CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00490087Updated Sep 2, 2011

Resectoscopic Treatment of Atypical Endometrial Polyps in Fertile Women

A Phase 3 interventional study of Levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD) in Atypical Endometrial Polyps and Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia, sponsored by IRCCS Burlo Garofolo. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to female participants aged 25 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-09-02.

Sponsored by IRCCS Burlo Garofolo · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy and prognosis of hysteroscopic resection and coagulation of the base of endometrial polyps with focal atypia in fertile women.

Read the detailed description

The introduction of hysteroscopy in clinical practice changed significantly our knowledge of uterine cavity, but did not stimulate the start of big studies with aim to evaluate the feasibility of conservative treatments for better defined diseases as endometrial polyp. The use of curettage(D\&C) has led the gynecologists to consider diffuse atypical endometrial hyperplasia and atypical polyp as the same disease. The treatment of these precancerous lesions recommended by scientific societies is aggressive (hysterectomy). Surprisingly, regarding hysterectomy we did not observe management modifications after the introduction of endoscopic techniques, as happened in other surgical disciplines.

To evaluate costs and health benefits of operational hysteroscopy we started in our Institute a study protocol in 1998. In a first trial we studied a conservative treatment of postmenopausal woman with high anesthesiologic risk who had endometrial polyps with atypia and no involvement of the base (Scrimin F. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1328-30).

The good initial results and the request of conservative treatments by some women, desiring pregnancies, encouraged us to start this preliminary trial to evaluate the long-term efficacy and prognosis of hysteroscopic resection and coagulation of the base of endometrial polyps with focal atypia in a little sample of fertile women. Other studies suggest progestin treatment of well differentiated carcinoma in young women who desired to preserve their fertility. There is no evidence of a correlation between the tendency to develop endometrial polyps and the risk of endometrial carcinoma. The risk of malignant degeneration of endometrial polyps is not well known, but seems to range between 0.5% and 6%. On this background, we decided to study in the same population of fertile women and with a quasi-randomised design the possible additional effect of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD).

Comparison: women assigned to odd numbers underwent polyp resection and endometrial surveillance with insertion of levonorgestrel intrauterine system (IUD group), women assigned to even numbers underwent polyp resection and endometrial surveillance without insertion of levonorgestrel intrauterine system (no IUD or control group).

02

Conditions studied

  • Atypical Endometrial Polyps
  • Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia

Keywords

  • Atypical endometrial polyps
  • Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia
  • Hysteroscopic resection
  • Conservative treatment
  • Fertile women
03

In context

Uterine Neoplasms

255 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Neoplasms; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 49 across 181 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Neoplasms.

Browse Uterine Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

IRCCS Burlo Garofolo is the lead sponsor of 87 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • women in fertile age desiring to preserve their uterus
  • atypical polyps, without atypia in the base. The hysteroscopic and histologic criteria for inclusion in the study were: proliferative, secretive, dysfunctional endometrium or simple hyperplasia in 4 random biopsies.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • women with adenomatous or atypical hyperplasia in the random biopsies
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hysteroscopic resection plus IUD

    Device: Levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD)

  • No intervention
    Hysteroscopic resection without IUD

Interventions

  • DeviceLevonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy and prognosis of hysteroscopic resection of atypical polyps in terms of appearance of endometrial cancer or recurrence of atypical endometrial lesions

    Time frame: Five years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recurrence rate of polyp in the two groups

    Time frame: Five years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Institute of Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
    Trieste, Friuli Venezia Giulia 34137, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Scrimin F, Wiesenfeld U, Candiotto A, Inglese S, Ronfani L, Guaschino S. Resectoscopic treatment of atypical endometrial polyps in fertile women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;199(4):365.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.041. PubMed 18928975 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 2, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00490087
Lead sponsor
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
First posted
Jun 22, 2007
Start date
Jan 1999
Primary completion
Mar 2007
Completion
Mar 2007
Last update
Sep 2, 2011

Study contacts

Federica Scrimin, MD
principal investigator · Institute of Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2007. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion