An interventional study of Enhance Care and Usual Care in Cancer, Enhanced Care and Decision-Making, sponsored by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-03-18.
Sponsored by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new program to help the patient and the caregiver make decisions about treatment for lung cancer. We need to know if a new information program is helpful to patients. The way that we will do this is by comparing it with the usual information program that we now provide.
Patient are asked to make difficult decisions about their treatments. These decisions may include when to change treatments or when to stop treatment altogether. Most patients ask a family member or close friend to help them with these difficult decisions. A "caregiver" is someone they can count on to give support (either emotional or physical) over a period of time. The doctors and nurses will also help patients and their caregiver to make these decisions.
They will tell them the risks with each treatment, the success with each treatment, and how much time there is for making each decision.
Many patients with advanced lung cancer and their caregivers struggle with treatment decisions, such as when to say "enough." Patient preparation for facing termination of cancer-directed therapy for the number one cause of cancer mortality for both men and women in the U.S. is not well handled in most clinical practices. Sparse literature validates that this concern is often denied by investigators. Failure to engage in a systematic, informed decision-making process, even in the initial stage of treatment, may often result in patients looking back and saying, "Knowing what I know now, I wouldn't make the same choice" The long-term goal of this program of research is to enhance patient care for lung cancer by oncology health professionals and to promote patient empowerment to make informed choices, defined as the ability to actively understand and influence one's health status. For this study, shared decision making is defined as a tailored, interactive process (emphasizing beliefs/personal values) in which the patient is informed enough to ask pertinent questions and to participate in the final decision at his/her own preference and comfort levels. The intent is to test a decision aid for patients with advanced lung cancer to help facilitate informed decisions about treatments that affect quality of life, including termination of cancer-directed treatment.
9,610 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,508 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 8 is below the median of 50 across 7,429 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.
Browse Neoplasms studies →Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 1,957 studies on the registry; 323 are open to participants now.
Of its 132 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 68 (52%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Enhance Care (EC) will receive a decision aid with seven components: social support, anticipatory guidance, adhering to the patient's preference for participation in treatment decision making, a quality decision-making process tutorial, normalization (using a CD program), structured time with oncology professionals to discuss difficult decisions, and values clarification of 3 decisions throughout treatment. Self-report measures will be used for all participants in addition to probes for the taped interviews with EC. The outcome measures are quality decision making and decisional conflict. Two panels (decision making and lung cancer) will review the protocol twice. The plan will include serially screening the appointment roster. The decision aid will be administered during three clinic visits.
Behavioral: Enhance Care
As an intentional control, the usual care group will receive standard care related to lung cancer and treatment; they will not receive any oral, written, or recorded information related to decision making. Usual care includes anticipatory guidance related to the disease and treatment (e.g., what to do about treatment side effects, signs of an infection, why a treatment would be changed or stopped) using patient education materials normally used in the MSKCC, TOS, Outpatient Clinic.
Behavioral: Usual Care
EC will receive a decision aid with seven components: social support, anticipatory guidance, adhering to the patient's preference for participation in treatment decision making, a quality decision-making process tutorial, normalization (using a CD program), structured time with oncology professionals to discuss difficult decisions, and values clarification of 3 decisions throughout treatment. Self-report measures will be used for all participants in addition to probes for the taped interviews with EC. The outcome measures are quality decision making and decisional conflict. Two panels (decision making and lung cancer) will review the protocol twice. The plan will include serially screening the appointment roster. The decision aid will be administered during three clinic visits
Also known as: EC
As an intentional control, the usual care group will receive standard care related to lung cancer and treatment; they will not receive any oral, written, or recorded information related to decision making. Usual care includes anticipatory guidance related to the disease and treatment (e.g., what to do about treatment side effects, signs of an infection, why a treatment would be changed or stopped) using patient education materials normally used in the MSKCC, TOS, Outpatient Clinic.
To determine the feasibility of implementing a short, clinic-based, decision-making aid (cognitive-behavioral skills intervention) for patients with advanced lung cancer (and their caregivers) facing cancer-directed treatment.
Time frame: 2 years
To gather data for testing the hypothesis that patients with advanced lung cancer who receive a decision aid will report increased quality decision making, and decreased decisional conflict at the end of Decision 3 compared to the usual care group.
Time frame: 2 years
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center →