ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00496678Updated Aug 9, 2013

Trial of Patient Navigation-Activation

A Phase 4 interventional study of Navigation and Standard of Care in Breast Cancer and Colorectal Cancer, sponsored by University of Rochester. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-08-09.

Sponsored by University of Rochester · Phase 4, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
900
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The University of Rochester, Department of Family Medicine, funded by the National Cancer Institute will train community health workers to guide patients through the cancer care system. The project will help to teach patients how to communicate more effectively with their health care team in order to understand the treatment options available to them. Although not widely available, it is believed patient navigation programs are beneficial.

This research study will evaluate how well this tool works, especially among those who experience disparities in health care. The goal is to determine if having a trained navigator shortens the time between an abnormal test result and a definitive diagnosis and between a definitive diagnosis and completion of treatment for breast and colorectal cancer patients. The project also will evaluate whether navigation improves the ability to communicate with the doctor, patient satisfaction with care and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Racial and ethnic minority groups and low-income persons experience significantly higher cancer mortality rates than other Americans. These disparities are due to at least two factors: (1) delays in follow-up of abnormal cancer screening results and (2) suboptimal management of diagnosed cancer. Patient navigation represents a promising means for addressing disparities by improving cancer related management for minority and other underserved populations. However, patient navigation for cancer has yet to be evaluated through a well-designed randomized controlled trial. Furthermore, patient navigation is likely to prove most effective and sustainable when it is integrated into primary care and helps patients be more active in their care. This combination of patient empowerment and enablement is referred to as "activation." The aim of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness and costs of such a program in a rigorous manner so that the results can be generalized and the program can be widely disseminated and implemented. we will develop, implement, and evaluate a primary care-based, patient navigation-activation program using specially-trained community health workers (CHWs). We propose to investigate the effect of this intervention on timing and quality of cancer-related care. Secondary aims examine the impact of navigation on disparities in care, improvement in patient activation and total costs. Project findings will inform national policy regarding patient navigation for cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer
  • Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

  • PNRP
  • navigation
  • navigator
  • activation
  • disparities
  • randomized control trial
  • primary care
  • racial and ethnic minorities
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,815 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,920 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 900 is above the median of 72 across 9,494 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Rochester is the lead sponsor of 728 studies on the registry; 115 are open to participants now.

Of its 56 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 44 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Receive care at a participating practice
  2. Have received a positive breast or colorectal cancer screening test requiring follow-up on a different day
  3. Have been newly diagnosed with breast or colorectal cancer
  4. Have received notification by the provider of an abnormal breast or colorectal screening result

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cognitively impaired
  2. Institutionalized (nursing home, incarcerated)
  3. Children \<18
  4. Actively involved in cancer treatment at time of presentation
  5. Currently or previously navigated with (a) navigation documented in the medical record or (b) patient can articulate that they are in a navigation program or case management program for cancer
  6. History of prior invasive cancer, lymphoma, or leukemia except non-melanoma (basal or squamous of the skin) cancer or CIN (Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia).
  7. Prior cancer that has been treated-The rationale for excluding patients with any prior cancers that have been treated is that patient familiarity with the treatment process in general would make care easier even without a navigator.
  8. Women who are pregnant at time of enrollment.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
900 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Navigation

    Navigation through the cancer care system is the intervention

    Behavioral: Navigation

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care

    Cancer patient receives standard of care.

    Behavioral: Standard of Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralNavigation

    Cancer patients are randomly assigned to receive standard of care or the help of a trained person to navigated them through the cancer care system

  • BehavioralStandard of Care

    Cancer patients receive standard of care for their cancer treatment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To develop, implement, and evaluate a primary care-based, patient navigation program using specially-trained community health workers. We will investigate the effect of this intervention on timing and quality of cancer-related care.

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary aims examine the impact of navigation on disparities in care, improvement in patient activation and total costs.

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Rochester
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Battaglia TA, Darnell JS, Ko N, Snyder F, Paskett ED, Wells KJ, Whitley EM, Griggs JJ, Karnad A, Young H, Warren-Mears V, Simon MA, Calhoun E. The impact of patient navigation on the delivery of diagnostic breast cancer care in the National Patient Navigation Research Program: a prospective meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Aug;158(3):523-34. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3887-8. Epub 2016 Jul 18. PubMed 27432417 ↗
  • Wells KJ, Winters PC, Jean-Pierre P, Warren-Mears V, Post D, Van Duyn MA, Fiscella K, Darnell J, Freund KM; Patient Navigation Research Program Investigators. Effect of patient navigation on satisfaction with cancer-related care. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Apr;24(4):1729-53. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2946-8. Epub 2015 Oct 5. PubMed 26438146 ↗
  • Rodday AM, Parsons SK, Snyder F, Simon MA, Llanos AA, Warren-Mears V, Dudley D, Lee JH, Patierno SR, Markossian TW, Sanders M, Whitley EM, Freund KM. Impact of patient navigation in eliminating economic disparities in cancer care. Cancer. 2015 Nov 15;121(22):4025-34. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29612. Epub 2015 Sep 8. PubMed 26348120 ↗
  • Ko NY, Darnell JS, Calhoun E, Freund KM, Wells KJ, Shapiro CL, Dudley DJ, Patierno SR, Fiscella K, Raich P, Battaglia TA. Can patient navigation improve receipt of recommended breast cancer care? Evidence from the National Patient Navigation Research Program. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 1;32(25):2758-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.6037. Epub 2014 Jul 28. PubMed 25071111 ↗
  • Hendren S, Griggs JJ, Epstein RM, Humiston S, Rousseau S, Jean-Pierre P, Carroll J, Yosha AM, Loader S, Fiscella K. Study protocol: a randomized controlled trial of patient navigation-activation to reduce cancer health disparities. BMC Cancer. 2010 Oct 13;10:551. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-551. PubMed 20939928 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 2007, a primary completion of Jun 2010 and a completion of Aug 2010. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 3, 2007
First posted
Jul 4, 2007
Start
Apr 2007
Primary completionActual
Jun 2010
CompletionActual
Aug 2010
Last update
Aug 9, 2013
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 9, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00496678
First posted
Jul 4, 2007
Start date
Apr 2007
Primary completion
Jun 2010
Completion
Aug 2010
Last update
Aug 9, 2013

Study contacts

Kevin Fiscella, M.D., MPH
principal investigator · University of Rochester

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2007. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion