, etc. are evaluated at follow-up visits one and three months post-treatment. Key safety data include the incidence rates and severity scoring of side effects, as well as by photodocumentation

02

Conditions studied

  • Acne
  • Scar

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • acne vulgaris
  • scarring
  • laser
03

In context

Cicatrix

307 studies on the registry are indexed under Cicatrix; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 39 across 251 interventional studies indexed under Cicatrix.

Browse Cicatrix studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Irvine is the lead sponsor of 466 studies on the registry; 96 are open to participants now.

Of its 41 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Have Fitzpatrick skin type I-V. (Type I is blonde/red hair with freckles and Type V are Hispanics and lighter African Americans.)
  • Are male or female.
  • Are between 18 and 75 years of age.
  • Have moderate to severe acne scarring. Acne scarring will be assessed with the Acne Scar Severity Scale. Subjects will be eligible for treatment if the area to be treated is scored as having an Acne Scar Severity Score > 4 according to the Acne Scar Severity Scale (0-9).
  • Are able to read, understand, and sign the Informed Consent.
  • Are willing and able to comply with all follow-up requirements for a minimum of 8 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have had active localized or systemic infections within 6 months of enrollment
  • Have compromised ability for wound healing, such as: malnutrition, oral steroid use, history of collagen vascular disease (e.g. lupus, scleroderma, history of keloid formation (raised and thickened scars), atrophic dermatitis (extreme skin irritation or itchiness) or immunologic abnormalities such as vitiligo (white patches of skin due to loss of pigment)
  • Have immunocompromised status (inability to resist infection, etc.)
  • Have been treated with lasers, chemical procedures, or other cosmetic procedures on the area to be treated within 6 months of enrollment
  • Have taken Accutane within 12 months of enrollment
  • Are allergic to lidocaine (skin numbing agent)
  • Are allergic to Valtrex (an anti-viral medication)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Fractional carbon dioxide laser system

    Thirty total healthy subjects from two research centers with skin type I-IV of moderate to severe acne scarring received treatment with the 10,600 nm fractional carbon dioxide laser system.

    Device: 10,600 nm fractional carbon dioxide laser system

Interventions

  • Device10,600 nm fractional carbon dioxide laser system

    1-3 laser treatments using 20-100 millijoules (mJ) with 100-400 microscopic treatment zones (MTZ)/cm2 per pass and total density of 600-1200 MTZ/cm2

    Also known as: Fraxel Re:pair laser

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Improvement of Acne Scarring

    Subject assessment of the percent improvement of acne scarring compared to baseline and based on the quartile scale (0: no improvement; 1: 1-25% improvement; 2: 26-50%; 3: 51-75%; 4: 76-100% improvement).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month and 3 months post-treatment

  2. Average Improvement in Surface Texture

    Subject assessment of the percent improvement of surface texture compared to baseline and based on the quartile scale (0: no improvement; 1: 1-25% improvement; 2: 26-50%; 3: 51-75%; 4: 76-100% improvement).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month and 3 months post-treatment

  3. Degree of Atrophy

    Subject assessment of the percent improvement in extent of atrophy compared to baseline and based on the quartile scale (0: no improvement; 1: 1-25% improvement; 2: 26-50%; 3: 51-75%; 4: 76-100% improvement).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month and 3 months post-treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Tolerance

    The average pain score reported over all three treatments was 5.67, corresponding to "moderate" pain based on a 10-point scale. The pain score is recorded on a 10-point scale, with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "worst pain imaginable." All subjects reported that any discomfort associated with the procedure was only during active intervention and resolved immediately post-procedure. Increased pain scores correlated with increased density, but not increased energy.

    Time frame: At treatment visit (up to 3 visits)

07

Results

Posted Dec 2, 2013
Limitations and caveats
There were no major limitations to this trial. The trial was completed without any technical problems or major complications.

Participant flow

30 total patients with moderate to severe acne scarring were recruited from 3/2007-5/2008 between two locations. Of these, 15 patients received treatment and 14 patients completed the full course of the study at the University of California, Irvine General Clinical Research Center.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFractional Carbon Dioxide Laser System
Started15
Completed14
Not completed1
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Improvement of Acne Scarring

Subject assessment of the percent improvement of acne scarring compared to baseline and based on the quartile scale (0: no improvement; 1: 1-25% improvement; 2: 26-50%; 3: 51-75%; 4: 76-100% improvement).

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 month and 3 months post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Overall Improvement of Acne Scarring
units on a scaleFractional CO2 Laser System
Month 12.26 ± 1.15
Month 31.91 ± 1.0
PrimaryAverage Improvement in Surface Texture

Subject assessment of the percent improvement of surface texture compared to baseline and based on the quartile scale (0: no improvement; 1: 1-25% improvement; 2: 26-50%; 3: 51-75%; 4: 76-100% improvement).

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 month and 3 months post-treatment
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Average Improvement in Surface Texture
units on a scaleFractional CO2 Laser System
Month 11.94 ± 1.16
Month 32.09 ± 0.85
PrimaryDegree of Atrophy

Subject assessment of the percent improvement in extent of atrophy compared to baseline and based on the quartile scale (0: no improvement; 1: 1-25% improvement; 2: 26-50%; 3: 51-75%; 4: 76-100% improvement).

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 month and 3 months post-treatment
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Degree of Atrophy
units on a scaleFractional CO2 Laser System
Month 11.68 ± 1.11
Month 31.65 ± 1.14
SecondaryPain Tolerance

The average pain score reported over all three treatments was 5.67, corresponding to "moderate" pain based on a 10-point scale. The pain score is recorded on a 10-point scale, with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "worst pain imaginable." All subjects reported that any discomfort associated with the procedure was only during active intervention and resolved immediately post-procedure. Increased pain scores correlated with increased density, but not increased energy.

Time frame:
At treatment visit (up to 3 visits)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain Tolerance
units on a scaleFractional CO2 Laser System
Pain Tolerance5.67 ± 0.833

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data was collected over the entire study for approximately 1 year and 3 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Fractional CO2 Laser System—0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Of 30 patients enrolled between two research centers, 15 subjects were enrolled at the UC Irvine General Clinical Research Center

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Fractional CO2 Laser System
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years15
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Fractional CO2 Laser System
Mean36 ± 13
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Fractional CO2 Laser System
Female9
Male6
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Fractional CO2 Laser System
United States15
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UC Irvine Dermatology Clinical Research Center
    Irvine, California 92697, United States
09

References and documents

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 15, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00585286
Lead sponsor
University of California, Irvine
Collaborators
Reliant Technologies, Inc. Mountain View, CA, University of Minnesota
Responsible party
Christopher Zachary (Clinical Professor, University of California, Irvine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 3, 2008
Start date
Mar 2007
Primary completion
Jul 2008
Completion
Jul 2008
Results posted
Dec 2, 2013
Last update
Jan 15, 2014

Study contacts

Christopher B Zachary, MBBS, FRCP
principal investigator · University of California, Irvine
Brian D Zelickson, MD
principal investigator · Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion