CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00480675Updated Jan 28, 2009

Randomized Study Comparing Fluoroscopically-Guided Versus Blinded Trochanteric Bursa Injections

An interventional study of trochanteric bursa injection done under fluoroscopy with depomedrol and bupivacaine and Trochanteric bursa injection with depomedrol and bupivacaine in Bursitis, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-01-28.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
65
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goals of our research project are to study the relationship, if any, between the success of a TB injection (measured by pain relief and general patient satisfaction) and the method in which it was placed. Because fluoroscopy places patients requires a slight risk from radiation exposure and increased cost versus blind injection, it is important to know if there is an advantage to using this technique. The investigators will randomize 64 patients to receive either trochanteric bursa injections with corticosteroid and local anesthetic guided by fluoroscopy, or trochanteric bursa patients to receive trochanteric bursa injections based on landmarks on palpation. The investigators will then determine which method is superior, and whether injecting steroid and local anesthetic into the bursa itself is superior or inferior to injecting it into a tender area outside the bursa.

Read the detailed description

This will be a randomized, controlled study evaluating the value of fluoroscopy in trochanteric bursa injections. Subjects will be recruited solely from the patients we normally see at the Blaustein Pain Treatment Center with a clinical diagnosis of GTPS. Sixty-four patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio using sealed envelopes to receive either TB corticosteroid injection done blind or with fluoroscopy. All patients who provide informed consent will be brought into the fluoroscopy suite and placed in the lateral decubitus position. In the patients randomized to receive fluoroscopically guided injections, a 22-gauge needle will be placed into the TB and correct position confirmed by fluoroscopy and contrast injection (1 ml per attempt) before corticosteroid and local anesthetic injection (60 mg of depomedrol and 2.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine). In the blinded group, one sham, pulsed fluoroscopic image will be taken of the femur, and the injection will be done based only on physical exam (overlying the area of maximal tenderness) and landmarks. Prior to the injection, 1 ml of contrast will be administered and another image taken to determine whether or not the needle is within the bursa, but this will not alter the injection. After contrast administration, the same corticosteroid and bupivacaine injection will be administered. The 2 main questions we propose to answer are: 1) whether using fluoroscopy for TB injections results in improved outcomes (comparison of the 32 patients in each group); and 2) whether injecting into the bursa provides superior results than performing non-bursal injections into the area of maximal tenderness (comparison of 32 patients who receive fluoroscopically-guided bursa injections + those patients whose blinded injection was noted to be intra-bursal vs. those patients whose blinded injection was extra-bursal).

02

Conditions studied

  • Bursitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • bursitis
  • injection
  • fluoroscopy
03

In context

Bursitis

411 studies on the registry are indexed under Bursitis; 112 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 65 is above the median of 45 across 371 interventional studies indexed under Bursitis.

Browse Bursitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,783 studies on the registry; 313 are open to participants now.

Of its 203 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years
  • Clinical diagnosis of trochanteric bursitis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Allergy to contrast
  • Untreated coagulopathy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
65 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Trochanteric bursa injections done into the bursa under fluoroscopic guidance

    Procedure: trochanteric bursa injection done under fluoroscopy with depomedrol and bupivacaine

  • Active comparator
    2

    Trochanteric bursa injection done with sham fluoroscopy using only landmarks as guidance.

    Procedure: Trochanteric bursa injection with depomedrol and bupivacaine

Interventions

  • Proceduretrochanteric bursa injection done under fluoroscopy with depomedrol and bupivacaine

    Depomedrol 60 mg + bupivacaine 2.5 ml

  • ProcedureTrochanteric bursa injection with depomedrol and bupivacaine

    Trochanteric bursa injection done with sham x-ray and 60 mg of depomedroal and 2.5 ml bupivacaine using landmarks for guidance.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numerical pain scores

    Time frame: 1 and 3 month post-injection

Secondary outcomes

  1. SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index, Satisfaction

    Time frame: 1 and 3 months post-injection

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Blaustein Pain Treatment Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cohen SP, Narvaez JC, Lebovits AH, Stojanovic MP. Corticosteroid injections for trochanteric bursitis: is fluoroscopy necessary? A pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Jan;94(1):100-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei012. Epub 2004 Oct 29. PubMed 15516348 ↗
  • Schapira D, Nahir M, Scharf Y. Trochanteric bursitis: a common clinical problem. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986 Nov;67(11):815-7. PubMed 3778178 ↗
  • Cohen SP, Strassels SA, Foster L, Marvel J, Williams K, Crooks M, Gross A, Kurihara C, Nguyen C, Williams N. Comparison of fluoroscopically guided and blind corticosteroid injections for greater trochanteric pain syndrome: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009 Apr 14;338:b1088. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1088. PubMed 19366755 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 28, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00480675
Lead sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
First posted
May 31, 2007
Start date
Mar 2007
Primary completion
May 2008
Completion
May 2008
Last update
Jan 28, 2009

Study contacts

Steven P Cohen, MD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion