CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00481247DASISIONUpdated Feb 15, 2017Results posted

A Phase III Study of Dasatinib vs Imatinib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

A Phase 3 interventional study of Dasatinib and Imatinib in Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic, sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Completed at 109 sites in 27 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-15.

Sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
547
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical research study is to compare the confirmed complete cytogenetic response of dasatinib with that of imatinib within 12 months after randomization in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase Philadelphia positive chronic myeloid leukemia. The safety of this treatment will also be studied.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic

Keywords

  • Chronic Phase Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
03

In context

Leukemia

5,441 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia; 636 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 547 is above the median of 38 across 4,247 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia.

Browse Leukemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Bristol-Myers Squibb is the lead sponsor of 1,538 studies on the registry; 116 are open to participants now.

Of its 429 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 223 (52%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, aged 18 years and older
  • Chronic phase, Philadelphia Chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 0-2

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pleural Effusion
  • Uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
  • Significant bleeding disorder unrelated to CML
  • Prior treatment with interferon/imatinib/dasatinib/anti-CML systemic treatments except anagrelide/hydroxyurea
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
547 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dasatinib

    Drug: Dasatinib

  • Active comparator
    Imatinib

    Drug: Imatinib

Interventions

  • DrugDasatinib

    Tablets, oral, dasatinib 50-140 mg once daily (QD)

    Also known as: Sprycel®, BMS-354825

  • DrugImatinib

    Tablets, oral, imatinib 200-800 mg, QD

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Best Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR) Within 12 Months

    Cytogenetic response (CyR) is based on the prevalence of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) cells in metaphase from bone marrow (BM) sample. (Ideally, 25 metaphases but at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were evaluated). Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)=0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. A cCCyR=those in which all measurements up to at least 28 days after the initial response show an equivalent or better CCyR.

    Time frame: Pretreatment, every 3 months up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Remaining in Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR)

    Cytogenetic response (CyR) is based on the prevalence of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) cells in metaphase from bone marrow (BM) sample. (Ideally, 25 metaphases but at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were evaluated). Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)=0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. A cCCyR=those in which all measurements up to at least 28 days after the initial response show an equivalent or better CCyR. Percentage of participants in cCCyR at years 2, 3, 4 and 5 was computed for all randomized participants who achieved cCCyR as measured from the time of first confirmation until the date of progression or death. Participants with cCCyR who neither progress nor die are censored on the date of their last cytogenetic assessment. Participants without cCCyR are considered to have progressed on Day 1.

    Time frame: Years 2, 3, 4 and 5

  2. Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Any Time

    Molecular response was assessed using BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction. MMR is defined as a ratio BCR-ABL/ABL ≤0.1% on the international scale (ie, at least 3 log reduction from a standardized baseline value).

    Time frame: Planned total follow-up duration of 5 years

  3. Time to Confirmed Complete Cytogenic Response (cCCyR) Overall

    The time to cCCyR for all randomized participants is defined as the time from the randomization date until criteria are first met for complete cytogenic response (provided it is confirmed later). The time to cCCyR analysis censors nonresponders who do not progress at their last cytogenetic assessments and nonresponders who progress at the maximum time of all randomized participants. .

    Time frame: Day 1 to 5 years

  4. Time to Major Molecular Response (MMR) Overall

    The time to MMR for all randomized participants is defined as the time from randomization date until measurement criteria are first met for MMR. The time to MMR analysis censors nonresponders who do not progress at their last molecular assessments and nonresponders who progress at the maximum time of all randomized participants.

    Time frame: Day 1 to 5 years

  5. Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization until progression (any progression/death within 30 days of last dosing date, or between 30-60 days of last dosing prior to start of secondary therapy). Those who did not progress/die or who progressed/died after 60 days of last dose were censored at last on-study hematologic/cytogenetic assessment; those with progression/death 30-60 days of last dosing date and after start date of secondary therapy censored at last on-study hematologic/cytogenetic assessment prior to start of secondary therapy; those who had not received study treatment censored on date randomized.

    Time frame: Participants were followed-up for at least 5 years

  6. Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. If the participant had not died, survival was censored on last date the participant was known to be alive.

    Time frame: Participants were followed-up for at least 5 years

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Drug-related AEs, Drug-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All Deaths

    AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a subject administered an investigational (medicinal) product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.

    Time frame: From date of last person, first visit to date of last person, last visit (approximately 8 years)

  2. Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Abnormalities in On-study Laboratory Test Results

    ULN=upper limit of normal. Grade 3=Severe AE; Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE. Absolute neutrophil count: Grade 3 \<1000-500/mm\^3; Grade 4 \<500/mm\^3. Hemoglobin: Grade 3 \<8.0-6.5 g/dL; Grade 4 \<6.5 g/dL. Platelets: Grade 3 \<50,000-25,000/mm\^3; Grade 4 \<25,000/mm\^3. ALT/AST: Grade 3 \>5.0-20\*ULN; Grade 4 \>20\*ULN. Total bilirubin: Grade 3 \>3-10\*ULN; Grade 4 \>10\*ULN. Sample normal ranges (may vary by institution): ALT, Female: 7-30 U/L, Male: 10-55 U/L; AST, Female: 9-25 U/L, Male10-40 U/L; Total bilirubin: 0.0-1.0 mg/dL. Creatinine: Grade 3 \>3.0-6.0\*ULN; Grade 4 \>6.0\*ULN. Phosphate: Grade 3 \<2.0-1.0 mg/dL; Grade 4 \<1.0 mg/dL. Calcium: Grade 3 \<7.0-6.0 mg/dL; Grade 4 \<6.0 mg/dL. Potassium: Grade 3 \<3.0-2.5 mmol/L; Grade 4 \<2.5 mmol/L.

    Time frame: From date of last person, first visit to date of last person, last visit (approximately 8 years)

07

Results

Posted Mar 15, 2011

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDasatinibImatinib
Started259260
Received treatment258258
Completed00
Not completed259260
Withdrew: Death01
Withdrew: Disease progression1822
Withdrew: Intolerance4217
Withdrew: Treatment failure1014
Withdrew: Ae unrelated to study drug134
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject813
Withdrew: Pregnancy21
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up12
Withdrew: Poor compliance/noncompliance17
Withdrew: Administrative reason by sponsor157162
Withdrew: Varied615
Withdrew: Did not receive treatment12

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Best Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR) Within 12 Months

Cytogenetic response (CyR) is based on the prevalence of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) cells in metaphase from bone marrow (BM) sample. (Ideally, 25 metaphases but at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were evaluated). Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)=0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. A cCCyR=those in which all measurements up to at least 28 days after the initial response show an equivalent or better CCyR.

Time frame:
Pretreatment, every 3 months up to 12 months
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Best Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR) Within 12 Months
ParticipantsDasatinibImatinib
Number of Participants With Best Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR) Within 12 Months204177
Statistical analysis
  • Dasatinib vs Imatinib · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0056 (A priori threshold for statistical significance=0.05.)Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by Hasford Score.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Remaining in Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR)

Cytogenetic response (CyR) is based on the prevalence of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) cells in metaphase from bone marrow (BM) sample. (Ideally, 25 metaphases but at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were evaluated). Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)=0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. A cCCyR=those in which all measurements up to at least 28 days after the initial response show an equivalent or better CCyR. Percentage of participants in cCCyR at years 2, 3, 4 and 5 was computed for all randomized participants who achieved cCCyR as measured from the time of first confirmation until the date of progression or death. Participants with cCCyR who neither progress nor die are censored on the date of their last cytogenetic assessment. Participants without cCCyR are considered to have progressed on Day 1.

Time frame:
Years 2, 3, 4 and 5
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Remaining in Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR)
percentage of participantsDasatinibImatinib
At Year 298.0 (94.7 to 99.2)96.9 (93.2 to 98.6)
At Year 396.9 (93.3 to 98.6)95.7 (91.6 to 97.8)
At Year 495.6 (91.4 to 97.8)95.7 (91.6 to 97.8)
At Year 593.1 (86.5 to 96.5)91.0 (83.6 to 95.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Dasatinib vs Imatinib · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.79 · 95% CI 0.55 to 1.13
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Any Time

Molecular response was assessed using BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction. MMR is defined as a ratio BCR-ABL/ABL ≤0.1% on the international scale (ie, at least 3 log reduction from a standardized baseline value).

Time frame:
Planned total follow-up duration of 5 years
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Any Time
Percentage of participantsDasatinibImatinib
Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Any Time76.464.2
SecondaryTime to Confirmed Complete Cytogenic Response (cCCyR) Overall

The time to cCCyR for all randomized participants is defined as the time from the randomization date until criteria are first met for complete cytogenic response (provided it is confirmed later). The time to cCCyR analysis censors nonresponders who do not progress at their last cytogenetic assessments and nonresponders who progress at the maximum time of all randomized participants. .

Time frame:
Day 1 to 5 years
Reported as:
Median · Months
Time to Confirmed Complete Cytogenic Response (cCCyR) Overall
MonthsDasatinibImatinib
Time to Confirmed Complete Cytogenic Response (cCCyR) Overall3.1 (3.0 to 3.1)5.8 (5.6 to 6.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Dasatinib vs Imatinib · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.46 · 95% CI 1.20 to 1.77
SecondaryTime to Major Molecular Response (MMR) Overall

The time to MMR for all randomized participants is defined as the time from randomization date until measurement criteria are first met for MMR. The time to MMR analysis censors nonresponders who do not progress at their last molecular assessments and nonresponders who progress at the maximum time of all randomized participants.

Time frame:
Day 1 to 5 years
Reported as:
Median · Months
Time to Major Molecular Response (MMR) Overall
MonthsDasatinibImatinib
Time to Major Molecular Response (MMR) Overall9.3 (8.8 to 11.8)15.0 (12.2 to 18.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Dasatinib vs Imatinib · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.54 · 95% CI 1.25 to 1.89
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization until progression (any progression/death within 30 days of last dosing date, or between 30-60 days of last dosing prior to start of secondary therapy). Those who did not progress/die or who progressed/died after 60 days of last dose were censored at last on-study hematologic/cytogenetic assessment; those with progression/death 30-60 days of last dosing date and after start date of secondary therapy censored at last on-study hematologic/cytogenetic assessment prior to start of secondary therapy; those who had not received study treatment censored on date randomized.

Time frame:
Participants were followed-up for at least 5 years
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Percentage of participantsDasatinibImatinib
Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)88.989.2
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. If the participant had not died, survival was censored on last date the participant was known to be alive.

Time frame:
Participants were followed-up for at least 5 years
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
Percentage of participantsDasatinibImatinib
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)90.989.6
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Drug-related AEs, Drug-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All Deaths

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a subject administered an investigational (medicinal) product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.

Time frame:
From date of last person, first visit to date of last person, last visit (approximately 8 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Drug-related AEs, Drug-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All Deaths
ParticipantsDasatinibImatinib
All AEs251251
All Drug-related AEs224231
Diarrhea10091
Pleural effusion743
Nausea4074
Cough6828
Muscle spasms1463
Thrombocytopenia6150
Neutropenia6049
Headache5946
Pyrexia5851
Vomiting4354
SAEs9070
Drug-related SAEs4322
AEs leading to discontinuation5126
All deaths2626
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Abnormalities in On-study Laboratory Test Results

ULN=upper limit of normal. Grade 3=Severe AE; Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE. Absolute neutrophil count: Grade 3 \<1000-500/mm\^3; Grade 4 \<500/mm\^3. Hemoglobin: Grade 3 \<8.0-6.5 g/dL; Grade 4 \<6.5 g/dL. Platelets: Grade 3 \<50,000-25,000/mm\^3; Grade 4 \<25,000/mm\^3. ALT/AST: Grade 3 \>5.0-20\*ULN; Grade 4 \>20\*ULN. Total bilirubin: Grade 3 \>3-10\*ULN; Grade 4 \>10\*ULN. Sample normal ranges (may vary by institution): ALT, Female: 7-30 U/L, Male: 10-55 U/L; AST, Female: 9-25 U/L, Male10-40 U/L; Total bilirubin: 0.0-1.0 mg/dL. Creatinine: Grade 3 \>3.0-6.0\*ULN; Grade 4 \>6.0\*ULN. Phosphate: Grade 3 \<2.0-1.0 mg/dL; Grade 4 \<1.0 mg/dL. Calcium: Grade 3 \<7.0-6.0 mg/dL; Grade 4 \<6.0 mg/dL. Potassium: Grade 3 \<3.0-2.5 mmol/L; Grade 4 \<2.5 mmol/L.

Time frame:
From date of last person, first visit to date of last person, last visit (approximately 8 years)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Abnormalities in On-study Laboratory Test Results
ParticipantsDasatinibImatinib
Grade 3/4 Absolute neutrophil count7461
Grade 3/4 Hemoglobin3523
Grade 3/4 Platelets5637
Grade 3/4 Alanine aminotransferase (ALT)24
Grade 3/4 Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)23
Grade 3/4 Total bilirubin30
Grade 3/4 Creatinine32
Grade 3/4 Phosphate1979
Grade 3/4 Calcium97
Grade 3/4 Potassium08

Adverse events

Collected over Randomization to end of study (December 2015). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Dasatinib—90/258 (34.9%)216/258 (83.7%)
Imatinib—70/258 (27.1%)231/258 (89.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 166
Most frequent serious events
EventDasatinibImatinib
PLEURAL EFFUSIONRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders13/2581/258
PULMONARY HYPERTENSIONRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders7/2580/258
ABDOMINAL PAINGastrointestinal disorders5/2581/258
DIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disorders5/2583/258
ANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disorders4/2581/258
THROMBOCYTOPENIABlood and lymphatic system disorders4/2584/258
BLAST CELL IN MYELOGENOUS LEUKAEMIANeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)3/2584/258
FEBRILE NEUTROPENIABlood and lymphatic system disorders0/2583/258
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTIONCardiac disorders3/2581/258
CARDIAC FAILURE CONGESTIVECardiac disorders3/2580/258
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 54
Most frequent other events
EventDasatinibImatinib
DIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disorders99/25889/258
NAUSEAGastrointestinal disorders40/25874/258
PLEURAL EFFUSIONRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders69/2583/258
COUGHRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders68/25828/258
MUSCLE SPASMSMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders14/25863/258
NEUTROPENIABlood and lymphatic system disorders60/25849/258
THROMBOCYTOPENIABlood and lymphatic system disorders59/25848/258
HEADACHENervous system disorders59/25846/258
PYREXIAGeneral disorders58/25850/258
VOMITINGGastrointestinal disorders41/25852/258

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)DasatinibImatinibTotal
Mean46.4 ± 14.647.1 ± 13.946.7 ± 14.2
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)DasatinibImatinibTotal
<20 years5914
Between 21 and 45 years123102225
Between 46 and 65 years111125236
Between 66 and 75 years132033
>75 years7411
Gender
Gender(Participants)DasatinibImatinibTotal
Female11597212
Male144163307
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)DasatinibImatinibTotal
White132143275
Black/African American213
Asian10895203
Other172138
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status(Participants)DasatinibImatinibTotal
ECOG score=0213205418
ECOG score=1465399
ECOG score=2022
Number of Patients With Liver Involvement
Number of Patients With Liver Involvement(Participants)DasatinibImatinibTotal
Number371855
Number of Participants With Spleen Involvement
Number of Participants With Spleen Involvement(Participants)DasatinibImatinibTotal
Number8371154
08

Study locations

109 sites
  • Molecular Md
    Portland, Oregon 97219, United States
  • Local Institution
    Capital Federal, Buenos Aires 1280, Argentina
  • Local Institution
    Capital Federal, Buenos Aires C1114AAN, Argentina
  • Local Institution
    Buenos Aires, 1021, Argentina
  • Local Institution
    Waratah, New South Wales 2298, Australia
  • Local Institution
    Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia
  • Local Institution
    Greenslopes, Queensland 4120, Australia
  • Local Institution
    Perth, Western Australia WA 6000, Australia
  • Local Institution
    Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
  • Local Institution
    Wien, 1090, Austria
  • Local Institution
    Brugge, 8000, Belgium
  • Local Institution
    Bruxelles, 1200, Belgium
  • Local Institution
    Curitiba, Parana 80060, Brazil
  • Local Institution
    Campinas, Sao Paulo 13083, Brazil
  • Local Institution
    Jau, Sao Paulo 17210, Brazil
  • Local Institution
    Rio De Janeiro, 20230130, Brazil
  • Local Institution
    Sao Paulo, 01401, Brazil
  • Local Institution
    Sao Paulo, 05403, Brazil
  • Local Institution
    Santiago, Metropolitana, Chile
  • Local Institution
    Beijing, Beijing 100044, China
  • Local Institution
    Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, China
  • Local Institution
    Shanghai, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Local Institution
    Tianjin, Tianjin 300020, China
  • Local Institution
    Colombia, Bogota, Colombia
  • Local Institution
    Bogota, Colombia
  • Local Institution
    Brno, 625 00, Czech Republic
  • Local Institution
    Hradec Kralove, 500 05, Czech Republic
  • Local Institution
    Olomouc, 775 20, Czech Republic
  • Local Institution
    Prague 2, 128 20, Czech Republic
  • Local Institution
    Aarhus, 8000, Denmark
  • Local Institution
    Nantes, Cedex 1 44093, France
  • Local Institution
    Brest Cedex 02, 29609, France
  • Local Institution
    Lille Cedex, 59037, France
  • Local Institution
    Limoges, 87042, France
  • Local Institution
    Montpellier Cedex, 34295, France
  • Local Institution
    Paris Cedex 10, 75475, France
  • Local Institution
    Paris, 75015, France
  • Local Institution
    Pierre Benite Cedex, 69495, France
  • Local Institution
    Poitiers Cedex, 86021, France
  • Local Institution
    Rennes, 35033, France
  • Local Institution
    Strasbourg Cedex, 67091, France
  • Local Institution
    Toulouse Cedex 09, 31059, France
  • Local Institution
    Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, 54511, France
  • Local Institution
    Berlin, 13353, Germany
  • Local Institution
    Rostock, 18055, Germany
  • Local Institution
    Tuebingen, 72076, Germany
  • Local Institution
    Ulm, 89081, Germany
  • Local Institution
    Thessaloniki, 57010, Greece
  • Local Institution
    Budapest, 1097, Hungary
  • Local Institution
    Debrecen, 4012, Hungary
  • Local Institution
    Vellore, Tamilnadu 632004, India
  • Local Institution
    Ahmedabad, 380009, India
  • Local Institution
    Cochin, 682304, India
  • Local Institution
    Mumbai, 400010, India
  • Local Institution
    Mumbai, 400012, India
  • Local Institution
    Mumbai, 400014, India
  • Local Institution
    Trivandrum, 695011, India
  • Local Institution
    Bologna, 40138, Italy
  • Local Institution
    Catania, 95124, Italy
  • Local Institution
    Monza (mb), 20900, Italy
  • Local Institution
    Orbassano (to), 10043, Italy
  • Local Institution
    Pavia, 27100, Italy
  • Local Institution
    Roma, 00144, Italy
  • Local Institution
    Roma, 00161, Italy
  • Local Institution
    Nagoya, Aichi 466-8650, Japan
  • Local Institution
    Kamogawa-shi, Chiba 2968602, Japan
  • Local Institution
    Fukuoka-shi, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan
  • Local Institution
    Morioka-shi, Iwate 020-8505, Japan
  • Local Institution
    Kagoshima-shi, Kagoshima 890-0064, Japan
  • Local Institution
    Yokohama, Kanagawa 232-0024, Japan
  • Local Institution
    Kyoto-shi, Kyoto 6028566, Japan
  • Local Institution
    Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • Local Institution
    Okayama-shi, Okayama 7008558, Japan
  • Local Institution
    Osaka-shi, Osaka 545-8586, Japan
  • Local Institution
    Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8677, Japan
  • Local Institution
    Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 1418625, Japan
  • Local Institution
    Seoul, 137-040, Korea, Republic of
  • Local Institution
    Seoul, 138-736, Korea, Republic of
  • Local Institution
    Mexico D.f., Distrito Federal 14000, Mexico
  • Local Institution
    Mexico, D. F., Distrito Federal 06726, Mexico
  • Local Institution
    Mexico, Distrito Federal 02990, Mexico
  • Local Institution
    Monterrey, Nuevo Leon 64460, Mexico
  • Local Institution
    Culiacan, Sinaloa 80230, Mexico
  • Local Institution
    Groningen, 9700 RB, Netherlands
  • Local Institution
    Nijmegen, 6500 HB, Netherlands
  • Local Institution
    Arequipa, Peru
  • Local Institution
    Lima, 11, Peru
  • Local Institution
    Lima, 34, Peru
  • Local Institution
    Chorzow, 41-500, Poland
  • Local Institution
    Krakow, 31501, Poland
  • Local Institution
    Lodz, 93-510, Poland
  • Local Institution
    Poznan, 60869, Poland
  • Local Institution
    Warsaw, 02776, Poland
  • Local Institution
    Moscow, 125167, Russian Federation
  • Local Institution
    Rostov-on-don, 344022, Russian Federation
  • Local Institution
    St.petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation
  • Local Institution
    Singapore, 169865, Singapore
  • Local Institution
    A Coruna, 15706, Spain
  • Local Institution
    Barcelona, 08003, Spain
  • Local Institution
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain

Showing the first 100 of 109 sites across 27 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Glauche I, Kuhn M, Baldow C, Schulze P, Rothe T, Liebscher H, Roy A, Wang X, Roeder I. Quantitative prediction of long-term molecular response in TKI-treated CML - Lessons from an imatinib versus dasatinib comparison. Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 17;8(1):12330. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29923-4. PubMed 30120281 ↗
  • Hughes TP, Saglio G, Quintas-Cardama A, Mauro MJ, Kim DW, Lipton JH, Bradley-Garelik MB, Ukropec J, Hochhaus A. BCR-ABL1 mutation development during first-line treatment with dasatinib or imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Leukemia. 2015 Sep;29(9):1832-8. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.168. Epub 2015 Jun 29. PubMed 26118315 ↗
  • Fujisawa S, Nakamae H, Ogura M, Ishizawa K, Taniwaki M, Utsunomiya A, Matsue K, Takamatsu Y, Usuki K, Tanimoto M, Ishida Y, Akiyama H, Onishi S. Efficacy and safety of dasatinib versus imatinib in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP): Subset analysis of the DASISION trial with 2-year follow-up. Int J Hematol. 2014 Feb;99(2):141-53. doi: 10.1007/s12185-013-1470-1. Epub 2013 Dec 20. PubMed 24357015 ↗
  • Jabbour E, Kantarjian HM, Saglio G, Steegmann JL, Shah NP, Boque C, Chuah C, Pavlovsky C, Mayer J, Cortes J, Baccarani M, Kim DW, Bradley-Garelik MB, Mohamed H, Wildgust M, Hochhaus A. Early response with dasatinib or imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: 3-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood. 2014 Jan 23;123(4):494-500. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-511592. Epub 2013 Dec 5. PubMed 24311723 ↗
  • Kantarjian HM, Shah NP, Cortes JE, Baccarani M, Agarwal MB, Undurraga MS, Wang J, Ipina JJ, Kim DW, Ogura M, Pavlovsky C, Junghanss C, Milone JH, Nicolini FE, Robak T, Van Droogenbroeck J, Vellenga E, Bradley-Garelik MB, Zhu C, Hochhaus A. Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood. 2012 Feb 2;119(5):1123-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-376087. Epub 2011 Dec 9. PubMed 22160483 ↗
  • Kantarjian H, Shah NP, Hochhaus A, Cortes J, Shah S, Ayala M, Moiraghi B, Shen Z, Mayer J, Pasquini R, Nakamae H, Huguet F, Boque C, Chuah C, Bleickardt E, Bradley-Garelik MB, Zhu C, Szatrowski T, Shapiro D, Baccarani M. Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 17;362(24):2260-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002315. Epub 2010 Jun 5. PubMed 20525995 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 15, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00481247
Lead sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 1, 2007
Start date
Sep 2007
Primary completion
Dec 2009
Completion
Dec 2015
Results posted
Mar 15, 2011
Last update
Feb 15, 2017

Study contacts

Bristol-Myers Squibb
study director · Bristol-Myers Squibb

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion