An interventional study of Minimal invasive decompression and Interspinous Process Decompression (IPD) in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Radiculopathy, sponsored by Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Terminated at 1 site in Norway. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-25.
Sponsored by Norwegian University of Science and Technology · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to compare two surgery methods on lumbar spinal stenosis: minimal invasive decompression and X-stop. It is a prospective randomized multicenter study including patients with lumbar spinal stenosis on one or two levels, and neurogenic intermittent claudication. Effect assessment will include measures of pain and self-evaluated health condition, a full economical evaluation, and areal measurements (MR imaging and roentgen analyses)
469 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Stenosis; 106 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 96 is above the median of 80 across 289 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Stenosis.
Browse Spinal Stenosis studies →Norwegian University of Science and Technology is the lead sponsor of 494 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Minimal invasive decompression
Procedure: Minimal invasive decompression
X-stop, an interspinous decompression device
Procedure: Interspinous Process Decompression (IPD)
foraminotomy, laminotomy, microscopic decompression
Also known as: mini-invasive decompression
Interspinous device
Also known as: X-stop
Claudication
Zürich Claudication Questionnaire
Time frame: 2 years
self-evaluated health condition
SF36, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ5-D and VAS scale
Time frame: 2 years
This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology →