CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00554320Updated Sep 18, 2009

Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Chronic Pelvic Pain

An interventional study of tDCS and tDCS in Chronic Pelvic Pain, Interstitial Cystitis and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, sponsored by Summa Health System. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-09-18.

Sponsored by Summa Health System · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

We will rigorously test whether modulation of the motor cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an effective treatment for patients with chronic pelvic pain through the following specific aims:

A) The primary aim of this study is to determine whether transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the motor cortex in patients with chronic pelvic pain induces a significant decrease in the pain or symptoms as compared with sham tDCS. We will also measure changes in the clinical symptom scores of multiple pelvic organs, drug intake (narcotic), anxiety, depression, traumatic stress, as well as overall improvement in the quality of life to assess the effects of this treatment.

B) Determine the duration of the clinical effects of tDCS. We will therefore compare the amelioration of pain and related symptoms between active and sham tDCS for one year following treatment.

C) Determine whether tDCS changes the threshold for pain detection as compared with sham tDCS. Patients with chronic pelvic pain have a lower threshold for pain as compared to healthy subjects and we hypothesized that this threshold will increase after stimulation with tDCS.

D) Finally, we will examine whether 5 days of tDCS treatment is safe for use in chronic pelvic pain patients. Safety will be assessed through neuropsychological tests and adverse event reporting.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pelvic Pain
  • Interstitial Cystitis
  • Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Keywords

  • vulvodynia
  • painful bladder syndrome
  • myofascial pain syndrome
  • pelvic floor tension myalgia
03

In context

Fibromyalgia

1,336 studies on the registry are indexed under Fibromyalgia; 266 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 60 across 1,035 interventional studies indexed under Fibromyalgia.

Browse Fibromyalgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Summa Health System is the lead sponsor of 18 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects must be females between 18 and 55 years of age.
  • Subjects must have a current VAS for pelvic pain of 5 or more.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known pelvic malignancy.
  • Patients with major depression with suicidal risk as clinically defined.
  • Patients with other known, uncontrolled neuropsychiatric disorders.
  • Abnormal neurological examination other than as signs of the condition studied in the present protocol.
  • Contraindication to tDCS:
  • A history of unmanaged substance abuse or dependence within the last 6 months.
  • A history of previous treatment with tDCS.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    A

    During each session, the anode electrode will be placed on the motor cortex (contralateral to the most \[or predominant\] painful side \[or the side where the symptoms begin or the left as a default\]) and the cathode will be placed over the contralateral supraorbital area. In active tDCS subjects, 1 mA of transcranial direct current stimulation will be applied for 30 minutes.

    Procedure: tDCS

  • Placebo comparator
    C

    For sham-controlled tDCS subjects, the same montage will be used; however current will be applied only for 30 seconds.

    Procedure: tDCS

Interventions

  • ProceduretDCS

    During each session, the anode electrode will be placed on the motor cortex (contralateral to the most \[or predominant\] painful side \[or the side where the symptoms begin or the left as a default\]) and the cathode will be placed over the contralateral supraorbital area. In active tDCS subjects, 1 mA of transcranial direct current stimulation will be applied for 30 minutes.

  • ProceduretDCS

    For sham-controlled tDCS subjects, the same montage will be used; however current will be applied only for 30 seconds.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Global Assessment (PGA):

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  2. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain:

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Interstitial cystitis symptom index:

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Summa Health System
    Akron, Ohio 44309, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00554320
Lead sponsor
Summa Health System
First posted
Nov 6, 2007
Start date
Jan 2009
Primary completion
Jun 2009
Completion
Jun 2009
Last update
Sep 18, 2009

Study contacts

Bradford W Fenton, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Summa Health System

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion