CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00579878Updated Oct 2, 2023Results posted

Triple III Comparison of Leflunomide Alone Versus Two DMARD Combinations in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Leflunomide and Methotrexate-Sulfasalazine-Hydroxychloroquine in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by University of Nebraska. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-02.

Sponsored by University of Nebraska · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 years 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2001, registered Dec 2007).
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
69
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study has been designed as a 48-week, double-blind, randomized, controlled study comparing the use of leflunomide alone to combinations of leflunomide-sulfasalazine-HCQ, and methotrexate-sulfasalazine-HCQ.

Read the detailed description

Objectives: The combination of methotrexate-sulfasalazine-hydroxychloroquine has been shown to be more effective than methotrexate alone or the double combination of methotrexate-sulfasalazine or methotrexate-hydroxychloroquine. The objective of this study is to look at the safety and efficacy of a new DMARD, leflunomide, alone or in combination with traditional DMARDs (sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine).

Research Design: This protocol has been designed as a 48 week, double blind, randomized, prospective and controlled. A total of 180 subjects will be enrolled, and randomly assigned to one of three study arms (60 subjects in each arm): 1) leflunomide alone; 2) leflunomide-sulfasalazine-hydroxychloroquine; 3) methotrexate-sulfasalazine-hydroxychloroquine. All subjects will receive an identical number of medications in a combination of active drug and placebo. Patients are further stratified into two groups: methotrexate-naïve (no history of methotrexate); and methotrexate-failure (failed to achieve clinical response at top dose of 20 mg/week for at least 8 weeks). Methotrexate-naïve patients will start the study at 10 mg/week methotrexate with possible increases at next evaluations dependent on remission criteria. Methotrexate-failure patients will start the study at the top study dose of 20 mg/week and remain at that dose for the entire study.

Methodology: All patients will be recruited from outpatient academic, private practice, and VA rheumatology clinics. Subjects will be between the ages of 19 and 80 years. No pediatric subjects will be enrolled. No enrollment restrictions are based on race, ethnic origin or gender. Inclusion criteria includes: formal diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis per ACR criteria; disease duration of >6 months; at least 6 swollen and 6 tender joints on examination; and negative urine pregnancy test for premenopausal females. Specific exclusion criteria includes: previous treatment with leflunomide or combination DMARDs; abnormal lab values; history of allergy to sulfa, aspirin or tartrazine; any significant comorbid diseases; and unwillingness to avoid alcohol. Study subjects will return for evaluations every 8 weeks. All patients will be monitored for efficacy and signs of drug toxicity throughout the study by laboratory examination (CBC with platelets, AST or ALT, albumin, creatinine, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate), hand x-rays, retinal examination, and chest x-rays (if indicated). Every six months subjects will be asked to complete the ClinHAQ and SF36 questionnaires, designed to evaluate the effect of RA on daily live (ADLs). Subjects will be withdrawn from the study: due to pregnancy; serious adverse event not alleviated by symptomatic treatment; recurrent toxicity that reappears after treatment or drug suspension; lack of efficacy (20% improvement by week 32); non-compliance with the protocol; or withdrawal of consent. The primary study outcome measures were planned before data collection began.

Clinical Relationship: Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic disease affecting a large proportion of the population. It produces significant morbidity and may result in premature mortality. The majority of patients with RA remain on disease-modifying agents for less than two years because of toxicity or lack of efficacy. Because of the failure of standard therapies to consistently halt and slow the progression of disease and the incidence of side effects, new approaches are clearly needed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 69 is below the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Nebraska is the lead sponsor of 473 studies on the registry; 66 are open to participants now.

Of its 75 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 46 (61%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age greater or 19 years and less than or 80 years old
  • Duration of disease greater or equal to 6 months
  • Diagnosis of RA with criteria
  • Negative urine pregnancy test
  • Be capable of understanding and giving written, voluntary informed consent
  • Must present with at least six swollen and six tender joints at the screening evaluation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients treated previously with leflunomide
  • Patients that have been treated with methotrexate in combination with any of the study drugs
  • Patients with a history of allergy to, or any history of significant clinical or laboratory adverse experience associated with any of the study drugs
  • Doses of oral steroids that are either unstable or greater than 10mg/day
  • Stage IV disease or other significant disease including chest x-rays that show evidence of rheumatoid lung disease. Stage IV disease is defined as x-ray evidence of cartilage/bone destruction with fibrous or bony ankylosis; creatinine greater than 2.0mg/dL, AST or ALT greater normal
  • Any significant liver, renal , hematologic, pulmonary, cardiovascular disease (including uncontrolled hypertension), any active peptic ulcer disease, or visual problems including a recent decrease in acuity, retinal disease, or macular degeneration
  • Patients who are not willing to abstain from alcohol consumption
  • Women of childbearing potential who are not practicing a successful method of contraception, or wish to become pregnant
  • Patients that are unable to understand the study procedures and/or give written informed consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
69 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Leflunomide alone vs combination therapy

    Group A: Leflunomide alone

    Drug: Leflunomide

  • Active comparator
    Methotrexate-Sulfasalazine-Hydroxychloroquine

    Methotrexate, Sulfasalazine, Hydroxychloroquine.

    Drug: Methotrexate-Sulfasalazine-Hydroxychloroquine

  • Active comparator
    Leflunomide-Sulfasalazine-Hydroxychloroquine

    Leflunomide-Sulfasalazine-Hydroxychloroquine

    Drug: Leflunomide-Sulfasalazine-Hydroxychloroquine

Interventions

  • DrugLeflunomide

    A loading dose of 100 mg (or placebo) for three (3) days will be given. Following that three-day period, a dose of 20 mg/day will be maintained throughout the remainder of the study. This dose may be decreased to 10 mg/day at the discretion of the treating physician if minor toxicities occur (e.g., diarrhea, liver enzyme elevations

    Also known as: Arava®

  • DrugMethotrexate-Sulfasalazine-Hydroxychloroquine

    Methotrexate: dosing starts at 10mg/week (4 tabs/wk). If total remission (according to ACR criteria found in Appendix II) has not been achieved and the labs are acceptable at the 8-week evaluation, the dose increased to 15 mg/week (6 tabs/wk);at the 16-week evaluation, the dose increased to 20 mg/week (8 tabs/wk). This dose will remain stable until the end of the study. Sulfasalazine: dosing will start at 500 mg bid (1000 mg/day). This dose will remain steady until the 24-week evaluation. If total remission has not been achieved by this time and the labs remain acceptable,dose will be increased to 1000 mg bid (2000 mg/day) Hydroxychloroquine: dosing will be started and maintained throughout the study at 200 mg bid (400 mg/day).

    Also known as: Trexall, Rheumatrex, Azulfidine®, Plaquenil®

  • DrugLeflunomide-Sulfasalazine-Hydroxychloroquine

    Leflunomide: dose of 100 mg (or placebo) for three (3) days. Followed by a dose of 20 mg/day will be maintained throughout the remainder of the study. dose may be decreased to 10 mg/day at the discretion of the treating physician if minor toxicities occur Sulfasalazine: dosing will start at 500 mg bid (1000 mg/day). This dose will remain steady until the 24-week evaluation. If total remission has not been achieved by this time and the labs remain acceptable, dose will be increased to 1000 mg bid (2000 mg/day) Hydroxychloroquine: dosing will be started and maintained throughout the study at 200 mg bid (400 mg/day).

    Also known as: Arava®, Azulfidine®, Plaquenil®

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Measuring the Safety and Efficacy of a New DMARD, Leflunomide Alone or in Combination With Traditional DMARD's. Participants Reaching ACR 20 Response. at 48 Weeks

    The combination of Methotrexate-Sulfasalazine-Hydroxychloroquine has been shown to be more effective than Methotrexate alone or the double combination of Methotrexate-Hydroxychloroquine. Primary outcome is ACR 20 response at 48 weeks. An ACR 20 Response is a measure of at least 20% improvement in the number of tender and swollen joints. and a 20% improvement in at least 3 of the following: the patient's global assessment of disease status; the patient's assessment of pain; the patient's assessment of function; the physician's global assessment of disease status; serum C-reactive protein levels.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

07

Results

Posted May 14, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone1- Leflunomide Alone - vs Combination TherapyMethotrexate-Sulfasalazine-HydroxychloroquineLeflunomide-Sulfasalazine-Hydroxychloroquine
Started222324
Completed152014
Not completed7310

Outcome measures

PrimaryMeasuring the Safety and Efficacy of a New DMARD, Leflunomide Alone or in Combination With Traditional DMARD's. Participants Reaching ACR 20 Response. at 48 Weeks

The combination of Methotrexate-Sulfasalazine-Hydroxychloroquine has been shown to be more effective than Methotrexate alone or the double combination of Methotrexate-Hydroxychloroquine. Primary outcome is ACR 20 response at 48 weeks. An ACR 20 Response is a measure of at least 20% improvement in the number of tender and swollen joints. and a 20% improvement in at least 3 of the following: the patient's global assessment of disease status; the patient's assessment of pain; the patient's assessment of function; the physician's global assessment of disease status; serum C-reactive protein levels.

Time frame:
48 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Measuring the Safety and Efficacy of a New DMARD, Leflunomide Alone or in Combination With Traditional DMARD's. Participants Reaching ACR 20 Response. at 48 Weeks
Participants1 Leflunomide Alone vs Combination TherapyMethotrexate-Sulfasalazine-HydroxychloroquineLeflunomide-Sulfasalazine-Hydroxychloroquine
Measuring the Safety and Efficacy of a New DMARD, Leflunomide Alone or in Combination With Traditional DMARD's. Participants Reaching ACR 20 Response. at 48 Weeks82012

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
1 Leflunomide Alone vs Combination Therapy—1/22 (4.5%)1/22 (4.5%)
Methotrexate-Sulfasalazine-Hydroxychloroquine—0/23 (0%)2/23 (8.7%)
Leflunomide-Sulfasalazine-Hydroxychloroquine—0/24 (0%)6/24 (25%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
Event1 Leflunomide Alone vs Combination TherapyMethotrexate-Sulfasalazine-HydroxychloroquineLeflunomide-Sulfasalazine-Hydroxychloroquine
lung carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/220/230/24
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
Event1 Leflunomide Alone vs Combination TherapyMethotrexate-Sulfasalazine-HydroxychloroquineLeflunomide-Sulfasalazine-Hydroxychloroquine
GI distressGastrointestinal disorders1/221/233/24
KeratitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/221/230/24
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/220/231/24
DepressionPsychiatric disorders0/220/231/24
Elevated liver enzymesHepatobiliary disorders0/220/231/24

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)1- Leflunomide Alone - vs Combination TherapyMethotrexate-Sulfasalazine-HydroxychloroquineLeflunomide-Sulfasalazine-HydroxychloroquineTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years18201957
>=65 years43512
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)1- Leflunomide Alone - vs Combination TherapyMethotrexate-Sulfasalazine-HydroxychloroquineLeflunomide-Sulfasalazine-HydroxychloroquineTotal
Mean50 ± 554 ± 651 ± 452 ± 4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)1- Leflunomide Alone - vs Combination TherapyMethotrexate-Sulfasalazine-HydroxychloroquineLeflunomide-Sulfasalazine-HydroxychloroquineTotal
Female17121645
Male511824
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)1- Leflunomide Alone - vs Combination TherapyMethotrexate-Sulfasalazine-HydroxychloroquineLeflunomide-Sulfasalazine-HydroxychloroquineTotal
United States22232469
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
    Omaha, Nebraska 69198-3025, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 2, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00579878
Lead sponsor
University of Nebraska
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 24, 2007
Start date
Mar 27, 2001
Primary completion
Mar 11, 2010
Completion
Mar 11, 2010
Results posted
May 14, 2019
Last update
Oct 2, 2023

Study contacts

James R O'Dell, MD
principal investigator · University of Nebraska

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion